Influence of pacifier use and bottle in exclusive breastfeeding among mothers treated at a Human Milk Bank
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Nutrição |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/8260 |
Resumo: | ObjectiveTo evaluate the use of pacifiers and bottles and their influence on the prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding among children of mothers attending a human milk bank. MethodsThis cross-sectional study included mothers seen at a human milk bank from 2009 to 2011. The following information was collected by a structured questionnaire: sociodemographic data, obstetric history, and information about exclusive breastfeeding, bottle use, and pacifier use. The data were analyzed descriptively and by the Chi-square test and Poisson’s regression. ResultsA total of 9,474 mothers were assessed. Of these, 65.2% had completed high school, and 60.6% reported having done exclusive breastfeeding. The prevalences of bottle and pacifier use were 22.9 and 25.0%, respectively. Exclusive breastfeeding was less prevalent in children who used pacifier (38.4 versus 43.2%; p<0.001) and bottle (13.5 versus 46.6%; p<0.001). Use of bottle was associated with a smaller prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding (PR=0.43; 95%CI=0.35-0.53), unlike feeding on demand (PR=5.5; 95%CI=4.17-7.3), higher maternal education level (PR=1.2; 95%CI=1.08-1.35), prenatal care (PR=1.25; 95%CI=1.13-1.38), andmother having received counseling on breastfeeding (PR=1.10; 95%CI=1.02-1.18), which favored the practice. Pacifier use was not associated with the prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding (PR=1.10; 95%CI=1.00-1.21). ConclusionBottle use had a negative impact on the prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding, thus it should be considered a target of strategies that promote it. |
id |
PUC_CAMP-2_282b26572cac76fa2b6065c1571af204 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br:article/8260 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_CAMP-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Nutrição |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Influence of pacifier use and bottle in exclusive breastfeeding among mothers treated at a Human Milk BankInfluência do uso de chupeta e mamadeira no aleitamento materno exclusivo entre mães atendidas em um Banco de Leite HumanoBreastfeedingBottle feedingMilk banksPacifiersAleitamento maternoAlimentação artificialBancos de leiteChupetaObjectiveTo evaluate the use of pacifiers and bottles and their influence on the prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding among children of mothers attending a human milk bank. MethodsThis cross-sectional study included mothers seen at a human milk bank from 2009 to 2011. The following information was collected by a structured questionnaire: sociodemographic data, obstetric history, and information about exclusive breastfeeding, bottle use, and pacifier use. The data were analyzed descriptively and by the Chi-square test and Poisson’s regression. ResultsA total of 9,474 mothers were assessed. Of these, 65.2% had completed high school, and 60.6% reported having done exclusive breastfeeding. The prevalences of bottle and pacifier use were 22.9 and 25.0%, respectively. Exclusive breastfeeding was less prevalent in children who used pacifier (38.4 versus 43.2%; p<0.001) and bottle (13.5 versus 46.6%; p<0.001). Use of bottle was associated with a smaller prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding (PR=0.43; 95%CI=0.35-0.53), unlike feeding on demand (PR=5.5; 95%CI=4.17-7.3), higher maternal education level (PR=1.2; 95%CI=1.08-1.35), prenatal care (PR=1.25; 95%CI=1.13-1.38), andmother having received counseling on breastfeeding (PR=1.10; 95%CI=1.02-1.18), which favored the practice. Pacifier use was not associated with the prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding (PR=1.10; 95%CI=1.00-1.21). ConclusionBottle use had a negative impact on the prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding, thus it should be considered a target of strategies that promote it. ObjetivoAvaliar o uso de chupeta e mamadeira e sua influência na prevalência do aleitamento materno exclusivo entre lactentes de mães atendidas em um Banco de Leite Humano. MétodosEstudo transversal com mães atendidas em um Banco de Leite Humano entre 2009 e 2011 a partir de informações (sociodemográficas, antecedentes obstétricos, dados sobre aleitamento materno exclusivo, mamadeira e chupeta) obtidas por meio de questionário estruturado. Realizaram-se análise descritiva, teste de Qui-quadrado e regressão de Poisson. ResultadosAvaliaram-se 9.474 mães, 65,2% com escolaridade até o ensino médio e 60,6% referiram aleitamento materno exclusivo. A prevalência de uso de mamadeira e chupeta foi de 22,9 e 25,0%, respectivamente. A amamentaçãoexclusiva foi menor entre os lactentes que usavam chupeta (38,4 versus 43,2%; p<0,001) e mamadeira (13,5 versus 46,6%; p<0,001). O uso de mamadeira se associou à menor prevalência de aleitamento exclusivo (RP=0,43; IC95%=0,35-0,53), em contraste com a amamentação sob livre demanda (RP=5,5; IC95%=4,17-7,3), maior nível de escolaridade materna (RP=1,2; IC95%=1,08-1,35), pré-natal (RP=1,25; IC95%=1,13-1,38) e a mãe orientada sobre amamentação (RP=1,10; IC95%=1,02-1,18), que favoreceram esta prática. O uso de chupeta não se associou à prevalência de aleitamento materno exclusivo (RP=1,10; IC95%=1,00-1,21). ConclusãoO uso de mamadeira exerceu influência negativa na prevalência do aleitamento materno exclusivo e deve ser considerado alvo de estratégias para incremento dessa prática. Núcleo de Editoração – PUC-Campinas2023-04-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/8260Brazilian Journal of