The role of parabiotic ants and environment on epiphyte composition and protection in ant gardens
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional do INPA |
Texto Completo: | https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/15239 |
Resumo: | Ant gardens (AGs) are a multi-partner specialized ant-plant interaction involving several ant and epiphyte species. Although studies on AGs have reported possible roles for some species in this system, there are unanswered questions regarding the process of epiphyte incorporation in the AGs and the role of less aggressive ant species in AG protection. In this study, we used AGs in the Brazilian Amazon forest formed by two parabiotic ant species to test a set of hypothesis regarding two main questions: 1) How is AG plant community composition affected by the surrounding environment? 2) Does Crematogaster levior play a role in the chemical detection of herbivory in the AGs? After identifying epiphytes occurring at AGs at the forest edge and in the interior, we found that ant gardens in each environment exhibited different compositions, and that plant species bearing oil or extrafloral nectar glands were more frequent in AGs located in the forest interior than in those at the forest edge. By performing experiments with volatile compounds emitted from injured epiphytes, we detected that only Camponotus femoratus was responsive, responding almost eight times faster in response to plant extracts than water treatments. Our results support the idea that environmental conditions affect ant preference for feeding resources provided by epiphytes and consequently shape the structure of the epiphyte community in AGs. On the other hand, the role of C. levior in AGs remains unknown, since it seems to play no direct or indirect role in AG protection. |
id |
INPA-2_e674f7959cac1a0845c2def414a69130 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio:1/15239 |
network_acronym_str |
INPA-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional do INPA |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Leal, Laura CarolinaJakovac, Catarina ConteBobrowiec, Paulo Estefano DineliCamargo, José Luís CampanaPeixoto, Paulo Enrique Cardoso2020-05-07T14:17:11Z2020-05-07T14:17:11Z2017https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/1523910.13102/sociobiology.v64i3.1219Ant gardens (AGs) are a multi-partner specialized ant-plant interaction involving several ant and epiphyte species. Although studies on AGs have reported possible roles for some species in this system, there are unanswered questions regarding the process of epiphyte incorporation in the AGs and the role of less aggressive ant species in AG protection. In this study, we used AGs in the Brazilian Amazon forest formed by two parabiotic ant species to test a set of hypothesis regarding two main questions: 1) How is AG plant community composition affected by the surrounding environment? 2) Does Crematogaster levior play a role in the chemical detection of herbivory in the AGs? After identifying epiphytes occurring at AGs at the forest edge and in the interior, we found that ant gardens in each environment exhibited different compositions, and that plant species bearing oil or extrafloral nectar glands were more frequent in AGs located in the forest interior than in those at the forest edge. By performing experiments with volatile compounds emitted from injured epiphytes, we detected that only Camponotus femoratus was responsive, responding almost eight times faster in response to plant extracts than water treatments. Our results support the idea that environmental conditions affect ant preference for feeding resources provided by epiphytes and consequently shape the structure of the epiphyte community in AGs. On the other hand, the role of C. levior in AGs remains unknown, since it seems to play no direct or indirect role in AG protection.Volume 64, Número 3, Pags. 276-283Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessThe role of parabiotic ants and environment on epiphyte composition and protection in ant gardensinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleSociobiologyengreponame:Repositório Institucional do INPAinstname:Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)instacron:INPAORIGINALartigo-inpa.pdfapplication/pdf649871https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/bitstream/1/15239/1/artigo-inpa.pdff9c980fc00638364861f250689c66953MD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdfapplication/octet-stream914https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/bitstream/1/15239/2/license_rdf4d2950bda3d176f570a9f8b328dfbbefMD521/152392020-07-14 11:00:46.932oai:repositorio:1/15239Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/oai/requestopendoar:2020-07-14T15:00:46Repositório Institucional do INPA - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)false |
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv |
The role of parabiotic ants and environment on epiphyte composition and protection in ant gardens |
title |
The role of parabiotic ants and environment on epiphyte composition and protection in ant gardens |
spellingShingle |
The role of parabiotic ants and environment on epiphyte composition and protection in ant gardens Leal, Laura Carolina |
title_short |
The role of parabiotic ants and environment on epiphyte composition and protection in ant gardens |
title_full |
The role of parabiotic ants and environment on epiphyte composition and protection in ant gardens |
title_fullStr |
The role of parabiotic ants and environment on epiphyte composition and protection in ant gardens |
title_full_unstemmed |
The role of parabiotic ants and environment on epiphyte composition and protection in ant gardens |
title_sort |
The role of parabiotic ants and environment on epiphyte composition and protection in ant gardens |
author |
Leal, Laura Carolina |
author_facet |
Leal, Laura Carolina Jakovac, Catarina Conte Bobrowiec, Paulo Estefano Dineli Camargo, José Luís Campana Peixoto, Paulo Enrique Cardoso |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Jakovac, Catarina Conte Bobrowiec, Paulo Estefano Dineli Camargo, José Luís Campana Peixoto, Paulo Enrique Cardoso |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Leal, Laura Carolina Jakovac, Catarina Conte Bobrowiec, Paulo Estefano Dineli Camargo, José Luís Campana Peixoto, Paulo Enrique Cardoso |
description |
Ant gardens (AGs) are a multi-partner specialized ant-plant interaction involving several ant and epiphyte species. Although studies on AGs have reported possible roles for some species in this system, there are unanswered questions regarding the process of epiphyte incorporation in the AGs and the role of less aggressive ant species in AG protection. In this study, we used AGs in the Brazilian Amazon forest formed by two parabiotic ant species to test a set of hypothesis regarding two main questions: 1) How is AG plant community composition affected by the surrounding environment? 2) Does Crematogaster levior play a role in the chemical detection of herbivory in the AGs? After identifying epiphytes occurring at AGs at the forest edge and in the interior, we found that ant gardens in each environment exhibited different compositions, and that plant species bearing oil or extrafloral nectar glands were more frequent in AGs located in the forest interior than in those at the forest edge. By performing experiments with volatile compounds emitted from injured epiphytes, we detected that only Camponotus femoratus was responsive, responding almost eight times faster in response to plant extracts than water treatments. Our results support the idea that environmental conditions affect ant preference for feeding resources provided by epiphytes and consequently shape the structure of the epiphyte community in AGs. On the other hand, the role of C. levior in AGs remains unknown, since it seems to play no direct or indirect role in AG protection. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2017 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-07T14:17:11Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-07T14:17:11Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/15239 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.13102/sociobiology.v64i3.1219 |
url |
https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/15239 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.13102/sociobiology.v64i3.1219 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Volume 64, Número 3, Pags. 276-283 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociobiology |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociobiology |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional do INPA instname:Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA) instacron:INPA |
instname_str |
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA) |
instacron_str |
INPA |
institution |
INPA |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional do INPA |
collection |
Repositório Institucional do INPA |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/bitstream/1/15239/1/artigo-inpa.pdf https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/bitstream/1/15239/2/license_rdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
f9c980fc00638364861f250689c66953 4d2950bda3d176f570a9f8b328dfbbef |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional do INPA - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1809928862824398848 |