Profile of Clinical Trials Submitted for Ethical Review by the National Research Ethics Committee between 2015 and 2019
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Journal of Forensic Sciences, Medical Law and Bioethics |
Texto Completo: | https://www.ipebj.com.br/bjfs/index.php/bjfs/article/view/814 |
Resumo: | We aim to characterize the clinical trials submitted for Conep’s ethical analysis. The protocolos were registered in Plataforma Brasil from 2015 to 2019, and to compare national and international clinical trials. In this sense, we did an exploratory and retrospective study using Plataforma Brasil with extraction of data from clinical research protocols. Only initial protocols were considered. The data were presented by frequency and relative distribution and the comparison was made in relation to protocols with origin from Brazil and overseas. 904 clinical trials were submitted for ethical analysis from phase I to IV. He number of clinical trials remained stable during the analyzed period, with a downward trend for international studies with private funding and an upward trend for national studies with public funding. There was a difference between the profile of national and international clinical trials. In despite of the growing government incentive and a slight increase in the number of national studies with public funding, there is still a huge foreign dependence, which impedes scientific development in the country. The results obtained in the present study can contribute to the debate on clinical research in Brazil. |
id |
IPEBJ_7cd66f68748bd10988ae6109abc229af |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:bjfs:article/814 |
network_acronym_str |
IPEBJ |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Forensic Sciences, Medical Law and Bioethics |
spelling |
Profile of Clinical Trials Submitted for Ethical Review by the National Research Ethics Committee between 2015 and 2019Perfil dos ensaios clínicos submetidos para apreciação ética da Comissão Nacional de Ética em Pesquisa entre 2015 a 2019Clinical trialBioethicsClinical trial protocolResearch ethics committeeEnsaio ClínicoBioéticaProtocolo de Ensaio ClínicoComitês de Ética em PesquisaWe aim to characterize the clinical trials submitted for Conep’s ethical analysis. The protocolos were registered in Plataforma Brasil from 2015 to 2019, and to compare national and international clinical trials. In this sense, we did an exploratory and retrospective study using Plataforma Brasil with extraction of data from clinical research protocols. Only initial protocols were considered. The data were presented by frequency and relative distribution and the comparison was made in relation to protocols with origin from Brazil and overseas. 904 clinical trials were submitted for ethical analysis from phase I to IV. He number of clinical trials remained stable during the analyzed period, with a downward trend for international studies with private funding and an upward trend for national studies with public funding. There was a difference between the profile of national and international clinical trials. In despite of the growing government incentive and a slight increase in the number of national studies with public funding, there is still a huge foreign dependence, which impedes scientific development in the country. The results obtained in the present study can contribute to the debate on clinical research in Brazil.O objetivo deste trabalho é caracterizar os ensaios clínicos submetidos para análise ética da Conep, registrados na base de dados da Plataforma Brasil de 2015 a 2019, e comparar os ensaios clínicos nacionais e internacionais. Para isso, fez-se um estudo exploratório e retrospectivo na base de dados da Plataforma Brasil com extração dos dados de protocolos de pesquisa clínica submetidos para análise da Conep. Foram considerados somente protocolos iniciais. Os dados foram apresentados pela distribuição das frequências absoluta e relativa e a comparação foi feita em relação aos protocolos com origem nacional e internacional. Foram submetidos 904 ensaios clínicos para análise ética de fase I a IV. A quantidade de ensaios clínicos se manteve estável durante o período analisado, observando-se tendência de queda para os estudos internacionais com financiamento privado e tendência de aumento entre os estudos nacionais com financiamento público. Houve diferença entre o perfil dos ensaios clínicos nacionais e internacionais. Apesar do crescente incentivo governamental e um discreto aumento na quantidade de