TELEOLOGY IN ARISTOTLE'S PRACTICAL PHILOSOPHY
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Journal of Teleological Science |
Texto Completo: | https://www.telosjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/jts/article/view/185 |
Resumo: | This article contributes to the debate on the relation of Aristotle’s practical and theoretical philosophy. It argues that his practical philosophy depends to a considerable extent on his teleological conception of nature. This thesis is primarily directed against scholars who maintain that Aristotle does not derive political and human relations from natural or cosmic conditions. The paper defends David Sedley’s anthropocentric interpretation of Aristotle’s natural teleology and shows how Aristotle applies teleological explanations to power relations among human beings – among men and women and among freemen and natural slaves – and their purposes and goals. The article focuses on Aristotle’s human ‘function’ (ergon) argument, which is a teleological argument at the center of his practical philosophy. It argues that this argument, which Aristotle presents to define ‘human flourishing’ or ‘happiness’ (eudaimonia), depends on his definition of man as the only ‘living being that has language and reason’ (zôon logon echon). It further claims that the dispute about whether Aristotle identifies eudaimonia only with a life of contemplation or whether eudaimonia includes a political life can be clarified by referring to the natural purpose of logos. |
id |
INDEP-3_0ea0d5d2c91f952e924fa229761e963b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.www.telosjournals.com.br:article/185 |
network_acronym_str |
INDEP-3 |
network_name_str |
Journal of Teleological Science |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
TELEOLOGY IN ARISTOTLE'S PRACTICAL PHILOSOPHYTELEOLOGIA NA FILOSOFIA PRÁTICA DE ARISTÓTELESAristotleTeleologyPractical PhilosophyAristótelesTeleologiaFilosofia PráticaThis article contributes to the debate on the relation of Aristotle’s practical and theoretical philosophy. It argues that his practical philosophy depends to a considerable extent on his teleological conception of nature. This thesis is primarily directed against scholars who maintain that Aristotle does not derive political and human relations from natural or cosmic conditions. The paper defends David Sedley’s anthropocentric interpretation of Aristotle’s natural teleology and shows how Aristotle applies teleological explanations to power relations among human beings – among men and women and among freemen and natural slaves – and their purposes and goals. The article focuses on Aristotle’s human ‘function’ (ergon) argument, which is a teleological argument at the center of his practical philosophy. It argues that this argument, which Aristotle presents to define ‘human flourishing’ or ‘happiness’ (eudaimonia), depends on his definition of man as the only ‘living being that has language and reason’ (zôon logon echon). It further claims that the dispute about whether Aristotle identifies eudaimonia only with a life of contemplation or whether eudaimonia includes a political life can be clarified by referring to the natural purpose of logos.Este artigo contribui para o debate sobre a relação da filosofia prática e teórica de Aristóteles. Ele argumenta que sua filosofia prática depende em grande parte de sua concepção teleológica da natureza. Esta tese é dirigida principalmente contra os estudiosos que sustentam que Aristóteles não deriva de relações políticas e humanas de condições naturais ou cósmicas. O artigo defende a interpretação antropocêntrica de David Sedley da teleologia natural de Aristóteles e mostra como Aristóteles aplica explicações teleológicas às relações de poder entre os seres humanos - entre homens e mulheres e entre homens livres e escravos naturais - e seus propósitos e objetivos. O artigo enfoca o argumento da "função" (ergonomia) humana de Aristóteles, que é um argumento teleológico no centro de sua filosofia prática. Argumenta que este argumento, que Aristóteles apresenta para definir 'florescimento humano' ou 'felicidade' (eudaimonia), depende de sua definição de homem como o único 'ser vivo que tem linguagem e razão' (zôon logon echon). Alega ainda que a disputa sobre se Aristóteles identifica eudaimonia apenas com uma vida de contemplação ou se eudaimonia inclui uma vida política pode ser esclarecida referindo-se ao propósito natural dos logotipos. Sergio Salles2022-04-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.telosjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/jts/article/view/18510.59079/jts.v1i1.185Journal of Teleological Science; Vol. 2 (2022): JAN.