Removal of nutrients due to biomass harvest of Eucalyptus urograndis in different soils: macronutrients

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Salvador,Simone Martini
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Ludvichak,Aline Aparecida, Momolli,Dione Richer, Santos,Kristiana Fiorentin dos, Consensa,Catarine Barcellos, Schumacher,Mauro Valdir, Stahl,James
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Ambiente & Água
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-993X2021000300302
Resumo: Abstract Intensive management of forest stands can increase biomass production, as well as increase the removal of nutrients from the site. This study therefore sought to simulate different harvest intensities and to calculate the nutrient-use efficiency of Eucalyptus urograndis in different types of soil. The study was carried out in a plantation of seven-year-old hybrid E. urograndis in the city of Telêmaco Borba, Paraná, Brazil. The study site included two sub areas with sandy soil and clayey soil (Cambisols Inceptisol and Ferralsols Oxisols, respectively). Using biomass and nutrients stock data, nutrient removal was simulated under five different harvest scenarios. Nutrient-use efficiency was obtained from the relation between the amount of biomass and nutrients of each tree component. Harvesting the whole tree resulted in the removal of approximately 61% of the nutrients from the site in sandy soil, while in clayey soil 57% of the nutrients were removed. With harvesting of only the commercial stemwood, only 22% of the nutrients were removed from the sandy soil, and 21% from the clayey soil. Stemwood was the component that had the highest nutrient-use efficiency values for all the analyzed nutrients. In conclusion, to achieve nutritional sustainability of E. urograndis stands, the best harvesting system involves the removal of only commercial stemwood. For the production of stemwood, sandy soils have a greater biological efficiency of calcium and magnesium when compared to clayey soil.
id IPABHI-1_88f93a9e6c7a750633c56411c51b1fe2
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1980-993X2021000300302
network_acronym_str IPABHI-1
network_name_str Revista Ambiente & Água
repository_id_str
spelling Removal of nutrients due to biomass harvest of Eucalyptus urograndis in different soils: macronutrientsclayey soilforest nutritionharvest intensitynutrient use efficiencysandy soilAbstract Intensive management of forest stands can increase biomass production, as well as increase the removal of nutrients from the site. This study therefore sought to simulate different harvest intensities and to calculate the nutrient-use efficiency of Eucalyptus urograndis in different types of soil. The study was carried out in a plantation of seven-year-old hybrid E. urograndis in the city of Telêmaco Borba, Paraná, Brazil. The study site included two sub areas with sandy soil and clayey soil (Cambisols Inceptisol and Ferralsols Oxisols, respectively). Using biomass and nutrients stock data, nutrient removal was simulated under five different harvest scenarios. Nutrient-use efficiency was obtained from the relation between the amount of biomass and nutrients of each tree component. Harvesting the whole tree resulted in the removal of approximately 61% of the nutrients from the site in sandy soil, while in clayey soil 57% of the nutrients were removed. With harvesting of only the commercial stemwood, only 22% of the nutrients were removed from the sandy soil, and 21% from the clayey soil. Stemwood was the component that had the highest nutrient-use efficiency values for all the analyzed nutrients. In conclusion, to achieve nutritional sustainability of E. urograndis stands, the best harvesting system involves the removal of only commercial stemwood. For the production of stemwood, sandy soils have a greater biological efficiency of calcium and magnesium when compared to clayey soil.Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-993X2021000300302Revista Ambiente & Água v.16 n.3 2021reponame:Revista Ambiente & Águainstname:Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas (IPABHI)instacron:IPABHI10.4136/ambi-agua.2671info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSalvador,Simone MartiniLudvichak,Aline AparecidaMomolli,Dione RicherSantos,Kristiana Fiorentin dosConsensa,Catarine BarcellosSchumacher,Mauro ValdirStahl,Jameseng2021-06-09T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1980-993X2021000300302Revistahttp://www.ambi-agua.net/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||ambi.agua@gmail.com1980-993X1980-993Xopendoar:2021-06-09T00:00Revista Ambiente & Água - Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas (IPABHI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Removal of nutrients due to biomass harvest of Eucalyptus urograndis in different soils: macronutrients
