Reorienting development: towards an engendered employment strategy

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Jahan, Selim
Data de Publicação: 2005
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea)
dARK ID: ark:/51990/001300000hnsf
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/handle/11058/15631
Resumo: Development strategies, in the name of gender-neutral, are gender-blind. The gender blindness of development strategies are derived from the gender-insensitiveness of dominant development paradigms, which, in the name of work, do not make any distinction between productive and reproductive work and does not differentiate, in the name of household, the asymmetries faced by its different members on the basis of sex. Given the nature of gender blindness of development strategies, it is clear that issues related to work and employment are at the core of it. For example, if work done by women within households and for the care economy continues to be not properly valued and compensated for, development strategies would be biased against women. If labour supply functions continue to exclude the trade-off between productive and reproductive functions of women, employment strategies would be partial. The failure to recognize the differentiated position of women within households in terms of opportunities also has adverse implications on work, employment and incomes of women. Female employment is crucial for equitable growth and poverty reduction. Enhanced female employment and income also contribute to better priority setting and resource allocation within families, as women are more prudent. Women, however, have been found to be concentrated in lowpaying, low productive jobs, they account for major part of temporary, part-time and precarious employment. An employment-friendly strategy is not necessarily gendersensitive. Engendering employment strategy would require reorienting the macro policies, the incentive mechanisms and catering to specific needs of women as they juggle between their productive and reproductive roles, and protecting their rights and safety as workers.
id IPEA_e274044607f1b11595ef05b9f1828a14
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ipea.gov.br:11058/15631
network_acronym_str IPEA
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea)
repository_id_str
spelling Reorienting development: towards an engendered employment strategyDevelopmentGenderPovertyEconomic policiesDevelopment strategies, in the name of gender-neutral, are gender-blind. The gender blindness of development strategies are derived from the gender-insensitiveness of dominant development paradigms, which, in the name of work, do not make any distinction between productive and reproductive work and does not differentiate, in the name of household, the asymmetries faced by its different members on the basis of sex. Given the nature of gender blindness of development strategies, it is clear that issues related to work and employment are at the core of it. For example, if work done by women within households and for the care economy continues to be not properly valued and compensated for, development strategies would be biased against women. If labour supply functions continue to exclude the trade-off between productive and reproductive functions of women, employment strategies would be partial. The failure to recognize the differentiated position of women within households in terms of opportunities also has adverse implications on work, employment and incomes of women. Female employment is crucial for equitable growth and poverty reduction. Enhanced female employment and income also contribute to better priority setting and resource allocation within families, as women are more prudent. Women, however, have been found to be concentrated in lowpaying, low productive jobs, they account for major part of temporary, part-time and precarious employment. An employment-friendly strategy is not necessarily gendersensitive. Engendering employment strategy would require reorienting the macro policies, the incentive mechanisms and catering to specific needs of women as they juggle between their productive and reproductive roles, and protecting their rights and safety as workers.19 p. : il.2024-10-04T00:02:28Z2024-10-04T00:02:28Z2005info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/handle/11058/15631ark:/51990/001300000hnsfInternational Policy Centre for Inclusive GrowthUnited Nations Development ProgrammeLicença total exclusivaO texto e dados desta publicação podem ser reproduzidos desde que as fontes sejam citadas. Reproduções com fins comerciais são proibidas.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessJahan, Selimengreponame:Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea)instname:Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA)instacron:IPEA2024-10-04T06:03:52Zoai:repositorio.ipea.gov.br:11058/15631Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/oai/requestsuporte@ipea.gov.bropendoar:2024-10-04T06:03:52Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea) - Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Reorienting development: towards an engendered employment strategy
title Reorienting development: towards an engendered employment strategy
spellingShingle Reorienting development: towards an engendered employment strategy
Jahan, Selim
Development
Gender
Poverty
Economic policies
title_short Reorienting development: towards an engendered employment strategy
title_full Reorienting development: towards an engendered employment strategy
title_fullStr Reorienting development: towards an engendered employment strategy
title_full_unstemmed Reorienting development: towards an engendered employment strategy
title_sort Reorienting development: towards an engendered employment strategy
author Jahan, Selim
author_facet Jahan, Selim
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Jahan, Selim
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Development
Gender
Poverty
Economic policies
topic Development
Gender
Poverty
Economic policies
description Development strategies, in the name of gender-neutral, are gender-blind. The gender blindness of development strategies are derived from the gender-insensitiveness of dominant development paradigms, which, in the name of work, do not make any distinction between productive and reproductive work and does not differentiate, in the name of household, the asymmetries faced by its different members on the basis of sex. Given the nature of gender blindness of development strategies, it is clear that issues related to work and employment are at the core of it. For example, if work done by women within households and for the care economy continues to be not properly valued and compensated for, development strategies would be biased against women. If labour supply functions continue to exclude the trade-off between productive and reproductive functions of women, employment strategies would be partial. The failure to recognize the differentiated position of women within households in terms of opportunities also has adverse implications on work, employment and incomes of women. Female employment is crucial for equitable growth and poverty reduction. Enhanced female employment and income also contribute to better priority setting and resource allocation within families, as women are more prudent. Women, however, have been found to be concentrated in lowpaying, low productive jobs, they account for major part of temporary, part-time and precarious employment. An employment-friendly strategy is not necessarily gendersensitive. Engendering employment strategy would require reorienting the macro policies, the incentive mechanisms and catering to specific needs of women as they juggle between their productive and reproductive roles, and protecting their rights and safety as workers.
publishDate 2005
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2005
2024-10-04T00:02:28Z
2024-10-04T00:02:28Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/handle/11058/15631
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv ark:/51990/001300000hnsf
url https://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/handle/11058/15631
identifier_str_mv ark:/51990/001300000hnsf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth
United Nations Development Programme
Licença total exclusiva
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth
United Nations Development Programme
Licença total exclusiva
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea)
instname:Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA)
instacron:IPEA
instname_str Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA)
instacron_str IPEA
institution IPEA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea)
collection Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea) - Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv suporte@ipea.gov.br
_version_ 1815173106472321024