Kin terms in Karitiana and how they may contribute to the reconstruction of Proto-Tupian kin terminology

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Storto,Luciana
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-81222019000100121
Resumo: Abstract This paper reports a case study that discusses issues related to the reconstruction of kinship terminology in Proto-Tupi, based on previous work by Araújo and Storto (2002) on the Arikém and Juruna subfamilies. It also presents the remaining kin terminology of the Karitiana language (Arikém branch or subfamily) which was not discussed in the case study. Comparing Karitiana (Landin, 1989) and Juruna (Lima, 1995) kin terminology, Araújo and Storto (2002) have shown that some cognates can be found in the two languages and proposed that they reconstruct in Proto-Tupi. These authors claim that these reconstructed items indicate the following hypotheses: (1) the speakers of Proto-Tupi (4500 BP) had a Dravidian kinship system; (2) the speakers of Proto-Tupi had a kinship and naming system in which ego was equated with the paternal grandparent of the same sex as ego. Besides the 11 cognates discussed by Araújo and Storto (2002), we discuss the remaining 19 kin terms that form the Karitiana kinship system according to Landin (1989).
id MPEG-2_fc5bcad19adcc16911c83afefd75e82f
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1981-81222019000100121
network_acronym_str MPEG-2
network_name_str Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas
repository_id_str
spelling Kin terms in Karitiana and how they may contribute to the reconstruction of Proto-Tupian kin terminologyKaritianaArikémJurunaTupiKinshipReconstructionAbstract This paper reports a case study that discusses issues related to the reconstruction of kinship terminology in Proto-Tupi, based on previous work by Araújo and Storto (2002) on the Arikém and Juruna subfamilies. It also presents the remaining kin terminology of the Karitiana language (Arikém branch or subfamily) which was not discussed in the case study. Comparing Karitiana (Landin, 1989) and Juruna (Lima, 1995) kin terminology, Araújo and Storto (2002) have shown that some cognates can be found in the two languages and proposed that they reconstruct in Proto-Tupi. These authors claim that these reconstructed items indicate the following hypotheses: (1) the speakers of Proto-Tupi (4500 BP) had a Dravidian kinship system; (2) the speakers of Proto-Tupi had a kinship and naming system in which ego was equated with the paternal grandparent of the same sex as ego. Besides the 11 cognates discussed by Araújo and Storto (2002), we discuss the remaining 19 kin terms that form the Karitiana kinship system according to Landin (1989).MCTI/Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi2019-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-81222019000100121Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas v.14 n.1 2019reponame:Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanasinstname:Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi (MPEG)instacron:MPEG10.1590/1981.81222019000100008info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessStorto,Lucianaeng2019-04-30T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1981-81222019000100121Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bgoeldi/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpboletim.humanas@museu-goeldi.br||boletim.humanas@museu-goeldi.br1981-81222178-2547opendoar:2019-04-30T00:00Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas - Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi (MPEG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Kin terms in Karitiana and how they may contribute to the reconstruction of Proto-Tupian kin terminology
title Kin terms in Karitiana and how they may contribute to the reconstruction of Proto-Tupian kin terminology
spellingShingle Kin terms in Karitiana and how they may contribute to the reconstruction of Proto-Tupian kin terminology
Storto,Luciana
Karitiana
Arikém
Juruna
Tupi
Kinship
Reconstruction
title_short Kin terms in Karitiana and how they may contribute to the reconstruction of Proto-Tupian kin terminology
title_full Kin terms in Karitiana and how they may contribute to the reconstruction of Proto-Tupian kin terminology
title_fullStr Kin terms in Karitiana and how they may contribute to the reconstruction of Proto-Tupian kin terminology
title_full_unstemmed Kin terms in Karitiana and how they may contribute to the reconstruction of Proto-Tupian kin terminology
title_sort Kin terms in Karitiana and how they may contribute to the reconstruction of Proto-Tupian kin terminology
author Storto,Luciana
author_facet Storto,Luciana
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Storto,Luciana
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Karitiana
Arikém
Juruna
Tupi
Kinship
Reconstruction
topic Karitiana
Arikém
Juruna
Tupi
Kinship
Reconstruction
description Abstract This paper reports a case study that discusses issues related to the reconstruction of kinship terminology in Proto-Tupi, based on previous work by Araújo and Storto (2002) on the Arikém and Juruna subfamilies. It also presents the remaining kin terminology of the Karitiana language (Arikém branch or subfamily) which was not discussed in the case study. Comparing Karitiana (Landin, 1989) and Juruna (Lima, 1995) kin terminology, Araújo and Storto (2002) have shown that some cognates can be found in the two languages and proposed that they reconstruct in Proto-Tupi. These authors claim that these reconstructed items indicate the following hypotheses: (1) the speakers of Proto-Tupi (4500 BP) had a Dravidian kinship system; (2) the speakers of Proto-Tupi had a kinship and naming system in which ego was equated with the paternal grandparent of the same sex as ego. Besides the 11 cognates discussed by Araújo and Storto (2002), we discuss the remaining 19 kin terms that form the Karitiana kinship system according to Landin (1989).
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-81222019000100121
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-81222019000100121
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1981.81222019000100008
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv MCTI/Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi
publisher.none.fl_str_mv MCTI/Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas v.14 n.1 2019
reponame:Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas
instname:Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi (MPEG)
instacron:MPEG
instname_str Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi (MPEG)
instacron_str MPEG
institution MPEG
reponame_str Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas
collection Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas
repository.name.fl_str_mv Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas - Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi (MPEG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv boletim.humanas@museu-goeldi.br||boletim.humanas@museu-goeldi.br
_version_ 1752128743448510464