A DUPLA FACE DE SALOMÃO MEMÓRIAS DE UMA ESCOLA DE ESCRIBAS NO SÉCULO X A.C.

• Autor(a) principal: Calonga, Tania Aparecida da Silva
• Data de Publicação: 2012
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da METODISTA
• Texto Completo: http://tede.metodista.br/jspui/handle/tede/237
• topic: história, memória, monarquia, sabedoria, campo, cidade; history, memory, monarchy, wisdom, field, city; CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS

The memorable king Solomon entered into history as a wise man for excellence. Even nowadays most people link his name to wisdom. But, when we get knowledge of texts that refer to Solomon, of how they were written and which ideologies they have (the favourable and the opposite ones), then many questions are made, in special when they search methodically to dissociate the history from memory. It seems the traditional historiography about Solomon has been found much dependent of his idealized figure yet. Result of a construction made as since his time by his scribes s hands as in later times, too, according to interests of each epoch. The conclusion is that Solomon s wisdom is not more than an ideological construction. Since this perspective, urge the challenge in searching another memory of Solomon, with the aim of suggesting an alternative way which may allow us to produce a new historiography about him. A historiography that may not be based on the oficial memory , but that one which may follow in the opposite way, from memories of those who were not influenced by the ideology of power. And, finally, to verify our thesis about the existence of two opposite memories about Solomon in the school of scribes in the court of Jerusalenm in 10th century b. C. Unfortunately, available sources about this issue are scarce, for we only have texts or memories about Solomon. We refer to 1Rs 1-2, that belongs to the so called History of succession believing that, from that narrative, it is possible to construct a historiography that might be different of that traditional one. We conclude that within the Solomonic school of scribes there were two opposite ideologies: Those which were favourable to Solomon and were used to defend the urban interests, and those that belonged to anti-Solomonic school and anti-Jerusalem, which were used to represent the interests of peasants who were explored and oppressed by the power.