Digesting the Alphabet Soup: a Comparative Institutional History of IBSA and BRICS
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea) |
dARK ID: | ark:/51990/0013000001k60 |
Texto Completo: | https://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/handle/11058/15248 |
Resumo: | The BRICS Grouping (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) and the IBSA Dialogue Forum (India, Brazil and South Africa)represent interregional cooperative mechanisms of increasing importance in international relations. This can be attributed to the recent rise of the global South, placing unprecedented emphasis on South–South cooperation. With three members in common, the necessity for and contribution of both IBSA and BRICS are often called into question. IBSA’s two-year successive postponement of its annual summit, five of which have taken place thus far, has prompted questions regarding the continued relevance of an organisation which in many ways is viewed as duplicating the functions of BRICS. Combined with the fact that BRICS contains the political-economic weight of Russia and China (permanent members of the United Nations Security Council and Nuclear Superpowers), the future of IBSA is doubted by some. To determine the future of IBSA, it is important to examine how it differs from BRICS in terms of capacity, priorities and political character. (…) |
id |
IPEA_318712e44df6b28d0d9d3ff59882425b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ipea.gov.br:11058/15248 |
network_acronym_str |
IPEA |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Digesting the Alphabet Soup: a Comparative Institutional History of IBSA and BRICSDigesting the Alphabet Soup: a Comparative Institutional History of IBSA and BRICSThe BRICS Grouping (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) and the IBSA Dialogue Forum (India, Brazil and South Africa)represent interregional cooperative mechanisms of increasing importance in international relations. This can be attributed to the recent rise of the global South, placing unprecedented emphasis on South–South cooperation. With three members in common, the necessity for and contribution of both IBSA and BRICS are often called into question. IBSA’s two-year successive postponement of its annual summit, five of which have taken place thus far, has prompted questions regarding the continued relevance of an organisation which in many ways is viewed as duplicating the functions of BRICS. Combined with the fact that BRICS contains the political-economic weight of Russia and China (permanent members of the United Nations Security Council and Nuclear Superpowers), the future of IBSA is doubted by some. To determine the future of IBSA, it is important to examine how it differs from BRICS in terms of capacity, priorities and political character. (…)4 p. : il.2024-10-03T23:53:14Z2024-10-03T23:53:14Z2014Policy Research Briefinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/handle/11058/15248ark:/51990/0013000001k60International Policy Centre for Inclusive GrowthUnited Nations Development ProgrammeLicença total exclusivaO texto e dados desta publicação podem ser reproduzidos desde que as fontes sejam citadas. Reproduções com fins comerciais são proibidas.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessArruda, Pedro Lara deSlingsby, Ashleigh Kateengreponame:Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea)instname:Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA)instacron:IPEA2024-10-04T06:15:56Zoai:repositorio.ipea.gov.br:11058/15248Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/oai/requestsuporte@ipea.gov.bropendoar:2024-10-04T06:15:56Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea) - Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Digesting the Alphabet Soup: a Comparative Institutional History of IBSA and BRICS |
title |
Digesting the Alphabet Soup: a Comparative Institutional History of IBSA and BRICS |
spellingShingle |
Digesting the Alphabet Soup: a Comparative Institutional History of IBSA and BRICS Arruda, Pedro Lara de Digesting the Alphabet Soup: a Comparative Institutional History of IBSA and BRICS |
title_short |
Digesting the Alphabet Soup: a Comparative Institutional History of IBSA and BRICS |
title_full |
Digesting the Alphabet Soup: a Comparative Institutional History of IBSA and BRICS |
title_fullStr |
Digesting the Alphabet Soup: a Comparative Institutional History of IBSA and BRICS |
title_full_unstemmed |
Digesting the Alphabet Soup: a Comparative Institutional History of IBSA and BRICS |
title_sort |
Digesting the Alphabet Soup: a Comparative Institutional History of IBSA and BRICS |
author |
Arruda, Pedro Lara de |
author_facet |
Arruda, Pedro Lara de Slingsby, Ashleigh Kate |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Slingsby, Ashleigh Kate |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Arruda, Pedro Lara de Slingsby, Ashleigh Kate |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Digesting the Alphabet Soup: a Comparative Institutional History of IBSA and BRICS |
topic |
Digesting the Alphabet Soup: a Comparative Institutional History of IBSA and BRICS |
description |
The BRICS Grouping (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) and the IBSA Dialogue Forum (India, Brazil and South Africa)represent interregional cooperative mechanisms of increasing importance in international relations. This can be attributed to the recent rise of the global South, placing unprecedented emphasis on South–South cooperation. With three members in common, the necessity for and contribution of both IBSA and BRICS are often called into question. IBSA’s two-year successive postponement of its annual summit, five of which have taken place thus far, has prompted questions regarding the continued relevance of an organisation which in many ways is viewed as duplicating the functions of BRICS. Combined with the fact that BRICS contains the political-economic weight of Russia and China (permanent members of the United Nations Security Council and Nuclear Superpowers), the future of IBSA is doubted by some. To determine the future of IBSA, it is important to examine how it differs from BRICS in terms of capacity, priorities and political character. (…) |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014 2024-10-03T23:53:14Z 2024-10-03T23:53:14Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
Policy Research Brief |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/handle/11058/15248 |
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv |
ark:/51990/0013000001k60 |
url |
https://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/handle/11058/15248 |
identifier_str_mv |
ark:/51990/0013000001k60 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth United Nations Development Programme Licença total exclusiva info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth United Nations Development Programme Licença total exclusiva |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea) instname:Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA) instacron:IPEA |
instname_str |
Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA) |
instacron_str |
IPEA |
institution |
IPEA |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea) |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea) - Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
suporte@ipea.gov.br |
_version_ |
1815173048665374720 |