Periphyton-based jaraqui (Semaprochilodus Insignis) culture with two types of substrates at different densities

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Tortolero, Simon Alexis Ramos
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Cavero, Bruno Adan Sagratzki, Brito, Janaína Gomes de, Soares, Climéia Corrêa, Silva, Joel Lima da, Almeida, Jose Carlos de, Barlaya, Gangadhar, Perar, Keshavanath
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional do INPA
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/15868
Resumo: Influences of two types of substrates, natural (macrophyte, Pistia stratiotes) and artificial (plastic screen) were evaluated at 3 differrent densities (10, 20, 30%) on periphyton development, water quality and growth performance of jaraqui (Semaprochilodus insignis). Fish of average initial weight 1.46-1.69 g and length 4.15-4.26 cm stocked at 1/m2 in 46 m2 masonry tanks were grown for 120 days. The tanks were fertilized with urea, triple superphosphate and wheat bran. The types and densities of substrates tested did not drastically influence water quality. Natural substrate harboured higher periphyton biomass (1.48±0.09 mg/cm2) as well as species diversity (28 genera) than the artificial substrate (0.84±0.12 mg/cm2, 20 genera,). Fish in 10% and 20% artificial substrate and 20% natural substrate treatments showed better mean values of body weight (24.64, 23.86, 29.26 g respectively) on termination of the experiment. Fish survival was the lowest in 30% natural substrate (84.1%) and highest in 10% artificial substrate (94.2%). Higher fish biomass was recorded in 20% natural and 10% artificial substrate treatments (25.05 and 21.71 g/m2), which amounts to a four-month yield of 250 and 217 kg/ha in the two treatments. © Published by Central Fisheries Research Institute (CFRI) Trabzon, Turkey.
id INPA-2_9fc92a7fe9ac85125556d42216909a29
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio:1/15868
network_acronym_str INPA-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional do INPA
repository_id_str
spelling Tortolero, Simon Alexis RamosCavero, Bruno Adan SagratzkiBrito, Janaína Gomes deSoares, Climéia CorrêaSilva, Joel Lima daAlmeida, Jose Carlos deBarlaya, GangadharPerar, Keshavanath2020-05-19T20:34:01Z2020-05-19T20:34:01Z2016https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/1586810.4194/1303-2712-v16_2_15Influences of two types of substrates, natural (macrophyte, Pistia stratiotes) and artificial (plastic screen) were evaluated at 3 differrent densities (10, 20, 30%) on periphyton development, water quality and growth performance of jaraqui (Semaprochilodus insignis). Fish of average initial weight 1.46-1.69 g and length 4.15-4.26 cm stocked at 1/m2 in 46 m2 masonry tanks were grown for 120 days. The tanks were fertilized with urea, triple superphosphate and wheat bran. The types and densities of substrates tested did not drastically influence water quality. Natural substrate harboured higher periphyton biomass (1.48±0.09 mg/cm2) as well as species diversity (28 genera) than the artificial substrate (0.84±0.12 mg/cm2, 20 genera,). Fish in 10% and 20% artificial substrate and 20% natural substrate treatments showed better mean values of body weight (24.64, 23.86, 29.26 g respectively) on termination of the experiment. Fish survival was the lowest in 30% natural substrate (84.1%) and highest in 10% artificial substrate (94.2%). Higher fish biomass was recorded in 20% natural and 10% artificial substrate treatments (25.05 and 21.71 g/m2), which amounts to a four-month yield of 250 and 217 kg/ha in the two treatments. © Published by Central Fisheries Research Institute (CFRI) Trabzon, Turkey.Volume 16, Número 2, Pags. 347-359Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPeriphyton-based jaraqui (Semaprochilodus Insignis) culture with two types of substrates at different densitiesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleTurkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciencesengreponame:Repositório Institucional do INPAinstname:Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)instacron:INPAORIGINALartigo-inpa.pdfartigo-inpa.pdfapplication/pdf672653https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/bitstream/1/15868/1/artigo-inpa.pdfe12dce2a7ae409d445d4aaffac715595MD511/158682020-05-19 16:54:16.216oai:repositorio:1/15868Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/oai/requestopendoar:2020-05-19T20:54:16Repositório Institucional do INPA - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)false
