The role of parabiotic ants and environment on epiphyte composition and protection in ant gardens

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Leal, Laura Carolina
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Jakovac, Catarina Conte, Bobrowiec, Paulo Estefano Dineli, Camargo, José Luís Campana, Peixoto, Paulo Enrique Cardoso
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional do INPA
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/15239
Resumo: Ant gardens (AGs) are a multi-partner specialized ant-plant interaction involving several ant and epiphyte species. Although studies on AGs have reported possible roles for some species in this system, there are unanswered questions regarding the process of epiphyte incorporation in the AGs and the role of less aggressive ant species in AG protection. In this study, we used AGs in the Brazilian Amazon forest formed by two parabiotic ant species to test a set of hypothesis regarding two main questions: 1) How is AG plant community composition affected by the surrounding environment? 2) Does Crematogaster levior play a role in the chemical detection of herbivory in the AGs? After identifying epiphytes occurring at AGs at the forest edge and in the interior, we found that ant gardens in each environment exhibited different compositions, and that plant species bearing oil or extrafloral nectar glands were more frequent in AGs located in the forest interior than in those at the forest edge. By performing experiments with volatile compounds emitted from injured epiphytes, we detected that only Camponotus femoratus was responsive, responding almost eight times faster in response to plant extracts than water treatments. Our results support the idea that environmental conditions affect ant preference for feeding resources provided by epiphytes and consequently shape the structure of the epiphyte community in AGs. On the other hand, the role of C. levior in AGs remains unknown, since it seems to play no direct or indirect role in AG protection.
id INPA-2_e674f7959cac1a0845c2def414a69130
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio:1/15239
network_acronym_str INPA-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional do INPA
repository_id_str
spelling Leal, Laura CarolinaJakovac, Catarina ConteBobrowiec, Paulo Estefano DineliCamargo, José Luís CampanaPeixoto, Paulo Enrique Cardoso2020-05-07T14:17:11Z2020-05-07T14:17:11Z2017https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/1523910.13102/sociobiology.v64i3.1219Ant gardens (AGs) are a multi-partner specialized ant-plant interaction involving several ant and epiphyte species. Although studies on AGs have reported possible roles for some species in this system, there are unanswered questions regarding the process of epiphyte incorporation in the AGs and the role of less aggressive ant species in AG protection. In this study, we used AGs in the Brazilian Amazon forest formed by two parabiotic ant species to test a set of hypothesis regarding two main questions: 1) How is AG plant community composition affected by the surrounding environment? 2) Does Crematogaster levior play a role in the chemical detection of herbivory in the AGs? After identifying epiphytes occurring at AGs at the forest edge and in the interior, we found that ant gardens in each environment exhibited different compositions, and that plant species bearing oil or extrafloral nectar glands were more frequent in AGs located in the forest interior than in those at the forest edge. By performing experiments with volatile compounds emitted from injured epiphytes, we detected that only Camponotus femoratus was responsive, responding almost eight times faster in response to plant extracts than water treatments. Our results support the idea that environmental conditions affect ant preference for feeding resources provided by epiphytes and consequently shape the structure of the epiphyte community in AGs. On the other hand, the role of C. levior in AGs remains unknown, since it seems to play no direct or indirect role in AG protection.Volume 64, Número 3, Pags. 276-283Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessThe role of parabiotic ants and environment on epiphyte composition and protection in ant gardensinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleSociobiologyengreponame:Repositório Institucional do INPAinstname:Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)instacron:INPAORIGINALartigo-inpa.pdfapplication/pdf649871https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/bitstream/1/15239/1/artigo-inpa.pdff9c980fc00638364861f250689c66953MD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdfapplication/octet-stream914https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/bitstream/1/15239/2/license_rdf4d2950bda3d176f570a9f8b328dfbbefMD521/152392020-07-14 11:00:46.932oai:repositorio:1/15239Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/oai/requestopendoar:2020-07-14T15:00:46Repositório Institucional do INPA - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)false
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv The role of parabiotic ants and environment on epiphyte composition and protection in ant gardens
title The role of parabiotic ants and environment on epiphyte composition and protection in ant gardens
spellingShingle The role of parabiotic ants and environment on epiphyte composition and protection in ant gardens
Leal, Laura Carolina
title_short The role of parabiotic ants and environment on epiphyte composition and protection in ant gardens
title_full The role of parabiotic ants and environment on epiphyte composition and protection in ant gardens
title_fullStr The role of parabiotic ants and environment on epiphyte composition and protection in ant gardens
title_full_unstemmed The role of parabiotic ants and environment on epiphyte composition and protection in ant gardens
title_sort The role of parabiotic ants and environment on epiphyte composition and protection in ant gardens
author Leal, Laura Carolina
author_facet Leal, Laura Carolina
Jakovac, Catarina Conte
Bobrowiec, Paulo Estefano Dineli
Camargo, José Luís Campana
Peixoto, Paulo Enrique Cardoso
author_role author
author2 Jakovac, Catarina Conte
Bobrowiec, Paulo Estefano Dineli
Camargo, José Luís Campana
Peixoto, Paulo Enrique Cardoso
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Leal, Laura Carolina
Jakovac, Catarina Conte
Bobrowiec, Paulo Estefano Dineli
Camargo, José Luís Campana
Peixoto, Paulo Enrique Cardoso
description Ant gardens (AGs) are a multi-partner specialized ant-plant interaction involving several ant and epiphyte species. Although studies on AGs have reported possible roles for some species in this system, there are unanswered questions regarding the process of epiphyte incorporation in the AGs and the role of less aggressive ant species in AG protection. In this study, we used AGs in the Brazilian Amazon forest formed by two parabiotic ant species to test a set of hypothesis regarding two main questions: 1) How is AG plant community composition affected by the surrounding environment? 2) Does Crematogaster levior play a role in the chemical detection of herbivory in the AGs? After identifying epiphytes occurring at AGs at the forest edge and in the interior, we found that ant gardens in each environment exhibited different compositions, and that plant species bearing oil or extrafloral nectar glands were more frequent in AGs located in the forest interior than in those at the forest edge. By performing experiments with volatile compounds emitted from injured epiphytes, we detected that only Camponotus femoratus was responsive, responding almost eight times faster in response to plant extracts than water treatments. Our results support the idea that environmental conditions affect ant preference for feeding resources provided by epiphytes and consequently shape the structure of the epiphyte community in AGs. On the other hand, the role of C. levior in AGs remains unknown, since it seems to play no direct or indirect role in AG protection.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2017
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2020-05-07T14:17:11Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2020-05-07T14:17:11Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/15239
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.13102/sociobiology.v64i3.1219
url https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/15239
identifier_str_mv 10.13102/sociobiology.v64i3.1219
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Volume 64, Número 3, Pags. 276-283
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociobiology
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociobiology
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional do INPA
instname:Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)
instacron:INPA
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)
instacron_str INPA
institution INPA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional do INPA
collection Repositório Institucional do INPA
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/bitstream/1/15239/1/artigo-inpa.pdf
https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/bitstream/1/15239/2/license_rdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv f9c980fc00638364861f250689c66953
4d2950bda3d176f570a9f8b328dfbbef
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional do INPA - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1809928862824398848