Prezygotic resource-allocation dynamics and reproductive trade-offs in calymperaceae (Bryophyta)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pereira, Marta Regina Silva
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Sales Dambros, Cristian de, Zartman, Charles Eugene
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional do INPA
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/15793
Resumo: PREMISE OF THE STUDY: Resource allocation is difficult to characterize in plants because of the challenges of quantifying gametes and propagules. We surveyed six sympatric, unisexual species in the family Calymperaceae (Bryophyta) to test for trade-offs in prezygotic sexual and asexual expression and density-dependent survivorship of female gametangia. METHODS: We tallied gametangial and asexual propagule output for 1820 shoots from 17 populations of six species at monthly intervals during one year (2010–2011) in a central Amazonian forest. Generalized linear mixed models were used to test for trade-offs in sexual and asexual expression and density-dependent senescence probability of gametangia. Precipitation and microsite variables were also included in the model. KEY RESULTS: For all species, sexual and asexual expression were positively correlated with mean monthly precipitation. Asexually expressing shoots produced significantly fewer gametangia than nonexpressing ones, and the probability of senescence increased with shoot density. Archegonium density per shoot was also consistently lower than the modeled optimum to maximize the number of receptive archegonia. CONCLUSIONS: Trade-offs among reproductive strategies and positive density-dependent senescence of female gametangia suggest that prezygotic sexual and asexual expression come at a tangible investment. However, the apparently inefficient resource-allocation dynamics in the production of female gametangia makes the possible advantages of squandering such investments unclear. One possibility is that the study populations, like those of many dioicous mosses, are skewed toward expressing females with low sporophyte production, which would suggest that asexual reproduction predominates and upstages efficient resource allocation in prezygotic investment. © 2016 Botanical Society of America.
id INPA-2_dab661ab9de2ed0796b06168a2ea0118
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio:1/15793
network_acronym_str INPA-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional do INPA
repository_id_str
spelling Pereira, Marta Regina SilvaSales Dambros, Cristian deZartman, Charles Eugene2020-05-18T21:21:05Z2020-05-18T21:21:05Z2016https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/1579310.3732/ajb.1600240PREMISE OF THE STUDY: Resource allocation is difficult to characterize in plants because of the challenges of quantifying gametes and propagules. We surveyed six sympatric, unisexual species in the family Calymperaceae (Bryophyta) to test for trade-offs in prezygotic sexual and asexual expression and density-dependent survivorship of female gametangia. METHODS: We tallied gametangial and asexual propagule output for 1820 shoots from 17 populations of six species at monthly intervals during one year (2010–2011) in a central Amazonian forest. Generalized linear mixed models were used to test for trade-offs in sexual and asexual expression and density-dependent senescence probability of gametangia. Precipitation and microsite variables were also included in the model. KEY RESULTS: For all species, sexual and asexual expression were positively correlated with mean monthly precipitation. Asexually expressing shoots produced significantly fewer gametangia than nonexpressing ones, and the probability of senescence increased with shoot density. Archegonium density per shoot was also consistently lower than the modeled optimum to maximize the number of receptive archegonia. CONCLUSIONS: Trade-offs among reproductive strategies and positive density-dependent senescence of female gametangia suggest that prezygotic sexual and asexual expression come at a tangible investment. However, the apparently inefficient resource-allocation dynamics in the production of female gametangia makes the possible advantages of squandering such investments unclear. One possibility is that the study populations, like those of many dioicous mosses, are skewed toward expressing females with low sporophyte production, which would suggest that asexual reproduction predominates and upstages efficient resource allocation in prezygotic investment. © 2016 Botanical Society of America.Volume 103, Número 10, Pags. 1838-1846Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGameteMossPropaguleRainforestReproductive BehaviorResource AllocationSenescenceSporophyteSurvivorshipTrade-offAmazoniaBryophytaCalymperaceaeReproduction, AsexualBrasilBryopsidaEvolutionPhysiologyRainforestReproductionSeasonSpecies DifferenceBiological EvolutionBrasilBryopsidaRainforestReproductionReproduction, AsexualSeasonsSpecies SpecificityPrezygotic resource-allocation dynamics and reproductive trade-offs in calymperaceae (Bryophyta)info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleAmerican Journal of Botanyengreponame:Repositório Institucional do INPAinstname:Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)instacron:INPAORIGINALartigo-inpa.pdfartigo-inpa.pdfapplication/pdf1036943https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/bitstream/1/15793/1/artigo-inpa.pdf4e6809e629dd4c36b3111c965e44da42MD511/157932020-05-18 17:45:10.064oai:repositorio:1/15793Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/oai/requestopendoar:2020-05-18T21:45:10Repositório Institucional do INPA - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)false
