Periphyton-based jaraqui (Semaprochilodus Insignis) culture with two types of substrates at different densities
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional do INPA |
Texto Completo: | https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/15868 |
Resumo: | Influences of two types of substrates, natural (macrophyte, Pistia stratiotes) and artificial (plastic screen) were evaluated at 3 differrent densities (10, 20, 30%) on periphyton development, water quality and growth performance of jaraqui (Semaprochilodus insignis). Fish of average initial weight 1.46-1.69 g and length 4.15-4.26 cm stocked at 1/m2 in 46 m2 masonry tanks were grown for 120 days. The tanks were fertilized with urea, triple superphosphate and wheat bran. The types and densities of substrates tested did not drastically influence water quality. Natural substrate harboured higher periphyton biomass (1.48±0.09 mg/cm2) as well as species diversity (28 genera) than the artificial substrate (0.84±0.12 mg/cm2, 20 genera,). Fish in 10% and 20% artificial substrate and 20% natural substrate treatments showed better mean values of body weight (24.64, 23.86, 29.26 g respectively) on termination of the experiment. Fish survival was the lowest in 30% natural substrate (84.1%) and highest in 10% artificial substrate (94.2%). Higher fish biomass was recorded in 20% natural and 10% artificial substrate treatments (25.05 and 21.71 g/m2), which amounts to a four-month yield of 250 and 217 kg/ha in the two treatments. © Published by Central Fisheries Research Institute (CFRI) Trabzon, Turkey. |
id |
INPA-2_9fc92a7fe9ac85125556d42216909a29 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio:1/15868 |
network_acronym_str |
INPA-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional do INPA |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Tortolero, Simon Alexis RamosCavero, Bruno Adan SagratzkiBrito, Janaína Gomes deSoares, Climéia CorrêaSilva, Joel Lima daAlmeida, Jose Carlos deBarlaya, GangadharPerar, Keshavanath2020-05-19T20:34:01Z2020-05-19T20:34:01Z2016https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/1586810.4194/1303-2712-v16_2_15Influences of two types of substrates, natural (macrophyte, Pistia stratiotes) and artificial (plastic screen) were evaluated at 3 differrent densities (10, 20, 30%) on periphyton development, water quality and growth performance of jaraqui (Semaprochilodus insignis). Fish of average initial weight 1.46-1.69 g and length 4.15-4.26 cm stocked at 1/m2 in 46 m2 masonry tanks were grown for 120 days. The tanks were fertilized with urea, triple superphosphate and wheat bran. The types and densities of substrates tested did not drastically influence water quality. Natural substrate harboured higher periphyton biomass (1.48±0.09 mg/cm2) as well as species diversity (28 genera) than the artificial substrate (0.84±0.12 mg/cm2, 20 genera,). Fish in 10% and 20% artificial substrate and 20% natural substrate treatments showed better mean values of body weight (24.64, 23.86, 29.26 g respectively) on termination of the experiment. Fish survival was the lowest in 30% natural substrate (84.1%) and highest in 10% artificial substrate (94.2%). Higher fish biomass was recorded in 20% natural and 10% artificial substrate treatments (25.05 and 21.71 g/m2), which amounts to a four-month yield of 250 and 217 kg/ha in the two treatments. © Published by Central Fisheries Research Institute (CFRI) Trabzon, Turkey.Volume 16, Número 2, Pags. 347-359Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPeriphyton-based jaraqui (Semaprochilodus Insignis) culture with two types of substrates at different densitiesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleTurkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciencesengreponame:Repositório Institucional do INPAinstname:Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)instacron:INPAORIGINALartigo-inpa.pdfartigo-inpa.pdfapplication/pdf672653https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/bitstream/1/15868/1/artigo-inpa.pdfe12dce2a7ae409d445d4aaffac715595MD511/158682020-05-19 16:54:16.216oai:repositorio:1/15868Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/oai/requestopendoar:2020-05-19T20:54:16Repositório Institucional do INPA - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)false |
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv |
Periphyton-based jaraqui (Semaprochilodus Insignis) culture with two types of substrates at different densities |
title |
Periphyton-based jaraqui (Semaprochilodus Insignis) culture with two types of substrates at different densities |
spellingShingle |
Periphyton-based jaraqui (Semaprochilodus Insignis) culture with two types of substrates at different densities Tortolero, Simon Alexis Ramos |
title_short |
Periphyton-based jaraqui (Semaprochilodus Insignis) culture with two types of substrates at different densities |
title_full |
Periphyton-based jaraqui (Semaprochilodus Insignis) culture with two types of substrates at different densities |
title_fullStr |
Periphyton-based jaraqui (Semaprochilodus Insignis) culture with two types of substrates at different densities |
title_full_unstemmed |
Periphyton-based jaraqui (Semaprochilodus Insignis) culture with two types of substrates at different densities |
title_sort |
Periphyton-based jaraqui (Semaprochilodus Insignis) culture with two types of substrates at different densities |
author |
Tortolero, Simon Alexis Ramos |
author_facet |
Tortolero, Simon Alexis Ramos Cavero, Bruno Adan Sagratzki Brito, Janaína Gomes de Soares, Climéia Corrêa Silva, Joel Lima da Almeida, Jose Carlos de Barlaya, Gangadhar Perar, Keshavanath |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cavero, Bruno Adan Sagratzki Brito, Janaína Gomes de Soares, Climéia Corrêa Silva, Joel Lima da Almeida, Jose Carlos de Barlaya, Gangadhar Perar, Keshavanath |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Tortolero, Simon Alexis Ramos Cavero, Bruno Adan Sagratzki Brito, Janaína Gomes de Soares, Climéia Corrêa Silva, Joel Lima da Almeida, Jose Carlos de Barlaya, Gangadhar Perar, Keshavanath |
description |
Influences of two types of substrates, natural (macrophyte, Pistia stratiotes) and artificial (plastic screen) were evaluated at 3 differrent densities (10, 20, 30%) on periphyton development, water quality and growth performance of jaraqui (Semaprochilodus insignis). Fish of average initial weight 1.46-1.69 g and length 4.15-4.26 cm stocked at 1/m2 in 46 m2 masonry tanks were grown for 120 days. The tanks were fertilized with urea, triple superphosphate and wheat bran. The types and densities of substrates tested did not drastically influence water quality. Natural substrate harboured higher periphyton biomass (1.48±0.09 mg/cm2) as well as species diversity (28 genera) than the artificial substrate (0.84±0.12 mg/cm2, 20 genera,). Fish in 10% and 20% artificial substrate and 20% natural substrate treatments showed better mean values of body weight (24.64, 23.86, 29.26 g respectively) on termination of the experiment. Fish survival was the lowest in 30% natural substrate (84.1%) and highest in 10% artificial substrate (94.2%). Higher fish biomass was recorded in 20% natural and 10% artificial substrate treatments (25.05 and 21.71 g/m2), which amounts to a four-month yield of 250 and 217 kg/ha in the two treatments. © Published by Central Fisheries Research Institute (CFRI) Trabzon, Turkey. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2016 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-19T20:34:01Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-19T20:34:01Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/15868 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.4194/1303-2712-v16_2_15 |
url |
https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/15868 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4194/1303-2712-v16_2_15 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Volume 16, Número 2, Pags. 347-359 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional do INPA instname:Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA) instacron:INPA |
instname_str |
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA) |
instacron_str |
INPA |
institution |
INPA |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional do INPA |
collection |
Repositório Institucional do INPA |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/bitstream/1/15868/1/artigo-inpa.pdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
e12dce2a7ae409d445d4aaffac715595 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional do INPA - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1809928855268360192 |