Evaluation of Logistic Performance Indicators of Brazil in the International Trade

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Faria, Rosane Nunes de
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Souza, Caio Silvestre de, Vieira, Jose Geraldo Vidal
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie
Texto Completo: https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5307
Resumo: The importance of efficient logistics for trade growth is widely acknowledged. The literature has been shown that better logistics performance is strongly associated with trade expansion, export diversification, ability to attract foreign direct investments, and economic growth. On the other hand, international trade represents a challenge to logistic operations to transport and store products. The high logistic costs and low quality of services may be considered obstacles to international trade. This research aims to assess Brazil Logistics Performance Index (LPI) in relation to its major competitors in international trade. The international trade data was collected from SECEX and COMTRADE, while the LPI was provided by the World Bank. Statistical techniques such as cluster analysis and multiple comparison tests of means have applied to analyse the data. Using LPI index for the 39 competitors it has observed that Brazil is in 26th rank of performers behind South Africa, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia. The top performers are in general the leading exporters and importers worldwide (Germany, U.S.A., Japan and the Netherlands). Furthermore, they are the strongest competitors of Brazil in international trade. Thus, the competitiveness of Brazilian domestic firms depends crucially on a dynamic and competitive internal logistic environment in order to face these countries. The results also indicate the bureaucracy as major obstacle to the logistic performance of the country. The dimension Timeliness of Brazil is very close to the High Logistics Performance Group (HLPG) while Customs is very close to the Low Logistics Performance Group (LLPG). Despite Brazil has failed in their customs operations there seems to be more credibility in Brazilian dealings. The main contribution of this paper is to reveal logistical aspects in which Brazil has shown large inefficiencies. The difference among the logistic performance indicators also appears to be relevant to governments to address their new public policies, and also to highlight the logistic obstacles of the Brazilian international trade.
id MACKENZIE_23dd58662a2950dfa10bb5e75ac10004
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.editorarevistas.mackenzie.br:article/5307
network_acronym_str MACKENZIE
network_name_str RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of Logistic Performance Indicators of Brazil in the International TradeEvaluación de Indicadores de Desempeño Logístico de Brasil en el Comercio InternacionalAvaliação de Indicadores de Desempenho Logístico do Brasil no Comércio InternacionalInternational trade. Logistic performance indicators. Cluster analysis. Logistic. Customs clearance.Comercio internacional. Indicador de desempeño logístico. Análisis de conglomerado. Logística. Procedimientos aduaneros.Comércio internacional. Indicador de desempenho logístico. Análise de agrupamento. Logística. Procedimentos alfandegários.The importance of efficient logistics for trade growth is widely acknowledged. The literature has been shown that better logistics performance is strongly associated with trade expansion, export diversification, ability to attract foreign direct investments, and economic growth. On the other hand, international trade represents a challenge to logistic operations to transport and store products. The high logistic costs and low quality of services may be considered obstacles to international trade. This research aims to assess Brazil Logistics Performance Index (LPI) in relation to its major competitors in international trade. The international trade data was collected from SECEX and COMTRADE, while the LPI was provided by the World Bank. Statistical techniques such as cluster analysis and multiple comparison tests of means have applied to analyse the data. Using LPI index for the 39 competitors it has observed that Brazil is in 26th rank of performers behind South Africa, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia. The top performers are in general the leading exporters and importers worldwide (Germany, U.S.A., Japan and the Netherlands). Furthermore, they are the strongest competitors of Brazil in international trade. Thus, the competitiveness of Brazilian domestic firms depends crucially on a dynamic and competitive internal logistic environment in order to face these countries. The results also indicate the bureaucracy as major obstacle to the logistic performance of the country. The dimension Timeliness of Brazil is very close to the High Logistics Performance Group (HLPG) while Customs is very close to the Low Logistics Performance Group (LLPG). Despite Brazil has failed in their customs operations there seems to be more credibility in Brazilian dealings. The main contribution of this paper is to reveal logistical aspects in which Brazil has shown large inefficiencies. The difference among the logistic performance indicators also appears to be relevant to governments to address their new public policies, and also to highlight the logistic obstacles of the Brazilian international trade.La importancia de una logística eficiente para el crecimiento del comercio es ampliamente reconocida. Estudios recientes han demostrado que un mejor desempeño logístico está fuertemente asociado a la expansión del comercio, la diversificación de las exportaciones, la capacidad de atraer inversión extranjera directa y al crecimiento económico. Por otra parte, el comercio internacional representa un desafío para las operaciones logísticas relacionadas al transporte y almacenamiento de productos. Los altos costos logísticos y la baja calidad de los servicios pueden ser considerados obstáculos del comercio internacional. Esta investigación tiene como objetivo evaluar los indicadores de desempeño