Fiscal equalisation in Brazil, Canada and Australia: The case of states or provinces

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mendes, Constantino Cronemberger
Data de Publicação: 2022
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea)
dARK ID: ark:/51990/001300000gvnx
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/handle/11058/15330
Resumo: As federated countries, Brazil, Canada and Australia follow distinct fiscal equalisation models, considering the interrelationships between federal and state or provincial governments, to provide adequate public services. An ideal equalisation model should feature a systemic view of fiscal capacities and social needs, as in Canada and Australia. This is particularly important for Brazil, considering the significant heterogeneities and inequalities in the socioeconomic structures of the country’s 26 states.
id IPEA_536eb0daafe0440227ead801d37de094
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ipea.gov.br:11058/15330
network_acronym_str IPEA
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea)
repository_id_str
spelling Fiscal equalisation in Brazil, Canada and Australia: The case of states or provincesfiscal equalisationfiscal capacityAs federated countries, Brazil, Canada and Australia follow distinct fiscal equalisation models, considering the interrelationships between federal and state or provincial governments, to provide adequate public services. An ideal equalisation model should feature a systemic view of fiscal capacities and social needs, as in Canada and Australia. This is particularly important for Brazil, considering the significant heterogeneities and inequalities in the socioeconomic structures of the country’s 26 states.7 p. : il.2024-10-03T23:54:45Z2024-10-03T23:54:45Z2022Policy Research Briefinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/handle/11058/15330ark:/51990/001300000gvnxInternational Policy Centre for Inclusive GrowthUnited Nations Development ProgrammeLicença total exclusivaO texto e dados desta publicação podem ser reproduzidos desde que as fontes sejam citadas. Reproduções com fins comerciais são proibidas.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMendes, Constantino Cronembergerengreponame:Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea)instname:Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA)instacron:IPEA2024-10-04T06:18:02Zoai:repositorio.ipea.gov.br:11058/15330Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/oai/requestsuporte@ipea.gov.bropendoar:2024-10-04T06:18:02Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea) - Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Fiscal equalisation in Brazil, Canada and Australia: The case of states or provinces
title Fiscal equalisation in Brazil, Canada and Australia: The case of states or provinces
spellingShingle Fiscal equalisation in Brazil, Canada and Australia: The case of states or provinces
Mendes, Constantino Cronemberger
fiscal equalisation
fiscal capacity
title_short Fiscal equalisation in Brazil, Canada and Australia: The case of states or provinces
title_full Fiscal equalisation in Brazil, Canada and Australia: The case of states or provinces
title_fullStr Fiscal equalisation in Brazil, Canada and Australia: The case of states or provinces
title_full_unstemmed Fiscal equalisation in Brazil, Canada and Australia: The case of states or provinces
title_sort Fiscal equalisation in Brazil, Canada and Australia: The case of states or provinces
author Mendes, Constantino Cronemberger
author_facet Mendes, Constantino Cronemberger
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mendes, Constantino Cronemberger
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv fiscal equalisation
fiscal capacity
topic fiscal equalisation
fiscal capacity
description As federated countries, Brazil, Canada and Australia follow distinct fiscal equalisation models, considering the interrelationships between federal and state or provincial governments, to provide adequate public services. An ideal equalisation model should feature a systemic view of fiscal capacities and social needs, as in Canada and Australia. This is particularly important for Brazil, considering the significant heterogeneities and inequalities in the socioeconomic structures of the country’s 26 states.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022
2024-10-03T23:54:45Z
2024-10-03T23:54:45Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv Policy Research Brief
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/handle/11058/15330
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv ark:/51990/001300000gvnx
url https://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/handle/11058/15330
identifier_str_mv ark:/51990/001300000gvnx
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth
United Nations Development Programme
Licença total exclusiva
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth
United Nations Development Programme
Licença total exclusiva
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea)
instname:Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA)
instacron:IPEA
instname_str Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA)
instacron_str IPEA
institution IPEA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea)
collection Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea) - Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv suporte@ipea.gov.br
_version_ 1815173103394750464