Cost-Utility Analysis in Adjuvant Treatment of Colon Cancer Staging III (Dukes C)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Riveros, Bruno Salgado
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Wiens, Astrid, Correr, Cassyano Januário
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online)
Texto Completo: https://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/565
Resumo: Introduction: The increase on government financial support related to adjuvant treatment of colon cancer staging III in hospitals from the Unified Health System allows the usage of drugs which have not been used before. However, there are no pharmaco-economic studies able to guide managers on choosing the most efficient treatment. Objective: To evaluate the cost-utility ratio among Fluorouracil/Leucovorin (5FU/LV, Mayo Clinic Regimen) versus Capecitabine and 5FU/LV versus Fluorouracil/Leucovorin/Oxaliplatin (FLOX) as adjuvant therapy in colon cancer staging III in a perspective of a public hospital located in Brazil. Method: Efficacy data were extracted from literature and costs from the Hospital Information System of the institution. A Markov Model was used, consisting of 10 cycles of 6 months each and four health states: Anti-neoplastic Therapy, Disease Free, Relapse and Death. A discount rate of 5% was applied to variables. Costs were expressed in Real (R$), the Brazilian currency, and outcomes in Quality Adjusted Life Month (QALM). A one-way sensitivity analysis was performed. Results: Capecitabine and FLO X promote 0.33 and 1.75 incremental QALM compared to 5FU/LV, respectively. The comparison between Capecitabine and 5FU/ LV showed an Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) of R$ 13,585.64/QALM, whereas FLOX and 5FU/LV showed an ICER of R$1,007.92/QALM. Sensitivity analysis shows robust findings. Conclusion: Acquisition cost of Capecitabine prevents its use in patients diagnosed with colon cancer stage III in the perspective evaluated. Incremental cost of FLOX is comprehended by government financial support, what favors its incorporation as adjuvant treatment of colon cancer stage III by the Hospital to patients eligible for this protocol.  
id INCA-1_a0091e6162d4782bc41d54912aac847b
oai_identifier_str oai:rbc.inca.gov.br:article/565
network_acronym_str INCA-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Cost-Utility Analysis in Adjuvant Treatment of Colon Cancer Staging III (Dukes C)Análisis Coste-Utilidad del Tratamiento Adyuvante del Cáncer de Colon en Estádio III (Dukes C)Análise de Custo-Utilidade do Tratamento Adjuvante de Câncer de Cólon Estádio III (Dukes C)Neoplasias do CólonQuimioterapia AdjuvanteAlocação de CustosAnálise Custo-BenefícioColonic NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantCost AllocationCost-Benefit AnalysisNeoplasias del ColonQuimioterapia AdyuvanteAsignación de CostosAnálisis Costo-BeneficioIntroduction: The increase on government financial support related to adjuvant treatment of colon cancer staging III in hospitals from the Unified Health System allows the usage of drugs which have not been used before. However, there are no pharmaco-economic studies able to guide managers on choosing the most efficient treatment. Objective: To evaluate the cost-utility ratio among Fluorouracil/Leucovorin (5FU/LV, Mayo Clinic Regimen) versus Capecitabine and 5FU/LV versus Fluorouracil/Leucovorin/Oxaliplatin (FLOX) as adjuvant therapy in colon cancer staging III in a perspective of a public hospital located in Brazil. Method: Efficacy data were extracted from literature and costs from the Hospital Information System of the institution. A Markov Model was used, consisting of 10 cycles of 6 months each and four health states: Anti-neoplastic Therapy, Disease Free, Relapse and Death. A discount rate of 5% was applied to variables. Costs were expressed in Real (R$), the Brazilian currency, and outcomes in Quality Adjusted Life Month (QALM). A one-way sensitivity analysis was performed. Results: Capecitabine and FLO X promote 0.33 and 1.75 incremental QALM compared to 5FU/LV, respectively. The comparison between Capecitabine and 5FU/ LV showed an Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) of R$ 13,585.64/QALM, whereas FLOX and 5FU/LV showed an ICER of R$1,007.92/QALM. Sensitivity analysis shows robust findings. Conclusion: Acquisition cost of Capecitabine prevents its use in patients diagnosed with colon cancer stage III in the perspective evaluated. Incremental cost of FLOX is comprehended by government financial support, what favors its incorporation as adjuvant treatment of colon cancer stage III by the Hospital to patients eligible for this protocol.  