Inference making while reading narrative and expository texts: an ERP study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Baretta,Luciane
Data de Publicação: 2009
Outros Autores: Tomitch,Lêda Maria Braga, MacNair,Nicolas, Lim,Vanessa Kwan, Waldie,Karen Elizabeth
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Psychology & Neuroscience (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-32882009000200005
Resumo: Much of the recent research on discourse comprehension has centered on the readers' ability to construct coherent mental representations of texts. In order to form a unified representation of a given text, a reader must be able to join the information presented in the text with his/her background knowledge to construe the meaning that may not be explicitly stated, through the generation of inferences. In this study, the process of inference making by native speakers of English while reading two different types of text was investigated using electroencephalography (EEG). Subjects read narrative and expository paragraphs, and judged the plausibility of the final sentence of each four-sentence long paragraph by reference to the previous information. The analysis of data focused on the N400 component and on accuracy of behavioral responses. N400 amplitudes revealed that exposition was more demanding than narration in terms of semantic processing, whereas the behavioral data showed that subjects were more prone to generate inferences when reading exposition. Overall, this study suggests that these two types of text are processed differently by the brain, as revealed by the changes in the N400 component across the last sentences of the paragraphs.
id PUCRJ-1_c1df7f64c4afb69fa67d682eff65de89
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1983-32882009000200005
network_acronym_str PUCRJ-1
network_name_str Psychology & Neuroscience (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Inference making while reading narrative and expository texts: an ERP studyinference makingnarrationEEGERPsN400Much of the recent research on discourse comprehension has centered on the readers' ability to construct coherent mental representations of texts. In order to form a unified representation of a given text, a reader must be able to join the information presented in the text with his/her background knowledge to construe the meaning that may not be explicitly stated, through the generation of inferences. In this study, the process of inference making by native speakers of English while reading two different types of text was investigated using electroencephalography (EEG). Subjects read narrative and expository paragraphs, and judged the plausibility of the final sentence of each four-sentence long paragraph by reference to the previous information. The analysis of data focused on the N400 component and on accuracy of behavioral responses. N400 amplitudes revealed that exposition was more demanding than narration in terms of semantic processing, whereas the behavioral data showed that subjects were more prone to generate inferences when reading exposition. Overall, this study suggests that these two types of text are processed differently by the brain, as revealed by the changes in the N400 component across the last sentences of the paragraphs.Pontificia Universidade Católica do Rio de JaneiroUniversidade de BrasíliaUniversidade de São Paulo2009-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-32882009000200005Psychology & Neuroscience v.2 n.2 2009reponame:Psychology & Neuroscience (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Neuropsicologia e Comportamento (IBNeC)instacron:PUCRJ10.3922/j.psns.2009.2.005info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBaretta,LucianeTomitch,Lêda Maria BragaMacNair,NicolasLim,Vanessa KwanWaldie,Karen Elizabetheng2011-01-17T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1983-32882009000200005Revistahttps://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/pnePRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppsycneuro@psycneuro.org1983-32881984-3054opendoar:2011-01-17T00:00Psychology & Neuroscience (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Neuropsicologia e Comportamento (IBNeC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Inference making while reading narrative and expository texts: an ERP study
title Inference making while reading narrative and expository texts: an ERP study
spellingShingle Inference making while reading narrative and expository texts: an ERP study
Baretta,Luciane
inference making
narration
EEG
ERPs
N400
title_short Inference making while reading narrative and expository texts: an ERP study
title_full Inference making while reading narrative and expository texts: an ERP study
title_fullStr Inference making while reading narrative and expository texts: an ERP study
title_full_unstemmed Inference making while reading narrative and expository texts: an ERP study
title_sort Inference making while reading narrative and expository texts: an ERP study
author Baretta,Luciane
author_facet Baretta,Luciane
Tomitch,Lêda Maria Braga
MacNair,Nicolas
Lim,Vanessa Kwan
Waldie,Karen Elizabeth
author_role author
author2 Tomitch,Lêda Maria Braga
MacNair,Nicolas
Lim,Vanessa Kwan
Waldie,Karen Elizabeth
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Baretta,Luciane
Tomitch,Lêda Maria Braga
MacNair,Nicolas
Lim,Vanessa Kwan
Waldie,Karen Elizabeth
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv inference making
narration
EEG
ERPs
N400
topic inference making
narration
EEG
ERPs
N400
description Much of the recent research on discourse comprehension has centered on the readers' ability to construct coherent mental representations of texts. In order to form a unified representation of a given text, a reader must be able to join the information presented in the text with his/her background knowledge to construe the meaning that may not be explicitly stated, through the generation of inferences. In this study, the process of inference making by native speakers of English while reading two different types of text was investigated using electroencephalography (EEG). Subjects read narrative and expository paragraphs, and judged the plausibility of the final sentence of each four-sentence long paragraph by reference to the previous information. The analysis of data focused on the N400 component and on accuracy of behavioral responses. N400 amplitudes revealed that exposition was more demanding than narration in terms of semantic processing, whereas the behavioral data showed that subjects were more prone to generate inferences when reading exposition. Overall, this study suggests that these two types of text are processed differently by the brain, as revealed by the changes in the N400 component across the last sentences of the paragraphs.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-32882009000200005
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-32882009000200005
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.3922/j.psns.2009.2.005
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro
Universidade de Brasília
Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro
Universidade de Brasília
Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Psychology & Neuroscience v.2 n.2 2009
reponame:Psychology & Neuroscience (Online)
instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Neuropsicologia e Comportamento (IBNeC)
instacron:PUCRJ
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro de Neuropsicologia e Comportamento (IBNeC)
instacron_str PUCRJ
institution PUCRJ
reponame_str Psychology & Neuroscience (Online)
collection Psychology & Neuroscience (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Psychology & Neuroscience (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Neuropsicologia e Comportamento (IBNeC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv psycneuro@psycneuro.org
_version_ 1754821072293724160