CONSUMER’S EVALUATION ABOUT SERVICE RECOVERY: THE ROLE OF SOCIAL COMPARISON

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: BORTOLI,LUIZA VENZKE
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: PIZZUTTI,CRISTIANE
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-69712017000400065
Resumo: ABSTRACT Purpose: This theoretical essay aims to contribute to a deeper understanding of distributive justice in situations of service recovery. More specifically, we seek to investigate distributive justice evaluations based on social comparisons. Originality/value: This article seeks to fill a gap in the existing knowledge to discuss the social comparison theory applied to the service recovery context. Design/methodology/approach: After a literature review, we present three research propositions about comparisons between consumers in terms of compensation received after complaining about a service and their effects on the evaluation of distributive justice, taking into account the perceived similarity between consumers and the time elapsed between the complaint handling and the comparison. Findings: Even though social comparisons are increasingly frequent, they have been neglected in the service marketing literature. It is possible for consumers to compare the compensation received after a complaint with the compensation given to another consumer and, perceiving upward differences, have negative reactions to the company.
id MACKENZIE-2_1f4b925bd6c091cc93d1db948e333601
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1678-69712017000400065
network_acronym_str MACKENZIE-2
network_name_str RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie
repository_id_str
spelling CONSUMER’S EVALUATION ABOUT SERVICE RECOVERY: THE ROLE OF SOCIAL COMPARISONService RecoveryServiceSocial ComparisonCompensationComplainingABSTRACT Purpose: This theoretical essay aims to contribute to a deeper understanding of distributive justice in situations of service recovery. More specifically, we seek to investigate distributive justice evaluations based on social comparisons. Originality/value: This article seeks to fill a gap in the existing knowledge to discuss the social comparison theory applied to the service recovery context. Design/methodology/approach: After a literature review, we present three research propositions about comparisons between consumers in terms of compensation received after complaining about a service and their effects on the evaluation of distributive justice, taking into account the perceived similarity between consumers and the time elapsed between the complaint handling and the comparison. Findings: Even though social comparisons are increasingly frequent, they have been neglected in the service marketing literature. It is possible for consumers to compare the compensation received after a complaint with the compensation given to another consumer and, perceiving upward differences, have negative reactions to the company.Editora MackenzieUniversidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie2017-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-69712017000400065RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie v.18 n.4 2017reponame:RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzieinstname:Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (UPM)instacron:MACKENZIE10.1590/1678-69712017/administracao.v18n4p65-86info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBORTOLI,LUIZA VENZKEPIZZUTTI,CRISTIANEeng2017-10-10T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1678-69712017000400065Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/ram/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevista.adm@mackenzie.br1678-69711518-6776opendoar:2017-10-10T00:00RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie - Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (UPM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv CONSUMER’S EVALUATION ABOUT SERVICE RECOVERY: THE ROLE OF SOCIAL COMPARISON
title CONSUMER’S EVALUATION ABOUT SERVICE RECOVERY: THE ROLE OF SOCIAL COMPARISON
spellingShingle CONSUMER’S EVALUATION ABOUT SERVICE RECOVERY: THE ROLE OF SOCIAL COMPARISON
BORTOLI,LUIZA VENZKE
Service Recovery
Service
Social Comparison
Compensation
Complaining
title_short CONSUMER’S EVALUATION ABOUT SERVICE RECOVERY: THE ROLE OF SOCIAL COMPARISON
title_full CONSUMER’S EVALUATION ABOUT SERVICE RECOVERY: THE ROLE OF SOCIAL COMPARISON
title_fullStr CONSUMER’S EVALUATION ABOUT SERVICE RECOVERY: THE ROLE OF SOCIAL COMPARISON
title_full_unstemmed CONSUMER’S EVALUATION ABOUT SERVICE RECOVERY: THE ROLE OF SOCIAL COMPARISON
title_sort CONSUMER’S EVALUATION ABOUT SERVICE RECOVERY: THE ROLE OF SOCIAL COMPARISON
author BORTOLI,LUIZA VENZKE
author_facet BORTOLI,LUIZA VENZKE
PIZZUTTI,CRISTIANE
author_role author
author2 PIZZUTTI,CRISTIANE
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv BORTOLI,LUIZA VENZKE
PIZZUTTI,CRISTIANE
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Service Recovery
Service
Social Comparison
Compensation
Complaining
topic Service Recovery
Service
Social Comparison
Compensation
Complaining
description ABSTRACT Purpose: This theoretical essay aims to contribute to a deeper understanding of distributive justice in situations of service recovery. More specifically, we seek to investigate distributive justice evaluations based on social comparisons. Originality/value: This article seeks to fill a gap in the existing knowledge to discuss the social comparison theory applied to the service recovery context. Design/methodology/approach: After a literature review, we present three research propositions about comparisons between consumers in terms of compensation received after complaining about a service and their effects on the evaluation of distributive justice, taking into account the perceived similarity between consumers and the time elapsed between the complaint handling and the comparison. Findings: Even though social comparisons are increasingly frequent, they have been neglected in the service marketing literature. It is possible for consumers to compare the compensation received after a complaint with the compensation given to another consumer and, perceiving upward differences, have negative reactions to the company.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-69712017000400065
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-69712017000400065
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1678-69712017/administracao.v18n4p65-86
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora Mackenzie
Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora Mackenzie
Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie v.18 n.4 2017
reponame:RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie
instname:Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (UPM)
instacron:MACKENZIE
instname_str Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (UPM)
instacron_str MACKENZIE
institution MACKENZIE
reponame_str RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie
collection RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie
repository.name.fl_str_mv RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie - Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (UPM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista.adm@mackenzie.br
_version_ 1752128649802285056