-DEC.; 52-79Journal of Teleological Science; v. 2 (2022): JAN.-DEC.; 52-792763-6577reponame:Journal of Teleological Scienceinstname:Publicação independenteinstacron:INDEPporhttps://www.telosjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/jts/article/view/185/129Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Teleological Sciencehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKnoll, Manuel2023-06-19T20:27:04Zoai:ojs2.www.telosjournals.com.br:article/185Revistahttps://www.telosjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/jtsPRIhttps://www.telosjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/jts/oaitelos@telosjournals.com2763-65772763-6577opendoar:2023-06-19T20:27:04Journal of Teleological Science - Publicação independentefalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
TELEOLOGY IN ARISTOTLE'S PRACTICAL PHILOSOPHY TELEOLOGIA NA FILOSOFIA PRÁTICA DE ARISTÓTELES |
title |
TELEOLOGY IN ARISTOTLE'S PRACTICAL PHILOSOPHY |
spellingShingle |
TELEOLOGY IN ARISTOTLE'S PRACTICAL PHILOSOPHY Knoll, Manuel Aristotle Teleology Practical Philosophy Aristóteles Teleologia Filosofia Prática |
title_short |
TELEOLOGY IN ARISTOTLE'S PRACTICAL PHILOSOPHY |
title_full |
TELEOLOGY IN ARISTOTLE'S PRACTICAL PHILOSOPHY |
title_fullStr |
TELEOLOGY IN ARISTOTLE'S PRACTICAL PHILOSOPHY |
title_full_unstemmed |
TELEOLOGY IN ARISTOTLE'S PRACTICAL PHILOSOPHY |
title_sort |
TELEOLOGY IN ARISTOTLE'S PRACTICAL PHILOSOPHY |
author |
Knoll, Manuel |
author_facet |
Knoll, Manuel |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Knoll, Manuel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Aristotle Teleology Practical Philosophy Aristóteles Teleologia Filosofia Prática |
topic |
Aristotle Teleology Practical Philosophy Aristóteles Teleologia Filosofia Prática |
description |
This article contributes to the debate on the relation of Aristotle’s practical and theoretical philosophy. It argues that his practical philosophy depends to a considerable extent on his teleological conception of nature. This thesis is primarily directed against scholars who maintain that Aristotle does not derive political and human relations from natural or cosmic conditions. The paper defends David Sedley’s anthropocentric interpretation of Aristotle’s natural teleology and shows how Aristotle applies teleological explanations to power relations among human beings – among men and women and among freemen and natural slaves – and their purposes and goals. The article focuses on Aristotle’s human ‘function’ (ergon) argument, which is a teleological argument at the center of his practical philosophy. It argues that this argument, which Aristotle presents to define ‘human flourishing’ or ‘happiness’ (eudaimonia), depends on his definition of man as the only ‘living being that has language and reason’ (zôon logon echon). It further claims that the dispute about whether Aristotle identifies eudaimonia only with a life of contemplation or whether eudaimonia includes a political life can be clarified by referring to the natural purpose of logos. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-04-04 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.telosjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/jts/article/view/185 10.59079/jts.v1i1.185 |
url |
https://www.telosjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/jts/article/view/185 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.59079/jts.v1i1.185 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.telosjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/jts/article/view/185/129 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Teleological Science https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Teleological Science https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sergio Salles |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sergio Salles |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Teleological Science; Vol. 2 (2022): JAN.-DEC.; 52-79 Journal of Teleological Science; v. 2 (2022): JAN.-DEC.; 52-79 2763-6577 reponame:Journal of Teleological Science instname:Publicação independente instacron:INDEP |
instname_str |
Publicação independente |
instacron_str |
INDEP |
institution |
INDEP |
reponame_str |
Journal of Teleological Science |
collection |
Journal of Teleological Science |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Teleological Science - Publicação independente |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
telos@telosjournals.com |
_version_ |
1797042106108215296 |