Ecosystem recovery in terra firme forests after cutting and burning: A comparison on species richness, floristic composition and forest structure in the Jau National Park, Amazonia

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ferreira, Leandro Valle
Data de Publicação: 1999
Outros Autores: Prance, Ghillean Tolmie
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional do INPA
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/16438
Resumo: Six hectares, three in a primary forest and three in a 40 year old secondary forest were inventoried for all trees with Diameter at Breast Height (DNH) of 10 cm or greater in a terra firme forest 200 km north-east of Manaus, central Amazonia in order to compare the difference between structure, species richness and floristic composition. Both species richness and tree density were significantly higher in the upland forest than in the secondary forest. The forest structure pattern analysed (DBH, basal area and estimated dry biomass) did not differ significantly between the two forest types. Similarity indices at species level were only 14%. In the 3 ha primary forest the number of species varied from 137 to 159, the number of individuals from 639 to 713, total basal area from 32.8 to 40.2 m2 and estimate total of above-ground dry biomass (AGBM) from 405 to 560 tons per ha. In the 3 ha of secondary forest, the number of species varied from 86 to 90, the number of individuals from 611 to 653, total basal area from 28.8 to 39.9 m2 and the estimated total AGBM from 340 to 586 tons per ha. Family Importance Value (FIV) is the sum of relative density, dominance and richness of a family. The most important families in relation to FIV were Burseraceae, Chrysobalanaceae, Lecythidaceae, Myristicaceae, Bombacaceae, Fabaceae and Mimosaceae in the 3 ha of primary forest, while Burseraceae, Lecythidaceae, Sapotaceae, Arecaceae and Cecropiaceae were the most important families in the 3 ha of secondary forest. Importance Value Index (IVI) is the sum of relative density, dominance and frequency of a species. Alexa grandiflora (Caesalpiniaceae), Scleronema micranthum (Bombacaceae) and Pourouma guianensis (Cecropiaceae) were the most important species in relation IVI, in the primary forest, while Esclaveilera grandiflora (Lecythidaceae), Protium apiculatum (Burseraceae) and Bertholletia excelsa (Lecythidaceae) were the most important species in the secondary forest. We conclude that species richness was significantly different between the two forests, but that forest structure patterns analysed in this study (DBH, basal area and dry biomass) were similar. This demonstrates that 40 years was sufficient time for the secondary forest to recover the original structure of the primary forest, but not the original species richness. The low species similarity between the two forests indicates that the floristic composition was quite distinct and that the mixture of primary forest and disturbed forest has led to an increase in total species diversity.
id INPA-2_7f7d837e592f2848bc03acc196df1fee
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio:1/16438
network_acronym_str INPA-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional do INPA
repository_id_str
spelling Ferreira, Leandro VallePrance, Ghillean Tolmie2020-06-05T17:59:42Z2020-06-05T17:59:42Z1999https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/1643810.1006/bojl.1998.0224Six hectares, three in a primary forest and three in a 40 year old secondary forest were inventoried for all trees with Diameter at Breast Height (DNH) of 10 cm or greater in a terra firme forest 200 km north-east of Manaus, central Amazonia in order to compare the difference between structure, species richness and floristic composition. Both species richness and tree density were significantly higher in the upland forest than in the secondary forest. The forest structure pattern analysed (DBH, basal area and estimated dry biomass) did not differ significantly between the two forest types. Similarity indices at species level were only 14%. In the 3 ha primary forest the number of species varied from 137 to 159, the number of individuals from 639 to 713, total basal area from 32.8 to 40.2 m2 and estimate total of above-ground dry biomass (AGBM) from 405 to 560 tons per ha. In the 3 ha of secondary forest, the number of species varied from 86 to 90, the number of individuals from 611 to 653, total basal area from 28.8 to 39.9 m2 and the estimated total AGBM from 340 to 586 tons per ha. Family Importance Value (FIV) is the sum of relative density, dominance and richness of a family. The most important families in relation to FIV were Burseraceae, Chrysobalanaceae, Lecythidaceae, Myristicaceae, Bombacaceae, Fabaceae and Mimosaceae in the 3 ha of primary forest, while Burseraceae, Lecythidaceae, Sapotaceae, Arecaceae and Cecropiaceae were the most important families in