Epistemologia do desacordo

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Michele Santos da
Data de Publicação: 2012
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional PUCRS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10923/3429
Resumo: People disagree all the time. The objects of discordance vary from the most banal, such as the correct location of a restaurant, to more sophisticated issues understood by some experts, as in the case of the Sciences. The question proposed here is the following: what is the relevancy of the disagreement to the epistemic justification? When one is in total disagreement, should we rethink our doxastic attitude? Initially, I sought for an answer in the form of a single epistemic norm for cases such as these. I will present the currents that have initially proposed such norms and how epistemic variables transform this vision during the deep debate over this issue.
id PUCR_aa493908bac6576c1917944629eeed4d
oai_identifier_str oai:meriva.pucrs.br:10923/3429
network_acronym_str PUCR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional PUCRS
repository_id_str 2753
spelling Silva, Michele Santos daAlmeida, Cláudio Gonçalves de2013-08-07T18:55:35Z2013-08-07T18:55:35Z2012http://hdl.handle.net/10923/3429People disagree all the time. The objects of discordance vary from the most banal, such as the correct location of a restaurant, to more sophisticated issues understood by some experts, as in the case of the Sciences. The question proposed here is the following: what is the relevancy of the disagreement to the epistemic justification? When one is in total disagreement, should we rethink our doxastic attitude? Initially, I sought for an answer in the form of a single epistemic norm for cases such as these. I will present the currents that have initially proposed such norms and how epistemic variables transform this vision during the deep debate over this issue.As pessoas discordam o tempo todo. Os objetos de discordância variam dos mais banais, como a localização correta de um restaurante, até questões mais sofisticadas entendidas somente por experts, como no caso das ciências. A pergunta proposta é: qual a relevância do desacordo para a justificação epistêmica? Ao entrar em franco desacordo, devemos revisar nossa atitude doxástica? Inicialmente procurei uma resposta na forma de uma norma epistêmica única para casos como esse. Apresentarei as correntes que inicialmente propuseram tais normas e como variáveis epistêmicas transformaram essa visão durante o denso debate sobre essa questão.Made available in DSpace on 2013-08-07T18:55:35Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 000444172-Texto+Completo-0.pdf: 230572 bytes, checksum: 8bdb754a0383ef037275280188cab145 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreFILOSOFIAEPISTEMOLOGIAEpistemologia do desacordoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do SulFaculdade de Filosofia e Ciências HumanasPrograma de Pós-Graduação em FilosofiaMestrado2012porreponame:Repositório Institucional PUCRSinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTEXT000444172-Texto+Completo-0.pdf.txt000444172-Texto+Completo-0.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain116402http://meriva.pucrs.br:8080/jspui/bitstream/10923/3429/3/000444172-Texto%2BCompleto-0.pdf.txt38d9bbd4bbfd756706652aaf50130bafMD53ORIGINAL000444172-Texto+Completo-0.pdfTexto Completoapplication/pdf230572http://meriva.pucrs.br:8080/jspui/bitstream/10923/3429/1/000444172-Texto%2BCompleto-0.pdf8bdb754a0383ef037275280188cab145MD51LICENSElicense.txttext/plain601http://meriva.pucrs.br:8080/jspui/bitstream/10923/3429/2/license.txt3d470ad030ca6782c9f44a1fb7650ec0MD5210923/34292017-09-28 09:40:36.224oai:meriva.pucrs.br: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Repositório InstitucionalPRIhttp://repositorio.pucrs.br/oai/request?verb=Identifyopendoar:27532017-09-28T12:40:36Repositório Institucional PUCRS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Epistemologia do desacordo
title Epistemologia do desacordo
spellingShingle Epistemologia do desacordo
Silva, Michele Santos da
FILOSOFIA
EPISTEMOLOGIA
title_short Epistemologia do desacordo
title_full Epistemologia do desacordo
title_fullStr Epistemologia do desacordo
title_full_unstemmed Epistemologia do desacordo
title_sort Epistemologia do desacordo
author Silva, Michele Santos da
author_facet Silva, Michele Santos da
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Michele Santos da
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Almeida, Cláudio Gonçalves de
contributor_str_mv Almeida, Cláudio Gonçalves de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv FILOSOFIA
EPISTEMOLOGIA
topic FILOSOFIA
EPISTEMOLOGIA
description People disagree all the time. The objects of discordance vary from the most banal, such as the correct location of a restaurant, to more sophisticated issues understood by some experts, as in the case of the Sciences. The question proposed here is the following: what is the relevancy of the disagreement to the epistemic justification? When one is in total disagreement, should we rethink our doxastic attitude? Initially, I sought for an answer in the form of a single epistemic norm for cases such as these. I will present the currents that have initially proposed such norms and how epistemic variables transform this vision during the deep debate over this issue.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2012
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2013-08-07T18:55:35Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2013-08-07T18:55:35Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10923/3429
url http://hdl.handle.net/10923/3429
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
Porto Alegre
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
Porto Alegre
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional PUCRS
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional PUCRS
collection Repositório Institucional PUCRS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://meriva.pucrs.br:8080/jspui/bitstream/10923/3429/3/000444172-Texto%2BCompleto-0.pdf.txt
http://meriva.pucrs.br:8080/jspui/bitstream/10923/3429/1/000444172-Texto%2BCompleto-0.pdf
http://meriva.pucrs.br:8080/jspui/bitstream/10923/3429/2/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 38d9bbd4bbfd756706652aaf50130baf
8bdb754a0383ef037275280188cab145
3d470ad030ca6782c9f44a1fb7650ec0
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional PUCRS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1817559037519069184