Avaliação da resistência à união dentinária entre tratamento ultra-sônico e alta rotação na interface dente/material restaurador
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2007 |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional PUCRS |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10923/430 |
Resumo: | Seventeen extracted healthy third molars were used in order to evaluate dentine as to: microtensile bond strength (μTBS) with Z250 resin composite (CR), and 3M Single Bond 2 adhesive; appearance previous to adhesive treatment (APTA); adhesive union (UA); type of fracture by Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM), and energy dispersion spectroscopy (EDS), comparing the treatment with a KGSorensen diamond bur (PD) and a CVDentus (UT) ultrasound tips with (c/a) and without (s/a) etching. Four groups (n=40) were divided according to the dentin processing (PDs/a - diamond bur without etching); (PDc/a - diamond bur with etching); (UTs/a - ultrasound tip without etching); (UTc/a - ultrasound tip with etching) were restored, embedded in politetrafluoretilene tube using chemically activated acrylic resin, and sectioned into samples for μTBS testing in an EMIC DL-2000 universal machine (0. 5 mm/min). Samples were analyzed by SEM and EDS for fracture classification UA and APTA. Statistical tests were: Kolmogorov- Smirnov Test; Two way Variance Analysis; Tukey and Fisher's Exact Test (p≤0,05). Failures were classified as: cohesive in dentine (CD); cohesive in CR (CM); cohesive interfacial on the base or top of hybrid layer (CBT); adhesive cohesive interfacial (CA); mixed (M); interfacial on smear layer (S). Results showed (group, average μTBS in MPa - standard deviation): (UTc/a, 45. 31-8. 16); (PDc/a, 34. 04-9. 29); (UTs/a, 15. 17-3. 71); (PDs/a, 9. 86-3. 80).The PD method is associated to CBT, and the UT method is associated to CA and CM; c/a is associated to CBT and CM, and s/a is associated to S. APTA showed: PDs/a - total obstruction of dentinal tubules (cd); UTs/a - partial disobstruction of cd and irregular surface appearance; PDc/a - complete disobstruction of cd; UTc/a - complete disobstruction of cd, and irregular surface appearance. UA showed: PDs/a rectilinear hybrid layer occurred without tags penetration (PT); UTs/a, curvilinear with a few PT; PDc/a, rectilinear with PT; UTc/a, curvilinear with PT. It was concluded that the association of UTc/a treatment promotes higher values of μTBS. There is an association between CBT failure and the PD method, failures CA and CM and the UT method, failures CBT and CM and the c/a method, and failure S and the s/a method. The failures that caused higher resistance to its rupture were, in a decreasing order: CD; CM; CBT; CA; M, and S. |
id |
PUCR_c4e678135c9435dbc93e94614e38dae2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.pucrs.br:10923/430 |
network_acronym_str |
PUCR |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional PUCRS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Conde, AlexandreMota, Eduardo Gonçalves2011-12-27T14:14:13Z2011-12-27T14:14:13Z2007http://hdl.handle.net/10923/430Seventeen extracted healthy third molars were used in order to evaluate dentine as to: microtensile bond strength (μTBS) with Z250 resin composite (CR), and 3M Single Bond 2 adhesive; appearance previous to adhesive treatment (APTA); adhesive union (UA); type of fracture by Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM), and energy dispersion spectroscopy (EDS), comparing the treatment with a KGSorensen diamond bur (PD) and a CVDentus (UT) ultrasound tips with (c/a) and without (s/a) etching. Four groups (n=40) were divided according to the dentin processing (PDs/a - diamond bur without etching); (PDc/a - diamond bur with etching); (UTs/a - ultrasound tip without etching); (UTc/a - ultrasound tip with etching) were restored, embedded in politetrafluoretilene tube using chemically activated acrylic resin, and sectioned into samples for μTBS testing in an EMIC DL-2000 universal machine (0. 5 mm/min). Samples were analyzed by SEM and EDS for fracture classification UA and APTA. Statistical tests were: Kolmogorov- Smirnov Test; Two way Variance Analysis; Tukey and Fisher's Exact Test (p≤0,05). Failures were classified as: cohesive in dentine (CD); cohesive in CR (CM); cohesive interfacial on the base or top of hybrid layer (CBT); adhesive cohesive interfacial (CA); mixed (M); interfacial on smear layer (S). Results showed (group, average μTBS in MPa - standard deviation): (UTc/a, 45. 31-8. 16); (PDc/a, 34. 04-9. 29); (UTs/a, 15. 17-3. 71); (PDs/a, 9. 86-3. 