Legal feasibility of special permission for public security agents to act unlawfully in case of self-defense

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fialho de Oliveira, MSc. Iolete Maria
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: dos Santos Costa, Leonardo Otaviano
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurídicos e Financeiros (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.processus.com.br/index.php/egjf/article/view/192
Resumo: The theme of this article is the legal feasibility of immediately executing criminals carrying firearms of restricted use of the armed forces. The following issue was investigated: is said execution legally feasible from the perspective of the Federal Constitution of 1988 and the of the subconstitutional legislation in force in Brazil? The following hypotheses were considered: the first is that said execution is unfeasible, from a legal point of view, for violating the accused's individual rights and guarantees, such as the presumption of innocence; the second considers the feasibility from a flexible understanding of the current legislation, in order to ensure more safety to the police officer without, at the same time, violating constitutional precepts. The general objective is to define the legal feasibility of that execution, in the light of fundamental rights and guarantees, provided in the text of the Federal Constitution and the current subconstitutional legislation.
id PROCESSUS_959db4fe6e45daeedafb042a318e9549
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.periodicos.processus.com.br:article/192
network_acronym_str PROCESSUS
network_name_str Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurídicos e Financeiros (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Legal feasibility of special permission for public security agents to act unlawfully in case of self-defenseVIABILIDADE JURÍDICA DA EXCLUDENTE DE ILICITUDE ESPECIAL PARA AGENTES DE SEGURANÇA PÚBLICA EM ESTADO DE LEGÍTIMA DEFESAAbate de criminososPresunção de inocênciaLegí­tima defesaExcludente de ilicitudeSegurança Pública.: Immediate execution of criminals. Presumption of innocence. Self-defense. Special legal permission. Public security.The theme of this article is the legal feasibility of immediately executing criminals carrying firearms of restricted use of the armed forces. The following issue was investigated: is said execution legally feasible from the perspective of the Federal Constitution of 1988 and the of the subconstitutional legislation in force in Brazil? The following hypotheses were considered: the first is that said execution is unfeasible, from a legal point of view, for violating the accused's individual rights and guarantees, such as the presumption of innocence; the second considers the feasibility from a flexible understanding of the current legislation, in order to ensure more safety to the police officer without, at the same time, violating constitutional precepts. The general objective is to define the legal feasibility of that execution, in the light of fundamental rights and guarantees, provided in the text of the Federal Constitution and the current subconstitutional legislation. O tema deste artigo é a viabilidade jurí­dica que consiste na autorização para matar suspeitos que portam arma de fogo de uso restrito das forças armadas. Investigou-se o seguinte problema: o abate de criminosos portadores de armas de uso restrito das forças armadas é viável juridicamente, do ponto de vista da Constituição Federal de 1988 e da legislação infraconstitucional vigente no Brasil? Cogitaram-se as seguintes hipóteses: a primeira, no sentido de que o abate é inviável, do ponto de vista jurí­dico, por violar direitos e garantias individuais do acusado, como a presunção de inocência; a segunda, pela viabilidade, a partir de um entendimento flexí­vel da legislação vigente, de modo a conferir mais segurança e proteção ao agente policial sem, ao mesmo tempo, violar preceitos de ordem constitucional. O objetivo geral é definir a viabilidade jurí­dica do abate de criminosos portadores de armas de uso restrito das forças armadas, í  luz dos direitos e garantias fundamentais.Centro Universitário Processus - UniProcessus2020-04-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.processus.com.br/index.php/egjf/article/view/192Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurí­dicos e Financeiros; v. 11 n. 40 (2020): REVISTA PROCESSUS DE ESTUDOS DE GESTÃO, JURÍDICOS E FINANCEIROS; 65-76Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, jurídicos e Financeiros; Vol. 11 No. 40 (2020): PROCESSUS REVIEW OF MANAGEMENT, LEGAL AND FINANCIAL STUDIES; 65-76Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, jurídicos e Financeiros; Vol. 11 Núm. 40 (2020): REVISIÓN DEL PROCESO DE LA GESTIÓN, ESTUDIOS LEGALES Y FINANCIEROS; 65-762178-20082237-2342reponame:Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurídicos e Financeiros (Online)instname:Faculdade Processus (DF)instacron:PROCESSUSporhttps://periodicos.processus.com.br/index.php/egjf/article/view/192/201https://periodicos.processus.com.br/index.php/egjf/article/view/192/250https://periodicos.processus.com.br/index.php/egjf/article/view/192/251Fialho de Oliveira, MSc. Iolete Mariados Santos Costa, Leonardo Otavianoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-05-06T16:16:18Zoai:ojs2.periodicos.processus.com.br:article/192Revistahttps://periodicos.processus.com.br/index.php/egjf/PRIhttps://periodicos.processus.com.br/index.php/egjf/oaijonas.goncalves@institutoprocessus.com.br2178-20082178-2008opendoar:2021-05-06T16:16:18Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurídicos e Financeiros (Online) - Faculdade Processus (DF)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Legal feasibility of special permission for public security agents to act unlawfully in case of self-defense
VIABILIDADE JURÍDICA DA EXCLUDENTE DE ILICITUDE ESPECIAL PARA AGENTES DE SEGURANÇA PÚBLICA EM ESTADO DE LEGÍTIMA DEFESA
title Legal feasibility of special permission for public security agents to act unlawfully in case of self-defense
spellingShingle Legal feasibility of special permission for public security agents to act unlawfully in case of self-defense
Fialho de Oliveira, MSc. Iolete Maria
Abate de criminosos
Presunção de inocência
Legí­tima defesa
Excludente de ilicitude
Segurança Pública.
