The impact of laboratory chow for rats in the experiments: Chemical and biological evaluation of nine grain-based diet options

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ferreira, R. S.; et. al.
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório do Instituto de Tecnologia de Alimentos
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.ital.sp.gov.br/jspui/handle/123456789/241
Resumo: Cereal-based diets formulated as semi-purified diets can provide flexibility for researchers, enabling open controlled formulas, besides being cheaper than purified diets. Seeking to widen the researchers’ options in their experimental design developments, we aimed at assaying the chemical score, growth performance and protein utilization of nine semi-purified experimental chows. These diets were formulated at 17.8%, 12% and 8% protein contents, using three variations of ingredients for each one, as follows: casein (C), caseinþsoybean meal (CþS, 1:1 w/w protein) and caseinþsoybean mealþcorn gluten meal (CþSþG, 1:1:1 w/w protein), without cysteine supplementation and setting casein 17.8% (AIN-93G) as reference diet. The diets C and CþS (17.8%) had the Cys as the limiting amino acid once the addition of gluten turns the Lys as second limiting. All diets had the potential for promoting growth with body mass gain, feed conversion ratio (FCR; chow consumed per body weight gain, average 3.12) and feed efficiency ratio (FER; body weight gain per chow consumed, average 0.3), except for CþSþG 8% (FCR ¼ 6 g; FER ¼ 0.13). These variations were mainly due to the protein amounts independently from the protein ingredient used and could characterize the CþSþG 8% as unable to support growth. For the other parameters (digestibility, net protein ratio, net protein utilization and protein efficiency ratio), there were no relevant differences between the diets. We can conclude that 17.8%, 12% and 8% chows (C and CþS) allowed a proper combination of ingredients from the point of view of palatability, nutrient availability/utilization, metabolic processes, growth performance and feed utilization parameters.
id ITAL-2_00facf98cf595c5f3b269a213b46be90
oai_identifier_str oai:http://repositorio.ital.sp.gov.br:123456789/241
network_acronym_str ITAL-2
network_name_str Repositório do Instituto de Tecnologia de Alimentos
repository_id_str
spelling The impact of laboratory chow for rats in the experiments: Chemical and biological evaluation of nine grain-based diet optionsExperimental dietsCereal-based dietProtein utilizationChowCereal-based diets formulated as semi-purified diets can provide flexibility for researchers, enabling open controlled formulas, besides being cheaper than purified diets. Seeking to widen the researchers’ options in their experimental design developments, we aimed at assaying the chemical score, growth performance and protein utilization of nine semi-purified experimental chows. These diets were formulated at 17.8%, 12% and 8% protein contents, using three variations of ingredients for each one, as follows: casein (C), caseinþsoybean meal (CþS, 1:1 w/w protein) and caseinþsoybean mealþcorn gluten meal (CþSþG, 1:1:1 w/w protein), without cysteine supplementation and setting casein 17.8% (AIN-93G) as reference diet. The diets C and CþS (17.8%) had the Cys as the limiting amino acid once the addition of gluten turns the Lys as second limiting. All diets had the potential for promoting growth with body mass gain, feed conversion ratio (FCR; chow consumed per body weight gain, average 3.12) and feed efficiency ratio (FER; body weight gain per chow consumed, average 0.3), except for CþSþG 8% (FCR ¼ 6 g; FER ¼ 0.13). These variations were mainly due to the protein amounts independently from the protein ingredient used and could characterize the CþSþG 8% as unable to support growth. For the other parameters (digestibility, net protein ratio, net protein utilization and protein efficiency ratio), there were no relevant differences between the diets. We can conclude that 17.8%, 12% and 8% chows (C and CþS) allowed a proper combination of ingredients from the point of view of palatability, nutrient availability/utilization, metabolic processes, growth performance and feed utilization parameters.Ferreira, R. S.; et. al.2022-03-16T20:07:19Z2022-03-16T20:07:19Z2017info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfHuman & Experimental Toxicology, 2017. DOI: 10.1177/0960327117695637.1477-0903http://repositorio.ital.sp.gov.br/jspui/handle/123456789/241reponame:Repositório do Instituto de Tecnologia de Alimentosinstname:Instituto de Tecnologia de Alimentos (ITAL)instacron:ITALenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-05-20T16:13:55Zoai:http://repositorio.ital.sp.gov.br:123456789/241Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.ital.sp.gov.br/oai/requestbjftsec@ital.sp.gov.br || bjftsec@ital.sp.gov.bropendoar:2022-05-20T16:13:55Repositório do Instituto de Tecnologia de Alimentos - Instituto de Tecnologia de Alimentos (ITAL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The impact of laboratory chow for rats in the experiments: Chemical and biological evaluation of nine grain-based diet options
title The impact of laboratory chow for rats in the experiments: Chemical and biological evaluation of nine grain-based diet options
spellingShingle The impact of laboratory chow for rats in the experiments: Chemical and biological evaluation of nine grain-based diet options
Ferreira, R. S.; et. al.
Experimental diets
Cereal-based diet
Protein utilization
Chow
title_short The impact of laboratory chow for rats in the experiments: Chemical and biological evaluation of nine grain-based diet options
title_full The impact of laboratory chow for rats in the experiments: Chemical and biological evaluation of nine grain-based diet options
title_fullStr The impact of laboratory chow for rats in the experiments: Chemical and biological evaluation of nine grain-based diet options
title_full_unstemmed The impact of laboratory chow for rats in the experiments: Chemical and biological evaluation of nine grain-based diet options
title_sort The impact of laboratory chow for rats in the experiments: Chemical and biological evaluation of nine grain-based diet options
author Ferreira, R. S.; et. al.
author_facet Ferreira, R. S.; et. al.
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv







dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ferreira, R. S.; et. al.
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv

dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Experimental diets
Cereal-based diet
Protein utilization
Chow
topic Experimental diets
Cereal-based diet
Protein utilization
Chow
description Cereal-based diets formulated as semi-purified diets can provide flexibility for researchers, enabling open controlled formulas, besides being cheaper than purified diets. Seeking to widen the researchers’ options in their experimental design developments, we aimed at assaying the chemical score, growth performance and protein utilization of nine semi-purified experimental chows. These diets were formulated at 17.8%, 12% and 8% protein contents, using three variations of ingredients for each one, as follows: casein (C), caseinþsoybean meal (CþS, 1:1 w/w protein) and caseinþsoybean mealþcorn gluten meal (CþSþG, 1:1:1 w/w protein), without cysteine supplementation and setting casein 17.8% (AIN-93G) as reference diet. The diets C and CþS (17.8%) had the Cys as the limiting amino acid once the addition of gluten turns the Lys as second limiting. All diets had the potential for promoting growth with body mass gain, feed conversion ratio (FCR; chow consumed per body weight gain, average 3.12) and feed efficiency ratio (FER; body weight gain per chow consumed, average 0.3), except for CþSþG 8% (FCR ¼ 6 g; FER ¼ 0.13). These variations were mainly due to the protein amounts independently from the protein ingredient used and could characterize the CþSþG 8% as unable to support growth. For the other parameters (digestibility, net protein ratio, net protein utilization and protein efficiency ratio), there were no relevant differences between the diets. We can conclude that 17.8%, 12% and 8% chows (C and CþS) allowed a proper combination of ingredients from the point of view of palatability, nutrient availability/utilization, metabolic processes, growth performance and feed utilization parameters.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv




2017
2022-03-16T20:07:19Z
2022-03-16T20:07:19Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv

dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Human & Experimental Toxicology, 2017. DOI: 10.1177/0960327117695637.
1477-0903
http://repositorio.ital.sp.gov.br/jspui/handle/123456789/241
identifier_str_mv
Human & Experimental Toxicology, 2017. DOI: 10.1177/0960327117695637.
1477-0903
url http://repositorio.ital.sp.gov.br/jspui/handle/123456789/241
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language_invalid_str_mv
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv

dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv

application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv

publisher.none.fl_str_mv

dc.source.none.fl_str_mv
reponame:Repositório do Instituto de Tecnologia de Alimentos
instname:Instituto de Tecnologia de Alimentos (ITAL)
instacron:ITAL
instname_str Instituto de Tecnologia de Alimentos (ITAL)
instacron_str ITAL
institution ITAL
reponame_str Repositório do Instituto de Tecnologia de Alimentos
collection Repositório do Instituto de Tecnologia de Alimentos
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório do Instituto de Tecnologia de Alimentos - Instituto de Tecnologia de Alimentos (ITAL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bjftsec@ital.sp.gov.br || bjftsec@ital.sp.gov.br
_version_ 1798311816759083008