80).The PD method is associated to CBT, and the UT method is associated to CA and CM; c/a is associated to CBT and CM, and s/a is associated to S. APTA showed: PDs/a - total obstruction of dentinal tubules (cd); UTs/a - partial disobstruction of cd and irregular surface appearance; PDc/a - complete disobstruction of cd; UTc/a - complete disobstruction of cd, and irregular surface appearance. UA showed: PDs/a rectilinear hybrid layer occurred without tags penetration (PT); UTs/a, curvilinear with a few PT; PDc/a, rectilinear with PT; UTc/a, curvilinear with PT. It was concluded that the association of UTc/a treatment promotes higher values of μTBS. There is an association between CBT failure and the PD method, failures CA and CM and the UT method, failures CBT and CM and the c/a method, and failure S and the s/a method. The failures that caused higher resistance to its rupture were, in a decreasing order: CD; CM; CBT; CA; M, and S.Dezessete terceiros molares hígidos extraídos foram utilizados com objetivo de avaliar a dentina quanto: resistência à união por microtração (μTBS) com resina composta (CR) Z250 e adesivo Single Bond 2 (3M); aspecto prévio ao tratamento adesivo (APTA); união adesiva (UA); tipo de fratura por microscopia eletrônica de varredura (MEV) e espectroscopia por dispersão de energia (EDS) comparando o tratamento com ponta diamantada KGSorensen (PD) e haste ultra-sônica CVDentUS (UT) com (c/a) ou sem (s/a) condicionamento ácido. Quatro grupos (n=40) divididos conforme processamento dentinário (PDs/a; PDc/a; UTs/a; UTc/a) foram restaurados, incluídos em resina acrílica autopolimerizável e transformados em pequenas barras por máquina de corte seriado para posterior ensaio de μTBS em máquina universal EMIC DL-2000 (0,5 mm/min). As amostras foram analisadas por MEV e EDS para classificação de fratura, UA e APTA. Os testes estatísticos foram: Kolmogorov-Smirnov; Análise de Variância fatorial; Tukey e Exato de Fisher (p≤0,05). As falhas foram classificadas em: Coesiva em dentina (CD); coesiva em CR (CM); interfacial coesiva na base ou topo de camada híbrida (CBT); interfacial coesiva adesiva (CA); mista (M); interfacial no smear layer (S). Os resultados mostraram (grupo, média μTBS em MPa - desvio padrão): (UTc/a, 45,31-8,16); (PDc/a, 34,04-9,29); (UTs/a, 15,17-3,71); (PDs/a, 9,86-3,80). O método PD está associado à CBT e o método UT às CA e CM, c/a está associado às CBT e CM e s/a à S. O APTA mostrou: PDs/a total obstrução dos canalículos dentinários (cd); UTs/a parcial desobstrução dos cd e aspecto irregular de superfície; PDc/a completa desobstrução dos cd; UTc/a completa desobstrução dos cd e aspecto irregular de superfície. Em PDs/a ocorreu camada híbrida retilínea sem penetrações de tags (PT); UTs/a, curvilínea com algumas PT; PDc/a, retilínea com PT; UTc/a, curvilínea com PT. Concluiu-se que a associação do tratamento UTc/a promove valores maiores de μTBS. Existe associação entre falha CBT com o método PD, falhas CA e CM com o método UT, falhas CBT e CM com o método c/a e falha S com o método s/a. As falhas que ofereceram maior resistência para seu rompimento são, em ordem decrescente: CD; CM; CBT; CA; M; S.Made available in DSpace on 2011-12-27T14:14:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 000387554-0.pdf: 6424305 bytes, checksum: eede53bc1323d5be8d0e3d939fde81ca (MD5) license.txt: 581 bytes, checksum: 44ea52f0b7567232681c6e3d72285adc (MD5)Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreODONTOLOGIARESISTÊNCIA DOS MATERIAIS (ODONTOLOGIA)DENTINAADESIVOS DENTÁRIOSAvaliação da resistência à união dentinária entre tratamento ultra-sônico e alta rotação na interface dente/material restauradorinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do SulFaculdade de OdontologiaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em OdontologiaDoutorado2007porreponame:Repositório Institucional PUCRSinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessORIGINAL000387554-0.pdfTexto Completoapplication/pdf6424305repositorio.pucrs.br/jspui/bitstream/10923/430/1/000387554-0.pdfeede53bc1323d5be8d0e3d939fde81caMD51LICENSElicense.txttext/plain581repositorio.pucrs.br/jspui/bitstream/10923/430/2/license.txt44ea52f0b7567232681c6e3d72285adcMD52TEXT000387554-0.pdf.txt000387554-0.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain430463repositorio.pucrs.br/jspui/bitstream/10923/430/3/000387554-0.pdf.txt98e7b0a677558bed214b30770595d834MD5310923/4302017-09-28 11:05:35.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ório InstitucionalPRI |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Avaliação da resistência à união dentinária entre tratamento ultra-sônico e alta rotação na interface dente/material restaurador |
title |
Avaliação da resistência à união dentinária entre tratamento ultra-sônico e alta rotação na interface dente/material restaurador |
spellingShingle |
Avaliação da resistência à união dentinária entre tratamento ultra-sônico e alta rotação na interface dente/material restaurador Conde, Alexandre ODONTOLOGIA RESISTÊNCIA DOS MATERIAIS (ODONTOLOGIA) DENTINA ADESIVOS DENTÁRIOS |
