Reorienting development: towards an engendered employment strategy
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2005 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea) |
dARK ID: | ark:/51990/001300000hnsf |
Texto Completo: | https://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/handle/11058/15631 |
Resumo: | Development strategies, in the name of gender-neutral, are gender-blind. The gender blindness of development strategies are derived from the gender-insensitiveness of dominant development paradigms, which, in the name of work, do not make any distinction between productive and reproductive work and does not differentiate, in the name of household, the asymmetries faced by its different members on the basis of sex. Given the nature of gender blindness of development strategies, it is clear that issues related to work and employment are at the core of it. For example, if work done by women within households and for the care economy continues to be not properly valued and compensated for, development strategies would be biased against women. If labour supply functions continue to exclude the trade-off between productive and reproductive functions of women, employment strategies would be partial. The failure to recognize the differentiated position of women within households in terms of opportunities also has adverse implications on work, employment and incomes of women. Female employment is crucial for equitable growth and poverty reduction. Enhanced female employment and income also contribute to better priority setting and resource allocation within families, as women are more prudent. Women, however, have been found to be concentrated in lowpaying, low productive jobs, they account for major part of temporary, part-time and precarious employment. An employment-friendly strategy is not necessarily gendersensitive. Engendering employment strategy would require reorienting the macro policies, the incentive mechanisms and catering to specific needs of women as they juggle between their productive and reproductive roles, and protecting their rights and safety as workers. |
id |
IPEA_e274044607f1b11595ef05b9f1828a14 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ipea.gov.br:11058/15631 |
network_acronym_str |
IPEA |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Reorienting development: towards an engendered employment strategyDevelopmentGenderPovertyEconomic policiesDevelopment strategies, in the name of gender-neutral, are gender-blind. The gender blindness of development strategies are derived from the gender-insensitiveness of dominant development paradigms, which, in the name of work, do not make any distinction between productive and reproductive work and does not differentiate, in the name of household, the asymmetries faced by its different members on the basis of sex. Given the nature of gender blindness of development strategies, it is clear that issues related to work and employment are at the core of it. For example, if work done by women within households and for the care economy continues to be not properly valued and compensated for, development strategies would be biased against women. If labour supply functions continue to exclude the trade-off between productive and reproductive functions of women, employment strategies would be partial. The failure to recognize the differentiated position of women within households in terms of opportunities also has adverse implications on work, employment and incomes of women. Female employment is crucial for equitable growth and poverty reduction. Enhanced female employment and income also contribute to better priority setting and resource allocation within families, as women are more prudent. Women, however, have been found to be concentrated in lowpaying, low productive jobs, they account for major part of temporary, part-time and precarious employment. An employment-friendly strategy is not necessarily gendersensitive. Engendering employment strategy would require reorienting the macro policies, the incentive mechanisms and catering to specific needs of women as they juggle between their productive and reproductive roles, and protecting their rights and safety as workers.19 p. : il.2024-10-04T00:02:28Z2024-10-04T00:02:28Z2005info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/handle/11058/15631ark:/51990/001300000hnsfInternational Policy Centre for Inclusive GrowthUnited Nations Development ProgrammeLicença total exclusivaO texto e dados desta publicação podem ser reproduzidos desde que as fontes sejam citadas. Reproduções com fins comerciais são proibidas.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessJahan, Selimengreponame:Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea)instname:Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA)instacron:IPEA2024-10-04T06:03:52Zoai:repositorio.ipea.gov.br:11058/15631Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/oai/requestsuporte@ipea.gov.bropendoar:2024-10-04T06:03:52Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea) - Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Reorienting development: towards an engendered employment strategy |
title |
Reorienting development: towards an engendered employment strategy |
spellingShingle |
Reorienting development: towards an engendered employment strategy Jahan, Selim Development Gender Poverty Economic policies |
title_short |
Reorienting development: towards an engendered employment strategy |
title_full |
Reorienting development: towards an engendered employment strategy |
title_fullStr |
Reorienting development: towards an engendered employment strategy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reorienting development: towards an engendered employment strategy |
title_sort |
Reorienting development: towards an engendered employment strategy |
author |
Jahan, Selim |
author_facet |
Jahan, Selim |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Jahan, Selim |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Development Gender Poverty Economic policies |
topic |
Development Gender Poverty Economic policies |
description |
Development strategies, in the name of gender-neutral, are gender-blind. The gender blindness of development strategies are derived from the gender-insensitiveness of dominant development paradigms, which, in the name of work, do not make any distinction between productive and reproductive work and does not differentiate, in the name of household, the asymmetries faced by its different members on the basis of sex. Given the nature of gender blindness of development strategies, it is clear that issues related to work and employment are at the core of it. For example, if work done by women within households and for the care economy continues to be not properly valued and compensated for, development strategies would be biased against women. If labour supply functions continue to exclude the trade-off between productive and reproductive functions of women, employment strategies would be partial. The failure to recognize the differentiated position of women within households in terms of opportunities also has adverse implications on work, employment and incomes of women. Female employment is crucial for equitable growth and poverty reduction. Enhanced female employment and income also contribute to better priority setting and resource allocation within families, as women are more prudent. Women, however, have been found to be concentrated in lowpaying, low productive jobs, they account for major part of temporary, part-time and precarious employment. An employment-friendly strategy is not necessarily gendersensitive. Engendering employment strategy would require reorienting the macro policies, the incentive mechanisms and catering to specific needs of women as they juggle between their productive and reproductive roles, and protecting their rights and safety as workers. |
publishDate |
2005 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2005 2024-10-04T00:02:28Z 2024-10-04T00:02:28Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/handle/11058/15631 |
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv |
ark:/51990/001300000hnsf |
url |
https://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/handle/11058/15631 |
identifier_str_mv |
ark:/51990/001300000hnsf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth United Nations Development Programme Licença total exclusiva info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth United Nations Development Programme Licença total exclusiva |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea) instname:Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA) instacron:IPEA |
instname_str |
Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA) |
instacron_str |
IPEA |
institution |
IPEA |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea) |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da IPEA (RCIpea) - Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
suporte@ipea.gov.br |
_version_ |
1815173106472321024 |