Land use as a filter for species composition in Amazonian secondary forests
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional do INPA |
Texto Completo: | https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/15383 |
Resumo: | Questions: Secondary succession in the tropics can follow alternative pathways. Land-use history is known to engender alternative successional communities, but the underlying mechanisms driving and sustaining divergence remain unclear. In this study we aim to answer the following questions: (1) does previous land use act as a filter for species composition in secondary forests; and (2) what are the relative roles of management practices, soil properties and landscape composition in determining species composition?. Location: Central Amazon, Brazil. Methods: We sampled trees, shrubs and palms (≥1cm diameter) in 38 early secondary forests (5 yr after abandonment) located along gradients of land-use intensity in five shifting cultivation landscapes. We measured the diameter and height of each sampled plant, identified it to species or morpho-species level and checked if it was resprouting or not. At each secondary forest we also collected soil samples for chemical and physical analyses and estimated the amount of old-growth forest surrounding it (landscape composition). Results: We found that previous land-use intensity determined species composition. With increasing land-use intensity, management practices of cut-and-burn and associated reduction in soil quality filtered out seed-dependent species and favoured strong sprouters and species that can cope with low nutrient availability. Landscape composition had a weak effect on species assemblages. We found specific species assemblages and indicator species associated with different levels of previous land-use intensity. As a consequence of these local filters, species α- and β-diversity decreased and therefore early successional communities became more similar to each other. Conclusion: Species composition of successional forests is strongly determined by different land-use intensities. Dispersal limitation has a limited effect on determining the composition of the dominant species. Filtering effects of management practices and soil quality determine the species dominating the canopy at early stages of succession and narrow down the range of species able to colonize and establish. This study highlights how land use shapes successional communities and suggests that alternative successional pathways are determined at early stages of succession. Therefore, accounting for land-use history is crucial to improve the understanding of tropical secondary succession. We present a list of indicator species for different levels of previous land-use intensity that can be used to support conservation and restoration decisions in the Amazon. © 2016 The Authors. Journal of Vegetation Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Internation Association of Vegetation Science |
id |
INPA-2_cb83bdb09e2e49bd12513bf54f4249d9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio:1/15383 |
network_acronym_str |
INPA-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional do INPA |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Jakovac, Catarina ConteBongers, FransKuyper, Thomas W.Mesquita, Rita de Cássia GuimarãesPena-Claros, Marielos2020-05-08T20:36:30Z2020-05-08T20:36:30Z2016https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/1538310.1111/jvs.12457Questions: Secondary succession in the tropics can follow alternative pathways. Land-use history is known to engender alternative successional communities, but the underlying mechanisms driving and sustaining divergence remain unclear. In this study we aim to answer the following questions: (1) does previous land use act as a filter for species composition in secondary forests; and (2) what are the relative roles of management practices, soil properties and landscape composition in determining species composition?. Location: Central Amazon, Brazil. Methods: We sampled trees, shrubs and palms (≥1cm diameter) in 38 early secondary forests (5 yr after abandonment) located along gradients of land-use intensity in five shifting cultivation landscapes. We measured the diameter and height of each sampled plant, identified it to species or morpho-species level and checked if it was resprouting or not. At each secondary forest we also collected soil samples for chemical and physical analyses and estimated the amount of old-growth forest surrounding it (landscape composition). Results: We found that previous land-use intensity determined species composition. With increasing land-use intensity, management practices of cut-and-burn and associated reduction in soil quality filtered out seed-dependent species and favoured strong sprouters and species that can cope with low nutrient availability. Landscape composition had a weak effect on species assemblages. We found specific species assemblages and indicator species associated with different levels of previous land-use intensity. As a consequence of these local filters, species α- and β-diversity decreased and therefore early successional communities became more similar to each other. Conclusion: Species composition of successional forests is strongly determined by different land-use intensities. Dispersal limitation has a limited effect on determining the composition of the dominant species. Filtering effects of management practices and soil quality determine the species dominating the canopy at early stages of succession and narrow down the range of species able to colonize and establish. This study highlights how land use shapes successional communities and suggests that alternative successional pathways are determined at early stages of succession. Therefore, accounting for land-use history is crucial to improve the understanding of tropical secondary succession. We present a list of indicator species for different levels of previous land-use intensity that can be used to support conservation and restoration decisions in the Amazon. © 2016 The Authors. Journal of Vegetation Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Internation Association of Vegetation ScienceVolume 27, Número 6, Pags. 1104-1116Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCommunity CompositionFire HistoryLand UseLandscape EcologyPhosphorusPhysicochemical PropertyResproutingSecondary StructureShifting CultivationShrubSoil PropertySuccessionAmazonasBrasilCecropiaVismiaLand use as a filter for species composition in Amazonian secondary forestsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal of Vegetation Scienceengreponame:Repositório Institucional do INPAinstname:Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)instacron:INPAORIGINALartigo-inpa.pdfartigo-inpa.pdfapplication/pdf617848https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/bitstream/1/15383/1/artigo-inpa.pdfd095b61f6ee3a31f2ae97927b21fa61dMD511/153832020-07-14 11:05:35.409oai:repositorio:1/15383Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/oai/requestopendoar:2020-07-14T15:05:35Repositório Institucional do INPA - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)false |
