Partial exclusion of precipitation: throughfall, stemflow and canopy interception in Eucalyptus plantations in southern Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Ambiente & Água |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-993X2021000500303 |
Resumo: | Abstract Hydrological behavior in reforested watersheds is different from that under other forms of cover. The variation may be related to aspects intrinsic to species, planting density, physiological maturity, management system and climatic conditions. Periodically, climatic anomalies such as the case of La Ninã are observed, and these are responsible for the alteration of the rainfall regime and consequently generate water deficits in the southern region of Brazil. Water deficit is responsible for reducing growth and productivity for the Eucalyptus genus, in addition to causing changes in hydrological behavior in reforested watersheds. Accordingly, this study compared the partition of rainfall in throughfall, stemflow and canopy interception of eucalyptus trees submitted or not to partial exclusion of precipitation. In the open field, 3 rainfall collectors were installed, and in the stand, for each rain exclusion treatment, 9 throughfall collectors and 9 stemflow collectors were installed. Every two weeks for 12 months, the volume of the collectors was measured. The quantified precipitation was 1627 mm over a year. In the treatment without exclusion, 84.8, 2.9 and 12.3% referred to throughfall, stemflow and canopy interception, respectively, while in the treatment excluding rainfall 80.6, 2.3 and 17.2% referred to throughfall, stemflow and canopy interception. The regression adjustments for throughfall and stemflow showed satisfactory R2 coefficients. |
id |
IPABHI-1_4f0bd8fbdf9028a299130c57a82d7ca9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1980-993X2021000500303 |
network_acronym_str |
IPABHI-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Ambiente & Água |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Partial exclusion of precipitation: throughfall, stemflow and canopy interception in Eucalyptus plantations in southern BrazilhydrologysustainabilitywatershedAbstract Hydrological behavior in reforested watersheds is different from that under other forms of cover. The variation may be related to aspects intrinsic to species, planting density, physiological maturity, management system and climatic conditions. Periodically, climatic anomalies such as the case of La Ninã are observed, and these are responsible for the alteration of the rainfall regime and consequently generate water deficits in the southern region of Brazil. Water deficit is responsible for reducing growth and productivity for the Eucalyptus genus, in addition to causing changes in hydrological behavior in reforested watersheds. Accordingly, this study compared the partition of rainfall in throughfall, stemflow and canopy interception of eucalyptus trees submitted or not to partial exclusion of precipitation. In the open field, 3 rainfall collectors were installed, and in the stand, for each rain exclusion treatment, 9 throughfall collectors and 9 stemflow collectors were installed. Every two weeks for 12 months, the volume of the collectors was measured. The quantified precipitation was 1627 mm over a year. In the treatment without exclusion, 84.8, 2.9 and 12.3% referred to throughfall, stemflow and canopy interception, respectively, while in the treatment excluding rainfall 80.6, 2.3 and 17.2% referred to throughfall, stemflow and canopy interception. The regression adjustments for throughfall and stemflow showed satisfactory R2 coefficients.Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-993X2021000500303Revista Ambiente & Água v.16 n.5 2021reponame:Revista Ambiente & Águainstname:Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas (IPABHI)instacron:IPABHI10.4136/ambi-agua.2645info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPoleto,Gian CarlosMomolli,Dione RicherSchumacher,Mauro ValdirLudvichak,Aline AparecidaSantos,Kristiana Fiorentin dosStahl,JamesAlvares,Clayton Alcardeeng2021-10-14T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1980-993X2021000500303Revistahttp://www.ambi-agua.net/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||ambi.agua@gmail.com1980-993X1980-993Xopendoar:2021-10-14T00:00Revista Ambiente & Água - Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas (IPABHI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Partial exclusion of precipitation: throughfall, stemflow and canopy interception in Eucalyptus plantations in southern Brazil |
title |
Partial exclusion of precipitation: throughfall, stemflow and canopy interception in Eucalyptus plantations in southern Brazil |
spellingShingle |
Partial exclusion of precipitation: throughfall, stemflow and canopy interception in Eucalyptus plantations in southern Brazil Poleto,Gian Carlos hydrology sustainability watershed |
title_short |
Partial exclusion of precipitation: throughfall, stemflow and canopy interception in Eucalyptus plantations in southern Brazil |
title_full |
Partial exclusion of precipitation: throughfall, stemflow and canopy interception in Eucalyptus plantations in southern Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Partial exclusion of precipitation: throughfall, stemflow and canopy interception in Eucalyptus plantations in southern Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Partial exclusion of precipitation: throughfall, stemflow and canopy interception in Eucalyptus plantations in southern Brazil |
title_sort |
Partial exclusion of precipitation: throughfall, stemflow and canopy interception in Eucalyptus plantations in southern Brazil |
author |
Poleto,Gian Carlos |
author_facet |
Poleto,Gian Carlos Momolli,Dione Richer Schumacher,Mauro Valdir Ludvichak,Aline Aparecida Santos,Kristiana Fiorentin dos Stahl,James Alvares,Clayton Alcarde |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Momolli,Dione Richer Schumacher,Mauro Valdir Ludvichak,Aline Aparecida Santos,Kristiana Fiorentin dos Stahl,James Alvares,Clayton Alcarde |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Poleto,Gian Carlos Momolli,Dione Richer Schumacher,Mauro Valdir Ludvichak,Aline Aparecida Santos,Kristiana Fiorentin dos Stahl,James Alvares,Clayton Alcarde |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
hydrology sustainability watershed |
topic |
hydrology sustainability watershed |
description |
Abstract Hydrological behavior in reforested watersheds is different from that under other forms of cover. The variation may be related to aspects intrinsic to species, planting density, physiological maturity, management system and climatic conditions. Periodically, climatic anomalies such as the case of La Ninã are observed, and these are responsible for the alteration of the rainfall regime and consequently generate water deficits in the southern region of Brazil. Water deficit is responsible for reducing growth and productivity for the Eucalyptus genus, in addition to causing changes in hydrological behavior in reforested watersheds. Accordingly, this study compared the partition of rainfall in throughfall, stemflow and canopy interception of eucalyptus trees submitted or not to partial exclusion of precipitation. In the open field, 3 rainfall collectors were installed, and in the stand, for each rain exclusion treatment, 9 throughfall collectors and 9 stemflow collectors were installed. Every two weeks for 12 months, the volume of the collectors was measured. The quantified precipitation was 1627 mm over a year. In the treatment without exclusion, 84.8, 2.9 and 12.3% referred to throughfall, stemflow and canopy interception, respectively, while in the treatment excluding rainfall 80.6, 2.3 and 17.2% referred to throughfall, stemflow and canopy interception. The regression adjustments for throughfall and stemflow showed satisfactory R2 coefficients. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-993X2021000500303 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-993X2021000500303 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.4136/ambi-agua.2645 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Ambiente & Água v.16 n.5 2021 reponame:Revista Ambiente & Água instname:Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas (IPABHI) instacron:IPABHI |
instname_str |
Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas (IPABHI) |
instacron_str |
IPABHI |
institution |
IPABHI |
reponame_str |
Revista Ambiente & Água |
collection |
Revista Ambiente & Água |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Ambiente & Água - Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas (IPABHI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||ambi.agua@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1752129751706763264 |