Prezygotic resource-allocation dynamics and reproductive trade-offs in calymperaceae (Bryophyta)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional do INPA |
Texto Completo: | https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/15793 |
Resumo: | PREMISE OF THE STUDY: Resource allocation is difficult to characterize in plants because of the challenges of quantifying gametes and propagules. We surveyed six sympatric, unisexual species in the family Calymperaceae (Bryophyta) to test for trade-offs in prezygotic sexual and asexual expression and density-dependent survivorship of female gametangia. METHODS: We tallied gametangial and asexual propagule output for 1820 shoots from 17 populations of six species at monthly intervals during one year (2010–2011) in a central Amazonian forest. Generalized linear mixed models were used to test for trade-offs in sexual and asexual expression and density-dependent senescence probability of gametangia. Precipitation and microsite variables were also included in the model. KEY RESULTS: For all species, sexual and asexual expression were positively correlated with mean monthly precipitation. Asexually expressing shoots produced significantly fewer gametangia than nonexpressing ones, and the probability of senescence increased with shoot density. Archegonium density per shoot was also consistently lower than the modeled optimum to maximize the number of receptive archegonia. CONCLUSIONS: Trade-offs among reproductive strategies and positive density-dependent senescence of female gametangia suggest that prezygotic sexual and asexual expression come at a tangible investment. However, the apparently inefficient resource-allocation dynamics in the production of female gametangia makes the possible advantages of squandering such investments unclear. One possibility is that the study populations, like those of many dioicous mosses, are skewed toward expressing females with low sporophyte production, which would suggest that asexual reproduction predominates and upstages efficient resource allocation in prezygotic investment. © 2016 Botanical Society of America. |
id |
INPA-2_dab661ab9de2ed0796b06168a2ea0118 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio:1/15793 |
network_acronym_str |
INPA-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional do INPA |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Pereira, Marta Regina SilvaSales Dambros, Cristian deZartman, Charles Eugene2020-05-18T21:21:05Z2020-05-18T21:21:05Z2016https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/1579310.3732/ajb.1600240PREMISE OF THE STUDY: Resource allocation is difficult to characterize in plants because of the challenges of quantifying gametes and propagules. We surveyed six sympatric, unisexual species in the family Calymperaceae (Bryophyta) to test for trade-offs in prezygotic sexual and asexual expression and density-dependent survivorship of female gametangia. METHODS: We tallied gametangial and asexual propagule output for 1820 shoots from 17 populations of six species at monthly intervals during one year (2010–2011) in a central Amazonian forest. Generalized linear mixed models were used to test for trade-offs in sexual and asexual expression and density-dependent senescence probability of gametangia. Precipitation and microsite variables were also included in the model. KEY RESULTS: For all species, sexual and asexual expression were positively correlated with mean monthly precipitation. Asexually expressing shoots produced significantly fewer gametangia than nonexpressing ones, and the probability of senescence increased with shoot density. Archegonium density per shoot was also consistently lower than the modeled optimum to maximize the number of receptive archegonia. CONCLUSIONS: Trade-offs among reproductive strategies and positive density-dependent senescence of female gametangia suggest that prezygotic sexual and asexual expression come at a tangible investment. However, the apparently inefficient resource-allocation dynamics in the production of female gametangia makes the possible advantages of squandering such investments unclear. One possibility is that the study populations, like those of many dioicous mosses, are skewed toward expressing females with low sporophyte production, which would suggest that asexual reproduction predominates and upstages efficient resource allocation in prezygotic investment. © 2016 Botanical Society of America.Volume 103, Número 10, Pags. 1838-1846Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGameteMossPropaguleRainforestReproductive BehaviorResource AllocationSenescenceSporophyteSurvivorshipTrade-offAmazoniaBryophytaCalymperaceaeReproduction, AsexualBrasilBryopsidaEvolutionPhysiologyRainforestReproductionSeasonSpecies DifferenceBiological EvolutionBrasilBryopsidaRainforestReproductionReproduction, AsexualSeasonsSpecies SpecificityPrezygotic resource-allocation dynamics and reproductive trade-offs in calymperaceae (Bryophyta)info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleAmerican Journal of Botanyengreponame:Repositório Institucional do INPAinstname:Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)instacron:INPAORIGINALartigo-inpa.pdfartigo-inpa.pdfapplication/pdf1036943https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/bitstream/1/15793/1/artigo-inpa.pdf4e6809e629dd4c36b3111c965e44da42MD511/157932020-05-18 17:45:10.064oai:repositorio:1/15793Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/oai/requestopendoar:2020-05-18T21:45:10Repositório Institucional do INPA - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)false |
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv |
Prezygotic resource-allocation dynamics and reproductive trade-offs in calymperaceae (Bryophyta) |