title Removal of nutrients due to biomass harvest of Eucalyptus urograndis in different soils: macronutrients
spellingShingle Removal of nutrients due to biomass harvest of Eucalyptus urograndis in different soils: macronutrients
Salvador,Simone Martini
clayey soil
forest nutrition
harvest intensity
nutrient use efficiency
sandy soil
title_short Removal of nutrients due to biomass harvest of Eucalyptus urograndis in different soils: macronutrients
title_full Removal of nutrients due to biomass harvest of Eucalyptus urograndis in different soils: macronutrients
title_fullStr Removal of nutrients due to biomass harvest of Eucalyptus urograndis in different soils: macronutrients
title_full_unstemmed Removal of nutrients due to biomass harvest of Eucalyptus urograndis in different soils: macronutrients
title_sort Removal of nutrients due to biomass harvest of Eucalyptus urograndis in different soils: macronutrients
author Salvador,Simone Martini
author_facet Salvador,Simone Martini
Ludvichak,Aline Aparecida
Momolli,Dione Richer
Santos,Kristiana Fiorentin dos
Consensa,Catarine Barcellos
Schumacher,Mauro Valdir
Stahl,James
author_role author
author2 Ludvichak,Aline Aparecida
Momolli,Dione Richer
Santos,Kristiana Fiorentin dos
Consensa,Catarine Barcellos
Schumacher,Mauro Valdir
Stahl,James
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Salvador,Simone Martini
Ludvichak,Aline Aparecida
Momolli,Dione Richer
Santos,Kristiana Fiorentin dos
Consensa,Catarine Barcellos
Schumacher,Mauro Valdir
Stahl,James
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv clayey soil
forest nutrition
harvest intensity
nutrient use efficiency
sandy soil
topic clayey soil
forest nutrition
harvest intensity
nutrient use efficiency
sandy soil
description Abstract Intensive management of forest stands can increase biomass production, as well as increase the removal of nutrients from the site. This study therefore sought to simulate different harvest intensities and to calculate the nutrient-use efficiency of Eucalyptus urograndis in different types of soil. The study was carried out in a plantation of seven-year-old hybrid E. urograndis in the city of Telêmaco Borba, Paraná, Brazil. The study site included two sub areas with sandy soil and clayey soil (Cambisols Inceptisol and Ferralsols Oxisols, respectively). Using biomass and nutrients stock data, nutrient removal was simulated under five different harvest scenarios. Nutrient-use efficiency was obtained from the relation between the amount of biomass and nutrients of each tree component. Harvesting the whole tree resulted in the removal of approximately 61% of the nutrients from the site in sandy soil, while in clayey soil 57% of the nutrients were removed. With harvesting of only the commercial stemwood, only 22% of the nutrients were removed from the sandy soil, and 21% from the clayey soil. Stemwood was the component that had the highest nutrient-use efficiency values for all the analyzed nutrients. In conclusion, to achieve nutritional sustainability of E. urograndis stands, the best harvesting system involves the removal of only commercial stemwood. For the production of stemwood, sandy soils have a greater biological efficiency of calcium and magnesium when compared to clayey soil.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-993X2021000300302
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-993X2021000300302
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.4136/ambi-agua.2671
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Ambiente & Água v.16 n.3 2021
reponame:Revista Ambiente & Água
instname:Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas (IPABHI)
instacron:IPABHI
instname_str Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas (IPABHI)
instacron_str IPABHI
institution IPABHI
reponame_str Revista Ambiente & Água
collection Revista Ambiente & Água
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Ambiente & Água - Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas (IPABHI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||ambi.agua@gmail.com
_version_ 1752129751650140160