estudos nacionais com financiamento público, ainda existe uma enorme dependência estrangeira, que impede o desenvolvimento científico no país. Os resultados obtidos no presente trabalho podem contribuir para o debate sobre a pesquisa clínica no Brasil.IPEBJ2021-02-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo Originalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://www.ipebj.com.br/bjfs/index.php/bjfs/article/view/81410.17063/bjfs10(2)y2021164-177Brazilian Journal of Forensic Sciences, Medical Law and Bioethics; v. 10 n. 2 (2021): Volume 10 - Número 2; 164-177Brazilian Journal of Forensic Sciences, Medical Law and Bioethics; Vol. 10 No. 2 (2021): Volume 10 - Número 2; 164-1772237-261Xreponame:Brazilian Journal of Forensic Sciences, Medical Law and Bioethicsinstname:Instituto Paulista de Estudos Bioéticos e Jurídicos (IPEBJ)instacron:IPEBJporhttps://www.ipebj.com.br/bjfs/index.php/bjfs/article/view/814/928Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Forensic Sciences, Medical Law and Bioethicshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNaud, Ludmila2021-04-22T12:23:08Zoai:bjfs:article/814Revistahttps://www.ipebj.com.br/bjfs/index.php/bjfs/homePRIhttps://www.ipebj.com.br/bjfs/index.php/bjfs/oai2237-261X2237-261Xopendoar:2021-04-22 12:23:10.268Brazilian Journal of Forensic Sciences, Medical Law and Bioethics - Instituto Paulista de Estudos Bioéticos e Jurídicos (IPEBJ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Profile of Clinical Trials Submitted for Ethical Review by the National Research Ethics Committee between 2015 and 2019 Perfil dos ensaios clínicos submetidos para apreciação ética da Comissão Nacional de Ética em Pesquisa entre 2015 a 2019 |
title |
Profile of Clinical Trials Submitted for Ethical Review by the National Research Ethics Committee between 2015 and 2019 |
spellingShingle |
Profile of Clinical Trials Submitted for Ethical Review by the National Research Ethics Committee between 2015 and 2019 Naud, Ludmila Clinical trial Bioethics Clinical trial protocol Research ethics committee Ensaio Clínico Bioética Protocolo de Ensaio Clínico Comitês de Ética em Pesquisa |
title_short |
Profile of Clinical Trials Submitted for Ethical Review by the National Research Ethics Committee between 2015 and 2019 |
title_full |
Profile of Clinical Trials Submitted for Ethical Review by the National Research Ethics Committee between 2015 and 2019 |
title_fullStr |
Profile of Clinical Trials Submitted for Ethical Review by the National Research Ethics Committee between 2015 and 2019 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Profile of Clinical Trials Submitted for Ethical Review by the National Research Ethics Committee between 2015 and 2019 |
title_sort |
Profile of Clinical Trials Submitted for Ethical Review by the National Research Ethics Committee between 2015 and 2019 |
author |
Naud, Ludmila |
author_facet |
Naud, Ludmila |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Naud, Ludmila |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Clinical trial Bioethics Clinical trial protocol Research ethics committee Ensaio Clínico Bioética Protocolo de Ensaio Clínico Comitês de Ética em Pesquisa |
topic |
Clinical trial Bioethics Clinical trial protocol Research ethics committee Ensaio Clínico Bioética Protocolo de Ensaio Clínico Comitês de Ética em Pesquisa |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
We aim to characterize the clinical trials submitted for Conep’s ethical analysis. The protocolos were registered in Plataforma Brasil from 2015 to 2019, and to compare national and international clinical trials. In this sense, we did an exploratory and retrospective study using Plataforma Brasil with extraction of data from clinical research protocols. Only initial protocols were considered. The data were presented by frequency and relative distribution and the comparison was made in relation to protocols with origin from Brazil and overseas. 