Improving simulated Amazon forest biomass and productivity by including spatial variation in biophysical parameters
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2013 |
Other Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositório Institucional do INPA |
Download full: | https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/14897 |
Summary: | Dynamic vegetation models forced with spatially homogeneous biophysical parameters are capable of producing average productivity and biomass values for the Amazon basin forest biome that are close to the observed estimates, but these models are unable to reproduce observed spatial variability. Recent observational studies have shown substantial regional spatial variability of above-ground productivity and biomass across the Amazon basin, which is believed to be primarily driven by a combination of soil physical and chemical properties. In this study, spatial heterogeneity of vegetation properties is added to the Integrated Biosphere Simulator (IBIS) land surface model, and the simulated productivity and biomass of the Amazon basin are compared to observations from undisturbed forest. The maximum RuBiCo carboxylation capacity (Vcmax) and the woody biomass residence time (τw) were found to be the most important properties determining the modeled spatial variation of above-ground woody net primary productivity and biomass, respectively. Spatial heterogeneity of these properties may lead to simulated spatial variability of 1.8 times in the woody net primary productivity (NPPw) and 2.8 times in the woody above-ground biomass (AGBw). The coefficient of correlation between the modeled and observed woody productivity improved from 0.10 with homogeneous parameters to 0.73 with spatially heterogeneous parameters, while the coefficient of correlation between the simulated and observed woody above-ground biomass improved from 0.33 to 0.88. The results from our analyses with the IBIS dynamic vegetation model demonstrated that using single values for key ecological parameters in the tropical forest biome severely limits simulation accuracy. Clearer understanding of the biophysical mechanisms that drive the spatial variability of carbon allocation, τw and Vcmax is necessary to achieve further improvements to simulation accuracy. © 2013 Author(s). |
id |
INPA-2_5a4a09d3d00eb3faaea4096a4dfb10c6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio:1/14897 |
network_acronym_str |
INPA-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional do INPA |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Castanho, Andrea Dde AlmeidaCoe, Michael T.Costa, Marcos HeilMalhi, Yadvinder SinghGalbraith, David R.Quesada, Carlos Alberto2020-05-07T13:47:16Z2020-05-07T13:47:16Z2013https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/1489710.5194/bg-10-2255-2013Dynamic vegetation models forced with spatially homogeneous biophysical parameters are capable of producing average productivity and biomass values for the Amazon basin forest biome that are close to the observed estimates, but these models are unable to reproduce observed spatial variability. Recent observational studies have shown substantial regional spatial variability of above-ground productivity and biomass across the Amazon basin, which is believed to be primarily driven by a combination of soil physical and chemical properties. In this study, spatial heterogeneity of vegetation properties is added to the Integrated Biosphere Simulator (IBIS) land surface model, and the simulated productivity and biomass of the Amazon basin are compared to observations from undisturbed forest. The maximum RuBiCo carboxylation capacity (Vcmax) and the woody biomass residence time (τw) were found to be the most important properties determining the modeled spatial variation of above-ground woody net primary productivity and biomass, respectively. Spatial heterogeneity of these properties may lead to simulated spatial variability of 1.8 times in the woody net primary productivity (NPPw) and 2.8 times in the woody above-ground biomass (AGBw). The coefficient of correlation between the modeled and observed woody productivity improved from 0.10 with homogeneous parameters to 0.73 with spatially heterogeneous parameters, while the coefficient of correlation between the simulated and observed woody above-ground biomass improved from 0.33 to 0.88. The results from our analyses with the IBIS dynamic vegetation model demonstrated that using single values for key ecological parameters in the tropical forest biome severely limits simulation accuracy. Clearer understanding of the biophysical mechanisms that drive the spatial variability of carbon allocation, τw and Vcmax is necessary to achieve further improvements to simulation accuracy. © 2013 Author(s).Volume 10, Número 4, Pags. 2255-2272Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAboveground BiomassBiomeEcological ModelingForest EcosystemHomogeneityNet Primary ProductionNumerical ModelPhysicochemical PropertySpatial VariationTropical ForestAmazoniaImproving simulated Amazon forest biomass and productivity by including spatial variation in biophysical parametersinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleBiogeosciencesengreponame:Repositório Institucional do INPAinstname:Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)instacron:INPAORIGINALartigo-inpa.pdfapplication/pdf9688252https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/bitstream/1/14897/1/artigo-inpa.pdfbf6be4b98b6370943dcf36d71cb366c6MD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdfapplication/octet-stream914https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/bitstream/1/14897/2/license_rdf4d2950bda3d176f570a9f8b328dfbbefMD521/148972020-07-14 10:28:10.214oai:repositorio:1/14897Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/oai/requestopendoar:2020-07-14T14:28:10Repositório Institucional do INPA - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)false |
