Legal feasibility of special permission for public security agents to act unlawfully in case of self-defense
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurídicos e Financeiros (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.processus.com.br/index.php/egjf/article/view/192 |
Resumo: | The theme of this article is the legal feasibility of immediately executing criminals carrying firearms of restricted use of the armed forces. The following issue was investigated: is said execution legally feasible from the perspective of the Federal Constitution of 1988 and the of the subconstitutional legislation in force in Brazil? The following hypotheses were considered: the first is that said execution is unfeasible, from a legal point of view, for violating the accused's individual rights and guarantees, such as the presumption of innocence; the second considers the feasibility from a flexible understanding of the current legislation, in order to ensure more safety to the police officer without, at the same time, violating constitutional precepts. The general objective is to define the legal feasibility of that execution, in the light of fundamental rights and guarantees, provided in the text of the Federal Constitution and the current subconstitutional legislation. |
id |
PROCESSUS_959db4fe6e45daeedafb042a318e9549 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.periodicos.processus.com.br:article/192 |
network_acronym_str |
PROCESSUS |
network_name_str |
Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurídicos e Financeiros (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Legal feasibility of special permission for public security agents to act unlawfully in case of self-defenseVIABILIDADE JURÍDICA DA EXCLUDENTE DE ILICITUDE ESPECIAL PARA AGENTES DE SEGURANÇA PÚBLICA EM ESTADO DE LEGÍTIMA DEFESAAbate de criminososPresunção de inocênciaLegítima defesaExcludente de ilicitudeSegurança Pública.: Immediate execution of criminals. Presumption of innocence. Self-defense. Special legal permission. Public security.The theme of this article is the legal feasibility of immediately executing criminals carrying firearms of restricted use of the armed forces. The following issue was investigated: is said execution legally feasible from the perspective of the Federal Constitution of 1988 and the of the subconstitutional legislation in force in Brazil? The following hypotheses were considered: the first is that said execution is unfeasible, from a legal point of view, for violating the accused's individual rights and guarantees, such as the presumption of innocence; the second considers the feasibility from a flexible understanding of the current legislation, in order to ensure more safety to the police officer without, at the same time, violating constitutional precepts. The general objective is to define the legal feasibility of that execution, in the light of fundamental rights and guarantees, provided in the text of the Federal Constitution and the current subconstitutional legislation. O tema deste artigo é a viabilidade jurídica que consiste na autorização para matar suspeitos que portam arma de fogo de uso restrito das forças armadas. Investigou-se o seguinte problema: o abate de criminosos portadores de armas de uso restrito das forças armadas é viável juridicamente, do ponto de vista da Constituição Federal de 1988 e da legislação infraconstitucional vigente no Brasil? Cogitaram-se as seguintes hipóteses: a primeira, no sentido de que o abate é inviável, do ponto de vista jurídico, por violar direitos e garantias individuais do acusado, como a presunção de inocência; a segunda, pela viabilidade, a partir de um entendimento flexível da legislação vigente, de modo a conferir mais segurança e proteção ao agente policial sem, ao mesmo tempo, violar preceitos de ordem constitucional. O objetivo geral é definir a viabilidade jurídica do abate de criminosos portadores de armas de uso restrito das forças armadas, í luz dos direitos e garantias fundamentais.Centro Universitário Processus - UniProcessus2020-04-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.processus.com.br/index.php/egjf/article/view/192Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurídicos e Financeiros; v. 11 n. 40 (2020): REVISTA PROCESSUS DE ESTUDOS DE GESTÃO, JURÍDICOS E FINANCEIROS; 65-76Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, jurídicos e Financeiros; Vol. 11 No. 40 (2020): PROCESSUS REVIEW OF MANAGEMENT, LEGAL AND FINANCIAL STUDIES; 65-76Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, jurídicos e Financeiros; Vol. 11 Núm. 40 (2020): REVISIÓN DEL PROCESO DE LA GESTIÓN, ESTUDIOS LEGALES Y FINANCIEROS; 65-762178-20082237-2342reponame:Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurídicos e Financeiros (Online)instname:Faculdade Processus (DF)instacron:PROCESSUSporhttps://periodicos.processus.com.br/index.php/egjf/article/view/192/201https://periodicos.processus.com.br/index.php/egjf/article/view/192/250https://periodicos.processus.com.br/index.php/egjf/article/view/192/251Fialho de Oliveira, MSc. Iolete Mariados Santos Costa, Leonardo Otavianoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-05-06T16:16:18Zoai:ojs2.periodicos.processus.com.br:article/192Revistahttps://periodicos.processus.com.br/index.php/egjf/PRIhttps://periodicos.processus.com.br/index.php/egjf/oaijonas.goncalves@institutoprocessus.com.br2178-20082178-2008opendoar:2021-05-06T16:16:18Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurídicos e Financeiros (Online) - Faculdade Processus (DF)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Legal feasibility of special permission for public security agents to act unlawfully in case of self-defense VIABILIDADE JURÍDICA DA EXCLUDENTE DE ILICITUDE ESPECIAL PARA AGENTES DE SEGURANÇA PÚBLICA EM ESTADO DE LEGÍTIMA DEFESA |
