Land use as a filter for species composition in Amazonian secondary forests

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Jakovac, Catarina Conte
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Bongers, Frans, Kuyper, Thomas W., Mesquita, Rita de Cássia Guimarães, Pena-Claros, Marielos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional do INPA
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/15383
Resumo: Questions: Secondary succession in the tropics can follow alternative pathways. Land-use history is known to engender alternative successional communities, but the underlying mechanisms driving and sustaining divergence remain unclear. In this study we aim to answer the following questions: (1) does previous land use act as a filter for species composition in secondary forests; and (2) what are the relative roles of management practices, soil properties and landscape composition in determining species composition?. Location: Central Amazon, Brazil. Methods: We sampled trees, shrubs and palms (≥1cm diameter) in 38 early secondary forests (5 yr after abandonment) located along gradients of land-use intensity in five shifting cultivation landscapes. We measured the diameter and height of each sampled plant, identified it to species or morpho-species level and checked if it was resprouting or not. At each secondary forest we also collected soil samples for chemical and physical analyses and estimated the amount of old-growth forest surrounding it (landscape composition). Results: We found that previous land-use intensity determined species composition. With increasing land-use intensity, management practices of cut-and-burn and associated reduction in soil quality filtered out seed-dependent species and favoured strong sprouters and species that can cope with low nutrient availability. Landscape composition had a weak effect on species assemblages. We found specific species assemblages and indicator species associated with different levels of previous land-use intensity. As a consequence of these local filters, species α- and β-diversity decreased and therefore early successional communities became more similar to each other. Conclusion: Species composition of successional forests is strongly determined by different land-use intensities. Dispersal limitation has a limited effect on determining the composition of the dominant species. Filtering effects of management practices and soil quality determine the species dominating the canopy at early stages of succession and narrow down the range of species able to colonize and establish. This study highlights how land use shapes successional communities and suggests that alternative successional pathways are determined at early stages of succession. Therefore, accounting for land-use history is crucial to improve the understanding of tropical secondary succession. We present a list of indicator species for different levels of previous land-use intensity that can be used to support conservation and restoration decisions in the Amazon. © 2016 The Authors. Journal of Vegetation Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Internation Association of Vegetation Science
id INPA-2_cb83bdb09e2e49bd12513bf54f4249d9
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio:1/15383
network_acronym_str INPA-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional do INPA
repository_id_str
spelling Jakovac, Catarina ConteBongers, FransKuyper, Thomas W.Mesquita, Rita de Cássia GuimarãesPena-Claros, Marielos2020-05-08T20:36:30Z2020-05-08T20:36:30Z2016https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/1538310.1111/jvs.12457Questions: Secondary succession in the tropics can follow alternative pathways. Land-use history is known to engender alternative successional communities, but the underlying mechanisms driving and sustaining divergence remain unclear. In this study we aim to answer the following questions: (1) does previous land use act as a filter for species composition in secondary forests; and (2) what are the relative roles of management practices, soil properties and landscape composition in determining species composition?. Location: Central Amazon, Brazil. Methods: We sampled trees, shrubs and palms (≥1cm diameter) in 38 early secondary forests (5 yr after abandonment) located along gradients of land-use intensity in five shifting cultivation landscapes. We measured the diameter and height of each sampled plant, identified it to species or morpho-species level and checked if it was resprouting or not. At each secondary forest we also collected soil samples for chemical and physical analyses and estimated the amount of old-growth forest surrounding it (landscape composition). Results: We found that previous land-use intensity determined species composition. With increasing land-use intensity, management practices of cut-and-burn and associated reduction in soil quality filtered out seed-dependent species and favoured strong sprouters and species that can cope with low nutrient availability. Landscape composition had a weak effect on species assemblages. We found specific species assemblages and indicator species associated with different levels of previous land-use intensity. As a consequence of these local filters, species α- and β-diversity decreased and therefore early successional communities became more similar to each other. Conclusion: Species composition of successional forests is strongly determined by different land-use intensities. Dispersal limitation has a limited effect on determining the composition of the dominant species. Filtering effects of management practices and soil quality determine the species dominating the canopy at early stages of succession and narrow down the range of species able to colonize and establish. This study highlights how land use shapes successional communities and suggests that alternative successional pathways are determined at early stages of succession. Therefore, accounting for land-use history is crucial to improve the understanding of tropical secondary succession. We present a list of indicator species for different levels of previous land-use intensity that can be used to support conservation and restoration decisions in the Amazon. © 2016 The Authors. Journal of Vegetation Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Internation Association of Vegetation ScienceVolume 27, Número 6, Pags. 1104-1116Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCommunity CompositionFire HistoryLand UseLandscape EcologyPhosphorusPhysicochemical PropertyResproutingSecondary StructureShifting CultivationShrubSoil PropertySuccessionAmazonasBrasilCecropiaVismiaLand use as a filter for species composition in Amazonian secondary forestsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal of Vegetation Scienceengreponame:Repositório Institucional do INPAinstname:Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)instacron:INPAORIGINALartigo-inpa.pdfartigo-inpa.pdfapplication/pdf617848https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/bitstream/1/15383/1/artigo-inpa.pdfd095b61f6ee3a31f2ae97927b21fa61dMD511/153832020-07-14 11:05:35.409oai:repositorio:1/15383Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/oai/requestopendoar:2020-07-14T15:05:35Repositório Institucional do INPA - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)false
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv Land use as a filter for species composition in Amazonian secondary forests
title Land use as a filter for species composition in Amazonian secondary forests
spellingShingle Land use as a filter for species composition in Amazonian secondary forests
Jakovac, Catarina Conte
Community Composition
Fire History
Land Use
Landscape Ecology
Phosphorus
Physicochemical Property
Resprouting
Secondary Structure
Shifting Cultivation
Shrub
Soil Property
Succession
Amazonas
Brasil
Cecropia
Vismia
title_short Land use as a filter for species composition in Amazonian secondary forests
title_full Land use as a filter for species composition in Amazonian secondary forests
title_fullStr Land use as a filter for species composition in Amazonian secondary forests
title_full_unstemmed Land use as a filter for species composition in Amazonian secondary forests
title_sort Land use as a filter for species composition in Amazonian secondary forests
author Jakovac, Catarina Conte
author_facet Jakovac, Catarina Conte
Bongers, Frans
Kuyper, Thomas W.