904 clinical trials were submitted for ethical analysis from phase I to IV. He number of clinical trials remained stable during the analyzed period, with a downward trend for international studies with private funding and an upward trend for national studies with public funding. There was a difference between the profile of national and international clinical trials. In despite of the growing government incentive and a slight increase in the number of national studies with public funding, there is still a huge foreign dependence, which impedes scientific development in the country. The results obtained in the present study can contribute to the debate on clinical research in Brazil. O objetivo deste trabalho é caracterizar os ensaios clínicos submetidos para análise ética da Conep, registrados na base de dados da Plataforma Brasil de 2015 a 2019, e comparar os ensaios clínicos nacionais e internacionais. Para isso, fez-se um estudo exploratório e retrospectivo na base de dados da Plataforma Brasil com extração dos dados de protocolos de pesquisa clínica submetidos para análise da Conep. Foram considerados somente protocolos iniciais. Os dados foram apresentados pela distribuição das frequências absoluta e relativa e a comparação foi feita em relação aos protocolos com origem nacional e internacional. Foram submetidos 904 ensaios clínicos para análise ética de fase I a IV. A quantidade de ensaios clínicos se manteve estável durante o período analisado, observando-se tendência de queda para os estudos internacionais com financiamento privado e tendência de aumento entre os estudos nacionais com financiamento público. Houve diferença entre o perfil dos ensaios clínicos nacionais e internacionais. Apesar do crescente incentivo governamental e um discreto aumento na quantidade de estudos nacionais com financiamento público, ainda existe uma enorme dependência estrangeira, que impede o desenvolvimento científico no país. Os resultados obtidos no presente trabalho podem contribuir para o debate sobre a pesquisa clínica no Brasil. |
description |
We aim to characterize the clinical trials submitted for Conep’s ethical analysis. The protocolos were registered in Plataforma Brasil from 2015 to 2019, and to compare national and international clinical trials. In this sense, we did an exploratory and retrospective study using Plataforma Brasil with extraction of data from clinical research protocols. Only initial protocols were considered. The data were presented by frequency and relative distribution and the comparison was made in relation to protocols with origin from Brazil and overseas. 904 clinical trials were submitted for ethical analysis from phase I to IV. He number of clinical trials remained stable during the analyzed period, with a downward trend for international studies with private funding and an upward trend for national studies with public funding. There was a difference between the profile of national and international clinical trials. In despite of the growing government incentive and a slight increase in the number of national studies with public funding, there is still a huge foreign dependence, which impedes scientific development in the country. The results obtained in the present study can contribute to the debate on clinical research in Brazil. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-02-18 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo Original info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.ipebj.com.br/bjfs/index.php/bjfs/article/view/814 10.17063/bjfs10(2)y2021164-177 |
url |
https://www.ipebj.com.br/bjfs/index.php/bjfs/article/view/814 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.17063/bjfs10(2)y2021164-177 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.ipebj.com.br/bjfs/index.php/bjfs/article/view/814/928 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Forensic Sciences, Medical Law and Bioethics https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Forensic Sciences, Medical Law and Bioethics https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
IPEBJ |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
IPEBJ |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Forensic Sciences, Medical Law and Bioethics; v. 10 n. 2 (2021): Volume 10 - Número 2; 164-177 Brazilian Journal of Forensic Sciences, Medical Law and Bioethics; Vol. 10 No. 2 (2021): Volume 10 - Número 2; 164-177 2237-261X reponame:Brazilian Journal of Forensic Sciences, Medical Law and Bioethics instname:Instituto Paulista de Estudos Bioéticos e Jurídicos (IPEBJ) instacron:IPEBJ |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Forensic Sciences, Medical Law and Bioethics |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Forensic Sciences, Medical Law and Bioethics |
instname_str |
Instituto Paulista de Estudos Bioéticos e Jurídicos (IPEBJ) |
instacron_str |
IPEBJ |
institution |
IPEBJ |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Forensic Sciences, Medical Law and Bioethics - Instituto Paulista de Estudos Bioéticos e Jurídicos (IPEBJ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1697756592216211456 |