logístico de Brasil en relación con sus principales competidores en el comercio internacional. Las fuentes de datos de comercio internacional para este estudio fueron SECEX y COMTRADE, y los indicadores de desempeño logístico fueron recolectados en la base de datos del Banco Mundial. Se utilizaron técnicas estadísticas como el análisis de clúster y pruebas de comparaciones múltiples de medias para analizar los indicadores de desempeño logístico. Al utilizar los indicadores para 39 competidores, se observó que Brasil está en la posición 26 después de Sudáfrica, Kuwait y Arabia Saudita. Los mejores desempeños son, en general, de los principales países exportadores e importadores mundiales (Alemania, Estados Unidos, Japón y los Países Bajos). Además, son los principales competidores de Brasil en el comercio internacional. Por lo tanto, la competitividad de las empresas nacionales brasileñas depende fundamentalmente de un ambiente logístico interno dinámico y competitivo para enfrentar a estos países. Los resultados también señalan a la "burocracia" como el principal obstáculo para el desempeño logístico del país. La dimensión "puntualidad de Brasil" es muy cercana a la del grupo de alto desempeño logístico, mientras que "aduana" es más cercana a la del grupo de desempeño logístico bajo. Aunque Brasil presente lentitud en sus operaciones aduaneras, parece que todavía existe credibilidad en las relaciones de comercio internacional. La principal contribución de este trabajo es revelar aspectos logísticos en los que Brasil ha mostrado grandes ineficiencias. La diferencia entre los indicadores de desempeño logístico también parece ser relevante para los gobiernos, pues pueden indicar nuevas políticas públicas, y también poner de relieve los obstáculos logísticos de Brasil en el comercio internacional.A importância de uma logística eficiente para o crescimento do comércio é amplamente reconhecida. Estudos recentes têm mostrado que um melhor desempenhor logístico está fortemente associado à expansão do comércio, à diversificação das exportações, à capacidade de atrair investimentos estrangeiros diretos, e ao crescimento econômico. Por outro lado, o comércio internacional representa um desafio para as operações de logística relacioandas ao transporte e armazenamento dos produtos. Os altos custos de logística e a baixa qualidade dos serviços podem ser considerados obstáculos ao comércio internacional. Esta pesquisa tem por objetivo avaliar os indicadores de desempenho logístico do Brasil em relação aos seus principais concorrentes no comércio internacional. As fontes de dados de comércio internacional para esta pesquisa foram a SECEX e COMTRADE, e os indicadores de desempenho logístico foram coletados na base de dados do Banco Mundial. Técnicas estatísticas tais como análise de cluster e testes de comparações múltiplas de médias foram usadas para analisar indicadores de desempenho logístico. Ao usar os indicadores para 39 concorrentes, foi observado que o Brasil está na 26ª posição atrás da África do Sul, Kuwait e Arábia Saudita. Os melhores desempenhos são, em geral, dos principais países exportadores e importadores mundiais (Alemanha, Estados Unidos, Japão e Países Baixos). Além disso, eles são os principais concorrentes do Brasil no comércio internacional. Assim, a competitividade das empresas nacionais brasileiras depende fundamentalmente de um ambiente logístico interno dinâmico e competitivo para enfrentar esses países. Os resultados também indicam a “burocracia” como o principal obstáculo para o desempenho logístico do país. A dimensão “pontualidade do Brasil” é muito próxima do grupo de alto desempenho logístico, enquanto “alfândega” está muito próxima do grupo de baixo desempenho logístico. Apesar de o Brasil apresentar lentidão em suas operações aduaneiras, parece haver ainda credibilidade nas relações de comércio internacional. A principal contribuição deste trabalho é revelar aspectos logísticos em que o Brasil tem mostrado grandes ineficiências. A diferença entre os indicadores de desempenho logístico também parece ser relevante para os governos, pois pode indicar novas políticas públicas, e também destacar os obstáculos logísticos do Brasil no comércio internacional. Editora Mackenzie2014-12-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAnálise de agrupamentoAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdfapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documenthttps://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5307Revista de Administração Mackenzie; Vol. 16 No. 1 (2015)Revista de Administração Mackenzie; Vol. 16 Núm. 1 (2015)Revista de Administração Mackenzie (Mackenzie Management Review); v. 16 n. 1 (2015)1678-69711518-6776reponame:RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzieinstname:Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE)instacron:MACKENZIEenghttps://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5307/5253https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5307/8817https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5307/8818Copyright (c) 2015 Revista de Administração Mackenzieinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFaria, Rosane Nunes deSouza, Caio Silvestre deVieira, Jose Geraldo Vidal2015-03-19T23:55:00Zoai:ojs.editorarevistas.mackenzie.br:article/5307Revistahttps://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/PUBhttps://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/oairevista.adm@mackenzie.br1678-69711518-6776opendoar:2015-03-19T23:55RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie - Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of Logistic Performance Indicators of Brazil in the International Trade
Evaluación de Indicadores de Desempeño Logístico de Brasil en el Comercio Internacional
Avaliação de Indicadores de Desempenho Logístico do Brasil no Comércio Internacional
title Evaluation of Logistic Performance Indicators of Brazil in the International Trade
spellingShingle Evaluation of Logistic Performance Indicators of Brazil in the International Trade
Faria, Rosane Nunes de
International trade. Logistic performance indicators. Cluster analysis. Logistic. Customs clearance.
