Standardized Assessment of Biodiversity Trends in Tropical Forest Protected Areas: The End Is Not in Sight

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Beaudrot, Lydia H.
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Ahumada, Jorge A., O’Brien, Timothy L., Álvarez-Loayza, Patricia, Boekee, Kelly, Campos-Arceiz, Ahimsa, Eichberg, David, Espinosa, Santiago, Fegraus, Eric H., Fletcher, Christine Dawn, Gajapersad, Krisna, Hallam, Chris D., Hurtado, Johanna, Jansen, Patrick A., Kumar, Amit, Eileen, Larney, Lima, Marcela Guimarães Moreira, Mahony, Colin, Martin, Emanuel H., McWilliam, Alex, Mugerwa, Badru, Ndoundou-Hockemba, Mireille, Razafimahaimodison, Jean Claude A., Romero-Saltos, Hugo, Rovero, F., Salvador, Julia, Santos, Fernanda da Silva, Sheil, Douglas, Spironello, Wilson Roberto, Willig, Michael R., Winarni, Nurul Laksmi, Zvoleff, Alexander, Andelman, Sandy J.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional do INPA
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/15841
Resumo: Extinction rates in the Anthropocene are three orders of magnitude higher than background and disproportionately occur in the tropics, home of half the world’s species. Despite global efforts to combat tropical species extinctions, lack of high-quality, objective information on tropical biodiversity has hampered quantitative evaluation of conservation strategies. In particular, the scarcity of population-level monitoring in tropical forests has stymied assessment of biodiversity outcomes, such as the status and trends of animal populations in protected areas. Here, we evaluate occupancy trends for 511 populations of terrestrial mammals and birds, representing 244 species from 15 tropical forest protected areas on three continents. For the first time to our knowledge, we use annual surveys from tropical forests worldwide that employ a standardized camera trapping protocol, and we compute data analytics that correct for imperfect detection. We found that occupancy declined in 22%, increased in 17%, and exhibited no change in 22% of populations during the last 3–8 years, while 39% of populations were detected too infrequently to assess occupancy changes. Despite extensive variability in occupancy trends, these 15 tropical protected areas have not exhibited systematic declines in biodiversity (i.e., occupancy, richness, or evenness) at the community level. Our results differ from reports of widespread biodiversity declines based on aggregated secondary data and expert opinion and suggest less extreme deterioration in tropical forest protected areas. We simultaneously fill an important conservation data gap and demonstrate the value of large-scale monitoring infrastructure and powerful analytics, which can be scaled to incorporate additional sites, ecosystems, and monitoring methods. In an era of catastrophic biodiversity loss, robust indicators produced from standardized monitoring infrastructure are critical to accurately assess population outcomes and identify conservation strategies that can avert biodiversity collapse. © 2016 Beaudrot et al.
id INPA-2_c94907a08208475121a93ab4cda2cbd9
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio:1/15841
network_acronym_str INPA-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional do INPA
repository_id_str
spelling Beaudrot, Lydia H.Ahumada, Jorge A.O’Brien, Timothy L.Álvarez-Loayza, PatriciaBoekee, KellyCampos-Arceiz, AhimsaEichberg, DavidEspinosa, SantiagoFegraus, Eric H.Fletcher, Christine DawnGajapersad, KrisnaHallam, Chris D.Hurtado, JohannaJansen, Patrick A.Kumar, AmitEileen, Larney,Lima, Marcela Guimarães MoreiraMahony, ColinMartin, Emanuel H.McWilliam, AlexMugerwa, BadruNdoundou-Hockemba, MireilleRazafimahaimodison, Jean Claude A.Romero-Saltos, HugoRovero, F.Salvador, JuliaSantos, Fernanda da SilvaSheil, DouglasSpironello, Wilson RobertoWillig, Michael R.Winarni, Nurul LaksmiZvoleff, AlexanderAndelman, Sandy J.2020-05-19T14:25:49Z2020-05-19T14:25:49Z2016https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/1584110.1371/journal.pbio.1002357Extinction rates in the Anthropocene are three orders of magnitude higher than background and disproportionately occur in the tropics, home of half the world’s species. Despite global efforts to combat tropical species extinctions, lack of high-quality, objective information on tropical biodiversity has hampered quantitative evaluation of conservation strategies. In particular, the scarcity of population-level monitoring in tropical forests has stymied assessment of biodiversity outcomes, such as the status and trends of animal populations in protected areas. Here, we evaluate occupancy trends for 511 populations of terrestrial mammals and birds, representing 244 species from 15 tropical forest protected areas on three continents. For the first time to our knowledge, we use annual surveys from tropical forests worldwide that employ a