Fuel performance of iron-based alloy cladding using modified TRANSURANUS code

• Autor(a) principal: GIOVEDI, CLAUDIA
• Data de Publicação: 2020
• Outros Autores: MELO, CAIO, ABE, ALFREDO Y., SILVA, ANTONIO T., MARTINS, MARCELO R., INTERNATIONAL NUCLEAR ATLANTIC CONFERENCE
• Tipo de documento: Artigo de conferência
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional do IPEN
• Texto Completo: http://repositorio.ipen.br/handle/123456789/30812
• topic: cladding; comparative evaluations; computerized simulation; fuel rods; iron alloys; nuclear fuels; performance; pwr type reactors; stainless steel-348; steady-state conditions; t codes; zircaloy 4

The main challenge in the nuclear area since the Fukushima Daiichi accident is to develop fuel materials to be applied in nuclear reactors aiming to increase the safety under normal operation as well as transient and accident conditions. These efforts are concentrated in the Advanced Technology Fuel (ATF) program that has as main scopes to study cladding materials to replace the zirconium-based alloys, and fuel materials presenting higher thermal conductivity compared to the conventional uranium dioxide fuel pellet. In this sense, iron-based alloys, which were used with a good performance as cladding material in the first Pressurized Water Reactors (PWR), have becoming a good option. The assessment of the behavior of different materials previously to perform irradiation tests, which are time consuming, can be performed using fuel performance codes, but for this, the conventional fuel performance codes must be modified to implement the properties of the materials that are being studied. This paper presents the results obtained using a modified version of the well-known TRANSURANUS code, obtained from the implementation of the stainless steel 348 properties as cladding material. The simulations were performed using data available in the open literature related to a PWR irradiation experiment. The results obtained using the modified version of the code were compared to those obtained using the original code version for zircaloy-4. The performance of both cladding materials was evaluated by means of the comparison of parameters such as gap thickness, fuel centerline temperature, internal pressure, and cladding stress and strain.