Conscious sedation vs general anesthesia in pediatric dentistry – a review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | MedicalExpress (São Paulo. Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2358-04292015000100004 |
Resumo: | INTRODUCTION: Performing dental treatments on pediatric patients who present behavioral problems is usually a great clinical challenge. Depending on the patients’ emotional maturity and their physical, psychological and mental skills, the usual behavior control techniques may not offer adequate efficacy and safety when dental procedures are being carried out. In these circumstances, alternative and more invasive methods such as conscious sedation and general anesthesia may become necessary. OBJECTIVE: To compare the indications and contraindications of conscious sedation and general anesthesia in pediatric dentistry. METHOD: Literature research undertaken through the MEDLINE/Pubmed, Science Direct and B-on search engines between April and June 2013 using a 5 year time frame and the following keywords: conscious sedation, general anesthesia, pediatric dentistry and guidelines. RESULTS: Conscious sedation is recommended to anxious patients who have dental and needle phobia, to patients that present an increased vomiting reflex and also to patients with special needs but capable of communicating. General anesthesia is indicated for non-cooperating patients under the age of four, in mouth breathers, in children ASA III or higher and in pediatric patients who do not communicate. CONCLUSIONS: Each technique must be selected according to the characteristics showed by patient. Although conscious sedation and general anesthesia introduce benefits to pediatric dentistry, they should not be regarded as priority intervention techniques for behavior control. The pediatric dentist’s previous knowledge of these techniques provides a better level of dental care quality as well as more safety and less discomfort for their patients. |
id |
METC-1_59bee262bd5e8e16a5bc9d2a10ae6232 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S2358-04292015000100004 |
network_acronym_str |
METC-1 |
network_name_str |
MedicalExpress (São Paulo. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Conscious sedation vs general anesthesia in pediatric dentistry – a reviewDentistryanesthesiasedationpediatrics INTRODUCTION: Performing dental treatments on pediatric patients who present behavioral problems is usually a great clinical challenge. Depending on the patients’ emotional maturity and their physical, psychological and mental skills, the usual behavior control techniques may not offer adequate efficacy and safety when dental procedures are being carried out. In these circumstances, alternative and more invasive methods such as conscious sedation and general anesthesia may become necessary. OBJECTIVE: To compare the indications and contraindications of conscious sedation and general anesthesia in pediatric dentistry. METHOD: Literature research undertaken through the MEDLINE/Pubmed, Science Direct and B-on search engines between April and June 2013 using a 5 year time frame and the following keywords: conscious sedation, general anesthesia, pediatric dentistry and guidelines. RESULTS: Conscious sedation is recommended to anxious patients who have dental and needle phobia, to patients that present an increased vomiting reflex and also to patients with special needs but capable of communicating. General anesthesia is indicated for non-cooperating patients under the age of four, in mouth breathers, in children ASA III or higher and in pediatric patients who do not communicate. CONCLUSIONS: Each technique must be selected according to the characteristics showed by patient. Although conscious sedation and general anesthesia introduce benefits to pediatric dentistry, they should not be regarded as priority intervention techniques for behavior control. The pediatric dentist’s previous knowledge of these techniques provides a better level of dental care quality as well as more safety and less discomfort for their patients.Mavera Edições Técnicas e Científicas Ltda2015-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2358-04292015000100004MedicalExpress v.2 n.1 2015reponame:MedicalExpress (São Paulo. Online)instname:Mavera Edições Científicas e Técnicas Ltda-MEinstacron:METC10.5935/MedicalExpress.2015.01.04info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva,Cátia CarvalhoLavado,CarlaAreias,CristinaMourão,JoanaAndrade,David deeng2016-03-16T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2358-04292015000100004Revistahttp://www.medicalexpress.net.brhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||medicalexpress@me.net.br2358-04292318-8111opendoar:2016-03-16T00:00MedicalExpress (São Paulo. Online) - Mavera Edições Científicas e Técnicas Ltda-MEfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Conscious sedation vs general anesthesia in pediatric dentistry – a review |
title |
Conscious sedation vs general anesthesia in pediatric dentistry – a review |
spellingShingle |
Conscious sedation vs general anesthesia in pediatric dentistry – a review Silva,Cátia Carvalho Dentistry anesthesia sedation pediatrics |
title_short |
Conscious sedation vs general anesthesia in pediatric dentistry – a review |
title_full |
Conscious sedation vs general anesthesia in pediatric dentistry – a review |
title_fullStr |
Conscious sedation vs general anesthesia in pediatric dentistry – a review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Conscious sedation vs general anesthesia in pediatric dentistry – a review |
title_sort |
Conscious sedation vs general anesthesia in pediatric dentistry – a review |
author |
Silva,Cátia Carvalho |
author_facet |
Silva,Cátia Carvalho Lavado,Carla Areias,Cristina Mourão,Joana Andrade,David de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lavado,Carla Areias,Cristina Mourão,Joana Andrade,David de |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva,Cátia Carvalho Lavado,Carla Areias,Cristina Mourão,Joana Andrade,David de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dentistry anesthesia sedation pediatrics |
topic |
Dentistry anesthesia sedation pediatrics |
description |
INTRODUCTION: Performing dental treatments on pediatric patients who present behavioral problems is usually a great clinical challenge. Depending on the patients’ emotional maturity and their physical, psychological and mental skills, the usual behavior control techniques may not offer adequate efficacy and safety when dental procedures are being carried out. In these circumstances, alternative and more invasive methods such as conscious sedation and general anesthesia may become necessary. OBJECTIVE: To compare the indications and contraindications of conscious sedation and general anesthesia in pediatric dentistry. METHOD: Literature research undertaken through the MEDLINE/Pubmed, Science Direct and B-on search engines between April and June 2013 using a 5 year time frame and the following keywords: conscious sedation, general anesthesia, pediatric dentistry and guidelines. RESULTS: Conscious sedation is recommended to anxious patients who have dental and needle phobia, to patients that present an increased vomiting reflex and also to patients with special needs but capable of communicating. General anesthesia is indicated for non-cooperating patients under the age of four, in mouth breathers, in children ASA III or higher and in pediatric patients who do not communicate. CONCLUSIONS: Each technique must be selected according to the characteristics showed by patient. Although conscious sedation and general anesthesia introduce benefits to pediatric dentistry, they should not be regarded as priority intervention techniques for behavior control. The pediatric dentist’s previous knowledge of these techniques provides a better level of dental care quality as well as more safety and less discomfort for their patients. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-02-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2358-04292015000100004 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2358-04292015000100004 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.5935/MedicalExpress.2015.01.04 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Mavera Edições Técnicas e Científicas Ltda |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Mavera Edições Técnicas e Científicas Ltda |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
MedicalExpress v.2 n.1 2015 reponame:MedicalExpress (São Paulo. Online) instname:Mavera Edições Científicas e Técnicas Ltda-ME instacron:METC |
instname_str |
Mavera Edições Científicas e Técnicas Ltda-ME |
instacron_str |
METC |
institution |
METC |
reponame_str |
MedicalExpress (São Paulo. Online) |
collection |
MedicalExpress (São Paulo. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
MedicalExpress (São Paulo. Online) - Mavera Edições Científicas e Técnicas Ltda-ME |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||medicalexpress@me.net.br |
_version_ |
1754734596637851648 |