Avaliação "in vitro" da resistência à abrasão de resinas compostas comerciais à base de dimetacrilato e uma à base de silorano fotoativadas com duas densidades de energia

• Autor(a) principal: Barbieri, Guilherme Machado
• Data de Publicação: 2009
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional PUCRS
• Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10923/427
• topic: ODONTOLOGIA; MATERIAIS DENTÁRIOS; RESISTÊNCIA DOS MATERIAIS (ODONTOLOGIA); RESINAS (ODONTOLOGIA)

Article 1 - Aims: To compare the surface roughness of four resin composites with different organic matrix compositions applying the abrasion testing by tooth brushing until 20,000 cycles. Methods and materials: One hundred and sixty samples were buildup and divided into 16 groups (n=10) according to the type of composite resin, source of light and energy density. The resin composites used were Charisma, Z250, ROK and Filtek LS, being photo activated with LED or halogen unit, receiving 8 or 16 J/cm2. After 24h, the samples were submitted to a simulated wear test with a dentifrice and a soft toothbrush by periods of 6 months (5000 cycles), 12 months (10. 000 cycles) e 24 months (20. 000 cycles). After each period was realized the surface roughness measurement. Results: The factors as energy density (p=0. 0001), source of light (p=0. 0047), resin composites (p=0. 0001) and cycles (p=0. 0001) influenced the results. The mean roughness values obtained were (means followed by the same letter are not significantly different according to Tukey (α=5%)): 0. 07μm (A) - ROK; 0. 08μm (B) - Z250; 0. 12μm (C) - Charisma; 0,17μm (D) - Filtek LS. Conclusion: The UDMA-based resin composites present higher surface abrasion resistance. The silorane-based composites present lower surface abrasion resistance. The resin composites photo activated by 16J/cm2 present lower roughness than composites cured by 8J/cm2.Article 2 - Aim: To evaluate the surface roughness of two resin composites with different organic phase when submitted to a simulated wear test with tooth brushing and whitening dentifrices. Materials and methods: Forty-eight samples were built and divided into 6 groups (n=8) according to composite resin (ROK (SDI) or Z250 (3MESPE) and dentifrice used (Colgate Total 12, Colgate Max White or Close up Extra Whitening). The resins were submitted to cycles of simulated tooth brushing until 24 months. After each simulated period, the surface roughness of the resins was measured. Results: The surface roughness(Ra) average, in μm, to the Colgate total 12 (control), Colgate Max White and Close up Extra Whitening dentifrices were, respectively (means followed by the same letter are not statistically different to ANOVA and Tukey (p<0,05)): 1) ROK: 0. 09(B), 0. 12(B) and 0. 11(B); 2) Z250: 0. 09(B), 0. 21(A) and 0. 21(A). Conclusions: The ROK composite resin presented lower surface roughness (0. 11) than Z250 (0. 17). The resin composites ROK and Z250 have its abrasion resistance decreased when the whitening dentifrices Colgate Max-White and Close Up Extra-Whitening are applied.