Cancer Diagnosis Communication: Analysis of the Physician Behavior

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gomes, Cláudio Henrique Rebello
Data de Publicação: 2009
Outros Autores: Silva, Patrícia Veloso, Mota, Fernando Freitas
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online)
Texto Completo: https://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/1643
Resumo: Introduction: cancer diagnosis is not often communicated to the patients most of the time, which generates a series of discussions in the area of medical ethics. Objective: to examine the conduct of medical specialists in oncology and with non-specialists, when the communication of the cancer diagnosis, and to address the ethical issues related to this context. Methods: the authors assessed, in a prospective manner, 396 patients and their families referred by 76 physicians to specialized emergency surgery clinics for cancer from the period of 2002 to 2006. Results: two hundred and ninety one patients were female and one hundred and five were male. In relation to the topography of the lesion, most of them were in the abdomen or pelvis (86%), and 9% of the tumors originated in the head and neck, 4% in the thorax and 1% in members. The diagnosis omission index was 28.5%. Non-specialist doctors did not inform 87.9% of their patients, while the specialized doctors omitted the diagnosis in 6.4% of the cases. Family members of the non-informed patients were only communicated 27.4% of the time. 14.2% of cases, family members complained, before visiting, that patient was not aware of the neoplasia. Conclusion: the omission index of information was higher between non-specialist doctors; but, it was not zero between those who usually work with the cancer.
id INCA-1_5d375912016e040db31d0e273385bb62
oai_identifier_str oai:rbc.inca.gov.br:article/1643
network_acronym_str INCA-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Cancer Diagnosis Communication: Analysis of the Physician BehaviorComunicação do Diagnóstico de Câncer: Análise do Comportamento MédicoBarreiras de comunicaçãoDiagnóstico clínicoNeoplasiasÉtica médicaCommunication barriersDiagnosis, clinicalNeoplasmsEthics, medicalIntroduction: cancer diagnosis is not often communicated to the patients most of the time, which generates a series of discussions in the area of medical ethics. Objective: to examine the conduct of medical specialists in oncology and with non-specialists, when the communication of the cancer diagnosis, and to address the ethical issues related to this context. Methods: the authors assessed, in a prospective manner, 396 patients and their families referred by 76 physicians to specialized emergency surgery clinics for cancer from the period of 2002 to 2006. Results: two hundred and ninety one patients were female and one hundred and five were male. In relation to the topography of the lesion, most of them were in the abdomen or pelvis (86%), and 9% of the tumors originated in the head and neck, 4% in the thorax and 1% in members. The diagnosis omission index was 28.5%. Non-specialist doctors did not inform 87.9% of their patients, while the specialized doctors omitted the diagnosis in 6.4% of the cases. Family members of the non-informed patients were only communicated 27.4% of the time. 14.2% of cases, family members complained, before visiting, that patient was not aware of the neoplasia. Conclusion: the omission index of information was higher between non-specialist doctors; but, it was not zero between those who usually work with the cancer.Introdução: o diagnóstico de câncer deixa de ser comunicado aos pacientes em grande parte das vezes, o que gera uma série de discussões na área da ética médica. Objetivo: analisar a conduta de médicos especialistas em oncologia e não especialistas quanto à comunicação do diagnóstico de câncer, bem como abordar as questões éticas relacionadas a esse contexto. Métodos: os autores avaliaram, de maneira prospectiva, 396 pacientes e seus familiares encaminhados por 76 médicos para ambulatório especializado de cirurgia oncológica, no período de 2002 a 2006. Resultados: duzentos e noventa e um pacientes eram do sexo feminino e 105 do sexo masculino. Em relação à topografia da lesão, a maioria encontrava-se no abdômen ou pelve (86%), sendo 9% dos tumores originados na região da cabeça e pescoço, 4% em tórax e 1% em membros. O índice de omissão do diagnóstico foi de 28,5 %. Os médicos não especialistas deixaram de informar a 87,9% dos seus pacientes, enquanto que os especialistas omitiram o diagnóstico em 6,4% dos casos. Os familiares dos doentes não informados foram comunicados somente em 27,4% das vezes. Em 14,2% dos casos, foi solicitado pelos familiares em pré-consulta no ambulatório que o paciente não tomasse conhecimento da neoplasia. Conclusão: a taxa de omissão das informações foi superior entre os médicos não especialistas, porém não foi nula entre aqueles que trabalham habitualmente com o câncer.INCA2009-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigos, Avaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/164310.