Habitat amount hypothesis and passive sampling explain mammal species composition in Amazonian river islands

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rabelo, Rafael M.
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Aragón, Susan, Bicca-Marques, Júlio César, Nelson, Bruce Walker
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional do INPA
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/13030
Resumo: Nested structures of species assemblages have been frequently associated with patch size and isolation, leading to the conclusion that colonization–extinction dynamics drives nestedness. The ‘passive sampling’ model states that the regional abundance of species randomly determines their occurrence in patches. The ‘habitat amount hypothesis’ also challenges patch size and isolation effects, arguing that they occur because of a ‘sample area effect’. Here, we (a) ask whether the structure of the mammal assemblages of fluvial islands shows a nested pattern, (b) test whether species’ regional abundance predicts species’ occurrence on islands, and (c) ask whether habitat amount in the landscape and matrix resistance to biological flow predict the islands’ species composition. We quantified nestedness and tested its significance using null models. We used a regression model to analyze whether a species’ relative regional abundance predicts its incidence on islands. We accessed islands’ species composition by an NMDS ordination and used multiple regression to evaluate how species composition responds to habitat amount and matrix resistance. The degree of nestedness did not differ from that expected by the passive sampling hypothesis. Likewise, species’ regional abundance predicted its occurrence on islands. Habitat amount successfully predicted the species composition on islands, whereas matrix resistance did not. We suggest the application of habitat amount hypothesis for predicting species composition in other patchy systems. Although the island biogeography perspective has dominated the literature, we suggest that the passive sampling perspective is more appropriate for explaining the assemblages’ structure in this and other non-equilibrium patch systems. Abstract in Portuguese is available with online material. © 2019 The Association for Tropical Biology and Conservation
id INPA-2_b5e292b7aa4f8fd50149df357af22261
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio:1/13030
network_acronym_str INPA-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional do INPA
repository_id_str
spelling Rabelo, Rafael M.Aragón, SusanBicca-Marques, Júlio CésarNelson, Bruce Walker2020-04-21T17:03:14Z2020-04-21T17:03:14Z2019https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/1303010.1111/btp.12615Nested structures of species assemblages have been frequently associated with patch size and isolation, leading to the conclusion that colonization–extinction dynamics drives nestedness. The ‘passive sampling’ model states that the regional abundance of species randomly determines their occurrence in patches. The ‘habitat amount hypothesis’ also challenges patch size and isolation effects, arguing that they occur because of a ‘sample area effect’. Here, we (a) ask whether the structure of the mammal assemblages of fluvial islands shows a nested pattern, (b) test whether species’ regional abundance predicts species’ occurrence on islands, and (c) ask whether habitat amount in the landscape and matrix resistance to biological flow predict the islands’ species composition. We quantified nestedness and tested its significance using null models. We used a regression model to analyze whether a species’ relative regional abundance predicts its incidence on islands. We accessed islands’ species composition by an NMDS ordination and used multiple regression to evaluate how species composition responds to habitat amount and matrix resistance. The degree of nestedness did not differ from that expected by the passive sampling hypothesis. Likewise, species’ regional abundance predicted its occurrence on islands. Habitat amount successfully predicted the species composition on islands, whereas matrix resistance did not. We suggest the application of habitat amount hypothesis for predicting species composition in other patchy systems. Although the island biogeography perspective has dominated the literature, we suggest that the passive sampling perspective is more appropriate for explaining the assemblages’ structure in this and other non-equilibrium patch systems. Abstract in Portuguese is available with online material. © 2019 The Association for Tropical Biology and ConservationVolume 51, Número 1, Pags. 84-92Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessColonizationCommunity CompositionCommunity StructureEquilibriumHabitat AvailabilityHypothesis TestingIsland BiogeographyLandscape EcologyMammalNest StructureNestednessPatch DynamicsPatch SizeSamplingSpecies OccurrenceAmazoniaMammaliaHabitat amount hypothesis and passive sampling explain mammal species composition in Amazonian river islandsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleBiotropicaengreponame:Repositório Institucional do INPAinstname:Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)instacron:INPAORIGINALartigo-inpa.pdfartigo-inpa.pdfapplication/pdf873447https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/bitstream/1/13030/1/artigo-inpa.pdf949d0c3cb0af8e8b927cd49152fb876cMD511/130302020-07-14 09:06:32.365oai:repositorio:1/13030Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/oai/requestopendoar:2020-07-14T13:06:32Repositório Institucional do INPA - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)false
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv Habitat amount hypothesis and passive sampling explain mammal species composition in Amazonian river islands
title Habitat amount hypothesis and passive sampling explain mammal species composition in Amazonian river islands
spellingShingle Habitat amount hypothesis and passive sampling explain mammal species composition in Amazonian river islands
Rabelo, Rafael M.
