Origin and dispersal of domesticated peach palm

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Clement, Charles Roland
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Cristo-Araújo, Michelly de, D'Eeckenbrugge, Geo Coppens, dos Reis, Vanessa Maciel, Lehnebach, Romain, Picanço-Rodrigues, Doriane
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional do INPA
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/15701
Resumo: Peach palm (Bactris gasipaes Kunth) is a Neotropical palm domesticated by Native Americans. Its domestication resulted in a set of landraces (var. gasipaes), some with very starchy fruit used for fermentation, others with an equilibrium of starch and oil used as snacks. Which of the three wild types (var. chichagui) was involved and where the domestication process began are unclear, with three hypotheses under discussion: an origin in southwestern Amazonia; or in northwestern South America; or multiple origins. We reevaluate one of the wild types, defining it as the incipient domesticate, and then evaluate these hypotheses using the Brazilian peach palm Core Collection and selected herbaria samples to: (1) model the potential distributions of wild and domesticated populations; (2) identify the probable origin of domestication with a phylogeographic analysis of chloroplast DNA sequences; and (3) determine the dispersal routes after domestication using spatial analysis of genetic diversity based on 17 nuclear microsatellite loci. The two very small-fruited wild types have distinct distributions in the northern Andes region and across southern Amazonia, both under moderately humid climates, while the incipient domesticate, partly sympatric with the southern wild type, is also found along the Equatorial Andes, in a more humid climatic envelope, more similar to that of the domesticated landraces. Two distribution models for Last Glacial Maximum conditions (CCSM4, MIROC) also suggest distinct distributions for the two wild populations. The chloroplast DNA phylogeographic network confirms the area of sympatry of the incipient domesticate and the southern wild type in southwestern Amazonia as the origin of domestication. The spatial patterns of genetic diversity confirm the proposal of two dispersals, one along the Ucayali River, into western Amazonia, northwestern South America and finally Central America; the other along the Madeira River into central and then eastern Amazonia. The first dispersal resulted in very starchy fruit for fermentation, while the second may have been later and resulted in snack fruits. Further explorations of southwestern Amazonia are essential for more precise identification of the earliest events, both with new archeological methods and genetic analyses with larger samples. © 2017 Clement, Cristo-Araújo, Coppens d'Eeckenbrugge, Reis, Lehnebach and Picanço-Rodrigues.
id INPA-2_c3a0ff629bde0d11678fbe1fbee0060e
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio:1/15701
network_acronym_str INPA-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional do INPA
repository_id_str
spelling Clement, Charles RolandCristo-Araújo, Michelly deD'Eeckenbrugge, Geo Coppensdos Reis, Vanessa MacielLehnebach, RomainPicanço-Rodrigues, Doriane2020-05-18T14:33:56Z2020-05-18T14:33:56Z2017https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/1570110.3389/fevo.2017.00148Peach palm (Bactris gasipaes Kunth) is a Neotropical palm domesticated by Native Americans. Its domestication resulted in a set of landraces (var. gasipaes), some with very starchy fruit used for fermentation, others with an equilibrium of starch and oil used as snacks. Which of the three wild types (var. chichagui) was involved and where the domestication process began are unclear, with three hypotheses under discussion: an origin in southwestern Amazonia; or in northwestern South America; or multiple origins. We reevaluate one of the wild types, defining it as the incipient domesticate, and then evaluate these hypotheses using the Brazilian peach palm Core Collection and selected herbaria samples to: (1) model the potential distributions of wild and domesticated populations; (2) identify the probable origin of domestication with a phylogeographic analysis of chloroplast DNA sequences; and (3) determine the dispersal routes after domestication using spatial analysis of genetic diversity based on 17 nuclear microsatellite loci. The two very small-fruited wild types have distinct distributions in the northern Andes region and across southern Amazonia, both under moderately humid climates, while the incipient domesticate, partly sympatric with the southern wild type, is also found along the Equatorial Andes, in a more humid climatic envelope, more similar to that of the domesticated landraces. Two distribution models for Last Glacial Maximum conditions (CCSM4, MIROC) also suggest distinct distributions for the two wild populations. The chloroplast DNA phylogeographic network confirms the area of sympatry of the incipient domesticate and the southern wild type in southwestern Amazonia as the origin of domestication. The spatial patterns of genetic diversity confirm the proposal of two dispersals, one along the Ucayali River, into western Amazonia, northwestern South America and finally Central America; the other along the Madeira River into central and then eastern Amazonia. The first dispersal resulted in very starchy fruit for fermentation, while the second may have been later and resulted in snack fruits. Further explorations of southwestern Amazonia are essential for more precise identification of the earliest events, both with new