title |
Prezygotic resource-allocation dynamics and reproductive trade-offs in calymperaceae (Bryophyta) |
spellingShingle |
Prezygotic resource-allocation dynamics and reproductive trade-offs in calymperaceae (Bryophyta) Pereira, Marta Regina Silva Gamete Moss Propagule Rainforest Reproductive Behavior Resource Allocation Senescence Sporophyte Survivorship Trade-off Amazonia Bryophyta Calymperaceae Reproduction, Asexual Brasil Bryopsida Evolution Physiology Rainforest Reproduction Season Species Difference Biological Evolution Brasil Bryopsida Rainforest Reproduction Reproduction, Asexual Seasons Species Specificity |
title_short |
Prezygotic resource-allocation dynamics and reproductive trade-offs in calymperaceae (Bryophyta) |
title_full |
Prezygotic resource-allocation dynamics and reproductive trade-offs in calymperaceae (Bryophyta) |
title_fullStr |
Prezygotic resource-allocation dynamics and reproductive trade-offs in calymperaceae (Bryophyta) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Prezygotic resource-allocation dynamics and reproductive trade-offs in calymperaceae (Bryophyta) |
title_sort |
Prezygotic resource-allocation dynamics and reproductive trade-offs in calymperaceae (Bryophyta) |
author |
Pereira, Marta Regina Silva |
author_facet |
Pereira, Marta Regina Silva Sales Dambros, Cristian de Zartman, Charles Eugene |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Sales Dambros, Cristian de Zartman, Charles Eugene |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pereira, Marta Regina Silva Sales Dambros, Cristian de Zartman, Charles Eugene |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Gamete Moss Propagule Rainforest Reproductive Behavior Resource Allocation Senescence Sporophyte Survivorship Trade-off Amazonia Bryophyta Calymperaceae Reproduction, Asexual Brasil Bryopsida Evolution Physiology Rainforest Reproduction Season Species Difference Biological Evolution Brasil Bryopsida Rainforest Reproduction Reproduction, Asexual Seasons Species Specificity |
topic |
Gamete Moss Propagule Rainforest Reproductive Behavior Resource Allocation Senescence Sporophyte Survivorship Trade-off Amazonia Bryophyta Calymperaceae Reproduction, Asexual Brasil Bryopsida Evolution Physiology Rainforest Reproduction Season Species Difference Biological Evolution Brasil Bryopsida Rainforest Reproduction Reproduction, Asexual Seasons Species Specificity |
description |
PREMISE OF THE STUDY: Resource allocation is difficult to characterize in plants because of the challenges of quantifying gametes and propagules. We surveyed six sympatric, unisexual species in the family Calymperaceae (Bryophyta) to test for trade-offs in prezygotic sexual and asexual expression and density-dependent survivorship of female gametangia. METHODS: We tallied gametangial and asexual propagule output for 1820 shoots from 17 populations of six species at monthly intervals during one year (2010–2011) in a central Amazonian forest. Generalized linear mixed models were used to test for trade-offs in sexual and asexual expression and density-dependent senescence probability of gametangia. Precipitation and microsite variables were also included in the model. KEY RESULTS: For all species, sexual and asexual expression were positively correlated with mean monthly precipitation. Asexually expressing shoots produced significantly fewer gametangia than nonexpressing ones, and the probability of senescence increased with shoot density. Archegonium density per shoot was also consistently lower than the modeled optimum to maximize the number of receptive archegonia. CONCLUSIONS: Trade-offs among reproductive strategies and positive density-dependent senescence of female gametangia suggest that prezygotic sexual and asexual expression come at a tangible investment. However, the apparently inefficient resource-allocation dynamics in the production of female gametangia makes the possible advantages of squandering such investments unclear. One possibility is that the study populations, like those of many dioicous mosses, are skewed toward expressing females with low sporophyte production, which would suggest that asexual reproduction predominates and upstages efficient resource allocation in prezygotic investment. © 2016 Botanical Society of America. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2016 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-18T21:21:05Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-18T21:21:05Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/15793 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.3732/ajb.1600240 |
url |
https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/15793 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.3732/ajb.1600240 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Volume 103, Número 10, Pags. 1838-1846 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
American Journal of Botany |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
American Journal of Botany |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional do INPA instname:Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA) instacron:INPA |
instname_str |
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA) |
instacron_str |
INPA |
institution |
INPA |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional do INPA |
collection |
Repositório Institucional do INPA |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/bitstream/1/15793/1/artigo-inpa.pdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
4e6809e629dd4c36b3111c965e44da42 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional do INPA - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1809928877194084352 |