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv Prezygotic resource-allocation dynamics and reproductive trade-offs in calymperaceae (Bryophyta)
title Prezygotic resource-allocation dynamics and reproductive trade-offs in calymperaceae (Bryophyta)
spellingShingle Prezygotic resource-allocation dynamics and reproductive trade-offs in calymperaceae (Bryophyta)
Pereira, Marta Regina Silva
Gamete
Moss
Propagule
Rainforest
Reproductive Behavior
Resource Allocation
Senescence
Sporophyte
Survivorship
Trade-off
Amazonia
Bryophyta
Calymperaceae
Reproduction, Asexual
Brasil
Bryopsida
Evolution
Physiology
Rainforest
Reproduction
Season
Species Difference
Biological Evolution
Brasil
Bryopsida
Rainforest
Reproduction
Reproduction, Asexual
Seasons
Species Specificity
title_short Prezygotic resource-allocation dynamics and reproductive trade-offs in calymperaceae (Bryophyta)
title_full Prezygotic resource-allocation dynamics and reproductive trade-offs in calymperaceae (Bryophyta)
title_fullStr Prezygotic resource-allocation dynamics and reproductive trade-offs in calymperaceae (Bryophyta)
title_full_unstemmed Prezygotic resource-allocation dynamics and reproductive trade-offs in calymperaceae (Bryophyta)
title_sort Prezygotic resource-allocation dynamics and reproductive trade-offs in calymperaceae (Bryophyta)
author Pereira, Marta Regina Silva
author_facet Pereira, Marta Regina Silva
Sales Dambros, Cristian de
Zartman, Charles Eugene
author_role author
author2 Sales Dambros, Cristian de
Zartman, Charles Eugene
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pereira, Marta Regina Silva
Sales Dambros, Cristian de
Zartman, Charles Eugene
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Gamete
Moss
Propagule
Rainforest
Reproductive Behavior
Resource Allocation
Senescence
Sporophyte
Survivorship
Trade-off
Amazonia
Bryophyta
Calymperaceae
Reproduction, Asexual
Brasil
Bryopsida
Evolution
Physiology
Rainforest
Reproduction
Season
Species Difference
Biological Evolution
Brasil
Bryopsida
Rainforest
Reproduction
Reproduction, Asexual
Seasons
Species Specificity
topic Gamete
Moss
Propagule
Rainforest
Reproductive Behavior
Resource Allocation
Senescence
Sporophyte
Survivorship
Trade-off
Amazonia
Bryophyta
Calymperaceae
Reproduction, Asexual
Brasil
Bryopsida
Evolution
Physiology
Rainforest
Reproduction
Season
Species Difference
Biological Evolution
Brasil
Bryopsida
Rainforest
Reproduction
Reproduction, Asexual
Seasons
Species Specificity
description PREMISE OF THE STUDY: Resource allocation is difficult to characterize in plants because of the challenges of quantifying gametes and propagules. We surveyed six sympatric, unisexual species in the family Calymperaceae (Bryophyta) to test for trade-offs in prezygotic sexual and asexual expression and density-dependent survivorship of female gametangia. METHODS: We tallied gametangial and asexual propagule output for 1820 shoots from 17 populations of six species at monthly intervals during one year (2010–2011) in a central Amazonian forest. Generalized linear mixed models were used to test for trade-offs in sexual and asexual expression and density-dependent senescence probability of gametangia. Precipitation and microsite variables were also included in the model. KEY RESULTS: For all species, sexual and asexual expression were positively correlated with mean monthly precipitation. Asexually expressing shoots produced significantly fewer gametangia than nonexpressing ones, and the probability of senescence increased with shoot density. Archegonium density per shoot was also consistently lower than the modeled optimum to maximize the number of receptive archegonia. CONCLUSIONS: Trade-offs among reproductive strategies and positive density-dependent senescence of female gametangia suggest that prezygotic sexual and asexual expression come at a tangible investment. However, the apparently inefficient resource-allocation dynamics in the production of female gametangia makes the possible advantages of squandering such investments unclear. One possibility is that the study populations, like those of many dioicous mosses, are skewed toward expressing females with low sporophyte production, which would suggest that asexual reproduction predominates and upstages efficient resource allocation in prezygotic investment. © 2016 Botanical Society of America.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2016
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2020-05-18T21:21:05Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2020-05-18T21:21:05Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/15793
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.3732/ajb.1600240
url https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/15793
identifier_str_mv 10.3732/ajb.1600240
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Volume 103, Número 10, Pags. 1838-1846
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv American Journal of Botany
publisher.none.fl_str_mv American Journal of Botany
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional do INPA
instname:Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)
instacron:INPA
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)
instacron_str INPA
institution INPA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional do INPA
collection Repositório Institucional do INPA
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/bitstream/1/15793/1/artigo-inpa.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 4e6809e629dd4c36b3111c965e44da42
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional do INPA - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1809928877194084352