The face of the other: the particular versus the individual

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Farago,Claire
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-81222017000200289
Resumo: Abstract Five interrelated case studies from the sixteenth to the twentieth centuries develop the dynamic contrast between portraiture and pictorial genres newly invented in and about Latin America that do not represent their subjects as individuals despite the descriptive focus on the particular. From Jean de Léry’s genre-defining proto-ethnographic text (1578) about the Tupinamba of Brazil to the treatment of the Creole upper class in New Spain as persons whose individuality deserves to be memorialized in contrast to the Mestizaje, African, and Indian underclass objectified as types deserving of scientific study, hierarchical distinctions between portraiture and ethnographic images can be framed in historical terms around the Aristotelian categories of the universal, the individual, and the particular. There are also some intriguing examples that destabilize these inherited distinctions, such as Puerto Rican artist José Campeche’s disturbing and poignant image of a deformed child, Juan Pantaléon Aviles, 1808; and an imaginary portrait of Moctezuma II, c. 1697, based on an ethnographic image, attributed to the leading Mexican painter Antonio Rodriguez. These anomalies serve to focus the study on the hegemonic position accorded to the viewing subject as actually precarious and unstable, always ripe for reinterpretation at the receiving end of European culture.
id MPEG-2_4b4e624090a6e5e73f9a5aa9a89f46b7
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1981-81222017000200289
network_acronym_str MPEG-2
network_name_str Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas
repository_id_str
spelling The face of the other: the particular versus the individualEthnographyPortraitureMestizajeTupinambaJosé CampecheJean de LéryAbstract Five interrelated case studies from the sixteenth to the twentieth centuries develop the dynamic contrast between portraiture and pictorial genres newly invented in and about Latin America that do not represent their subjects as individuals despite the descriptive focus on the particular. From Jean de Léry’s genre-defining proto-ethnographic text (1578) about the Tupinamba of Brazil to the treatment of the Creole upper class in New Spain as persons whose individuality deserves to be memorialized in contrast to the Mestizaje, African, and Indian underclass objectified as types deserving of scientific study, hierarchical distinctions between portraiture and ethnographic images can be framed in historical terms around the Aristotelian categories of the universal, the individual, and the particular. There are also some intriguing examples that destabilize these inherited distinctions, such as Puerto Rican artist José Campeche’s disturbing and poignant image of a deformed child, Juan Pantaléon Aviles, 1808; and an imaginary portrait of Moctezuma II, c. 1697, based on an ethnographic image, attributed to the leading Mexican painter Antonio Rodriguez. These anomalies serve to focus the study on the hegemonic position accorded to the viewing subject as actually precarious and unstable, always ripe for reinterpretation at the receiving end of European culture.MCTI/Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi2017-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-81222017000200289Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas v.12 n.2 2017reponame:Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanasinstname:Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi (MPEG)instacron:MPEG10.1590/1981.81222017000200003info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFarago,Claireeng2017-08-29T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1981-81222017000200289Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bgoeldi/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpboletim.humanas@museu-goeldi.br||boletim.humanas@museu-goeldi.br1981-81222178-2547opendoar:2017-08-29T00:00Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas - Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi (MPEG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The face of the other: the particular versus the individual
title The face of the other: the particular versus the individual
spellingShingle The face of the other: the particular versus the individual
Farago,Claire
Ethnography
Portraiture
Mestizaje
Tupinamba
José Campeche
Jean de Léry
title_short The face of the other: the particular versus the individual
title_full The face of the other: the particular versus the individual
title_fullStr The face of the other: the particular versus the individual
title_full_unstemmed The face of the other: the particular versus the individual
title_sort The face of the other: the particular versus the individual
author Farago,Claire
author_facet Farago,Claire
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Farago,Claire
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ethnography
Portraiture
Mestizaje
Tupinamba
José Campeche
Jean de Léry
topic Ethnography
Portraiture
Mestizaje
Tupinamba
José Campeche
Jean de Léry
description Abstract Five interrelated case studies from the sixteenth to the twentieth centuries develop the dynamic contrast between portraiture and pictorial genres newly invented in and about Latin America that do not represent their subjects as individuals despite the descriptive focus on the particular. From Jean de Léry’s genre-defining proto-ethnographic text (1578) about the Tupinamba of Brazil to the treatment of the Creole upper class in New Spain as persons whose individuality deserves to be memorialized in contrast to the Mestizaje, African, and Indian underclass objectified as types deserving of scientific study, hierarchical distinctions between portraiture and ethnographic images can be framed in historical terms around the Aristotelian categories of the universal, the individual, and the particular. There are also some intriguing examples that destabilize these inherited distinctions, such as Puerto Rican artist José Campeche’s disturbing and poignant image of a deformed child, Juan Pantaléon Aviles, 1808; and an imaginary portrait of Moctezuma II, c. 1697, based on an ethnographic image, attributed to the leading Mexican painter Antonio Rodriguez. These anomalies serve to focus the study on the hegemonic position accorded to the viewing subject as actually precarious and unstable, always ripe for reinterpretation at the receiving end of European culture.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-81222017000200289
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-81222017000200289
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1981.81222017000200003
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv MCTI/Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi
publisher.none.fl_str_mv MCTI/Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas v.12 n.2 2017
reponame:Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas
instname:Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi (MPEG)
instacron:MPEG
instname_str Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi (MPEG)
instacron_str MPEG
institution MPEG
reponame_str Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas
collection Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas
repository.name.fl_str_mv Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas - Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi (MPEG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv boletim.humanas@museu-goeldi.br||boletim.humanas@museu-goeldi.br
_version_ 1752128743336312832