Diálogo constitucional: o litígio estratégico como método dialógico entre o supremo tribunal federal e o poder legislativo

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Alves, Samira Rodrigues Pereira
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da Uninove
Texto Completo: http://bibliotecatede.uninove.br/handle/tede/2408
Resumo: The debate about jurisdiction and constitutional supremacy is timeless. The phenomenon of judicialization of politics, the omission of the Legislative in the face of controversial issues and the violation of fundamental rights, call for answers that excel at the functioning of institutions and interaction between the Powers. In this sense theories emerge to try to solve this question. The theory of constitutional dialogue is one of them and seeks to achieve a dialogue between the Powers, represents an interaction and objective reciprocal collaboration between institutions in the construction of norms and constitutional interpretation. It is from this conception of constitutional dialogue that strategic litigation can be a means of stimulating dialogue, since it has as its setting a strategy of political claim and social transformation in order to drive new demands, is used in the Court to claim new sense of the laws before the judiciary, as well as enabling the dialogue between the institutions and society. Through the deductive method based on bibliographical and documentary research, this work investigates the possibility of strategic litigation succeeding as an instrument for promoting dialogue between the Powers, enabling the overcoming of the decisions of the Supreme Federal Court by the Legislature through deliberations compete: presentation of projects and drafting of laws, constitutional amendments. As a technician, strategic litigation was successful as an instrument to promote dialogue between the Powers, as it generated responses from the Legislative Power through the presentation of draft laws. This research used the deductive method with bibliographic and documentary research
id NOVE_251ffcea428b04b31a7599f7ada9e98a
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:tede/2408
network_acronym_str NOVE
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da Uninove
repository_id_str
spelling Marques, Samantha Ribeiro Meyer-PflugMarques, Samantha Ribeiro Meyer-PflugMaciel, Renata MotaPadilha, Norma Suelihttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6092099508573157Alves, Samira Rodrigues Pereira2020-11-19T19:01:14Z2020-04-01Alves, Samira Rodrigues Pereira. Diálogo constitucional: o litígio estratégico como método dialógico entre o supremo tribunal federal e o poder legislativo. 2020. 134 f. Dissertação( Mestrado em Direito) - Universidade Nove de Julho, São Paulo.http://bibliotecatede.uninove.br/handle/tede/2408The debate about jurisdiction and constitutional supremacy is timeless. The phenomenon of judicialization of politics, the omission of the Legislative in the face of controversial issues and the violation of fundamental rights, call for answers that excel at the functioning of institutions and interaction between the Powers. In this sense theories emerge to try to solve this question. The theory of constitutional dialogue is one of them and seeks to achieve a dialogue between the Powers, represents an interaction and objective reciprocal collaboration between institutions in the construction of norms and constitutional interpretation. It is from this conception of constitutional dialogue that strategic litigation can be a means of stimulating dialogue, since it has as its setting a strategy of political claim and social transformation in order to drive new demands, is used in the Court to claim new sense of the laws before the judiciary, as well as enabling the dialogue between the institutions and society. Through the deductive method based on bibliographical and documentary research, this work investigates the possibility of strategic litigation succeeding as an instrument for promoting dialogue between the Powers, enabling the overcoming of the decisions of the Supreme Federal Court by the Legislature through deliberations compete: presentation of projects and drafting of laws, constitutional amendments. As a technician, strategic litigation was successful as an instrument to promote dialogue between the Powers, as it generated responses from the