PROFESSIONALISATION OF SOUTH AFRICAN ARCHAEOLOGY: AN IMPORTANT LEAP TO THE FUTURE

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ndlovu, Ndukuyakhe
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Habitus
Texto Completo: https://seer.pucgoias.edu.br/index.php/habitus/article/view/8076
Resumo: Archaeology as a discipline has developed following generally similar trends around the world. In its infancy days, archaeology was largely dominated by collectors who were not providing much interpretation of the materials they were gathering. As amateurs, their analyses of the last was severely limited. In the case of South Africa, it was only in 1923 that a first South African was trained as an archaeologists. Training of more archaeologists was a slow phenomenon for many reasons, and thus it was not until a growing number of universities introduced archaeological programs in the country that there were concerted efforts to train more scholars in the discipline. While all these developments were taking place, however, the professional was not regulated. Instead, archaeological associations were informally constituted by like-minded people who shared the same passion for the past. It was not until March 2018 that the Association for Southern African Professional Archaeologists (ASAPA), administratively and historically based in South Africa, was recognised as a non-statutory body. The discipline has taken a long trajectory to reach this level. In my opinion, the preferred recognition would have been registration as a statutory body established by the law of South African Parliament. That aside, I share the journey South African archaeology has traversed over the period encompassing four centuries, as well as evaluate the impact made by the 2018 recognition by the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA).
id PUC-GO-1_14bffcec8a543a720ed4cd06b7f283af
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.seer.pucgoias.edu.br:article/8076
network_acronym_str PUC-GO-1
network_name_str Habitus
repository_id_str
spelling PROFESSIONALISATION OF SOUTH AFRICAN ARCHAEOLOGY: AN IMPORTANT LEAP TO THE FUTUREArchaeologyProfessionalisation;; Archaeology; Regulations; Statutory; Non-statutory; AssociationProfessionalisationArchaeology as a discipline has developed following generally similar trends around the world. In its infancy days, archaeology was largely dominated by collectors who were not providing much interpretation of the materials they were gathering. As amateurs, their analyses of the last was severely limited. In the case of South Africa, it was only in 1923 that a first South African was trained as an archaeologists. Training of more archaeologists was a slow phenomenon for many reasons, and thus it was not until a growing number of universities introduced archaeological programs in the country that there were concerted efforts to train more scholars in the discipline. While all these developments were taking place, however, the professional was not regulated. Instead, archaeological associations were informally constituted by like-minded people who shared the same passion for the past. It was not until March 2018 that the Association for Southern African Professional Archaeologists (ASAPA), administratively and historically based in South Africa, was recognised as a non-statutory body. The discipline has taken a long trajectory to reach this level. In my opinion, the preferred recognition would have been registration as a statutory body established by the law of South African Parliament. That aside, I share the journey South African archaeology has traversed over the period encompassing four centuries, as well as evaluate the impact made by the 2018 recognition by the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA).Editora da PUC GoiásNdlovu, Ndukuyakhe2020-10-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionavaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://seer.pucgoias.edu.br/index.php/habitus/article/view/807610.18224/hab.v18i1.8076Revista Habitus - Revista do Instituto Goiano de Pré-História e Antropologia; v. 18, n. 1 (2020); 89-1061983-779810.18224/hab.v18.1.2020reponame:Habitusinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás (PUC-GO)instacron:PUC-GOenghttps://seer.pucgoias.edu.br/index.php/habitus/article/view/8076/4733Direitos autorais 2020 Ndukuyakhe Ndlovuhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-02-26T15:53:12Zoai:ojs.seer.pucgoias.edu.br:article/8076Revistahttp://seer.pucgoias.edu.br/index.php/habitus/indexPRIhttps://seer.pucgoias.edu.br/index.php/habitus/oaihabitus@pucgoias.edu.br||sibeli@pucgoias.edu.br|| felixpadua@gmail.com1983-77981678-6475opendoar:2021-02-26T15:53:12Habitus - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás (PUC-GO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv PROFESSIONALISATION OF SOUTH AFRICAN ARCHAEOLOGY: AN IMPORTANT LEAP TO THE FUTURE