Mesquita, Rita de Cássia Guimarães
Pena-Claros, Marielos
author_role author
author2 Bongers, Frans
Kuyper, Thomas W.
Mesquita, Rita de Cássia Guimarães
Pena-Claros, Marielos
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Jakovac, Catarina Conte
Bongers, Frans
Kuyper, Thomas W.
Mesquita, Rita de Cássia Guimarães
Pena-Claros, Marielos
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Community Composition
Fire History
Land Use
Landscape Ecology
Phosphorus
Physicochemical Property
Resprouting
Secondary Structure
Shifting Cultivation
Shrub
Soil Property
Succession
Amazonas
Brasil
Cecropia
Vismia
topic Community Composition
Fire History
Land Use
Landscape Ecology
Phosphorus
Physicochemical Property
Resprouting
Secondary Structure
Shifting Cultivation
Shrub
Soil Property
Succession
Amazonas
Brasil
Cecropia
Vismia
description Questions: Secondary succession in the tropics can follow alternative pathways. Land-use history is known to engender alternative successional communities, but the underlying mechanisms driving and sustaining divergence remain unclear. In this study we aim to answer the following questions: (1) does previous land use act as a filter for species composition in secondary forests; and (2) what are the relative roles of management practices, soil properties and landscape composition in determining species composition?. Location: Central Amazon, Brazil. Methods: We sampled trees, shrubs and palms (≥1cm diameter) in 38 early secondary forests (5 yr after abandonment) located along gradients of land-use intensity in five shifting cultivation landscapes. We measured the diameter and height of each sampled plant, identified it to species or morpho-species level and checked if it was resprouting or not. At each secondary forest we also collected soil samples for chemical and physical analyses and estimated the amount of old-growth forest surrounding it (landscape composition). Results: We found that previous land-use intensity determined species composition. With increasing land-use intensity, management practices of cut-and-burn and associated reduction in soil quality filtered out seed-dependent species and favoured strong sprouters and species that can cope with low nutrient availability. Landscape composition had a weak effect on species assemblages. We found specific species assemblages and indicator species associated with different levels of previous land-use intensity. As a consequence of these local filters, species α- and β-diversity decreased and therefore early successional communities became more similar to each other. Conclusion: Species composition of successional forests is strongly determined by different land-use intensities. Dispersal limitation has a limited effect on determining the composition of the dominant species. Filtering effects of management practices and soil quality determine the species dominating the canopy at early stages of succession and narrow down the range of species able to colonize and establish. This study highlights how land use shapes successional communities and suggests that alternative successional pathways are determined at early stages of succession. Therefore, accounting for land-use history is crucial to improve the understanding of tropical secondary succession. We present a list of indicator species for different levels of previous land-use intensity that can be used to support conservation and restoration decisions in the Amazon. © 2016 The Authors. Journal of Vegetation Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Internation Association of Vegetation Science
publishDate 2016
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2016
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2020-05-08T20:36:30Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2020-05-08T20:36:30Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/15383
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.1111/jvs.12457
url https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/15383
identifier_str_mv 10.1111/jvs.12457
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Volume 27, Número 6, Pags. 1104-1116
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Vegetation Science
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Vegetation Science
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional do INPA
instname:Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)
instacron:INPA
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)
instacron_str INPA
institution INPA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional do INPA
collection Repositório Institucional do INPA
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/bitstream/1/15383/1/artigo-inpa.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv d095b61f6ee3a31f2ae97927b21fa61d
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional do INPA - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1801499134939627520