Defining a termite sampling protocol for ecological studies: An effective method to increase statistical power

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sales Dambros, Cristian de
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Morais, José Wellington de, Vasconcellos, Alexandre, Franklin, E.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional do INPA
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/15470
Resumo: Protocols for sampling soil fauna are usually designed to increase the number of species found when one or a few plots are heavily sampled. However, no previous study has evaluated how the number of plots sampled affect the power of statistical tests associating community composition and the environment. We test the effect of the number of transects (plots) and the sampling effort in each transect on the representation of trophic groups and on the association of termite species composition with environmental variables. Data were collected in 30 250m-long transects located in central Amazonia. Each transect was subdivided into 10 non-contiguous sections of 5 m × 2 m each (separation of 22 m between sections). We rarefied the data to determine arrangement of transects and sections that 1) best characterizes the distribution of species in trophic groups and 2) maximizes the chances to detect true associations between termite species composition and environmental predictor variables. When more than six transects (plots) were sampled with at least five non-contiguous sections each, the distribution of trophic groups was similar to the known distribution for the area. However, the detection of the association between termite species composition and environmental variables was more easily detected by increasing the number of transects sampled (plots) than the sampling effort per transect. Our results suggest that spreading sampling effort into at least 15 transects (plots) improves the ability to detect trophic groups and the performance of regression tests associating the composition of species with the environment. © 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS
id INPA-2_3a96a12a2d51ef5fbaaae173d61ec706
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio:1/15470
network_acronym_str INPA-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional do INPA
repository_id_str
spelling Sales Dambros, Cristian deMorais, José Wellington deVasconcellos, AlexandreFranklin, E.2020-05-14T15:32:07Z2020-05-14T15:32:07Z2020https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/1547010.1016/j.ejsobi.2019.103145Protocols for sampling soil fauna are usually designed to increase the number of species found when one or a few plots are heavily sampled. However, no previous study has evaluated how the number of plots sampled affect the power of statistical tests associating community composition and the environment. We test the effect of the number of transects (plots) and the sampling effort in each transect on the representation of trophic groups and on the association of termite species composition with environmental variables. Data were collected in 30 250m-long transects located in central Amazonia. Each transect was subdivided into 10 non-contiguous sections of 5 m × 2 m each (separation of 22 m between sections). We rarefied the data to determine arrangement of transects and sections that 1) best characterizes the distribution of species in trophic groups and 2) maximizes the chances to detect true associations between termite species composition and environmental predictor variables. When more than six transects (plots) were sampled with at least five non-contiguous sections each, the distribution of trophic groups was similar to the known distribution for the area. However, the detection of the association between termite species composition and environmental variables was more easily detected by increasing the number of transects sampled (plots) than the sampling effort per transect. Our results suggest that spreading sampling effort into at least 15 transects (plots) improves the ability to detect trophic groups and the performance of regression tests associating the composition of species with the environment. © 2019 Elsevier Masson SASVolume 96Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDefining a termite sampling protocol for ecological studies: An effective method to increase statistical powerinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleEuropean Journal of Soil Biologyengreponame:Repositório Institucional do INPAinstname:Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)instacron:INPAORIGINALartigo-inpa.pdfartigo-inpa.pdfapplication/pdf748697https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/bitstream/1/15470/1/artigo-inpa.pdf8d74e34c071ce1b74b1879af5547b96cMD511/154702020-05-14 12:02:32.312oai:repositorio:1/15470Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/oai/requestopendoar:2020-05-14T16:02:32Repositório Institucional do INPA - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)false
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv Defining a termite sampling protocol for ecological studies: An effective method to increase statistical power
title Defining a termite sampling protocol for ecological studies: An effective method to increase statistical power
spellingShingle Defining a termite sampling protocol for ecological studies: An effective method to increase statistical power
Sales Dambros, Cristian de
title_short Defining a termite sampling protocol for ecological studies: An effective method to increase statistical power
title_full Defining a termite sampling protocol for ecological studies: An effective method to increase statistical power
title_fullStr Defining a termite sampling protocol for ecological studies: An effective method to increase statistical power
title_full_unstemmed Defining a termite sampling protocol for ecological studies: An effective method to increase statistical power
title_sort Defining a termite sampling protocol for ecological studies: An effective method to increase statistical power
author Sales Dambros, Cristian de
author_facet Sales Dambros, Cristian de
Morais, José Wellington de
Vasconcellos, Alexandre
Franklin, E.
author_role author
author2 Morais, José Wellington de
Vasconcellos, Alexandre
Franklin, E.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sales Dambros, Cristian de
Morais, José Wellington de
Vasconcellos, Alexandre
Franklin, E.
description Protocols for sampling soil fauna are usually designed to increase the number of species found when one or a few plots are heavily sampled. However, no previous study has evaluated how the number of plots sampled affect the power of statistical tests associating community composition and the environment. We test the effect of the number of transects (plots) and the sampling effort in each transect on the representation of trophic groups and on the association of termite species composition with environmental variables. Data were collected in 30 250m-long transects located in central Amazonia. Each transect was subdivided into 10 non-contiguous sections of 5 m × 2 m each (separation of 22 m between sections). We rarefied the data to determine arrangement of transects and sections that 1) best characterizes the distribution of species in trophic groups and 2) maximizes the chances to detect true associations between termite species composition and environmental predictor variables. When more than six transects (plots) were sampled with at least five non-contiguous sections each, the distribution of trophic groups was similar to the known distribution for the area. However, the detection of the association between termite species composition and environmental variables was more easily detected by increasing the number of transects sampled (plots) than the sampling effort per transect. Our results suggest that spreading sampling effort into at least 15 transects (plots) improves the ability to detect trophic groups and the performance of regression tests associating the composition of species with the environment. © 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS
publishDate 2020
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2020-05-14T15:32:07Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2020-05-14T15:32:07Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2020
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/15470
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2019.103145
url https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/15470
identifier_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2019.103145
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Volume 96
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv European Journal of Soil Biology
publisher.none.fl_str_mv European Journal of Soil Biology
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional do INPA
instname:Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)
instacron:INPA
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)
instacron_str INPA
institution INPA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional do INPA
collection Repositório Institucional do INPA
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/bitstream/1/15470/1/artigo-inpa.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 8d74e34c071ce1b74b1879af5547b96c
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional do INPA - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1801499094417408000