Comercio internacional. Indicador de desempeño logístico. Análisis de conglomerado. Logística. Procedimientos aduaneros.
Comércio internacional. Indicador de desempenho logístico. Análise de agrupamento. Logística. Procedimentos alfandegários.
title_short Evaluation of Logistic Performance Indicators of Brazil in the International Trade
title_full Evaluation of Logistic Performance Indicators of Brazil in the International Trade
title_fullStr Evaluation of Logistic Performance Indicators of Brazil in the International Trade
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Logistic Performance Indicators of Brazil in the International Trade
title_sort Evaluation of Logistic Performance Indicators of Brazil in the International Trade
author Faria, Rosane Nunes de
author_facet Faria, Rosane Nunes de
Souza, Caio Silvestre de
Vieira, Jose Geraldo Vidal
author_role author
author2 Souza, Caio Silvestre de
Vieira, Jose Geraldo Vidal
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Faria, Rosane Nunes de
Souza, Caio Silvestre de
Vieira, Jose Geraldo Vidal
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv International trade. Logistic performance indicators. Cluster analysis. Logistic. Customs clearance.
Comercio internacional. Indicador de desempeño logístico. Análisis de conglomerado. Logística. Procedimientos aduaneros.
Comércio internacional. Indicador de desempenho logístico. Análise de agrupamento. Logística. Procedimentos alfandegários.
topic International trade. Logistic performance indicators. Cluster analysis. Logistic. Customs clearance.
Comercio internacional. Indicador de desempeño logístico. Análisis de conglomerado. Logística. Procedimientos aduaneros.
Comércio internacional. Indicador de desempenho logístico. Análise de agrupamento. Logística. Procedimentos alfandegários.
description The importance of efficient logistics for trade growth is widely acknowledged. The literature has been shown that better logistics performance is strongly associated with trade expansion, export diversification, ability to attract foreign direct investments, and economic growth. On the other hand, international trade represents a challenge to logistic operations to transport and store products. The high logistic costs and low quality of services may be considered obstacles to international trade. This research aims to assess Brazil Logistics Performance Index (LPI) in relation to its major competitors in international trade. The international trade data was collected from SECEX and COMTRADE, while the LPI was provided by the World Bank. Statistical techniques such as cluster analysis and multiple comparison tests of means have applied to analyse the data. Using LPI index for the 39 competitors it has observed that Brazil is in 26th rank of performers behind South Africa, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia. The top performers are in general the leading exporters and importers worldwide (Germany, U.S.A., Japan and the Netherlands). Furthermore, they are the strongest competitors of Brazil in international trade. Thus, the competitiveness of Brazilian domestic firms depends crucially on a dynamic and competitive internal logistic environment in order to face these countries. The results also indicate the bureaucracy as major obstacle to the logistic performance of the country. The dimension Timeliness of Brazil is very close to the High Logistics Performance Group (HLPG) while Customs is very close to the Low Logistics Performance Group (LLPG). Despite Brazil has failed in their customs operations there seems to be more credibility in Brazilian dealings. The main contribution of this paper is to reveal logistical aspects in which Brazil has shown large inefficiencies. The difference among the logistic performance indicators also appears to be relevant to governments to address their new public policies, and also to highlight the logistic obstacles of the Brazilian international trade.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-12-08
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Análise de agrupamento
Avaliado por Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5307
url https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5307
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5307/5253
https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5307/8817
https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/5307/8818
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Revista de Administração Mackenzie
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Revista de Administração Mackenzie
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora Mackenzie
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora Mackenzie
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Administração Mackenzie; Vol. 16 No. 1 (2015)
Revista de Administração Mackenzie; Vol. 16 Núm. 1 (2015)
Revista de Administração Mackenzie (Mackenzie Management Review); v. 16 n. 1 (2015)
1678-6971
1518-6776
reponame:RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie
instname:Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE)
instacron:MACKENZIE
instname_str Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE)
instacron_str MACKENZIE
institution MACKENZIE
reponame_str RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie
collection RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie
repository.name.fl_str_mv RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie - Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista.adm@mackenzie.br
_version_ 1813820671518572544