Legislative Power through the presentation of draft laws. This research used the deductive method with bibliographic and documentary researchO debate sobre jurisdição e supremacia constitucional é atemporal. O fenômeno da judicialização da política, a omissão do Poder Legislativo diante de temas polêmicos e a violação de direitos fundamentais pedem respostas que primem pelo funcionamento das instituições e a interação entres os Poderes. Neste sentido surgem teorias para tentar solucionar esta questão. A teoria do diálogo constitucional é uma delas e busca realizar uma interlocução entre as Instituições, prima pela interação e a colaboração recíproca entre os Poderes na construção das normas e na interpretação constitucional. É a partir dessa concepção do diálogo constitucional que o litígio estratégico pode ser um meio de estimular o diálogo, uma vez que tem como cenário uma estratégia de reivindicação política e transformação social com o intuito de impulsionar novas demandas e provocar alguma mobilização do Poder Legislativo. É utilizado no Supremo Tribunal Federal para reivindicar um novo sentido às leis perante o judiciário, como também viabilizar o diálogo entre as instituições e a sociedade. Enquanto técnica verificou-se o êxito do litígio estratégico como instrumento de promoção do diálogo entre os Poderes, pois gerou respostas do Poder Legislativo através a apresentação de projetos de leis. Esta pesquisa usou o método dedutivo com pesquisa bibliográfica e documental.Submitted by Nadir Basilio (nadirsb@uninove.br) on 2020-11-19T19:01:14Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Samira Rodrigues Pereira Alves.pdf: 1161326 bytes, checksum: abdd756d7505980f3e79be881ed38aaa (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2020-11-19T19:01:14Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Samira Rodrigues Pereira Alves.pdf: 1161326 bytes, checksum: abdd756d7505980f3e79be881ed38aaa (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020-04-01application/pdfporUniversidade Nove de JulhoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em DireitoUNINOVEBrasilDireitodiálogos constitucionaislitígio estratégicorevisão judicialjurisdição constitucionalconstitutional dialoguesstrategic litigationjudicial reviewconstitutional jurisdictionCIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITODiálogo constitucional: o litígio estratégico como método dialógico entre o supremo tribunal federal e o poder legislativoStrategic litigation as a dialogical method between the federal supreme court and the legislative powerinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis-7277407233034425144600info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da Uninoveinstname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)instacron:UNINOVEORIGINALSamira Rodrigues Pereira Alves.pdfSamira Rodrigues Pereira Alves.pdfapplication/pdf1164254http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/2408/3/Samira+Rodrigues+Pereira+Alves.pdf79ffdc37c8a0fb8fa00a70eb6b9ed723MD53LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/2408/1/license.txtbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD51tede/24082021-10-06 10:25:07.3oai:localhost:tede/2408Tk9UQTogQ09MT1FVRSBBUVVJIEEgU1VBIFBSw5NQUklBIExJQ0VOw4dBCkVzdGEgbGljZW7Dp2EgZGUgZXhlbXBsbyDDqSBmb3JuZWNpZGEgYXBlbmFzIHBhcmEgZmlucyBpbmZvcm1hdGl2b3MuCgpMSUNFTsOHQSBERSBESVNUUklCVUnDh8ODTyBOw4NPLUVYQ0xVU0lWQQoKQ29tIGEgYXByZXNlbnRhw6fDo28gZGVzdGEgbGljZW7Dp2EsIHZvY8OqIChvIGF1dG9yIChlcykgb3UgbyB0aXR1bGFyIGRvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBkZSBhdXRvcikgY29uY2VkZSDDoCBVbml2ZXJzaWRhZGUgClhYWCAoU2lnbGEgZGEgVW5pdmVyc2lkYWRlKSBvIGRpcmVpdG8gbsOjby1leGNsdXNpdm8gZGUgcmVwcm9kdXppciwgIHRyYWR1emlyIChjb25mb3JtZSBkZWZpbmlkbyBhYmFpeG8pLCBlL291IApkaXN0cmlidWlyIGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbyAoaW5jbHVpbmRvIG8gcmVzdW1vKSBwb3IgdG9kbyBvIG11bmRvIG5vIGZvcm1hdG8gaW1wcmVzc28gZSBlbGV0csO0bmljbyBlIAplbSBxdWFscXVlciBtZWlvLCBpbmNsdWluZG8gb3MgZm9ybWF0b3Mgw6F1ZGlvIG91IHbDrWRlby4KClZvY8OqIGNvbmNvcmRhIHF1ZSBhIFNpZ2xhIGRlIFVuaXZlcnNpZGFkZSBwb2RlLCBzZW0gYWx0ZXJhciBvIGNvbnRlw7pkbywgdHJhbnNwb3IgYSBzdWEgdGVzZSBvdSBkaXNzZXJ0YcOnw6NvIApwYXJhIHF1YWxxdWVyIG1laW8gb3UgZm9ybWF0byBwYXJhIGZpbnMgZGUgcHJlc2VydmHDp8Ojby4KClZvY8OqIHRhbWLDqW0gY29uY29yZGEgcXVlIGEgU2lnbGEgZGUgVW5pdmVyc2lkYWRlIHBvZGUgbWFudGVyIG1haXMgZGUgdW1hIGPDs3BpYSBhIHN1YSB0ZXNlIG91IApkaXNzZXJ0YcOnw6NvIHBhcmEgZmlucyBkZSBzZWd1cmFuw6dhLCBiYWNrLXVwIGUgcHJlc2VydmHDp8Ojby4KClZvY8OqIGRlY2xhcmEgcXVlIGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbyDDqSBvcmlnaW5hbCBlIHF1ZSB2b2PDqiB0ZW0gbyBwb2RlciBkZSBjb25jZWRlciBvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBjb250aWRvcyAKbmVzdGEgbGljZW7Dp2EuIFZvY8OqIHRhbWLDqW0gZGVjbGFyYSBxdWUgbyBkZXDDs3NpdG8gZGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbyBuw6NvLCBxdWUgc2VqYSBkZSBzZXUgCmNvbmhlY2ltZW50bywgaW5mcmluZ2UgZGlyZWl0b3MgYXV0b3JhaXMgZGUgbmluZ3XDqW0uCgpDYXNvIGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbyBjb250ZW5oYSBtYXRlcmlhbCBxdWUgdm9jw6ogbsOjbyBwb3NzdWkgYSB0aXR1bGFyaWRhZGUgZG9zIGRpcmVpdG9zIGF1dG9yYWlzLCB2b2PDqiAKZGVjbGFyYSBxdWUgb2J0ZXZlIGEgcGVybWlzc8OjbyBpcnJlc3RyaXRhIGRvIGRldGVudG9yIGRvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBhdXRvcmFpcyBwYXJhIGNvbmNlZGVyIMOgIFNpZ2xhIGRlIFVuaXZlcnNpZGFkZSAKb3MgZGlyZWl0b3MgYXByZXNlbnRhZG9zIG5lc3RhIGxpY2Vuw6dhLCBlIHF1ZSBlc3NlIG1hdGVyaWFsIGRlIHByb3ByaWVkYWRlIGRlIHRlcmNlaXJvcyBlc3TDoSBjbGFyYW1lbnRlIAppZGVudGlmaWNhZG8gZSByZWNvbmhlY2lkbyBubyB0ZXh0byBvdSBubyBjb250ZcO6ZG8gZGEgdGVzZSBvdSBkaXNzZXJ0YcOnw6NvIG9yYSBkZXBvc2l0YWRhLgoKQ0FTTyBBIFRFU0UgT1UgRElTU0VSVEHDh8ODTyBPUkEgREVQT1NJVEFEQSBURU5IQSBTSURPIFJFU1VMVEFETyBERSBVTSBQQVRST0PDjU5JTyBPVSAKQVBPSU8gREUgVU1BIEFHw4pOQ0lBIERFIEZPTUVOVE8gT1UgT1VUUk8gT1JHQU5JU01PIFFVRSBOw4NPIFNFSkEgQSBTSUdMQSBERSAKVU5JVkVSU0lEQURFLCBWT0PDiiBERUNMQVJBIFFVRSBSRVNQRUlUT1UgVE9ET1MgRSBRVUFJU1FVRVIgRElSRUlUT1MgREUgUkVWSVPDg08gQ09NTyAKVEFNQsOJTSBBUyBERU1BSVMgT0JSSUdBw4fDlUVTIEVYSUdJREFTIFBPUiBDT05UUkFUTyBPVSBBQ09SRE8uCgpBIFNpZ2xhIGRlIFVuaXZlcnNpZGFkZSBzZSBjb21wcm9tZXRlIGEgaWRlbnRpZmljYXIgY2xhcmFtZW50ZSBvIHNldSBub21lIChzKSBvdSBvKHMpIG5vbWUocykgZG8ocykgCmRldGVudG9yKGVzKSBkb3MgZGlyZWl0b3MgYXV0b3JhaXMgZGEgdGVzZSBvdSBkaXNzZXJ0YcOnw6NvLCBlIG7Do28gZmFyw6EgcXVhbHF1ZXIgYWx0ZXJhw6fDo28sIGFsw6ltIGRhcXVlbGFzIApjb25jZWRpZGFzIHBvciBlc3RhIGxpY2Vuw6dhLgo=Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://bibliotecatede.uninove.br/PRIhttp://bibliotecatede.uninove.br/oai/requestbibliotecatede@uninove.br||bibliotecatede@uninove.bropendoar:2021-10-06T13:25:07Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da Uninove - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Diálogo constitucional: o litígio estratégico como método dialógico entre o supremo tribunal federal e o poder legislativo
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv Strategic litigation as a dialogical method between the federal supreme court and the legislative power
title Diálogo constitucional: o litígio estratégico como método dialógico entre o supremo tribunal federal e o poder legislativo
spellingShingle Diálogo constitucional: o litígio estratégico como método dialógico entre o supremo tribunal federal e o poder legislativo
Alves, Samira Rodrigues Pereira
diálogos constitucionais
litígio estratégico
revisão judicial
jurisdição constitucional
constitutional dialogues
strategic litigation
judicial review
constitutional jurisdiction
CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
title_short Diálogo constitucional: o litígio estratégico como método dialógico entre o supremo tribunal federal e o poder legislativo
title_full Diálogo constitucional: o litígio estratégico como método dialógico entre o supremo tribunal federal e o poder legislativo
title_fullStr Diálogo constitucional: o litígio estratégico como método dialógico entre o supremo tribunal federal e o poder legislativo
title_full_unstemmed Diálogo constitucional: o litígio estratégico como método dialógico entre o supremo tribunal federal e o poder legislativo
title_sort Diálogo constitucional: o litígio estratégico como método dialógico entre o supremo tribunal federal e o poder legislativo
author Alves, Samira Rodrigues Pereira
author_facet Alves, Samira Rodrigues Pereira
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Marques, Samantha Ribeiro Meyer-Pflug
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Marques, Samantha Ribeiro Meyer-Pflug
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Maciel, Renata Mota
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv Padilha, Norma Sueli
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/6092099508573157
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Alves, Samira Rodrigues Pereira
contributor_str_mv Marques, Samantha Ribeiro Meyer-Pflug
Marques, Samantha Ribeiro Meyer-Pflug