the 3 ha of secondary forest. Importance Value Index (IVI) is the sum of relative density, dominance and frequency of a species. Alexa grandiflora (Caesalpiniaceae), Scleronema micranthum (Bombacaceae) and Pourouma guianensis (Cecropiaceae) were the most important species in relation IVI, in the primary forest, while Esclaveilera grandiflora (Lecythidaceae), Protium apiculatum (Burseraceae) and Bertholletia excelsa (Lecythidaceae) were the most important species in the secondary forest. We conclude that species richness was significantly different between the two forests, but that forest structure patterns analysed in this study (DBH, basal area and dry biomass) were similar. This demonstrates that 40 years was sufficient time for the secondary forest to recover the original structure of the primary forest, but not the original species richness. The low species similarity between the two forests indicates that the floristic composition was quite distinct and that the mixture of primary forest and disturbed forest has led to an increase in total species diversity.Volume 130, Número 2, Pags. 97-110Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCommunity StructureForest EcosystemSpecies InventorySpecies RichnessAmazoniaBrasilJau National ParkAlexaAlexa GrandifloraAlexa GrandifloraArecaceaeBertholletia ExcelsaBertholletia ExcelsaBurseraceaeCaesalpinioideaeChrysobalanaceaeEsclaveileraEsclaveilera GrandifloraEsclaveilera GrandifloraFabaceaeFeline Immunodeficiency VirusLecythidaceaeMalvaceaeMyristicaceaePouroumaPourouma GuianensisPourouma GuianensisProtium ApiculatumProtium ApiculatumSapotaceaeScleronema MicranthumScleronema MicranthumUrticaceaeEcosystem recovery in terra firme forests after cutting and burning: A comparison on species richness, floristic composition and forest structure in the Jau National Park, Amazoniainfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleBotanical Journal of the Linnean Societyengreponame:Repositório Institucional do INPAinstname:Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)instacron:INPAORIGINALartigo-inpa.pdfartigo-inpa.pdfapplication/pdf740554https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/bitstream/1/16438/1/artigo-inpa.pdfe36e2fca1b87e058a36a8de5c334e4a2MD511/164382020-06-05 14:17:44.927oai:repositorio:1/16438Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/oai/requestopendoar:2020-06-05T18:17:44Repositório Institucional do INPA - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)false
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv Ecosystem recovery in terra firme forests after cutting and burning: A comparison on species richness, floristic composition and forest structure in the Jau National Park, Amazonia
title Ecosystem recovery in terra firme forests after cutting and burning: A comparison on species richness, floristic composition and forest structure in the Jau National Park, Amazonia
spellingShingle Ecosystem recovery in terra firme forests after cutting and burning: A comparison on species richness, floristic composition and forest structure in the Jau National Park, Amazonia
Ferreira, Leandro Valle
Community Structure
Forest Ecosystem
Species Inventory
Species Richness
Amazonia
Brasil
Jau National Park
Alexa
Alexa Grandiflora
Alexa Grandiflora
Arecaceae
Bertholletia Excelsa
Bertholletia Excelsa
Burseraceae
Caesalpinioideae
Chrysobalanaceae
Esclaveilera
Esclaveilera Grandiflora
Esclaveilera Grandiflora
Fabaceae
Feline Immunodeficiency Virus
Lecythidaceae
Malvaceae
Myristicaceae
Pourouma
Pourouma Guianensis
Pourouma Guianensis
Protium Apiculatum
Protium Apiculatum
Sapotaceae
Scleronema Micranthum
Scleronema Micranthum
Urticaceae
title_short Ecosystem recovery in terra firme forests after cutting and burning: A comparison on species richness, floristic composition and forest structure in the Jau National Park, Amazonia
title_full Ecosystem recovery in terra firme forests after cutting and burning: A comparison on species richness, floristic composition and forest structure in the Jau National Park, Amazonia
title_fullStr Ecosystem recovery in terra firme forests after cutting and burning: A comparison on species richness, floristic composition and forest structure in the Jau National Park, Amazonia
title_full_unstemmed Ecosystem recovery in terra firme forests after cutting and burning: A comparison on species richness, floristic composition and forest structure in the Jau National Park, Amazonia
title_sort Ecosystem recovery in terra firme forests after cutting and burning: A comparison on species richness, floristic composition and forest structure in the Jau National Park, Amazonia
author Ferreira, Leandro Valle
author_facet Ferreira, Leandro Valle
Prance, Ghillean Tolmie
author_role author
author2 Prance, Ghillean Tolmie
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ferreira, Leandro Valle
Prance, Ghillean Tolmie