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv |
Improving simulated Amazon forest biomass and productivity by including spatial variation in biophysical parameters |
title |
Improving simulated Amazon forest biomass and productivity by including spatial variation in biophysical parameters |
spellingShingle |
Improving simulated Amazon forest biomass and productivity by including spatial variation in biophysical parameters Castanho, Andrea Dde Almeida Aboveground Biomass Biome Ecological Modeling Forest Ecosystem Homogeneity Net Primary Production Numerical Model Physicochemical Property Spatial Variation Tropical Forest Amazonia |
title_short |
Improving simulated Amazon forest biomass and productivity by including spatial variation in biophysical parameters |
title_full |
Improving simulated Amazon forest biomass and productivity by including spatial variation in biophysical parameters |
title_fullStr |
Improving simulated Amazon forest biomass and productivity by including spatial variation in biophysical parameters |
title_full_unstemmed |
Improving simulated Amazon forest biomass and productivity by including spatial variation in biophysical parameters |
title_sort |
Improving simulated Amazon forest biomass and productivity by including spatial variation in biophysical parameters |
author |
Castanho, Andrea Dde Almeida |
author_facet |
Castanho, Andrea Dde Almeida Coe, Michael T. Costa, Marcos Heil Malhi, Yadvinder Singh Galbraith, David R. Quesada, Carlos Alberto |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Coe, Michael T. Costa, Marcos Heil Malhi, Yadvinder Singh Galbraith, David R. Quesada, Carlos Alberto |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Castanho, Andrea Dde Almeida Coe, Michael T. Costa, Marcos Heil Malhi, Yadvinder Singh Galbraith, David R. Quesada, Carlos Alberto |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Aboveground Biomass Biome Ecological Modeling Forest Ecosystem Homogeneity Net Primary Production Numerical Model Physicochemical Property Spatial Variation Tropical Forest Amazonia |
topic |
Aboveground Biomass Biome Ecological Modeling Forest Ecosystem Homogeneity Net Primary Production Numerical Model Physicochemical Property Spatial Variation Tropical Forest Amazonia |
description |
Dynamic vegetation models forced with spatially homogeneous biophysical parameters are capable of producing average productivity and biomass values for the Amazon basin forest biome that are close to the observed estimates, but these models are unable to reproduce observed spatial variability. Recent observational studies have shown substantial regional spatial variability of above-ground productivity and biomass across the Amazon basin, which is believed to be primarily driven by a combination of soil physical and chemical properties. In this study, spatial heterogeneity of vegetation properties is added to the Integrated Biosphere Simulator (IBIS) land surface model, and the simulated productivity and biomass of the Amazon basin are compared to observations from undisturbed forest. The maximum RuBiCo carboxylation capacity (Vcmax) and the woody biomass residence time (τw) were found to be the most important properties determining the modeled spatial variation of above-ground woody net primary productivity and biomass, respectively. Spatial heterogeneity of these properties may lead to simulated spatial variability of 1.8 times in the woody net primary productivity (NPPw) and 2.8 times in the woody above-ground biomass (AGBw). The coefficient of correlation between the modeled and observed woody productivity improved from 0.10 with homogeneous parameters to 0.73 with spatially heterogeneous parameters, while the coefficient of correlation between the simulated and observed woody above-ground biomass improved from 0.33 to 0.88. The results from our analyses with the IBIS dynamic vegetation model demonstrated that using single values for key ecological parameters in the tropical forest biome severely limits simulation accuracy. Clearer understanding of the biophysical mechanisms that drive the spatial variability of carbon allocation, τw and Vcmax is necessary to achieve further improvements to simulation accuracy. © 2013 Author(s). |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2013 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-07T13:47:16Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-07T13:47:16Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/14897 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.5194/bg-10-2255-2013 |
url |
https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/14897 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5194/bg-10-2255-2013 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Volume 10, Número 4, Pags. 2255-2272 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Biogeosciences |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Biogeosciences |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional do INPA instname:Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA) instacron:INPA |
instname_str |
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA) |
instacron_str |
INPA |
institution |
INPA |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional do INPA |
collection |
Repositório Institucional do INPA |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/bitstream/1/14897/1/artigo-inpa.pdf https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/bitstream/1/14897/2/license_rdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
bf6be4b98b6370943dcf36d71cb366c6 4d2950bda3d176f570a9f8b328dfbbef |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional do INPA - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1797064381661446144 |