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv Periphyton-based jaraqui (Semaprochilodus Insignis) culture with two types of substrates at different densities
title Periphyton-based jaraqui (Semaprochilodus Insignis) culture with two types of substrates at different densities
spellingShingle Periphyton-based jaraqui (Semaprochilodus Insignis) culture with two types of substrates at different densities
Tortolero, Simon Alexis Ramos
title_short Periphyton-based jaraqui (Semaprochilodus Insignis) culture with two types of substrates at different densities
title_full Periphyton-based jaraqui (Semaprochilodus Insignis) culture with two types of substrates at different densities
title_fullStr Periphyton-based jaraqui (Semaprochilodus Insignis) culture with two types of substrates at different densities
title_full_unstemmed Periphyton-based jaraqui (Semaprochilodus Insignis) culture with two types of substrates at different densities
title_sort Periphyton-based jaraqui (Semaprochilodus Insignis) culture with two types of substrates at different densities
author Tortolero, Simon Alexis Ramos
author_facet Tortolero, Simon Alexis Ramos
Cavero, Bruno Adan Sagratzki
Brito, Janaína Gomes de
Soares, Climéia Corrêa
Silva, Joel Lima da
Almeida, Jose Carlos de
Barlaya, Gangadhar
Perar, Keshavanath
author_role author
author2 Cavero, Bruno Adan Sagratzki
Brito, Janaína Gomes de
Soares, Climéia Corrêa
Silva, Joel Lima da
Almeida, Jose Carlos de
Barlaya, Gangadhar
Perar, Keshavanath
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Tortolero, Simon Alexis Ramos
Cavero, Bruno Adan Sagratzki
Brito, Janaína Gomes de
Soares, Climéia Corrêa
Silva, Joel Lima da
Almeida, Jose Carlos de
Barlaya, Gangadhar
Perar, Keshavanath
description Influences of two types of substrates, natural (macrophyte, Pistia stratiotes) and artificial (plastic screen) were evaluated at 3 differrent densities (10, 20, 30%) on periphyton development, water quality and growth performance of jaraqui (Semaprochilodus insignis). Fish of average initial weight 1.46-1.69 g and length 4.15-4.26 cm stocked at 1/m2 in 46 m2 masonry tanks were grown for 120 days. The tanks were fertilized with urea, triple superphosphate and wheat bran. The types and densities of substrates tested did not drastically influence water quality. Natural substrate harboured higher periphyton biomass (1.48±0.09 mg/cm2) as well as species diversity (28 genera) than the artificial substrate (0.84±0.12 mg/cm2, 20 genera,). Fish in 10% and 20% artificial substrate and 20% natural substrate treatments showed better mean values of body weight (24.64, 23.86, 29.26 g respectively) on termination of the experiment. Fish survival was the lowest in 30% natural substrate (84.1%) and highest in 10% artificial substrate (94.2%). Higher fish biomass was recorded in 20% natural and 10% artificial substrate treatments (25.05 and 21.71 g/m2), which amounts to a four-month yield of 250 and 217 kg/ha in the two treatments. © Published by Central Fisheries Research Institute (CFRI) Trabzon, Turkey.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2016
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2020-05-19T20:34:01Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2020-05-19T20:34:01Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/15868
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.4194/1303-2712-v16_2_15
url https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/15868
identifier_str_mv 10.4194/1303-2712-v16_2_15
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Volume 16, Número 2, Pags. 347-359
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional do INPA
instname:Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)
instacron:INPA
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)
instacron_str INPA
institution INPA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional do INPA
collection Repositório Institucional do INPA
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/bitstream/1/15868/1/artigo-inpa.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv e12dce2a7ae409d445d4aaffac715595
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional do INPA - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1809928855268360192