title_short |
Avaliação da resistência à união dentinária entre tratamento ultra-sônico e alta rotação na interface dente/material restaurador |
title_full |
Avaliação da resistência à união dentinária entre tratamento ultra-sônico e alta rotação na interface dente/material restaurador |
title_fullStr |
Avaliação da resistência à união dentinária entre tratamento ultra-sônico e alta rotação na interface dente/material restaurador |
title_full_unstemmed |
Avaliação da resistência à união dentinária entre tratamento ultra-sônico e alta rotação na interface dente/material restaurador |
title_sort |
Avaliação da resistência à união dentinária entre tratamento ultra-sônico e alta rotação na interface dente/material restaurador |
author |
Conde, Alexandre |
author_facet |
Conde, Alexandre |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Conde, Alexandre |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Mota, Eduardo Gonçalves |
contributor_str_mv |
Mota, Eduardo Gonçalves |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
ODONTOLOGIA RESISTÊNCIA DOS MATERIAIS (ODONTOLOGIA) DENTINA ADESIVOS DENTÁRIOS |
topic |
ODONTOLOGIA RESISTÊNCIA DOS MATERIAIS (ODONTOLOGIA) DENTINA ADESIVOS DENTÁRIOS |
description |
Seventeen extracted healthy third molars were used in order to evaluate dentine as to: microtensile bond strength (μTBS) with Z250 resin composite (CR), and 3M Single Bond 2 adhesive; appearance previous to adhesive treatment (APTA); adhesive union (UA); type of fracture by Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM), and energy dispersion spectroscopy (EDS), comparing the treatment with a KGSorensen diamond bur (PD) and a CVDentus (UT) ultrasound tips with (c/a) and without (s/a) etching. Four groups (n=40) were divided according to the dentin processing (PDs/a - diamond bur without etching); (PDc/a - diamond bur with etching); (UTs/a - ultrasound tip without etching); (UTc/a - ultrasound tip with etching) were restored, embedded in politetrafluoretilene tube using chemically activated acrylic resin, and sectioned into samples for μTBS testing in an EMIC DL-2000 universal machine (0. 5 mm/min). Samples were analyzed by SEM and EDS for fracture classification UA and APTA. Statistical tests were: Kolmogorov- Smirnov Test; Two way Variance Analysis; Tukey and Fisher's Exact Test (p≤0,05). Failures were classified as: cohesive in dentine (CD); cohesive in CR (CM); cohesive interfacial on the base or top of hybrid layer (CBT); adhesive cohesive interfacial (CA); mixed (M); interfacial on smear layer (S). Results showed (group, average μTBS in MPa - standard deviation): (UTc/a, 45. 31-8. 16); (PDc/a, 34. 04-9. 29); (UTs/a, 15. 17-3. 71); (PDs/a, 9. 86-3. 80).The PD method is associated to CBT, and the UT method is associated to CA and CM; c/a is associated to CBT and CM, and s/a is associated to S. APTA showed: PDs/a - total obstruction of dentinal tubules (cd); UTs/a - partial disobstruction of cd and irregular surface appearance; PDc/a - complete disobstruction of cd; UTc/a - complete disobstruction of cd, and irregular surface appearance. UA showed: PDs/a rectilinear hybrid layer occurred without tags penetration (PT); UTs/a, curvilinear with a few PT; PDc/a, rectilinear with PT; UTc/a, curvilinear with PT. It was concluded that the association of UTc/a treatment promotes higher values of μTBS. There is an association between CBT failure and the PD method, failures CA and CM and the UT method, failures CBT and CM and the c/a method, and failure S and the s/a method. The failures that caused higher resistance to its rupture were, in a decreasing order: CD; CM; CBT; CA; M, and S. |
publishDate |
2007 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2007 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2011-12-27T14:14:13Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2011-12-27T14:14:13Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
format |
doctoralThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10923/430 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10923/430 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional PUCRS instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional PUCRS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional PUCRS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
repositorio.pucrs.br/jspui/bitstream/10923/430/1/000387554-0.pdf repositorio.pucrs.br/jspui/bitstream/10923/430/2/license.txt repositorio.pucrs.br/jspui/bitstream/10923/430/3/000387554-0.pdf.txt |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
eede53bc1323d5be8d0e3d939fde81ca 44ea52f0b7567232681c6e3d72285adc 98e7b0a677558bed214b30770595d834 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1731736511767904256 |