: Immediate execution of criminals
. Presumption of innocence. Self-defense. Special legal permission. Public security.
title_short Legal feasibility of special permission for public security agents to act unlawfully in case of self-defense
title_full Legal feasibility of special permission for public security agents to act unlawfully in case of self-defense
title_fullStr Legal feasibility of special permission for public security agents to act unlawfully in case of self-defense
title_full_unstemmed Legal feasibility of special permission for public security agents to act unlawfully in case of self-defense
title_sort Legal feasibility of special permission for public security agents to act unlawfully in case of self-defense
author Fialho de Oliveira, MSc. Iolete Maria
author_facet Fialho de Oliveira, MSc. Iolete Maria
dos Santos Costa, Leonardo Otaviano
author_role author
author2 dos Santos Costa, Leonardo Otaviano
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fialho de Oliveira, MSc. Iolete Maria
dos Santos Costa, Leonardo Otaviano
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Abate de criminosos
Presunção de inocência
Legí­tima defesa
Excludente de ilicitude
Segurança Pública.
: Immediate execution of criminals
. Presumption of innocence. Self-defense. Special legal permission. Public security.
topic Abate de criminosos
Presunção de inocência
Legí­tima defesa
Excludente de ilicitude
Segurança Pública.
: Immediate execution of criminals
. Presumption of innocence. Self-defense. Special legal permission. Public security.
description The theme of this article is the legal feasibility of immediately executing criminals carrying firearms of restricted use of the armed forces. The following issue was investigated: is said execution legally feasible from the perspective of the Federal Constitution of 1988 and the of the subconstitutional legislation in force in Brazil? The following hypotheses were considered: the first is that said execution is unfeasible, from a legal point of view, for violating the accused's individual rights and guarantees, such as the presumption of innocence; the second considers the feasibility from a flexible understanding of the current legislation, in order to ensure more safety to the police officer without, at the same time, violating constitutional precepts. The general objective is to define the legal feasibility of that execution, in the light of fundamental rights and guarantees, provided in the text of the Federal Constitution and the current subconstitutional legislation.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-04-24
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.processus.com.br/index.php/egjf/article/view/192
url https://periodicos.processus.com.br/index.php/egjf/article/view/192
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.processus.com.br/index.php/egjf/article/view/192/201
https://periodicos.processus.com.br/index.php/egjf/article/view/192/250
https://periodicos.processus.com.br/index.php/egjf/article/view/192/251
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro Universitário Processus - UniProcessus
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro Universitário Processus - UniProcessus
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurí­dicos e Financeiros; v. 11 n. 40 (2020): REVISTA PROCESSUS DE ESTUDOS DE GESTÃO, JURÍDICOS E FINANCEIROS; 65-76
Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, jurídicos e Financeiros; Vol. 11 No. 40 (2020): PROCESSUS REVIEW OF MANAGEMENT, LEGAL AND FINANCIAL STUDIES; 65-76
Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, jurídicos e Financeiros; Vol. 11 Núm. 40 (2020): REVISIÓN DEL PROCESO DE LA GESTIÓN, ESTUDIOS LEGALES Y FINANCIEROS; 65-76
2178-2008
2237-2342
reponame:Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurídicos e Financeiros (Online)
instname:Faculdade Processus (DF)
instacron:PROCESSUS
instname_str Faculdade Processus (DF)
instacron_str PROCESSUS
institution PROCESSUS
reponame_str Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurídicos e Financeiros (Online)
collection Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurídicos e Financeiros (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurídicos e Financeiros (Online) - Faculdade Processus (DF)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv jonas.goncalves@institutoprocessus.com.br
_version_ 1809209204236353536