standardized camera trapping protocol, and we compute data analytics that correct for imperfect detection. We found that occupancy declined in 22%, increased in 17%, and exhibited no change in 22% of populations during the last 3–8 years, while 39% of populations were detected too infrequently to assess occupancy changes. Despite extensive variability in occupancy trends, these 15 tropical protected areas have not exhibited systematic declines in biodiversity (i.e., occupancy, richness, or evenness) at the community level. Our results differ from reports of widespread biodiversity declines based on aggregated secondary data and expert opinion and suggest less extreme deterioration in tropical forest protected areas. We simultaneously fill an important conservation data gap and demonstrate the value of large-scale monitoring infrastructure and powerful analytics, which can be scaled to incorporate additional sites, ecosystems, and monitoring methods. In an era of catastrophic biodiversity loss, robust indicators produced from standardized monitoring infrastructure are critical to accurately assess population outcomes and identify conservation strategies that can avert biodiversity collapse. © 2016 Beaudrot et al.Volume 14, Número 1Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAfricaBiodiversityBirdCommunity StructureControlled StudyEnvironmental MonitoringEnvironmental ProtectionMammalNeotropicsNonhumanOutcome AssessmentQuantitative AnalysisSoutheast AsiaSpecies DiversitySpecies EvennessSpecies OccupancySpecies RichnessStandardizationTrend StudyTropical Rain ForestAnimalsBirdEcologyForestMammalProceduresTropic ClimateAnimalBiodiversityBirdsConservation Of Natural ResourcesEcologyForestsMammalsTropical ClimateStandardized Assessment of Biodiversity Trends in Tropical Forest Protected Areas: The End Is Not in Sightinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlePLoS Biologyengreponame:Repositório Institucional do INPAinstname:Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)instacron:INPAORIGINALartigo-inpa.pdfartigo-inpa.pdfapplication/pdf1239063https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/bitstream/1/15841/1/artigo-inpa.pdfed173baec826ac34305d005bf81b49b9MD511/158412020-07-14 11:25:58.647oai:repositorio:1/15841Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/oai/requestopendoar:2020-07-14T15:25:58Repositório Institucional do INPA - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)false
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv Standardized Assessment of Biodiversity Trends in Tropical Forest Protected Areas: The End Is Not in Sight
title Standardized Assessment of Biodiversity Trends in Tropical Forest Protected Areas: The End Is Not in Sight
spellingShingle Standardized Assessment of Biodiversity Trends in Tropical Forest Protected Areas: The End Is Not in Sight
Beaudrot, Lydia H.
Africa
Biodiversity
Bird
Community Structure
Controlled Study
Environmental Monitoring
Environmental Protection
Mammal
Neotropics
Nonhuman
Outcome Assessment
Quantitative Analysis
Southeast Asia
Species Diversity
Species Evenness
Species Occupancy
Species Richness
Standardization
Trend Study
Tropical Rain Forest
Animals
Bird
Ecology
Forest
Mammal
Procedures
Tropic Climate
Animal
Biodiversity
Birds
Conservation Of Natural Resources
Ecology
Forests
Mammals
Tropical Climate
title_short Standardized Assessment of Biodiversity Trends in Tropical Forest Protected Areas: The End Is Not in Sight
title_full Standardized Assessment of Biodiversity Trends in Tropical Forest Protected Areas: The End Is Not in Sight
title_fullStr Standardized Assessment of Biodiversity Trends in Tropical Forest Protected Areas: The End Is Not in Sight
title_full_unstemmed Standardized Assessment of Biodiversity Trends in Tropical Forest Protected Areas: The End Is Not in Sight
title_sort Standardized Assessment of Biodiversity Trends in Tropical Forest Protected Areas: The End Is Not in Sight
author Beaudrot, Lydia H.
author_facet Beaudrot, Lydia H.
Ahumada, Jorge A.
O’Brien, Timothy L.
Álvarez-Loayza, Patricia
Boekee, Kelly
Campos-Arceiz, Ahimsa
Eichberg, David
Espinosa, Santiago
Fegraus, Eric H.
Fletcher, Christine Dawn
Gajapersad, Krisna
Hallam, Chris D.
Hurtado, Johanna
Jansen, Patrick A.
Kumar, Amit
Eileen, Larney,
Lima, Marcela Guimarães Moreira
Mahony, Colin
Martin, Emanuel H.
McWilliam, Alex
Mugerwa, Badru
Ndoundou-Hockemba, Mireille
Razafimahaimodison, Jean Claude A.
Romero-Saltos, Hugo
Rovero, F.
Salvador, Julia
Santos, Fernanda da Silva
Sheil, Douglas
Spironello, Wilson Roberto
Willig, Michael R.
Winarni, Nurul Laksmi
Zvoleff, Alexander
Andelman, Sandy J.
author_role author
author2 Ahumada, Jorge A.
O’Brien, Timothy L.
Álvarez-Loayza, Patricia
Boekee, Kelly
Campos-Arceiz, Ahimsa
Eichberg, David
Espinosa, Santiago
Fegraus, Eric H.
Fletcher, Christine Dawn
Gajapersad, Krisna
Hallam, Chris D.
Hurtado, Johanna
Jansen, Patrick A.
