Removal of nutrients due to biomass harvest of Eucalyptus urograndis in different soils: macronutrients
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Ambiente & Água |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-993X2021000300302 |
Resumo: | Abstract Intensive management of forest stands can increase biomass production, as well as increase the removal of nutrients from the site. This study therefore sought to simulate different harvest intensities and to calculate the nutrient-use efficiency of Eucalyptus urograndis in different types of soil. The study was carried out in a plantation of seven-year-old hybrid E. urograndis in the city of Telêmaco Borba, Paraná, Brazil. The study site included two sub areas with sandy soil and clayey soil (Cambisols Inceptisol and Ferralsols Oxisols, respectively). Using biomass and nutrients stock data, nutrient removal was simulated under five different harvest scenarios. Nutrient-use efficiency was obtained from the relation between the amount of biomass and nutrients of each tree component. Harvesting the whole tree resulted in the removal of approximately 61% of the nutrients from the site in sandy soil, while in clayey soil 57% of the nutrients were removed. With harvesting of only the commercial stemwood, only 22% of the nutrients were removed from the sandy soil, and 21% from the clayey soil. Stemwood was the component that had the highest nutrient-use efficiency values for all the analyzed nutrients. In conclusion, to achieve nutritional sustainability of E. urograndis stands, the best harvesting system involves the removal of only commercial stemwood. For the production of stemwood, sandy soils have a greater biological efficiency of calcium and magnesium when compared to clayey soil. |
id |
IPABHI-1_88f93a9e6c7a750633c56411c51b1fe2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1980-993X2021000300302 |
network_acronym_str |
IPABHI-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Ambiente & Água |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Removal of nutrients due to biomass harvest of Eucalyptus urograndis in different soils: macronutrientsclayey soilforest nutritionharvest intensitynutrient use efficiencysandy soilAbstract Intensive management of forest stands can increase biomass production, as well as increase the removal of nutrients from the site. This study therefore sought to simulate different harvest intensities and to calculate the nutrient-use efficiency of Eucalyptus urograndis in different types of soil. The study was carried out in a plantation of seven-year-old hybrid E. urograndis in the city of Telêmaco Borba, Paraná, Brazil. The study site included two sub areas with sandy soil and clayey soil (Cambisols Inceptisol and Ferralsols Oxisols, respectively). Using biomass and nutrients stock data, nutrient removal was simulated under five different harvest scenarios. Nutrient-use efficiency was obtained from the relation between the amount of biomass and nutrients of each tree component. Harvesting the whole tree resulted in the removal of approximately 61% of the nutrients from the site in sandy soil, while in clayey soil 57% of the nutrients were removed. With harvesting of only the commercial stemwood, only 22% of the nutrients were removed from the sandy soil, and 21% from the clayey soil. Stemwood was the component that had the highest nutrient-use efficiency values for all the analyzed nutrients. In conclusion, to achieve nutritional sustainability of E. urograndis stands, the best harvesting system involves the removal of only commercial stemwood. For the production of stemwood, sandy soils have a greater biological efficiency of calcium and magnesium when compared to clayey soil.Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-993X2021000300302Revista Ambiente & Água v.16 n.3 2021reponame:Revista Ambiente & Águainstname:Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas (IPABHI)instacron:IPABHI10.4136/ambi-agua.2671info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSalvador,Simone MartiniLudvichak,Aline AparecidaMomolli,Dione RicherSantos,Kristiana Fiorentin dosConsensa,Catarine BarcellosSchumacher,Mauro ValdirStahl,Jameseng2021-06-09T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1980-993X2021000300302Revistahttp://www.ambi-agua.net/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||ambi.agua@gmail.com1980-993X1980-993Xopendoar:2021-06-09T00:00Revista Ambiente & Água - Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas (IPABHI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Removal of nutrients due to biomass harvest of Eucalyptus urograndis in different soils: macronutrients |
title |
Removal of nutrients due to biomass harvest of Eucalyptus urograndis in different soils: macronutrients |
spellingShingle |
Removal of nutrients due to biomass harvest of Eucalyptus urograndis in different soils: macronutrients Salvador,Simone Martini clayey soil forest nutrition harvest intensity nutrient use efficiency sandy soil |
title_short |
Removal of nutrients due to biomass harvest of Eucalyptus urograndis in different soils: macronutrients |
title_full |
Removal of nutrients due to biomass harvest of Eucalyptus urograndis in different soils: macronutrients |
title_fullStr |
Removal of nutrients due to biomass harvest of Eucalyptus urograndis in different soils: macronutrients |
title_full_unstemmed |
Removal of nutrients due to biomass harvest of Eucalyptus urograndis in different soils: macronutrients |
title_sort |
Removal of nutrients due to biomass harvest of Eucalyptus urograndis in different soils: macronutrients |
author |
Salvador,Simone Martini |
author_facet |
Salvador,Simone Martini Ludvichak,Aline Aparecida Momolli,Dione Richer Santos,Kristiana Fiorentin dos Consensa,Catarine Barcellos Schumacher,Mauro Valdir Stahl,James |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ludvichak,Aline Aparecida Momolli,Dione Richer Santos,Kristiana Fiorentin dos Consensa,Catarine Barcellos Schumacher,Mauro Valdir Stahl,James |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Salvador,Simone Martini Ludvichak,Aline Aparecida Momolli,Dione Richer Santos,Kristiana Fiorentin dos Consensa,Catarine Barcellos Schumacher,Mauro Valdir Stahl,James |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
clayey soil forest nutrition harvest intensity nutrient use efficiency sandy soil |
topic |
clayey soil forest nutrition harvest intensity nutrient use efficiency sandy soil |
description |
Abstract Intensive management of forest stands can increase biomass production, as well as increase the removal of nutrients from the site. This study therefore sought to simulate different harvest intensities and to calculate the nutrient-use efficiency of Eucalyptus urograndis in different types of soil. The study was carried out in a plantation of seven-year-old hybrid E. urograndis in the city of Telêmaco Borba, Paraná, Brazil. The study site included two sub areas with sandy soil and clayey soil (Cambisols Inceptisol and Ferralsols Oxisols, respectively). Using biomass and nutrients stock data, nutrient removal was simulated under five different harvest scenarios. Nutrient-use efficiency was obtained from the relation between the amount of biomass and nutrients of each tree component. Harvesting the whole tree resulted in the removal of approximately 61% of the nutrients from the site in sandy soil, while in clayey soil 57% of the nutrients were removed. With harvesting of only the commercial stemwood, only 22% of the nutrients were removed from the sandy soil, and 21% from the clayey soil. Stemwood was the component that had the highest nutrient-use efficiency values for all the analyzed nutrients. In conclusion, to achieve nutritional sustainability of E. urograndis stands, the best harvesting system involves the removal of only commercial stemwood. For the production of stemwood, sandy soils have a greater biological efficiency of calcium and magnesium when compared to clayey soil. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-993X2021000300302 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-993X2021000300302 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.4136/ambi-agua.2671 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Ambiente & Água v.16 n.3 2021 reponame:Revista Ambiente & Água instname:Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas (IPABHI) instacron:IPABHI |
instname_str |
Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas (IPABHI) |
instacron_str |
IPABHI |
institution |
IPABHI |
reponame_str |
Revista Ambiente & Água |
collection |
Revista Ambiente & Água |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Ambiente & Água - Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais em Bacias Hidrográficas (IPABHI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||ambi.agua@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1752129751650140160 |