Introducción: El incremento del traspaso financiero para el tratamiento adyuvante del cáncer de colon en estadio III en los hospitales que hacen parte del Sistema Nacional de Salud, permite el uso de agentes quimioterapéuticos, no empleados antes. Sin embargo, no existen estudios farmacoeconómicos para guiar los gestores en cuanto a la elección de la terapia. Objetivo: Evaluar el coste-utilidad de los tratamientos adyuvantes Fluorouracilo/Leucovorin (5FU/LV, Mayo Clinic Regimen) versus Capecitabina y 5FU/LV versus Fluorouracilo/Leucovorin/Oxaliplatina (FLO X) para cáncer de colon en estadio III en la perspectiva de un hospital público brasileño. Método: Datos de eficacia han sido extraídos de la literatura y los costes a partir del Sistema de Información Hospitalario de la mencionada institución. Se utilizó un modelo de Markov con 10 diez ciclos de seis meses con cuatro estados de salud: Terapia con Agente Anticanceroso, Libre de la Enfermedad, recidiva y Muerte. La tasa de descuento aplicada fue de 5%. Los costes han sido expresos en reales (R$), la moneda brasileña, y el resultado en meses de vida ajustada por la calidad (QALM) (Año de Vida ajustado por la calidad). Se ha realizado un analísis de sensibilidad univariado. Resultados: Capecitabina y FLOX proporcionan 0,33 y 1,75 QALM (AVAC ) a más comparado a 5FU/LV, respectivamente. La comparación de Capecitabina y 5FU/LV mostró Relación Coste-Efectividad-Incremental (RCEI ) R$13.585,64/QALM (AVAC ), en cuanto a comparación FLOX y 5FU/LV RCEI R$1.007,92/QALM (AVAC ). El Análisis de sensibilidad sugiere resultados robustos. Conclusión: El coste de adquisición de Capecitabina imposibilita su uso en pacientes con cáncer de colon en estadio III en la perspectiva evaluada. El coste incremental de FLOX está incluido en el traspaso financiero del gobierno lo que favorece al Hospital utilizarlo como terapia adyuvante del cancer de colon en estadio III en las personas elegibles para ese protocolo.  Introdução: O aumento do repasse financeiro ao tratamento adjuvante de câncer de cólon estádio III nos hospitais integrantes do Sistema Único de Saúde permite a utilização de quimioterápicos anteriormente não empregados. Entretanto, não há estudos farmacoeconômicos que norteiem gestores quanto a escolha da terapia. Objetivo: Avaliar a relação custo utilidade das terapias adjuvantes Fluorouracil/Leucovorin (5FU/LV, Mayo Clinic Regimen) versus Capecitabina e 5FU/LV versus Fluorouracil/Leucovorin/Oxaliplatina (FLOX) para câncer de cólon em estádio III na perspectiva de um hospital público no Brasil. Método: Dados de eficácia foram extraídos da literatura e custos a partir do Sistema de Informação Hospitalar da referida instituição. Utilizou-se uma modelagem de Markov com dez ciclos de seis meses com quatro estados de saúde: terapia com antineoplásico, livre de doença, recidiva e morte. A taxa de desconto aplicada foi de 5%. Os custos foram expressos em Real (R$) e o desfecho em meses de vida ajustados pela qualidade (QALM). Realizou-se análise de sensibilidade univariada. Resultados: Capecitabina e FLO X proporcionam 0,33 e 1,75 QALM a mais que 5FU/LV, respectivamente. A comparação Capecitabina e 5FU/LV mostrou relação custo efetividade incremental (RCEI) de R$13.585,64/QALM, enquanto a comparação FLO X e 5FU/LV RCEI de R$1.007,92/QALM. A análise de sensibilidade sugere resultados robustos. Conclusão: O custo de aquisição da Capecitabina inviabiliza o uso em pacientes com câncer de cólon estádio III na perspectiva avaliada. O custo incremental de FLOX está compreendido pelo repasse financeiro do SUS, favorecendo sua incorporacao como terapia adjuvante de câncer de cólon estádio III pelo hospital aos indivíduos elegíveis para esse protocolo.  INCA2012-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigos, Avaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/56510.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2012v58n4.565Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia; Vol. 58 No. 4 (2012): Oct./Nov./Dec.; 629-637Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia; Vol. 58 Núm. 4 (2012): oct./nov./dic.; 629-637Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia; v. 58 n. 4 (2012): out./nov./dez. ; 629-6372176-9745reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online)instname:Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA)instacron:INCAporhttps://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/565/350Riveros, Bruno Salgado Wiens, Astrid Correr, Cassyano Januário info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-11-29T20:13:10Zoai:rbc.inca.gov.br:article/565Revistahttps://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revistaPUBhttps://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/oairbc@inca.gov.br0034-71162176-9745opendoar:2021-11-29T20:13:10Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online) - Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Cost-Utility Analysis in Adjuvant Treatment of Colon Cancer Staging III (Dukes C)
Análisis Coste-Utilidad del Tratamiento Adyuvante del Cáncer de Colon en Estádio III (Dukes C)
Análise de Custo-Utilidade do Tratamento Adjuvante de Câncer de Cólon Estádio III (Dukes C)