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2009v55n2.1643Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia; Vol. 55 No. 2 (2009): Apr/May/June; 139-143Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia; Vol. 55 Núm. 2 (2009): abr./mayo/jun.; 139-143Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia; v. 55 n. 2 (2009): abr./maio/jun.; 139-1432176-9745reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online)instname:Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA)instacron:INCAporhttps://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/1643/971Gomes, Cláudio Henrique Rebello Silva, Patrícia Veloso Mota, Fernando Freitas info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-11-29T20:21:15Zoai:rbc.inca.gov.br:article/1643Revistahttps://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revistaPUBhttps://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/oairbc@inca.gov.br0034-71162176-9745opendoar:2021-11-29T20:21:15Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online) - Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Cancer Diagnosis Communication: Analysis of the Physician Behavior
Comunicação do Diagnóstico de Câncer: Análise do Comportamento Médico
title Cancer Diagnosis Communication: Analysis of the Physician Behavior
spellingShingle Cancer Diagnosis Communication: Analysis of the Physician Behavior
Gomes, Cláudio Henrique Rebello
Barreiras de comunicação
Diagnóstico clínico
Neoplasias
Ética médica
Communication barriers
Diagnosis, clinical
Neoplasms
Ethics, medical
title_short Cancer Diagnosis Communication: Analysis of the Physician Behavior
title_full Cancer Diagnosis Communication: Analysis of the Physician Behavior
title_fullStr Cancer Diagnosis Communication: Analysis of the Physician Behavior
title_full_unstemmed Cancer Diagnosis Communication: Analysis of the Physician Behavior
title_sort Cancer Diagnosis Communication: Analysis of the Physician Behavior
author Gomes, Cláudio Henrique Rebello
author_facet Gomes, Cláudio Henrique Rebello
Silva, Patrícia Veloso
Mota, Fernando Freitas
author_role author
author2 Silva, Patrícia Veloso
Mota, Fernando Freitas
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gomes, Cláudio Henrique Rebello
Silva, Patrícia Veloso
Mota, Fernando Freitas
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Barreiras de comunicação
Diagnóstico clínico
Neoplasias
Ética médica
Communication barriers
Diagnosis, clinical
Neoplasms
Ethics, medical
topic Barreiras de comunicação
Diagnóstico clínico
Neoplasias
Ética médica
Communication barriers
Diagnosis, clinical
Neoplasms
Ethics, medical
description Introduction: cancer diagnosis is not often communicated to the patients most of the time, which generates a series of discussions in the area of medical ethics. Objective: to examine the conduct of medical specialists in oncology and with non-specialists, when the communication of the cancer diagnosis, and to address the ethical issues related to this context. Methods: the authors assessed, in a prospective manner, 396 patients and their families referred by 76 physicians to specialized emergency surgery clinics for cancer from the period of 2002 to 2006. Results: two hundred and ninety one patients were female and one hundred and five were male. In relation to the topography of the lesion, most of them were in the abdomen or pelvis (86%), and 9% of the tumors originated in the head and neck, 4% in the thorax and 1% in members. The diagnosis omission index was 28.5%. Non-specialist doctors did not inform 87.9% of their patients, while the specialized doctors omitted the diagnosis in 6.4% of the cases. Family members of the non-informed patients were only communicated 27.4% of the time. 14.2% of cases, family members complained, before visiting, that patient was not aware of the neoplasia. Conclusion: the omission index of information was higher between non-specialist doctors; but, it was not zero between those who usually work with the cancer.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-06-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigos, Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/1643
10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2009v55n2.1643
url https://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/1643
identifier_str_mv 10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2009v55n2.1643
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/1643/971
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv INCA
publisher.none.fl_str_mv INCA
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia; Vol. 55 No. 2 (2009): Apr/May/June; 139-143
Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia; Vol. 55 Núm. 2 (2009): abr./mayo/jun.; 139-143
Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia; v. 55 n. 2 (2009): abr./maio/jun.; 139-143
2176-9745
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA)
instacron:INCA
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA)
instacron_str INCA
institution INCA
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online) - Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rbc@inca.gov.br
_version_ 1797042247496105984