Revisiting postverbal standard negation in the Jê languages
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-81222022000200207 |
Resumo: | Abstract In the Jê languages standard negators tend to take a post-verbal position. This paper asks why this should be the case and therefore discusses earlier accounts relating Jê standard negators to either negative verbs or privative postpositions. We argue that these accounts do not have to exclude each other. In particular, we propose that an existential negator can be reanalyzed as a privative one. We also argue that if the origin of the standard negator is a verb with the meaning ‘finish’, we may be dealing with a scenario that is similar to the ‘Negative Existential Cycle’. In both, the existential negator denies the existence of a state of affairs and then turns into a standard negator. But whereas in the Negative Existential Cycle the non-existence of a state of affairs is modelled on the non-existence of an object, in the ‘new’ scenario the non-existence of a state of affairs derives from the fact that a process or event has come to an end. |
id |
MPEG-2_ad2673ba4df248b5444c01f3d269f00b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1981-81222022000200207 |
network_acronym_str |
MPEG-2 |
network_name_str |
Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Revisiting postverbal standard negation in the Jê languagesStandard negationPostverbal negationJê languagesExistential negationPrivative negationProhibitive negationAbstract In the Jê languages standard negators tend to take a post-verbal position. This paper asks why this should be the case and therefore discusses earlier accounts relating Jê standard negators to either negative verbs or privative postpositions. We argue that these accounts do not have to exclude each other. In particular, we propose that an existential negator can be reanalyzed as a privative one. We also argue that if the origin of the standard negator is a verb with the meaning ‘finish’, we may be dealing with a scenario that is similar to the ‘Negative Existential Cycle’. In both, the existential negator denies the existence of a state of affairs and then turns into a standard negator. But whereas in the Negative Existential Cycle the non-existence of a state of affairs is modelled on the non-existence of an object, in the ‘new’ scenario the non-existence of a state of affairs derives from the fact that a process or event has come to an end.MCTI/Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-81222022000200207Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas v.17 n.2 2022reponame:Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanasinstname:Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi (MPEG)instacron:MPEG10.1590/2178-2547-bgoeldi-2021-0062info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAuwera,Johan van derKrasnoukhova,Olgaeng2022-08-23T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1981-81222022000200207Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bgoeldi/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpboletim.humanas@museu-goeldi.br||boletim.humanas@museu-goeldi.br1981-81222178-2547opendoar:2022-08-23T00:00Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas - Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi (MPEG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Revisiting postverbal standard negation in the Jê languages |
title |
Revisiting postverbal standard negation in the Jê languages |
spellingShingle |
Revisiting postverbal standard negation in the Jê languages Auwera,Johan van der Standard negation Postverbal negation Jê languages Existential negation Privative negation Prohibitive negation |
title_short |
Revisiting postverbal standard negation in the Jê languages |
title_full |
Revisiting postverbal standard negation in the Jê languages |
title_fullStr |
Revisiting postverbal standard negation in the Jê languages |
title_full_unstemmed |
Revisiting postverbal standard negation in the Jê languages |
title_sort |
Revisiting postverbal standard negation in the Jê languages |
author |
Auwera,Johan van der |
author_facet |
Auwera,Johan van der Krasnoukhova,Olga |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Krasnoukhova,Olga |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Auwera,Johan van der Krasnoukhova,Olga |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Standard negation Postverbal negation Jê languages Existential negation Privative negation Prohibitive negation |
topic |
Standard negation Postverbal negation Jê languages Existential negation Privative negation Prohibitive negation |
description |
Abstract In the Jê languages standard negators tend to take a post-verbal position. This paper asks why this should be the case and therefore discusses earlier accounts relating Jê standard negators to either negative verbs or privative postpositions. We argue that these accounts do not have to exclude each other. In particular, we propose that an existential negator can be reanalyzed as a privative one. We also argue that if the origin of the standard negator is a verb with the meaning ‘finish’, we may be dealing with a scenario that is similar to the ‘Negative Existential Cycle’. In both, the existential negator denies the existence of a state of affairs and then turns into a standard negator. But whereas in the Negative Existential Cycle the non-existence of a state of affairs is modelled on the non-existence of an object, in the ‘new’ scenario the non-existence of a state of affairs derives from the fact that a process or event has come to an end. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-81222022000200207 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-81222022000200207 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/2178-2547-bgoeldi-2021-0062 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
MCTI/Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
MCTI/Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas v.17 n.2 2022 reponame:Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas instname:Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi (MPEG) instacron:MPEG |
instname_str |
Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi (MPEG) |
instacron_str |
MPEG |
institution |
MPEG |
reponame_str |
Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas |
collection |
Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas - Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi (MPEG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
boletim.humanas@museu-goeldi.br||boletim.humanas@museu-goeldi.br |
_version_ |
1752128744012644352 |