MODELLING QUALITATIVE ISSUES IN THE NEGOTIATION PROCESS
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2008 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng spa |
Título da fonte: | RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie |
Texto Completo: | https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/49 |
Resumo: | Trying to reach a consensus in a negotiation process can be a very complex problem involving multiple agents, conflicting points of view and criteria, pressure groups, etc. In this context imprecision and risk are quite often present. Tools for imprecision analysis and group decision aiding can be thus utilized in order to facilitate achieving a compromise. This article shows how fuzzy and rough sets, multiattribute utility theory, and prospect theory can be used in the analytical modeling embedded in negotiation support systems. |
id |
MACKENZIE_e31e1e454ffe821e6a9b2c25987c4818 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.editorarevistas.mackenzie.br:article/49 |
network_acronym_str |
MACKENZIE |
network_name_str |
RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
MODELLING QUALITATIVE ISSUES IN THE NEGOTIATION PROCESSModelagem de aspectos qualitativos do processo de negociaçãoTrying to reach a consensus in a negotiation process can be a very complex problem involving multiple agents, conflicting points of view and criteria, pressure groups, etc. In this context imprecision and risk are quite often present. Tools for imprecision analysis and group decision aiding can be thus utilized in order to facilitate achieving a compromise. This article shows how fuzzy and rough sets, multiattribute utility theory, and prospect theory can be used in the analytical modeling embedded in negotiation support systems.A obtenção do consenso em uma negociação é um problema complexo que envolve vários agentes, critérios, interesses e pontos de vista conflitantes. Ferramentas que tratem imprecisões e/ou indiscernibilidades e sistemas de apoio à decisão e/ou negociação podem e devem ser utilizados para facilitar a obtenção de um consenso. Este artigo mostra como usar as teorias dos conjuntos aproximativos, a teoria da utilidade multiatributo, a teoria dos jogos, bem como a teoria dos conjuntos nebulosos em um processo de negociação.PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Negociação e análise de conflitos; Teoria dos conjuntos aproximativos; Apoio multicritério à decisão.Editora Mackenzie2008-07-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/49Revista de Administração Mackenzie; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2004)Revista de Administração Mackenzie; Vol. 5 Núm. 1 (2004)Revista de Administração Mackenzie (Mackenzie Management Review); v. 5 n. 1 (2004)1678-69711518-6776reponame:RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzieinstname:Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE)instacron:MACKENZIEporengspahttps://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/49/49https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/49/2025https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/49/2026Copyright (c) 2015 Revista de Administração Mackenzieinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGomes, Carlos Francisco SimõesGomes, Luiz Flavio Autran Monteiro2011-01-14T18:56:54Zoai:ojs.editorarevistas.mackenzie.br:article/49Revistahttps://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/PUBhttps://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/oairevista.adm@mackenzie.br1678-69711518-6776opendoar:2011-01-14T18:56:54RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie - Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
MODELLING QUALITATIVE ISSUES IN THE NEGOTIATION PROCESS Modelagem de aspectos qualitativos do processo de negociação |
title |
MODELLING QUALITATIVE ISSUES IN THE NEGOTIATION PROCESS |
spellingShingle |
MODELLING QUALITATIVE ISSUES IN THE NEGOTIATION PROCESS Gomes, Carlos Francisco Simões |
title_short |
MODELLING QUALITATIVE ISSUES IN THE NEGOTIATION PROCESS |
title_full |
MODELLING QUALITATIVE ISSUES IN THE NEGOTIATION PROCESS |
title_fullStr |
MODELLING QUALITATIVE ISSUES IN THE NEGOTIATION PROCESS |
title_full_unstemmed |
MODELLING QUALITATIVE ISSUES IN THE NEGOTIATION PROCESS |
title_sort |
MODELLING QUALITATIVE ISSUES IN THE NEGOTIATION PROCESS |
author |
Gomes, Carlos Francisco Simões |
author_facet |
Gomes, Carlos Francisco Simões Gomes, Luiz Flavio Autran Monteiro |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Gomes, Luiz Flavio Autran Monteiro |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gomes, Carlos Francisco Simões Gomes, Luiz Flavio Autran Monteiro |
description |
Trying to reach a consensus in a negotiation process can be a very complex problem involving multiple agents, conflicting points of view and criteria, pressure groups, etc. In this context imprecision and risk are quite often present. Tools for imprecision analysis and group decision aiding can be thus utilized in order to facilitate achieving a compromise. This article shows how fuzzy and rough sets, multiattribute utility theory, and prospect theory can be used in the analytical modeling embedded in negotiation support systems. |
publishDate |
2008 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2008-07-22 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/49 |
url |
https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/49 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng spa |
language |
por eng spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/49/49 https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/49/2025 https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/RAM/article/view/49/2026 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Revista de Administração Mackenzie info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Revista de Administração Mackenzie |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora Mackenzie |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora Mackenzie |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Administração Mackenzie; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2004) Revista de Administração Mackenzie; Vol. 5 Núm. 1 (2004) Revista de Administração Mackenzie (Mackenzie Management Review); v. 5 n. 1 (2004) 1678-6971 1518-6776 reponame:RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie instname:Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE) instacron:MACKENZIE |
instname_str |
Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE) |
instacron_str |
MACKENZIE |
institution |
MACKENZIE |
reponame_str |
RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie |
collection |
RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie - Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (MACKENZIE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista.adm@mackenzie.br |
_version_ |
1813820668515450880 |