Financial Liberalization and Domestic Resource Mobilization in Africa: an Assessment

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Serieux, John
Data de Publicação: 2008
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea)
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/handle/11058/15321
Resumo: Sub-Saharan Africa’s improving growth record in the first decade of the twenty-first century gives some hope that the potential for achieving the Millennium Development Goals will be enhanced by the improved economic conditions of the disadvantaged citizens of these countries. However, growth alone, even if it were much higher, would not be sufficient to ensure the achievement of the MDGs. The resources required for achieving them are beyond the capacity of most of these countries at present, and in the immediate future. Thus, for the region, the MDGs will be achievable only with substantial external resource inflows. In the immediate term, these resource inflows might also help to relieve the savings and foreign exchange constraints faced by most of these countries. However, movement to a higher growth and human development trajectory and eventual progress beyond such heavy dependence on external assistance require that these countries continue to develop their capacity for domestic resource mobilization. This is an area where progress is decidedly wanting for much of the region. Since 1980, Africa has had the weakest domestic resource mobilization record of any region (see Table 1 of the Appendix). On average, foreign savings have been necessary for funding more than 35 per cent of the region’s already low investment levels (see Table 2 of the Appendix). And, more to the point, these foreign resource inflows have come largely in the form of official development assistance rather than private capital flows. Given this record, if the region does not significantly improve domestic resource mobilization over the next decade, increased resource inflows pose a serious risk of entrenching (or institutionalizing) aid dependency—a situation in which high levels of external assistance perpetuate or exacerbate low savings rates. In this situation, countries lose the capacity to mobilize the resources necessary for generating even moderate growth in the absence of such aid. (...)
id IPEA_c76dccb8ed8807b6454cbff57c2530e2
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ipea.gov.br:11058/15321
network_acronym_str IPEA
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea)
repository_id_str
spelling Financial Liberalization and Domestic Resource Mobilization in Africa: an AssessmentFinancial LiberalizationDomestic Resource MobilizationAfricaSub-Saharan Africa’s improving growth record in the first decade of the twenty-first century gives some hope that the potential for achieving the Millennium Development Goals will be enhanced by the improved economic conditions of the disadvantaged citizens of these countries. However, growth alone, even if it were much higher, would not be sufficient to ensure the achievement of the MDGs. The resources required for achieving them are beyond the capacity of most of these countries at present, and in the immediate future. Thus, for the region, the MDGs will be achievable only with substantial external resource inflows. In the immediate term, these resource inflows might also help to relieve the savings and foreign exchange constraints faced by most of these countries. However, movement to a higher growth and human development trajectory and eventual progress beyond such heavy dependence on external assistance require that these countries continue to develop their capacity for domestic resource mobilization. This is an area where progress is decidedly wanting for much of the region. Since 1980, Africa has had the weakest domestic resource mobilization record of any region (see Table 1 of the Appendix). On average, foreign savings have been necessary for funding more than 35 per cent of the region’s already low investment levels (see Table 2 of the Appendix). And, more to the point, these foreign resource inflows have come largely in the form of official development assistance rather than private capital flows. Given this record, if the region does not significantly improve domestic resource mobilization over the next decade, increased resource inflows pose a serious risk of entrenching (or institutionalizing) aid dependency—a situation in which high levels of external assistance perpetuate or exacerbate low savings rates. In this situation, countries lose the capacity to mobilize the resources necessary for generating even moderate growth in the absence of such aid. (...)35 p. : il.2024-10-03T23:54:34Z2024-10-03T23:54:34Z2008info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/handle/11058/15321International Policy Centre for Inclusive GrowthUnited Nations Development ProgrammeLicença total exclusivaO texto e dados desta publicação podem ser reproduzidos desde que as fontes sejam citadas. Reproduções com fins comerciais são proibidas.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSerieux, Johnengreponame:Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea)instname:Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA)instacron:IPEA2024-10-04T06:17:48Zoai:repositorio.ipea.gov.br:11058/15321Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/oai/requestsuporte@ipea.gov.bropendoar:2024-10-04T06:17:48Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea) - Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Financial Liberalization and Domestic Resource Mobilization in Africa: an Assessment
title Financial Liberalization and Domestic Resource Mobilization in Africa: an Assessment
spellingShingle Financial Liberalization and Domestic Resource Mobilization in Africa: an Assessment
Serieux, John
Financial Liberalization
Domestic Resource Mobilization
Africa
title_short Financial Liberalization and Domestic Resource Mobilization in Africa: an Assessment
title_full Financial Liberalization and Domestic Resource Mobilization in Africa: an Assessment
title_fullStr Financial Liberalization and Domestic Resource Mobilization in Africa: an Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Financial Liberalization and Domestic Resource Mobilization in Africa: an Assessment
title_sort Financial Liberalization and Domestic Resource Mobilization in Africa: an Assessment
author Serieux, John
author_facet Serieux, John
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Serieux, John
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Financial Liberalization
Domestic Resource Mobilization
Africa
topic Financial Liberalization
Domestic Resource Mobilization
Africa
description Sub-Saharan Africa’s improving growth record in the first decade of the twenty-first century gives some hope that the potential for achieving the Millennium Development Goals will be enhanced by the improved economic conditions of the disadvantaged citizens of these countries. However, growth alone, even if it were much higher, would not be sufficient to ensure the achievement of the MDGs. The resources required for achieving them are beyond the capacity of most of these countries at present, and in the immediate future. Thus, for the region, the MDGs will be achievable only with substantial external resource inflows. In the immediate term, these resource inflows might also help to relieve the savings and foreign exchange constraints faced by most of these countries. However, movement to a higher growth and human development trajectory and eventual progress beyond such heavy dependence on external assistance require that these countries continue to develop their capacity for domestic resource mobilization. This is an area where progress is decidedly wanting for much of the region. Since 1980, Africa has had the weakest domestic resource mobilization record of any region (see Table 1 of the Appendix). On average, foreign savings have been necessary for funding more than 35 per cent of the region’s already low investment levels (see Table 2 of the Appendix). And, more to the point, these foreign resource inflows have come largely in the form of official development assistance rather than private capital flows. Given this record, if the region does not significantly improve domestic resource mobilization over the next decade, increased resource inflows pose a serious risk of entrenching (or institutionalizing) aid dependency—a situation in which high levels of external assistance perpetuate or exacerbate low savings rates. In this situation, countries lose the capacity to mobilize the resources necessary for generating even moderate growth in the absence of such aid. (...)
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008
2024-10-03T23:54:34Z
2024-10-03T23:54:34Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/handle/11058/15321
url https://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/handle/11058/15321
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth
United Nations Development Programme
Licença total exclusiva
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth
United Nations Development Programme
Licença total exclusiva
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea)
instname:Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA)
instacron:IPEA
instname_str Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA)
instacron_str IPEA
institution IPEA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea)
collection Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea) - Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv suporte@ipea.gov.br
_version_ 1814440876237127680