Environmental impact assessment in Brazilian Amazonia: Challenges and prospects to assess biodiversity

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ritter, Camila Duarte
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: McCrate, Gabriel, Nilsson, Henrik R., Fearnside, Philip Martin, Palme, Ulrika, Antonelli, Alexandre
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional do INPA
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/13033
Resumo: Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) has the goal of providing decision makers with an indication of the likely environmental consequences of planned actions risking environmental changes and, when necessary, allowing revision of these actions to mitigate adverse impacts. Here we provide an overview of the efficiency of EIA with emphasis on Brazilian Amazonia and discuss the problems and challenges with this type of assessment in highly diverse ecosystems. We concentrate on the methodology and performance of EIAs for three of the most recent and largest infrastructure projects in Amazonia: the Belo Monte hydroelectric dam, the BR-319 Highway, and the Juruti bauxite mine. We conclude that all of these EIAs fall short of properly assessing the expected impact of infrastructure development in situ, and that their results had little or no effect on policy decisions. To improve the reliability and usefulness of EIAs in biologically diverse ecosystems, we suggest three relatively fast and cost-effective complementary approaches for assessing biodiversity: remote sensing, reflectance spectroscopy, and DNA meta-barcoding. We discuss how these emerging cutting-edge techniques can help in identifying environmental threats and the consequences of different activities in Amazonia. The ability to monitor the state of the environment and the likely impacts of human activities on natural resources is fundamental to evidence-based decisions on development choices, to the design of appropriate management strategies, and to mitigate biological and ecological consequences. © 2017 The Authors
id INPA-2_3cacb0c91b32a0b533cc1e6092c34b64
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio:1/13033
network_acronym_str INPA-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional do INPA
repository_id_str
spelling Ritter, Camila DuarteMcCrate, GabrielNilsson, Henrik R.Fearnside, Philip MartinPalme, UlrikaAntonelli, Alexandre2020-04-23T15:46:48Z2020-04-23T15:46:48Z2017https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/1303310.1016/j.biocon.2016.12.031Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) has the goal of providing decision makers with an indication of the likely environmental consequences of planned actions risking environmental changes and, when necessary, allowing revision of these actions to mitigate adverse impacts. Here we provide an overview of the efficiency of EIA with emphasis on Brazilian Amazonia and discuss the problems and challenges with this type of assessment in highly diverse ecosystems. We concentrate on the methodology and performance of EIAs for three of the most recent and largest infrastructure projects in Amazonia: the Belo Monte hydroelectric dam, the BR-319 Highway, and the Juruti bauxite mine. We conclude that all of these EIAs fall short of properly assessing the expected impact of infrastructure development in situ, and that their results had little or no effect on policy decisions. To improve the reliability and usefulness of EIAs in biologically diverse ecosystems, we suggest three relatively fast and cost-effective complementary approaches for assessing biodiversity: remote sensing, reflectance spectroscopy, and DNA meta-barcoding. We discuss how these emerging cutting-edge techniques can help in identifying environmental threats and the consequences of different activities in Amazonia. The ability to monitor the state of the environment and the likely impacts of human activities on natural resources is fundamental to evidence-based decisions on development choices, to the design of appropriate management strategies, and to mitigate biological and ecological consequences. © 2017 The AuthorsVolume 206, Pags. 161-168Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEnvironmental impact assessment in Brazilian Amazonia: Challenges and prospects to assess biodiversityinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleBiological Conservationengreponame:Repositório Institucional do INPAinstname:Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)instacron:INPAORIGINALartigo-inpa.pdfartigo-inpa.pdfapplication/pdf958929https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/bitstream/1/13033/1/artigo-inpa.pdf7bb720e365876c084b5a57076f62307fMD511/130332020-07-14 09:18:14.372oai:repositorio:1/13033Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/oai/requestopendoar:2020-07-14T13:18:14Repositório Institucional do INPA - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)false
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv Environmental impact assessment in Brazilian Amazonia: Challenges and prospects to assess biodiversity
title Environmental impact assessment in Brazilian Amazonia: Challenges and prospects to assess biodiversity
spellingShingle Environmental impact assessment in Brazilian Amazonia: Challenges and prospects to assess biodiversity
Ritter, Camila Duarte
title_short Environmental impact assessment in Brazilian Amazonia: Challenges and prospects to assess biodiversity
title_full Environmental impact assessment in Brazilian Amazonia: Challenges and prospects to assess biodiversity
title_fullStr Environmental impact assessment in Brazilian Amazonia: Challenges and prospects to assess biodiversity
title_full_unstemmed Environmental impact assessment in Brazilian Amazonia: Challenges and prospects to assess biodiversity
title_sort Environmental impact assessment in Brazilian Amazonia: Challenges and prospects to assess biodiversity
author Ritter, Camila Duarte
author_facet Ritter, Camila Duarte
McCrate, Gabriel
Nilsson, Henrik R.
Fearnside, Philip Martin
Palme, Ulrika
Antonelli, Alexandre
author_role author
author2 McCrate, Gabriel
Nilsson, Henrik R.
Fearnside, Philip Martin
Palme, Ulrika
Antonelli, Alexandre
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ritter, Camila Duarte
McCrate, Gabriel
Nilsson, Henrik R.
Fearnside, Philip Martin
Palme, Ulrika
Antonelli, Alexandre
description Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) has the goal of providing decision makers with an indication of the likely environmental consequences of planned actions risking environmental changes and, when necessary, allowing revision of these actions to mitigate adverse impacts. Here we provide an overview of the efficiency of EIA with emphasis on Brazilian Amazonia and discuss the problems and challenges with this type of assessment in highly diverse ecosystems. We concentrate on the methodology and performance of EIAs for three of the most recent and largest infrastructure projects in Amazonia: the Belo Monte hydroelectric dam, the BR-319 Highway, and the Juruti bauxite mine. We conclude that all of these EIAs fall short of properly assessing the expected impact of infrastructure development in situ, and that their results had little or no effect on policy decisions. To improve the reliability and usefulness of EIAs in biologically diverse ecosystems, we suggest three relatively fast and cost-effective complementary approaches for assessing biodiversity: remote sensing, reflectance spectroscopy, and DNA meta-barcoding. We discuss how these emerging cutting-edge techniques can help in identifying environmental threats and the consequences of different activities in Amazonia. The ability to monitor the state of the environment and the likely impacts of human activities on natural resources is fundamental to evidence-based decisions on development choices, to the design of appropriate management strategies, and to mitigate biological and ecological consequences. © 2017 The Authors
publishDate 2017
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2017
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2020-04-23T15:46:48Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2020-04-23T15:46:48Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/13033
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.12.031
url https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/13033
identifier_str_mv 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.12.031
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Volume 206, Pags. 161-168
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Biological Conservation
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Biological Conservation
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional do INPA
instname:Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)
instacron:INPA
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)
instacron_str INPA
institution INPA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional do INPA
collection Repositório Institucional do INPA
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/bitstream/1/13033/1/artigo-inpa.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 7bb720e365876c084b5a57076f62307f
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional do INPA - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1809928906277388288