title |
Legal feasibility of special permission for public security agents to act unlawfully in case of self-defense |
spellingShingle |
Legal feasibility of special permission for public security agents to act unlawfully in case of self-defense Fialho de Oliveira, MSc. Iolete Maria Abate de criminosos Presunção de inocência Legítima defesa Excludente de ilicitude Segurança Pública. : Immediate execution of criminals . Presumption of innocence. Self-defense. Special legal permission. Public security. |
title_short |
Legal feasibility of special permission for public security agents to act unlawfully in case of self-defense |
title_full |
Legal feasibility of special permission for public security agents to act unlawfully in case of self-defense |
title_fullStr |
Legal feasibility of special permission for public security agents to act unlawfully in case of self-defense |
title_full_unstemmed |
Legal feasibility of special permission for public security agents to act unlawfully in case of self-defense |
title_sort |
Legal feasibility of special permission for public security agents to act unlawfully in case of self-defense |
author |
Fialho de Oliveira, MSc. Iolete Maria |
author_facet |
Fialho de Oliveira, MSc. Iolete Maria dos Santos Costa, Leonardo Otaviano |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
dos Santos Costa, Leonardo Otaviano |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Fialho de Oliveira, MSc. Iolete Maria dos Santos Costa, Leonardo Otaviano |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Abate de criminosos Presunção de inocência Legítima defesa Excludente de ilicitude Segurança Pública. : Immediate execution of criminals . Presumption of innocence. Self-defense. Special legal permission. Public security. |
topic |
Abate de criminosos Presunção de inocência Legítima defesa Excludente de ilicitude Segurança Pública. : Immediate execution of criminals . Presumption of innocence. Self-defense. Special legal permission. Public security. |
description |
The theme of this article is the legal feasibility of immediately executing criminals carrying firearms of restricted use of the armed forces. The following issue was investigated: is said execution legally feasible from the perspective of the Federal Constitution of 1988 and the of the subconstitutional legislation in force in Brazil? The following hypotheses were considered: the first is that said execution is unfeasible, from a legal point of view, for violating the accused's individual rights and guarantees, such as the presumption of innocence; the second considers the feasibility from a flexible understanding of the current legislation, in order to ensure more safety to the police officer without, at the same time, violating constitutional precepts. The general objective is to define the legal feasibility of that execution, in the light of fundamental rights and guarantees, provided in the text of the Federal Constitution and the current subconstitutional legislation. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-04-24 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.processus.com.br/index.php/egjf/article/view/192 |
url |
https://periodicos.processus.com.br/index.php/egjf/article/view/192 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.processus.com.br/index.php/egjf/article/view/192/201 https://periodicos.processus.com.br/index.php/egjf/article/view/192/250 https://periodicos.processus.com.br/index.php/egjf/article/view/192/251 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro Universitário Processus - UniProcessus |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro Universitário Processus - UniProcessus |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurídicos e Financeiros; v. 11 n. 40 (2020): REVISTA PROCESSUS DE ESTUDOS DE GESTÃO, JURÍDICOS E FINANCEIROS; 65-76 Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, jurídicos e Financeiros; Vol. 11 No. 40 (2020): PROCESSUS REVIEW OF MANAGEMENT, LEGAL AND FINANCIAL STUDIES; 65-76 Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, jurídicos e Financeiros; Vol. 11 Núm. 40 (2020): REVISIÓN DEL PROCESO DE LA GESTIÓN, ESTUDIOS LEGALES Y FINANCIEROS; 65-76 2178-2008 2237-2342 reponame:Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurídicos e Financeiros (Online) instname:Faculdade Processus (DF) instacron:PROCESSUS |
instname_str |
Faculdade Processus (DF) |
instacron_str |
PROCESSUS |
institution |
PROCESSUS |
reponame_str |
Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurídicos e Financeiros (Online) |
collection |
Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurídicos e Financeiros (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurídicos e Financeiros (Online) - Faculdade Processus (DF) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
jonas.goncalves@institutoprocessus.com.br |
_version_ |
1809209204236353536 |