Where are the Brazilian ethnobotanical studies in the Atlantic Forest and Caatinga?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Liporacci,Heitor S.N.
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Hanazaki,Natalia, Ritter,Mara Rejane, Araújo,Elcida de Lima
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Rodriguésia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2175-78602017000601225
Resumo: Abstract The Atlantic Forest and Caatinga ecosystems differ in terms of biodiversity and geoclimatic conditions but are similar in their rich socio-diversity and heterogeneity of vegetation types that comprise their floras. The objectives of this work were to map the ethnobotanical studies that have been conducted in these ecosystems and record the most investigated communities, regions, and vegetation formations related to this research. A literature review was made of ethnobotanical articles related to the use and knowledge of medicinal and food plants employed by local populations within the original territories of the Caatinga and Atlantic Forest. The areas with the highest concentrations of studies (Southeast and South regions in the Atlantic Forest and the states of Pernambuco and Paraíba in the Caatinga) reflect the presence of research groups in these regions. Until now, it was thought that ethnobotanical studies had been conducted throughout the Atlantic Forest and Caatinga; however, the results of this work show that both ecosystems contain areas that still need to be studied.
id JBRJ-1_66371b11af3105d643489da0ad59a818
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2175-78602017000601225
network_acronym_str JBRJ-1
network_name_str Rodriguésia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Where are the Brazilian ethnobotanical studies in the Atlantic Forest and Caatinga?ethnobotanyfood plantsliterature reviewmedicinal plantsAbstract The Atlantic Forest and Caatinga ecosystems differ in terms of biodiversity and geoclimatic conditions but are similar in their rich socio-diversity and heterogeneity of vegetation types that comprise their floras. The objectives of this work were to map the ethnobotanical studies that have been conducted in these ecosystems and record the most investigated communities, regions, and vegetation formations related to this research. A literature review was made of ethnobotanical articles related to the use and knowledge of medicinal and food plants employed by local populations within the original territories of the Caatinga and Atlantic Forest. The areas with the highest concentrations of studies (Southeast and South regions in the Atlantic Forest and the states of Pernambuco and Paraíba in the Caatinga) reflect the presence of research groups in these regions. Until now, it was thought that ethnobotanical studies had been conducted throughout the Atlantic Forest and Caatinga; however, the results of this work show that both ecosystems contain areas that still need to be studied.Instituto de Pesquisas Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro2017-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2175-78602017000601225Rodriguésia v.68 n.4 2017reponame:Rodriguésia (Online)instname:Instituto de Pesquisas Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro (JBRJ)instacron:JBRJ10.1590/2175-7860201768407info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLiporacci,Heitor S.N.Hanazaki,NataliaRitter,Mara RejaneAraújo,Elcida de Limaeng2017-10-16T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2175-78602017000601225Revistahttp://rodriguesia.jbrj.gov.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprodriguesia@jbrj.gov.br2175-78600370-6583opendoar:2017-10-16T00:00Rodriguésia (Online) - Instituto de Pesquisas Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro (JBRJ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Where are the Brazilian ethnobotanical studies in the Atlantic Forest and Caatinga?
title Where are the Brazilian ethnobotanical studies in the Atlantic Forest and Caatinga?
spellingShingle Where are the Brazilian ethnobotanical studies in the Atlantic Forest and Caatinga?
Liporacci,Heitor S.N.
ethnobotany
food plants
literature review
medicinal plants
title_short Where are the Brazilian ethnobotanical studies in the Atlantic Forest and Caatinga?
title_full Where are the Brazilian ethnobotanical studies in the Atlantic Forest and Caatinga?
title_fullStr Where are the Brazilian ethnobotanical studies in the Atlantic Forest and Caatinga?
title_full_unstemmed Where are the Brazilian ethnobotanical studies in the Atlantic Forest and Caatinga?
title_sort Where are the Brazilian ethnobotanical studies in the Atlantic Forest and Caatinga?
author Liporacci,Heitor S.N.
author_facet Liporacci,Heitor S.N.
Hanazaki,Natalia
Ritter,Mara Rejane
Araújo,Elcida de Lima
author_role author
author2 Hanazaki,Natalia
Ritter,Mara Rejane
Araújo,Elcida de Lima
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Liporacci,Heitor S.N.
Hanazaki,Natalia
Ritter,Mara Rejane
Araújo,Elcida de Lima
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv ethnobotany
food plants
literature review
medicinal plants
topic ethnobotany
food plants
literature review
medicinal plants
description Abstract The Atlantic Forest and Caatinga ecosystems differ in terms of biodiversity and geoclimatic conditions but are similar in their rich socio-diversity and heterogeneity of vegetation types that comprise their floras. The objectives of this work were to map the ethnobotanical studies that have been conducted in these ecosystems and record the most investigated communities, regions, and vegetation formations related to this research. A literature review was made of ethnobotanical articles related to the use and knowledge of medicinal and food plants employed by local populations within the original territories of the Caatinga and Atlantic Forest. The areas with the highest concentrations of studies (Southeast and South regions in the Atlantic Forest and the states of Pernambuco and Paraíba in the Caatinga) reflect the presence of research groups in these regions. Until now, it was thought that ethnobotanical studies had been conducted throughout the Atlantic Forest and Caatinga; however, the results of this work show that both ecosystems contain areas that still need to be studied.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2175-78602017000601225
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2175-78602017000601225
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/2175-7860201768407
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Pesquisas Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Pesquisas Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Rodriguésia v.68 n.4 2017
reponame:Rodriguésia (Online)
instname:Instituto de Pesquisas Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro (JBRJ)
instacron:JBRJ
instname_str Instituto de Pesquisas Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro (JBRJ)
instacron_str JBRJ
institution JBRJ
reponame_str Rodriguésia (Online)
collection Rodriguésia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Rodriguésia (Online) - Instituto de Pesquisas Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro (JBRJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rodriguesia@jbrj.gov.br
_version_ 1752128672708427776