Kumar, Amit
Eileen, Larney,
Lima, Marcela Guimarães Moreira
Mahony, Colin
Martin, Emanuel H.
McWilliam, Alex
Mugerwa, Badru
Ndoundou-Hockemba, Mireille
Razafimahaimodison, Jean Claude A.
Romero-Saltos, Hugo
Rovero, F.
Salvador, Julia
Santos, Fernanda da Silva
Sheil, Douglas
Spironello, Wilson Roberto
Willig, Michael R.
Winarni, Nurul Laksmi
Zvoleff, Alexander
Andelman, Sandy J.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Beaudrot, Lydia H.
Ahumada, Jorge A.
O’Brien, Timothy L.
Álvarez-Loayza, Patricia
Boekee, Kelly
Campos-Arceiz, Ahimsa
Eichberg, David
Espinosa, Santiago
Fegraus, Eric H.
Fletcher, Christine Dawn
Gajapersad, Krisna
Hallam, Chris D.
Hurtado, Johanna
Jansen, Patrick A.
Kumar, Amit
Eileen, Larney,
Lima, Marcela Guimarães Moreira
Mahony, Colin
Martin, Emanuel H.
McWilliam, Alex
Mugerwa, Badru
Ndoundou-Hockemba, Mireille
Razafimahaimodison, Jean Claude A.
Romero-Saltos, Hugo
Rovero, F.
Salvador, Julia
Santos, Fernanda da Silva
Sheil, Douglas
Spironello, Wilson Roberto
Willig, Michael R.
Winarni, Nurul Laksmi
Zvoleff, Alexander
Andelman, Sandy J.
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Africa
Biodiversity
Bird
Community Structure
Controlled Study
Environmental Monitoring
Environmental Protection
Mammal
Neotropics
Nonhuman
Outcome Assessment
Quantitative Analysis
Southeast Asia
Species Diversity
Species Evenness
Species Occupancy
Species Richness
Standardization
Trend Study
Tropical Rain Forest
Animals
Bird
Ecology
Forest
Mammal
Procedures
Tropic Climate
Animal
Biodiversity
Birds
Conservation Of Natural Resources
Ecology
Forests
Mammals
Tropical Climate
topic Africa
Biodiversity
Bird
Community Structure
Controlled Study
Environmental Monitoring
Environmental Protection
Mammal
Neotropics
Nonhuman
Outcome Assessment
Quantitative Analysis
Southeast Asia
Species Diversity
Species Evenness
Species Occupancy
Species Richness
Standardization
Trend Study
Tropical Rain Forest
Animals
Bird
Ecology
Forest
Mammal
Procedures
Tropic Climate
Animal
Biodiversity
Birds
Conservation Of Natural Resources
Ecology
Forests
Mammals
Tropical Climate
description Extinction rates in the Anthropocene are three orders of magnitude higher than background and disproportionately occur in the tropics, home of half the world’s species. Despite global efforts to combat tropical species extinctions, lack of high-quality, objective information on tropical biodiversity has hampered quantitative evaluation of conservation strategies. In particular, the scarcity of population-level monitoring in tropical forests has stymied assessment of biodiversity outcomes, such as the status and trends of animal populations in protected areas. Here, we evaluate occupancy trends for 511 populations of terrestrial mammals and birds, representing 244 species from 15 tropical forest protected areas on three continents. For the first time to our knowledge, we use annual surveys from tropical forests worldwide that employ a standardized camera trapping protocol, and we compute data analytics that correct for imperfect detection. We found that occupancy declined in 22%, increased in 17%, and exhibited no change in 22% of populations during the last 3–8 years, while 39% of populations were detected too infrequently to assess occupancy changes. Despite extensive variability in occupancy trends, these 15 tropical protected areas have not exhibited systematic declines in biodiversity (i.e., occupancy, richness, or evenness) at the community level. Our results differ from reports of widespread biodiversity declines based on aggregated secondary data and expert opinion and suggest less extreme deterioration in tropical forest protected areas. We simultaneously fill an important conservation data gap and demonstrate the value of large-scale monitoring infrastructure and powerful analytics, which can be scaled to incorporate additional sites, ecosystems, and monitoring methods. In an era of catastrophic biodiversity loss, robust indicators produced from standardized monitoring infrastructure are critical to accurately assess population outcomes and identify conservation strategies that can avert biodiversity collapse. © 2016 Beaudrot et al.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2016
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2020-05-19T14:25:49Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2020-05-19T14:25:49Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/15841
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002357
url https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/15841
identifier_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002357
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Volume 14, Número 1
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv PLoS Biology
publisher.none.fl_str_mv PLoS Biology
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional do INPA
instname:Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)
instacron:INPA
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)
instacron_str INPA
institution INPA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional do INPA
collection Repositório Institucional do INPA
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/bitstream/1/15841/1/artigo-inpa.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv ed173baec826ac34305d005bf81b49b9
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional do INPA - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1809928857558450176