Conscious sedation vs general anesthesia in pediatric dentistry – a review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva,Cátia Carvalho
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Lavado,Carla, Areias,Cristina, Mourão,Joana, Andrade,David de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: MedicalExpress (São Paulo. Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2358-04292015000100004
Resumo: INTRODUCTION: Performing dental treatments on pediatric patients who present behavioral problems is usually a great clinical challenge. Depending on the patients’ emotional maturity and their physical, psychological and mental skills, the usual behavior control techniques may not offer adequate efficacy and safety when dental procedures are being carried out. In these circumstances, alternative and more invasive methods such as conscious sedation and general anesthesia may become necessary. OBJECTIVE: To compare the indications and contraindications of conscious sedation and general anesthesia in pediatric dentistry. METHOD: Literature research undertaken through the MEDLINE/Pubmed, Science Direct and B-on search engines between April and June 2013 using a 5 year time frame and the following keywords: conscious sedation, general anesthesia, pediatric dentistry and guidelines. RESULTS: Conscious sedation is recommended to anxious patients who have dental and needle phobia, to patients that present an increased vomiting reflex and also to patients with special needs but capable of communicating. General anesthesia is indicated for non-cooperating patients under the age of four, in mouth breathers, in children ASA III or higher and in pediatric patients who do not communicate. CONCLUSIONS: Each technique must be selected according to the characteristics showed by patient. Although conscious sedation and general anesthesia introduce benefits to pediatric dentistry, they should not be regarded as priority intervention techniques for behavior control. The pediatric dentist’s previous knowledge of these techniques provides a better level of dental care quality as well as more safety and less discomfort for their patients.
id METC-1_59bee262bd5e8e16a5bc9d2a10ae6232
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2358-04292015000100004
network_acronym_str METC-1
network_name_str MedicalExpress (São Paulo. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Conscious sedation vs general anesthesia in pediatric dentistry – a reviewDentistryanesthesiasedationpediatrics INTRODUCTION: Performing dental treatments on pediatric patients who present behavioral problems is usually a great clinical challenge. Depending on the patients’ emotional maturity and their physical, psychological and mental skills, the usual behavior control techniques may not offer adequate efficacy and safety when dental procedures are being carried out. In these circumstances, alternative and more invasive methods such as conscious sedation and general anesthesia may become necessary. OBJECTIVE: To compare the indications and contraindications of conscious sedation and general anesthesia in pediatric dentistry. METHOD: Literature research undertaken through the MEDLINE/Pubmed, Science Direct and B-on search engines between April and June 2013 using a 5 year time frame and the following keywords: conscious sedation, general anesthesia, pediatric dentistry and guidelines. RESULTS: Conscious sedation is recommended to anxious patients who have dental and needle phobia, to patients that present an increased vomiting reflex and also to patients with special needs but capable of communicating. General anesthesia is indicated for non-cooperating patients under the age of four, in mouth breathers, in children ASA III or higher and in pediatric patients who do not communicate. CONCLUSIONS: Each technique must be selected according to the characteristics showed by patient. Although conscious sedation and general anesthesia introduce benefits to pediatric dentistry, they should not be regarded as priority intervention techniques for behavior control. The pediatric dentist’s previous knowledge of these techniques provides a better level of dental care quality as well as more safety and less discomfort for their patients.Mavera Edições Técnicas e Científicas Ltda2015-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2358-04292015000100004MedicalExpress v.2 n.1 2015reponame:MedicalExpress (São Paulo. Online)instname:Mavera Edições Científicas e Técnicas Ltda-MEinstacron:METC10.5935/MedicalExpress.2015.01.04info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva,Cátia CarvalhoLavado,CarlaAreias,CristinaMourão,JoanaAndrade,David deeng2016-03-16T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2358-04292015000100004Revistahttp://www.medicalexpress.net.brhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||medicalexpress@me.net.br2358-04292318-8111opendoar:2016-03-16T00:00MedicalExpress (São Paulo. Online) - Mavera Edições Científicas e Técnicas Ltda-MEfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Conscious sedation vs general anesthesia in pediatric dentistry – a review
title Conscious sedation vs general anesthesia in pediatric dentistry – a review
spellingShingle Conscious sedation vs general anesthesia in pediatric dentistry – a review
Silva,Cátia Carvalho
Dentistry
anesthesia
sedation
pediatrics
title_short Conscious sedation vs general anesthesia in pediatric dentistry – a review
title_full Conscious sedation vs general anesthesia in pediatric dentistry – a review
title_fullStr Conscious sedation vs general anesthesia in pediatric dentistry – a review
title_full_unstemmed Conscious sedation vs general anesthesia in pediatric dentistry – a review
title_sort Conscious sedation vs general anesthesia in pediatric dentistry – a review
author Silva,Cátia Carvalho
author_facet Silva,Cátia Carvalho
Lavado,Carla
Areias,Cristina
Mourão,Joana
Andrade,David de
author_role author
author2 Lavado,Carla
Areias,Cristina
Mourão,Joana
Andrade,David de
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva,Cátia Carvalho
Lavado,Carla
Areias,Cristina
Mourão,Joana
Andrade,David de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dentistry
anesthesia
sedation
pediatrics
topic Dentistry
anesthesia
sedation
pediatrics
description INTRODUCTION: Performing dental treatments on pediatric patients who present behavioral problems is usually a great clinical challenge. Depending on the patients’ emotional maturity and their physical, psychological and mental skills, the usual behavior control techniques may not offer adequate efficacy and safety when dental procedures are being carried out. In these circumstances, alternative and more invasive methods such as conscious sedation and general anesthesia may become necessary. OBJECTIVE: To compare the indications and contraindications of conscious sedation and general anesthesia in pediatric dentistry. METHOD: Literature research undertaken through the MEDLINE/Pubmed, Science Direct and B-on search engines between April and June 2013 using a 5 year time frame and the following keywords: conscious sedation, general anesthesia, pediatric dentistry and guidelines. RESULTS: Conscious sedation is recommended to anxious patients who have dental and needle phobia, to patients that present an increased vomiting reflex and also to patients with special needs but capable of communicating. General anesthesia is indicated for non-cooperating patients under the age of four, in mouth breathers, in children ASA III or higher and in pediatric patients who do not communicate. CONCLUSIONS: Each technique must be selected according to the characteristics showed by patient. Although conscious sedation and general anesthesia introduce benefits to pediatric dentistry, they should not be regarded as priority intervention techniques for behavior control. The pediatric dentist’s previous knowledge of these techniques provides a better level of dental care quality as well as more safety and less discomfort for their patients.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2358-04292015000100004
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2358-04292015000100004
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.5935/MedicalExpress.2015.01.04
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Mavera Edições Técnicas e Científicas Ltda
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Mavera Edições Técnicas e Científicas Ltda
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv MedicalExpress v.2 n.1 2015
reponame:MedicalExpress (São Paulo. Online)
instname:Mavera Edições Científicas e Técnicas Ltda-ME
instacron:METC
instname_str Mavera Edições Científicas e Técnicas Ltda-ME
instacron_str METC
institution METC
reponame_str MedicalExpress (São Paulo. Online)
collection MedicalExpress (São Paulo. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv MedicalExpress (São Paulo. Online) - Mavera Edições Científicas e Técnicas Ltda-ME
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||medicalexpress@me.net.br
_version_ 1754734596637851648