Maciel, Renata Mota
Padilha, Norma Sueli
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv diálogos constitucionais
litígio estratégico
revisão judicial
jurisdição constitucional
topic diálogos constitucionais
litígio estratégico
revisão judicial
jurisdição constitucional
constitutional dialogues
strategic litigation
judicial review
constitutional jurisdiction
CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv constitutional dialogues
strategic litigation
judicial review
constitutional jurisdiction
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
description The debate about jurisdiction and constitutional supremacy is timeless. The phenomenon of judicialization of politics, the omission of the Legislative in the face of controversial issues and the violation of fundamental rights, call for answers that excel at the functioning of institutions and interaction between the Powers. In this sense theories emerge to try to solve this question. The theory of constitutional dialogue is one of them and seeks to achieve a dialogue between the Powers, represents an interaction and objective reciprocal collaboration between institutions in the construction of norms and constitutional interpretation. It is from this conception of constitutional dialogue that strategic litigation can be a means of stimulating dialogue, since it has as its setting a strategy of political claim and social transformation in order to drive new demands, is used in the Court to claim new sense of the laws before the judiciary, as well as enabling the dialogue between the institutions and society. Through the deductive method based on bibliographical and documentary research, this work investigates the possibility of strategic litigation succeeding as an instrument for promoting dialogue between the Powers, enabling the overcoming of the decisions of the Supreme Federal Court by the Legislature through deliberations compete: presentation of projects and drafting of laws, constitutional amendments. As a technician, strategic litigation was successful as an instrument to promote dialogue between the Powers, as it generated responses from the Legislative Power through the presentation of draft laws. This research used the deductive method with bibliographic and documentary research
publishDate 2020
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2020-11-19T19:01:14Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2020-04-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv Alves, Samira Rodrigues Pereira. Diálogo constitucional: o litígio estratégico como método dialógico entre o supremo tribunal federal e o poder legislativo. 2020. 134 f. Dissertação( Mestrado em Direito) - Universidade Nove de Julho, São Paulo.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://bibliotecatede.uninove.br/handle/tede/2408
identifier_str_mv Alves, Samira Rodrigues Pereira. Diálogo constitucional: o litígio estratégico como método dialógico entre o supremo tribunal federal e o poder legislativo. 2020. 134 f. Dissertação( Mestrado em Direito) - Universidade Nove de Julho, São Paulo.
url http://bibliotecatede.uninove.br/handle/tede/2408
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv -7277407233034425144
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 600
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Nove de Julho
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UNINOVE
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Direito
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Nove de Julho
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da Uninove
instname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)
instacron:UNINOVE
instname_str Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)
instacron_str UNINOVE
institution UNINOVE
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da Uninove
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da Uninove
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/2408/3/Samira+Rodrigues+Pereira+Alves.pdf
http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/2408/1/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 79ffdc37c8a0fb8fa00a70eb6b9ed723
bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da Uninove - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bibliotecatede@uninove.br||bibliotecatede@uninove.br
_version_ 1811016880790437888

Registros relacionados