Colonization
Community Composition
Community Structure
Equilibrium
Habitat Availability
Hypothesis Testing
Island Biogeography
Landscape Ecology
Mammal
Nest Structure
Nestedness
Patch Dynamics
Patch Size
Sampling
Species Occurrence
Amazonia
Mammalia
title_short Habitat amount hypothesis and passive sampling explain mammal species composition in Amazonian river islands
title_full Habitat amount hypothesis and passive sampling explain mammal species composition in Amazonian river islands
title_fullStr Habitat amount hypothesis and passive sampling explain mammal species composition in Amazonian river islands
title_full_unstemmed Habitat amount hypothesis and passive sampling explain mammal species composition in Amazonian river islands
title_sort Habitat amount hypothesis and passive sampling explain mammal species composition in Amazonian river islands
author Rabelo, Rafael M.
author_facet Rabelo, Rafael M.
Aragón, Susan
Bicca-Marques, Júlio César
Nelson, Bruce Walker
author_role author
author2 Aragón, Susan
Bicca-Marques, Júlio César
Nelson, Bruce Walker
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rabelo, Rafael M.
Aragón, Susan
Bicca-Marques, Júlio César
Nelson, Bruce Walker
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Colonization
Community Composition
Community Structure
Equilibrium
Habitat Availability
Hypothesis Testing
Island Biogeography
Landscape Ecology
Mammal
Nest Structure
Nestedness
Patch Dynamics
Patch Size
Sampling
Species Occurrence
Amazonia
Mammalia
topic Colonization
Community Composition
Community Structure
Equilibrium
Habitat Availability
Hypothesis Testing
Island Biogeography
Landscape Ecology
Mammal
Nest Structure
Nestedness
Patch Dynamics
Patch Size
Sampling
Species Occurrence
Amazonia
Mammalia
description Nested structures of species assemblages have been frequently associated with patch size and isolation, leading to the conclusion that colonization–extinction dynamics drives nestedness. The ‘passive sampling’ model states that the regional abundance of species randomly determines their occurrence in patches. The ‘habitat amount hypothesis’ also challenges patch size and isolation effects, arguing that they occur because of a ‘sample area effect’. Here, we (a) ask whether the structure of the mammal assemblages of fluvial islands shows a nested pattern, (b) test whether species’ regional abundance predicts species’ occurrence on islands, and (c) ask whether habitat amount in the landscape and matrix resistance to biological flow predict the islands’ species composition. We quantified nestedness and tested its significance using null models. We used a regression model to analyze whether a species’ relative regional abundance predicts its incidence on islands. We accessed islands’ species composition by an NMDS ordination and used multiple regression to evaluate how species composition responds to habitat amount and matrix resistance. The degree of nestedness did not differ from that expected by the passive sampling hypothesis. Likewise, species’ regional abundance predicted its occurrence on islands. Habitat amount successfully predicted the species composition on islands, whereas matrix resistance did not. We suggest the application of habitat amount hypothesis for predicting species composition in other patchy systems. Although the island biogeography perspective has dominated the literature, we suggest that the passive sampling perspective is more appropriate for explaining the assemblages’ structure in this and other non-equilibrium patch systems. Abstract in Portuguese is available with online material. © 2019 The Association for Tropical Biology and Conservation
publishDate 2019
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2019
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2020-04-21T17:03:14Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2020-04-21T17:03:14Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/13030
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.1111/btp.12615
url https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/13030
identifier_str_mv 10.1111/btp.12615
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Volume 51, Número 1, Pags. 84-92
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Biotropica
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Biotropica
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional do INPA
instname:Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)
instacron:INPA
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)
instacron_str INPA
institution INPA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional do INPA
collection Repositório Institucional do INPA
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/bitstream/1/13030/1/artigo-inpa.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 949d0c3cb0af8e8b927cd49152fb876c
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional do INPA - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1797064416136527872