Restricted stimulus control in stimulus control shaping with a capuchin monkey

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Brino,Ana Leda de Faria
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Galvão,Olavo de Faria, Barros,Romariz da Silva, Goulart,Paulo Roney Kilpp, McIlvane,William J.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Psychology & Neuroscience (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-32882012000100011
Resumo: Teaching the first instances of arbitrary matching-to-sample to nonhumans can prove difficult and time consuming. Stimulus control relations may develop that differ from those intended by the experimenter-even when stimulus control shaping procedures are used. We present, in this study, efforts to identify sources of shaping program failure with a capuchin monkey. Procedures began with a baseline of identity matching. During subsequent shaping trials, compound comparison stimuli had two components-one identical to and another different from the sample. The identical component was eliminated gradually by removing portions across trials (i.e., subtracting stimulus elements). The monkey performed accurately throughout shaping. At a late stage in the program, probe tests were conducted: (1) arbitrary matching trials that had all elements of the identical comparison removed and (2) other trials that included residual elements. During the test, the monkey performed at low levels on the former trials and higher levels on the latter. These results suggested that higher accuracy was due merely to continued control by the residual elements: the target arbitrary matching relations had not been learned. Thus, it appears that procedures that gradually transform identity matching baselines into arbitrary matching can fail by inadvertently shaping restricted control by residual elements. Subsequent probes at the end of the shaping series showed a successful transfer of stimulus control from identity to arbitrary matching after further programming steps apparently overcame the restricted stimulus control.
id PUCRJ-1_2e263dbbcae1de1858765ebb7d36fb76
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1983-32882012000100011
network_acronym_str PUCRJ-1
network_name_str Psychology & Neuroscience (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Restricted stimulus control in stimulus control shaping with a capuchin monkeymatching-to-samplestimulus control shapingrestricted stimulus controlCebus cf. apellaTeaching the first instances of arbitrary matching-to-sample to nonhumans can prove difficult and time consuming. Stimulus control relations may develop that differ from those intended by the experimenter-even when stimulus control shaping procedures are used. We present, in this study, efforts to identify sources of shaping program failure with a capuchin monkey. Procedures began with a baseline of identity matching. During subsequent shaping trials, compound comparison stimuli had two components-one identical to and another different from the sample. The identical component was eliminated gradually by removing portions across trials (i.e., subtracting stimulus elements). The monkey performed accurately throughout shaping. At a late stage in the program, probe tests were conducted: (1) arbitrary matching trials that had all elements of the identical comparison removed and (2) other trials that included residual elements. During the test, the monkey performed at low levels on the former trials and higher levels on the latter. These results suggested that higher accuracy was due merely to continued control by the residual elements: the target arbitrary matching relations had not been learned. Thus, it appears that procedures that gradually transform identity matching baselines into arbitrary matching can fail by inadvertently shaping restricted control by residual elements. Subsequent probes at the end of the shaping series showed a successful transfer of stimulus control from identity to arbitrary matching after further programming steps apparently overcame the restricted stimulus control.Pontificia Universidade Católica do Rio de JaneiroUniversidade de BrasíliaUniversidade de São Paulo2012-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-32882012000100011Psychology & Neuroscience v.5 n.1 2012reponame:Psychology & Neuroscience (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Neuropsicologia e Comportamento (IBNeC)instacron:PUCRJ10.3922/j.psns.2012.1.11info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBrino,Ana Leda de FariaGalvão,Olavo de FariaBarros,Romariz da SilvaGoulart,Paulo Roney KilppMcIlvane,William J.eng2012-10-26T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1983-32882012000100011Revistahttps://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/pnePRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppsycneuro@psycneuro.org1983-32881984-3054opendoar:2012-10-26T00:00Psychology & Neuroscience (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Neuropsicologia e Comportamento (IBNeC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Restricted stimulus control in stimulus control shaping with a capuchin monkey
title Restricted stimulus control in stimulus control shaping with a capuchin monkey
spellingShingle Restricted stimulus control in stimulus control shaping with a capuchin monkey
Brino,Ana Leda de Faria
matching-to-sample
stimulus control shaping
restricted stimulus control
Cebus cf. apella
title_short Restricted stimulus control in stimulus control shaping with a capuchin monkey
title_full Restricted stimulus control in stimulus control shaping with a capuchin monkey
title_fullStr Restricted stimulus control in stimulus control shaping with a capuchin monkey
title_full_unstemmed Restricted stimulus control in stimulus control shaping with a capuchin monkey
title_sort Restricted stimulus control in stimulus control shaping with a capuchin monkey
author Brino,Ana Leda de Faria
author_facet Brino,Ana Leda de Faria
Galvão,Olavo de Faria
Barros,Romariz da Silva
Goulart,Paulo Roney Kilpp
McIlvane,William J.
author_role author
author2 Galvão,Olavo de Faria
Barros,Romariz da Silva
Goulart,Paulo Roney Kilpp
McIlvane,William J.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Brino,Ana Leda de Faria
Galvão,Olavo de Faria
Barros,Romariz da Silva
Goulart,Paulo Roney Kilpp
McIlvane,William J.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv matching-to-sample
stimulus control shaping
restricted stimulus control
Cebus cf. apella
topic matching-to-sample
stimulus control shaping
restricted stimulus control
Cebus cf. apella
description Teaching the first instances of arbitrary matching-to-sample to nonhumans can prove difficult and time consuming. Stimulus control relations may develop that differ from those intended by the experimenter-even when stimulus control shaping procedures are used. We present, in this study, efforts to identify sources of shaping program failure with a capuchin monkey. Procedures began with a baseline of identity matching. During subsequent shaping trials, compound comparison stimuli had two components-one identical to and another different from the sample. The identical component was eliminated gradually by removing portions across trials (i.e., subtracting stimulus elements). The monkey performed accurately throughout shaping. At a late stage in the program, probe tests were conducted: (1) arbitrary matching trials that had all elements of the identical comparison removed and (2) other trials that included residual elements. During the test, the monkey performed at low levels on the former trials and higher levels on the latter. These results suggested that higher accuracy was due merely to continued control by the residual elements: the target arbitrary matching relations had not been learned. Thus, it appears that procedures that gradually transform identity matching baselines into arbitrary matching can fail by inadvertently shaping restricted control by residual elements. Subsequent probes at the end of the shaping series showed a successful transfer of stimulus control from identity to arbitrary matching after further programming steps apparently overcame the restricted stimulus control.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-32882012000100011
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-32882012000100011
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.3922/j.psns.2012.1.11
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro
Universidade de Brasília
Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro
Universidade de Brasília
Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Psychology & Neuroscience v.5 n.1 2012
reponame:Psychology & Neuroscience (Online)
instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Neuropsicologia e Comportamento (IBNeC)
instacron:PUCRJ
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro de Neuropsicologia e Comportamento (IBNeC)
instacron_str PUCRJ
institution PUCRJ
reponame_str Psychology & Neuroscience (Online)
collection Psychology & Neuroscience (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Psychology & Neuroscience (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Neuropsicologia e Comportamento (IBNeC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv psycneuro@psycneuro.org
_version_ 1754821072830595072