title Cost-Utility Analysis in Adjuvant Treatment of Colon Cancer Staging III (Dukes C)
spellingShingle Cost-Utility Analysis in Adjuvant Treatment of Colon Cancer Staging III (Dukes C)
Riveros, Bruno Salgado
Neoplasias do Cólon
Quimioterapia Adjuvante
Alocação de Custos
Análise Custo-Benefício
Colonic Neoplasms
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
Cost Allocation
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Neoplasias del Colon
Quimioterapia Adyuvante
Asignación de Costos
Análisis Costo-Beneficio
title_short Cost-Utility Analysis in Adjuvant Treatment of Colon Cancer Staging III (Dukes C)
title_full Cost-Utility Analysis in Adjuvant Treatment of Colon Cancer Staging III (Dukes C)
title_fullStr Cost-Utility Analysis in Adjuvant Treatment of Colon Cancer Staging III (Dukes C)
title_full_unstemmed Cost-Utility Analysis in Adjuvant Treatment of Colon Cancer Staging III (Dukes C)
title_sort Cost-Utility Analysis in Adjuvant Treatment of Colon Cancer Staging III (Dukes C)
author Riveros, Bruno Salgado
author_facet Riveros, Bruno Salgado
Wiens, Astrid
Correr, Cassyano Januário
author_role author
author2 Wiens, Astrid
Correr, Cassyano Januário
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Riveros, Bruno Salgado
Wiens, Astrid
Correr, Cassyano Januário
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Neoplasias do Cólon
Quimioterapia Adjuvante
Alocação de Custos
Análise Custo-Benefício
Colonic Neoplasms
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
Cost Allocation
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Neoplasias del Colon
Quimioterapia Adyuvante
Asignación de Costos
Análisis Costo-Beneficio
topic Neoplasias do Cólon
Quimioterapia Adjuvante
Alocação de Custos
Análise Custo-Benefício
Colonic Neoplasms
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
Cost Allocation
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Neoplasias del Colon
Quimioterapia Adyuvante
Asignación de Costos
Análisis Costo-Beneficio
description Introduction: The increase on government financial support related to adjuvant treatment of colon cancer staging III in hospitals from the Unified Health System allows the usage of drugs which have not been used before. However, there are no pharmaco-economic studies able to guide managers on choosing the most efficient treatment. Objective: To evaluate the cost-utility ratio among Fluorouracil/Leucovorin (5FU/LV, Mayo Clinic Regimen) versus Capecitabine and 5FU/LV versus Fluorouracil/Leucovorin/Oxaliplatin (FLOX) as adjuvant therapy in colon cancer staging III in a perspective of a public hospital located in Brazil. Method: Efficacy data were extracted from literature and costs from the Hospital Information System of the institution. A Markov Model was used, consisting of 10 cycles of 6 months each and four health states: Anti-neoplastic Therapy, Disease Free, Relapse and Death. A discount rate of 5% was applied to variables. Costs were expressed in Real (R$), the Brazilian currency, and outcomes in Quality Adjusted Life Month (QALM). A one-way sensitivity analysis was performed. Results: Capecitabine and FLO X promote 0.33 and 1.75 incremental QALM compared to 5FU/LV, respectively. The comparison between Capecitabine and 5FU/ LV showed an Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) of R$ 13,585.64/QALM, whereas FLOX and 5FU/LV showed an ICER of R$1,007.92/QALM. Sensitivity analysis shows robust findings. Conclusion: Acquisition cost of Capecitabine prevents its use in patients diagnosed with colon cancer stage III in the perspective evaluated. Incremental cost of FLOX is comprehended by government financial support, what favors its incorporation as adjuvant treatment of colon cancer stage III by the Hospital to patients eligible for this protocol.  
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-12-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigos, Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/565
10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2012v58n4.565
url https://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/565
identifier_str_mv 10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2012v58n4.565
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/565/350
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv INCA
publisher.none.fl_str_mv INCA
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia; Vol. 58 No. 4 (2012): Oct./Nov./Dec.; 629-637
Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia; Vol. 58 Núm. 4 (2012): oct./nov./dic.; 629-637
Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia; v. 58 n. 4 (2012): out./nov./dez. ; 629-637
2176-9745
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA)
instacron:INCA
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA)
instacron_str INCA
institution INCA
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (Online) - Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rbc@inca.gov.br
_version_ 1797042244538073088