title PROFESSIONALISATION OF SOUTH AFRICAN ARCHAEOLOGY: AN IMPORTANT LEAP TO THE FUTURE
spellingShingle PROFESSIONALISATION OF SOUTH AFRICAN ARCHAEOLOGY: AN IMPORTANT LEAP TO THE FUTURE
Ndlovu, Ndukuyakhe
Archaeology
Professionalisation;; Archaeology; Regulations; Statutory; Non-statutory; Association
Professionalisation
title_short PROFESSIONALISATION OF SOUTH AFRICAN ARCHAEOLOGY: AN IMPORTANT LEAP TO THE FUTURE
title_full PROFESSIONALISATION OF SOUTH AFRICAN ARCHAEOLOGY: AN IMPORTANT LEAP TO THE FUTURE
title_fullStr PROFESSIONALISATION OF SOUTH AFRICAN ARCHAEOLOGY: AN IMPORTANT LEAP TO THE FUTURE
title_full_unstemmed PROFESSIONALISATION OF SOUTH AFRICAN ARCHAEOLOGY: AN IMPORTANT LEAP TO THE FUTURE
title_sort PROFESSIONALISATION OF SOUTH AFRICAN ARCHAEOLOGY: AN IMPORTANT LEAP TO THE FUTURE
author Ndlovu, Ndukuyakhe
author_facet Ndlovu, Ndukuyakhe
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ndlovu, Ndukuyakhe
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Archaeology
Professionalisation;; Archaeology; Regulations; Statutory; Non-statutory; Association
Professionalisation
topic Archaeology
Professionalisation;; Archaeology; Regulations; Statutory; Non-statutory; Association
Professionalisation
description Archaeology as a discipline has developed following generally similar trends around the world. In its infancy days, archaeology was largely dominated by collectors who were not providing much interpretation of the materials they were gathering. As amateurs, their analyses of the last was severely limited. In the case of South Africa, it was only in 1923 that a first South African was trained as an archaeologists. Training of more archaeologists was a slow phenomenon for many reasons, and thus it was not until a growing number of universities introduced archaeological programs in the country that there were concerted efforts to train more scholars in the discipline. While all these developments were taking place, however, the professional was not regulated. Instead, archaeological associations were informally constituted by like-minded people who shared the same passion for the past. It was not until March 2018 that the Association for Southern African Professional Archaeologists (ASAPA), administratively and historically based in South Africa, was recognised as a non-statutory body. The discipline has taken a long trajectory to reach this level. In my opinion, the preferred recognition would have been registration as a statutory body established by the law of South African Parliament. That aside, I share the journey South African archaeology has traversed over the period encompassing four centuries, as well as evaluate the impact made by the 2018 recognition by the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA).
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-10-14
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.pucgoias.edu.br/index.php/habitus/article/view/8076
10.18224/hab.v18i1.8076
url https://seer.pucgoias.edu.br/index.php/habitus/article/view/8076
identifier_str_mv 10.18224/hab.v18i1.8076
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.pucgoias.edu.br/index.php/habitus/article/view/8076/4733
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2020 Ndukuyakhe Ndlovu
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2020 Ndukuyakhe Ndlovu
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUC Goiás
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUC Goiás
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Habitus - Revista do Instituto Goiano de Pré-História e Antropologia; v. 18, n. 1 (2020); 89-106
1983-7798
10.18224/hab.v18.1.2020
reponame:Habitus
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás (PUC-GO)
instacron:PUC-GO
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás (PUC-GO)
instacron_str PUC-GO
institution PUC-GO
reponame_str Habitus
collection Habitus
repository.name.fl_str_mv Habitus - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás (PUC-GO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv habitus@pucgoias.edu.br||sibeli@pucgoias.edu.br|| felixpadua@gmail.com
_version_ 1798329550290026496