Environmental impact assessment in Brazilian Amazonia: Challenges and prospects to assess biodiversity
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional do INPA |
Texto Completo: | https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/13033 |
Resumo: | Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) has the goal of providing decision makers with an indication of the likely environmental consequences of planned actions risking environmental changes and, when necessary, allowing revision of these actions to mitigate adverse impacts. Here we provide an overview of the efficiency of EIA with emphasis on Brazilian Amazonia and discuss the problems and challenges with this type of assessment in highly diverse ecosystems. We concentrate on the methodology and performance of EIAs for three of the most recent and largest infrastructure projects in Amazonia: the Belo Monte hydroelectric dam, the BR-319 Highway, and the Juruti bauxite mine. We conclude that all of these EIAs fall short of properly assessing the expected impact of infrastructure development in situ, and that their results had little or no effect on policy decisions. To improve the reliability and usefulness of EIAs in biologically diverse ecosystems, we suggest three relatively fast and cost-effective complementary approaches for assessing biodiversity: remote sensing, reflectance spectroscopy, and DNA meta-barcoding. We discuss how these emerging cutting-edge techniques can help in identifying environmental threats and the consequences of different activities in Amazonia. The ability to monitor the state of the environment and the likely impacts of human activities on natural resources is fundamental to evidence-based decisions on development choices, to the design of appropriate management strategies, and to mitigate biological and ecological consequences. © 2017 The Authors |
id |
INPA-2_3cacb0c91b32a0b533cc1e6092c34b64 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio:1/13033 |
network_acronym_str |
INPA-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional do INPA |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Ritter, Camila DuarteMcCrate, GabrielNilsson, Henrik R.Fearnside, Philip MartinPalme, UlrikaAntonelli, Alexandre2020-04-23T15:46:48Z2020-04-23T15:46:48Z2017https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/1303310.1016/j.biocon.2016.12.031Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) has the goal of providing decision makers with an indication of the likely environmental consequences of planned actions risking environmental changes and, when necessary, allowing revision of these actions to mitigate adverse impacts. Here we provide an overview of the efficiency of EIA with emphasis on Brazilian Amazonia and discuss the problems and challenges with this type of assessment in highly diverse ecosystems. We concentrate on the methodology and performance of EIAs for three of the most recent and largest infrastructure projects in Amazonia: the Belo Monte hydroelectric dam, the BR-319 Highway, and the Juruti bauxite mine. We conclude that all of these EIAs fall short of properly assessing the expected impact of infrastructure development in situ, and that their results had little or no effect on policy decisions. To improve the reliability and usefulness of EIAs in biologically diverse ecosystems, we suggest three relatively fast and cost-effective complementary approaches for assessing biodiversity: remote sensing, reflectance spectroscopy, and DNA meta-barcoding. We discuss how these emerging cutting-edge techniques can help in identifying environmental threats and the consequences of different activities in Amazonia. The ability to monitor the state of the environment and the likely impacts of human activities on natural resources is fundamental to evidence-based decisions on development choices, to the design of appropriate management strategies, and to mitigate biological and ecological consequences. © 2017 The AuthorsVolume 206, Pags. 161-168Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEnvironmental impact assessment in Brazilian Amazonia: Challenges and prospects to assess biodiversityinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleBiological Conservationengreponame:Repositório Institucional do INPAinstname:Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)instacron:INPAORIGINALartigo-inpa.pdfartigo-inpa.pdfapplication/pdf958929https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/bitstream/1/13033/1/artigo-inpa.pdf7bb720e365876c084b5a57076f62307fMD511/130332020-07-14 09:18:14.372oai:repositorio:1/13033Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/oai/requestopendoar:2020-07-14T13:18:14Repositório Institucional do INPA - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)false |
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv |
Environmental impact assessment in Brazilian Amazonia: Challenges and prospects to assess biodiversity |
title |
Environmental impact assessment in Brazilian Amazonia: Challenges and prospects to assess biodiversity |
spellingShingle |
Environmental impact assessment in Brazilian Amazonia: Challenges and prospects to assess biodiversity Ritter, Camila Duarte |
title_short |
Environmental impact assessment in Brazilian Amazonia: Challenges and prospects to assess biodiversity |
title_full |
Environmental impact assessment in Brazilian Amazonia: Challenges and prospects to assess biodiversity |
title_fullStr |
Environmental impact assessment in Brazilian Amazonia: Challenges and prospects to assess biodiversity |
title_full_unstemmed |
Environmental impact assessment in Brazilian Amazonia: Challenges and prospects to assess biodiversity |
title_sort |
Environmental impact assessment in Brazilian Amazonia: Challenges and prospects to assess biodiversity |
author |
Ritter, Camila Duarte |
author_facet |
Ritter, Camila Duarte McCrate, Gabriel Nilsson, Henrik R. Fearnside, Philip Martin Palme, Ulrika Antonelli, Alexandre |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
McCrate, Gabriel Nilsson, Henrik R. Fearnside, Philip Martin Palme, Ulrika Antonelli, Alexandre |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ritter, Camila Duarte McCrate, Gabriel Nilsson, Henrik R. Fearnside, Philip Martin Palme, Ulrika Antonelli, Alexandre |
description |
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) has the goal of providing decision makers with an indication of the likely environmental consequences of planned actions risking environmental changes and, when necessary, allowing revision of these actions to mitigate adverse impacts. Here we provide an overview of the efficiency of EIA with emphasis on Brazilian Amazonia and discuss the problems and challenges with this type of assessment in highly diverse ecosystems. We concentrate on the methodology and performance of EIAs for three of the most recent and largest infrastructure projects in Amazonia: the Belo Monte hydroelectric dam, the BR-319 Highway, and the Juruti bauxite mine. We conclude that all of these EIAs fall short of properly assessing the expected impact of infrastructure development in situ, and that their results had little or no effect on policy decisions. To improve the reliability and usefulness of EIAs in biologically diverse ecosystems, we suggest three relatively fast and cost-effective complementary approaches for assessing biodiversity: remote sensing, reflectance spectroscopy, and DNA meta-barcoding. We discuss how these emerging cutting-edge techniques can help in identifying environmental threats and the consequences of different activities in Amazonia. The ability to monitor the state of the environment and the likely impacts of human activities on natural resources is fundamental to evidence-based decisions on development choices, to the design of appropriate management strategies, and to mitigate biological and ecological consequences. © 2017 The Authors |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2017 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2020-04-23T15:46:48Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2020-04-23T15:46:48Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/13033 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1016/j.biocon.2016.12.031 |
url |
https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/13033 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1016/j.biocon.2016.12.031 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Volume 206, Pags. 161-168 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Biological Conservation |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Biological Conservation |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional do INPA instname:Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA) instacron:INPA |
instname_str |
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA) |
instacron_str |
INPA |
institution |
INPA |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional do INPA |
collection |
Repositório Institucional do INPA |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/bitstream/1/13033/1/artigo-inpa.pdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
7bb720e365876c084b5a57076f62307f |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional do INPA - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1809928906277388288 |