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv |
Land use as a filter for species composition in Amazonian secondary forests |
title |
Land use as a filter for species composition in Amazonian secondary forests |
spellingShingle |
Land use as a filter for species composition in Amazonian secondary forests Jakovac, Catarina Conte Community Composition Fire History Land Use Landscape Ecology Phosphorus Physicochemical Property Resprouting Secondary Structure Shifting Cultivation Shrub Soil Property Succession Amazonas Brasil Cecropia Vismia |
title_short |
Land use as a filter for species composition in Amazonian secondary forests |
title_full |
Land use as a filter for species composition in Amazonian secondary forests |
title_fullStr |
Land use as a filter for species composition in Amazonian secondary forests |
title_full_unstemmed |
Land use as a filter for species composition in Amazonian secondary forests |
title_sort |
Land use as a filter for species composition in Amazonian secondary forests |
author |
Jakovac, Catarina Conte |
author_facet |
Jakovac, Catarina Conte Bongers, Frans Kuyper, Thomas W. Mesquita, Rita de Cássia Guimarães Pena-Claros, Marielos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bongers, Frans Kuyper, Thomas W. Mesquita, Rita de Cássia Guimarães Pena-Claros, Marielos |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Jakovac, Catarina Conte Bongers, Frans Kuyper, Thomas W. Mesquita, Rita de Cássia Guimarães Pena-Claros, Marielos |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Community Composition Fire History Land Use Landscape Ecology Phosphorus Physicochemical Property Resprouting Secondary Structure Shifting Cultivation Shrub Soil Property Succession Amazonas Brasil Cecropia Vismia |
topic |
Community Composition Fire History Land Use Landscape Ecology Phosphorus Physicochemical Property Resprouting Secondary Structure Shifting Cultivation Shrub Soil Property Succession Amazonas Brasil Cecropia Vismia |
description |
Questions: Secondary succession in the tropics can follow alternative pathways. Land-use history is known to engender alternative successional communities, but the underlying mechanisms driving and sustaining divergence remain unclear. In this study we aim to answer the following questions: (1) does previous land use act as a filter for species composition in secondary forests; and (2) what are the relative roles of management practices, soil properties and landscape composition in determining species composition?. Location: Central Amazon, Brazil. Methods: We sampled trees, shrubs and palms (≥1cm diameter) in 38 early secondary forests (5 yr after abandonment) located along gradients of land-use intensity in five shifting cultivation landscapes. We measured the diameter and height of each sampled plant, identified it to species or morpho-species level and checked if it was resprouting or not. At each secondary forest we also collected soil samples for chemical and physical analyses and estimated the amount of old-growth forest surrounding it (landscape composition). Results: We found that previous land-use intensity determined species composition. With increasing land-use intensity, management practices of cut-and-burn and associated reduction in soil quality filtered out seed-dependent species and favoured strong sprouters and species that can cope with low nutrient availability. Landscape composition had a weak effect on species assemblages. We found specific species assemblages and indicator species associated with different levels of previous land-use intensity. As a consequence of these local filters, species α- and β-diversity decreased and therefore early successional communities became more similar to each other. Conclusion: Species composition of successional forests is strongly determined by different land-use intensities. Dispersal limitation has a limited effect on determining the composition of the dominant species. Filtering effects of management practices and soil quality determine the species dominating the canopy at early stages of succession and narrow down the range of species able to colonize and establish. This study highlights how land use shapes successional communities and suggests that alternative successional pathways are determined at early stages of succession. Therefore, accounting for land-use history is crucial to improve the understanding of tropical secondary succession. We present a list of indicator species for different levels of previous land-use intensity that can be used to support conservation and restoration decisions in the Amazon. © 2016 The Authors. Journal of Vegetation Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Internation Association of Vegetation Science |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2016 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-08T20:36:30Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-08T20:36:30Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/15383 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1111/jvs.12457 |
url |
https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/15383 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1111/jvs.12457 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Volume 27, Número 6, Pags. 1104-1116 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Vegetation Science |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Vegetation Science |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional do INPA instname:Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA) instacron:INPA |
instname_str |
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA) |
instacron_str |
INPA |
institution |
INPA |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional do INPA |
collection |
Repositório Institucional do INPA |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/bitstream/1/15383/1/artigo-inpa.pdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
d095b61f6ee3a31f2ae97927b21fa61d |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional do INPA - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1809928902408142848 |