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Community Structure
Forest Ecosystem
Species Inventory
Species Richness
Amazonia
Brasil
Jau National Park
Alexa
Alexa Grandiflora
Alexa Grandiflora
Arecaceae
Bertholletia Excelsa
Bertholletia Excelsa
Burseraceae
Caesalpinioideae
Chrysobalanaceae
Esclaveilera
Esclaveilera Grandiflora
Esclaveilera Grandiflora
Fabaceae
Feline Immunodeficiency Virus
Lecythidaceae
Malvaceae
Myristicaceae
Pourouma
Pourouma Guianensis
Pourouma Guianensis
Protium Apiculatum
Protium Apiculatum
Sapotaceae
Scleronema Micranthum
Scleronema Micranthum
Urticaceae
topic Community Structure
Forest Ecosystem
Species Inventory
Species Richness
Amazonia
Brasil
Jau National Park
Alexa
Alexa Grandiflora
Alexa Grandiflora
Arecaceae
Bertholletia Excelsa
Bertholletia Excelsa
Burseraceae
Caesalpinioideae
Chrysobalanaceae
Esclaveilera
Esclaveilera Grandiflora
Esclaveilera Grandiflora
Fabaceae
Feline Immunodeficiency Virus
Lecythidaceae
Malvaceae
Myristicaceae
Pourouma
Pourouma Guianensis
Pourouma Guianensis
Protium Apiculatum
Protium Apiculatum
Sapotaceae
Scleronema Micranthum
Scleronema Micranthum
Urticaceae
description Six hectares, three in a primary forest and three in a 40 year old secondary forest were inventoried for all trees with Diameter at Breast Height (DNH) of 10 cm or greater in a terra firme forest 200 km north-east of Manaus, central Amazonia in order to compare the difference between structure, species richness and floristic composition. Both species richness and tree density were significantly higher in the upland forest than in the secondary forest. The forest structure pattern analysed (DBH, basal area and estimated dry biomass) did not differ significantly between the two forest types. Similarity indices at species level were only 14%. In the 3 ha primary forest the number of species varied from 137 to 159, the number of individuals from 639 to 713, total basal area from 32.8 to 40.2 m2 and estimate total of above-ground dry biomass (AGBM) from 405 to 560 tons per ha. In the 3 ha of secondary forest, the number of species varied from 86 to 90, the number of individuals from 611 to 653, total basal area from 28.8 to 39.9 m2 and the estimated total AGBM from 340 to 586 tons per ha. Family Importance Value (FIV) is the sum of relative density, dominance and richness of a family. The most important families in relation to FIV were Burseraceae, Chrysobalanaceae, Lecythidaceae, Myristicaceae, Bombacaceae, Fabaceae and Mimosaceae in the 3 ha of primary forest, while Burseraceae, Lecythidaceae, Sapotaceae, Arecaceae and Cecropiaceae were the most important families in the 3 ha of secondary forest. Importance Value Index (IVI) is the sum of relative density, dominance and frequency of a species. Alexa grandiflora (Caesalpiniaceae), Scleronema micranthum (Bombacaceae) and Pourouma guianensis (Cecropiaceae) were the most important species in relation IVI, in the primary forest, while Esclaveilera grandiflora (Lecythidaceae), Protium apiculatum (Burseraceae) and Bertholletia excelsa (Lecythidaceae) were the most important species in the secondary forest. We conclude that species richness was significantly different between the two forests, but that forest structure patterns analysed in this study (DBH, basal area and dry biomass) were similar. This demonstrates that 40 years was sufficient time for the secondary forest to recover the original structure of the primary forest, but not the original species richness. The low species similarity between the two forests indicates that the floristic composition was quite distinct and that the mixture of primary forest and disturbed forest has led to an increase in total species diversity.
publishDate 1999
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 1999
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2020-06-05T17:59:42Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2020-06-05T17:59:42Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/16438
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.1006/bojl.1998.0224
url https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/16438
identifier_str_mv 10.1006/bojl.1998.0224
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Volume 130, Número 2, Pags. 97-110
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional do INPA
instname:Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)
instacron:INPA
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)
instacron_str INPA
institution INPA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional do INPA
collection Repositório Institucional do INPA
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/bitstream/1/16438/1/artigo-inpa.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv e36e2fca1b87e058a36a8de5c334e4a2
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional do INPA - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1809928888628805632