archeological methods and genetic analyses with larger samples. © 2017 Clement, Cristo-Araújo, Coppens d'Eeckenbrugge, Reis, Lehnebach and Picanço-Rodrigues.Volume 5, Número NOVAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOrigin and dispersal of domesticated peach palminfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleFrontiers in Ecology and Evolutionengreponame:Repositório Institucional do INPAinstname:Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)instacron:INPAORIGINALartigo-inpa.pdfartigo-inpa.pdfapplication/pdf4930261https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/bitstream/1/15701/1/artigo-inpa.pdf2141f17ec66fc60aa3ad266635c732a9MD511/157012020-05-18 10:45:52.812oai:repositorio:1/15701Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/oai/requestopendoar:2020-05-18T14:45:52Repositório Institucional do INPA - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)false
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv Origin and dispersal of domesticated peach palm
title Origin and dispersal of domesticated peach palm
spellingShingle Origin and dispersal of domesticated peach palm
Clement, Charles Roland
title_short Origin and dispersal of domesticated peach palm
title_full Origin and dispersal of domesticated peach palm
title_fullStr Origin and dispersal of domesticated peach palm
title_full_unstemmed Origin and dispersal of domesticated peach palm
title_sort Origin and dispersal of domesticated peach palm
author Clement, Charles Roland
author_facet Clement, Charles Roland
Cristo-Araújo, Michelly de
D'Eeckenbrugge, Geo Coppens
dos Reis, Vanessa Maciel
Lehnebach, Romain
Picanço-Rodrigues, Doriane
author_role author
author2 Cristo-Araújo, Michelly de
D'Eeckenbrugge, Geo Coppens
dos Reis, Vanessa Maciel
Lehnebach, Romain
Picanço-Rodrigues, Doriane
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Clement, Charles Roland
Cristo-Araújo, Michelly de
D'Eeckenbrugge, Geo Coppens
dos Reis, Vanessa Maciel
Lehnebach, Romain
Picanço-Rodrigues, Doriane
description Peach palm (Bactris gasipaes Kunth) is a Neotropical palm domesticated by Native Americans. Its domestication resulted in a set of landraces (var. gasipaes), some with very starchy fruit used for fermentation, others with an equilibrium of starch and oil used as snacks. Which of the three wild types (var. chichagui) was involved and where the domestication process began are unclear, with three hypotheses under discussion: an origin in southwestern Amazonia; or in northwestern South America; or multiple origins. We reevaluate one of the wild types, defining it as the incipient domesticate, and then evaluate these hypotheses using the Brazilian peach palm Core Collection and selected herbaria samples to: (1) model the potential distributions of wild and domesticated populations; (2) identify the probable origin of domestication with a phylogeographic analysis of chloroplast DNA sequences; and (3) determine the dispersal routes after domestication using spatial analysis of genetic diversity based on 17 nuclear microsatellite loci. The two very small-fruited wild types have distinct distributions in the northern Andes region and across southern Amazonia, both under moderately humid climates, while the incipient domesticate, partly sympatric with the southern wild type, is also found along the Equatorial Andes, in a more humid climatic envelope, more similar to that of the domesticated landraces. Two distribution models for Last Glacial Maximum conditions (CCSM4, MIROC) also suggest distinct distributions for the two wild populations. The chloroplast DNA phylogeographic network confirms the area of sympatry of the incipient domesticate and the southern wild type in southwestern Amazonia as the origin of domestication. The spatial patterns of genetic diversity confirm the proposal of two dispersals, one along the Ucayali River, into western Amazonia, northwestern South America and finally Central America; the other along the Madeira River into central and then eastern Amazonia. The first dispersal resulted in very starchy fruit for fermentation, while the second may have been later and resulted in snack fruits. Further explorations of southwestern Amazonia are essential for more precise identification of the earliest events, both with new archeological methods and genetic analyses with larger samples. © 2017 Clement, Cristo-Araújo, Coppens d'Eeckenbrugge, Reis, Lehnebach and Picanço-Rodrigues.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2017
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2020-05-18T14:33:56Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2020-05-18T14:33:56Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/15701
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.3389/fevo.2017.00148
url https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/15701
identifier_str_mv 10.3389/fevo.2017.00148
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Volume 5, Número NOV
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional do INPA
instname:Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)
instacron:INPA
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)
instacron_str INPA
institution INPA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional do INPA
collection Repositório Institucional do INPA
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/bitstream/1/15701/1/artigo-inpa.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 2141f17ec66fc60aa3ad266635c732a9
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional do INPA - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1809928895319769088