Nutrition; Vol. 28 No. 6 (2015): Revista de NutriçãoRevista de Nutrição; Vol. 28 Núm. 6 (2015): Revista de NutriçãoRevista de Nutrição; v. 28 n. 6 (2015): Revista de Nutrição1678-9865reponame:Revista de Nutriçãoinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)instacron:PUC_CAMPporhttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/8260/5783Copyright (c) 2023 Ana Luiza Rodrigues PELLEGRINELLI, Simone Cardoso Lisboa PEREIRA, Iêda Passos RIBEIRO, Luana Caroline dos SANTOShttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRodrigues PELLEGRINELLI, Ana Luiza Cardoso Lisboa PEREIRA, Simone Passos RIBEIRO, Iêdados SANTOS, Luana Caroline 2023-04-05T18:07:33Zoai:ojs.periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br:article/8260Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rnPRIhttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/oai||sbi.submissionrn@puc-campinas.edu.br1678-98651415-5273opendoar:2023-04-05T18:07:33Revista de Nutrição - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Influence of pacifier use and bottle in exclusive breastfeeding among mothers treated at a Human Milk Bank Influência do uso de chupeta e mamadeira no aleitamento materno exclusivo entre mães atendidas em um Banco de Leite Humano |
title |
Influence of pacifier use and bottle in exclusive breastfeeding among mothers treated at a Human Milk Bank |
spellingShingle |
Influence of pacifier use and bottle in exclusive breastfeeding among mothers treated at a Human Milk Bank Rodrigues PELLEGRINELLI, Ana Luiza Breastfeeding Bottle feeding Milk banks Pacifiers Aleitamento materno Alimentação artificial Bancos de leite Chupeta |
title_short |
Influence of pacifier use and bottle in exclusive breastfeeding among mothers treated at a Human Milk Bank |
title_full |
Influence of pacifier use and bottle in exclusive breastfeeding among mothers treated at a Human Milk Bank |
title_fullStr |
Influence of pacifier use and bottle in exclusive breastfeeding among mothers treated at a Human Milk Bank |
title_full_unstemmed |
Influence of pacifier use and bottle in exclusive breastfeeding among mothers treated at a Human Milk Bank |
title_sort |
Influence of pacifier use and bottle in exclusive breastfeeding among mothers treated at a Human Milk Bank |
author |
Rodrigues PELLEGRINELLI, Ana Luiza |
author_facet |
Rodrigues PELLEGRINELLI, Ana Luiza Cardoso Lisboa PEREIRA, Simone Passos RIBEIRO, Iêda dos SANTOS, Luana Caroline |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cardoso Lisboa PEREIRA, Simone Passos RIBEIRO, Iêda dos SANTOS, Luana Caroline |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rodrigues PELLEGRINELLI, Ana Luiza Cardoso Lisboa PEREIRA, Simone Passos RIBEIRO, Iêda dos SANTOS, Luana Caroline |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Breastfeeding Bottle feeding Milk banks Pacifiers Aleitamento materno Alimentação artificial Bancos de leite Chupeta |
topic |
Breastfeeding Bottle feeding Milk banks Pacifiers Aleitamento materno Alimentação artificial Bancos de leite Chupeta |
description |
ObjectiveTo evaluate the use of pacifiers and bottles and their influence on the prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding among children of mothers attending a human milk bank. MethodsThis cross-sectional study included mothers seen at a human milk bank from 2009 to 2011. The following information was collected by a structured questionnaire: sociodemographic data, obstetric history, and information about exclusive breastfeeding, bottle use, and pacifier use. The data were analyzed descriptively and by the Chi-square test and Poisson’s regression. ResultsA total of 9,474 mothers were assessed. Of these, 65.2% had completed high school, and 60.6% reported having done exclusive breastfeeding. The prevalences of bottle and pacifier use were 22.9 and 25.0%, respectively. Exclusive breastfeeding was less prevalent in children who used pacifier (38.4 versus 43.2%; p<0.001) and bottle (13.5 versus 46.6%; p<0.001). Use of bottle was associated with a smaller prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding (PR=0.43; 95%CI=0.35-0.53), unlike feeding on demand (PR=5.5; 95%CI=4.17-7.3), higher maternal education level (PR=1.2; 95%CI=1.08-1.35), prenatal care (PR=1.25; 95%CI=1.13-1.38), andmother having received counseling on breastfeeding (PR=1.10; 95%CI=1.02-1.18), which favored the practice. Pacifier use was not associated with the prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding (PR=1.10; 95%CI=1.00-1.21). ConclusionBottle use had a negative impact on the prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding, thus it should be considered a target of strategies that promote it. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-04-05 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/8260 |
url |
https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/8260 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/8260/5783 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Núcleo de Editoração – PUC-Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Núcleo de Editoração – PUC-Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Nutrition; Vol. 28 No. 6 (2015): Revista de Nutrição Revista de Nutrição; Vol. 28 Núm. 6 (2015): Revista de Nutrição Revista de Nutrição; v. 28 n. 6 (2015): Revista de Nutrição 1678-9865 reponame:Revista de Nutrição instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS) instacron:PUC_CAMP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_CAMP |
institution |
PUC_CAMP |
reponame_str |
Revista de Nutrição |
collection |
Revista de Nutrição |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Nutrição - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||sbi.submissionrn@puc-campinas.edu.br |
_version_ |
1799126069562834944 |