PROTEIN QUALITY EVALUATION OF A DIET ESTABLISHED IN QUISSAMÃ, RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL, ADDED OR NOT WITH MULTI-MIXTURE AND POWDER OF CASSAVA LEAF

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Teles BOAVENTURA, Gilson
Data de Publicação: 2000
Outros Autores: Corrêa de Jesus CHIAPPINI, Claudete, ASSIS FERNANDES, Núbia Regina, Martins de OLIVEIRA, Elaine
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Nutrição
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/8940
Resumo: The following experiment tested the quality of proteins present in the diet of undernourished children in the city of Quissamã, Rio de Janeiro, and then conducted the same tests adding variables: multi-mixture or powder of cassava leaf. The subjects used were 48 Rattus norvergicus, Wistar, males, 24 days old, and weighing 58.95 g. They were fed water and ration ad libitum. Inthe first phase, called Undernourishment, the animals were divided into three groups: control group, Quissamã group and no proteins group. The control group was fed a ration based on casein and the Quissamã group was fed a ration based on the Quissamã diet. Both of these groups had 8 rats. The no proteins group, with 32 animals, was fed during 10 days a diet with no proteins. In the second phase, called Recovery, which lasted for 18 days, the control group and Quissamã group were fed the same diet. The no proteins group was subdivided into four groups: the undernourished control group, which was fed the same diet as that of the control group; the undernourished Quissamã group, which was fed the same diet as that of the Quissamã group;theundernourished Quissamã group plus powder of cassava leaf; and the undernourished Quissamã group plus multi-mixture. Then, the Protein Efficiency Ratio and the Net Protein Retention were determined for both the control group and the Quissamã group. The results showed significant statiscal differences between these two groups, with the Quissamã Group reaching relative NetProtein Retention and Protein Efficiency Ratio of 71.54% and 66.04 respectively, in relation to the control Group. The Protein Efficiency Ratio Modified was determined for the undernourished groups. The undernourished control group showed significant statiscal differences in relation to the other groups. In this case, the undernourished Quissamã group, the undernourished Quissamã group plus powder of cassava leaf and the undernourished Quissamã group plus multi-mixture reached Relative Protein Efficiency Ratio Modified of 78.10%, 75.72% and 74.67% respectively in relation to the undernourished control group. These tests showed that the presence of the multi-mixture or the powder of cassava leaf in the Quissamã diet had no positive effects in the dietquality since there were no signs of improvement of undernourishment in the animals tested.
id PUC_CAMP-2_cd25b23c72a8b46308780c340c07bec6
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br:article/8940
network_acronym_str PUC_CAMP-2
network_name_str Revista de Nutrição
repository_id_str
spelling PROTEIN QUALITY EVALUATION OF A DIET ESTABLISHED IN QUISSAMÃ, RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL, ADDED OR NOT WITH MULTI-MIXTURE AND POWDER OF CASSAVA LEAFAVALIAÇÃO DA QUALIDADE PROTÉICA DE UMA DIETA ESTABELECIDA EM QUISSAMÃ, RIO DE JANEIRO, ADICIONADA OU NÃO DE MULTIMISTURA E DE PÓ DE FOLHA DE MANDIOCAmulti-mixturepowder of cassava leafdietratsprotein qualityfood qualitymultimisturapó de folha de mandiocadietaratosqualidade protéicaqualidade dos alimentosThe following experiment tested the quality of proteins present in the diet of undernourished children in the city of Quissamã, Rio de Janeiro, and then conducted the same tests adding variables: multi-mixture or powder of cassava leaf. The subjects used were 48 Rattus norvergicus, Wistar, males, 24 days old, and weighing 58.95 g. They were fed water and ration ad libitum. Inthe first phase, called Undernourishment, the animals were divided into three groups: control group, Quissamã group and no proteins group. The control group was fed a ration based on casein and the Quissamã group was fed a ration based on the Quissamã diet. Both of these groups had 8 rats. The no proteins group, with 32 animals, was fed during 10 days a diet with no proteins. In the second phase, called Recovery, which lasted for 18 days, the control group and Quissamã group were fed the same diet. The no proteins group was subdivided into four groups: the undernourished control group, which was fed the same diet as that of the control group; the undernourished Quissamã group, which was fed the same diet as that of the Quissamã group;theundernourished Quissamã group plus powder of cassava leaf; and the undernourished Quissamã group plus multi-mixture. Then, the Protein Efficiency Ratio and the Net Protein Retention were determined for both the control group and the Quissamã group. The results showed significant statiscal differences between these two groups, with the Quissamã Group reaching relative NetProtein Retention and Protein Efficiency Ratio of 71.54% and 66.04 respectively, in relation to the control Group. The Protein Efficiency Ratio Modified was determined for the undernourished groups. The undernourished control group showed significant statiscal differences in relation to the other groups. In this case, the undernourished Quissamã group, the undernourished Quissamã group plus powder of cassava leaf and the undernourished Quissamã group plus multi-mixture reached Relative Protein Efficiency Ratio Modified of 78.10%, 75.72% and 74.67% respectively in relation to the undernourished control group. These tests showed that the presence of the multi-mixture or the powder of cassava leaf in the Quissamã diet had no positive effects in the dietquality since there were no signs of improvement of undernourishment in the animals tested.O trabalho avaliou a qualidade protéica da dieta consumida por crianças desnutridas do município de Quissamã, Rio de Janeiro, e adicionada da multimistura ou do pó de folha de mandioca, utilizando 48 Rattus norvergicus, Wistar, machos, com 24 dias, pesando 58,95 g, recebendo água e ração ad libitum. Na primeira fase, denominada de Desnutrição, os animais foram distribuídos em grupo controle, alimentados com ração à base de caseína, grupo Quissamã alimentados com ração à base da dieta estabelecida em Quissamã, ambos com n=8 animais, e grupo aprotéico com n=32, recebendo uma dieta isenta de proteínas durante 10 dias. Na segunda fase, denominada de Recuperação, com duração de 18 dias, o grupo central e o grupo Quissamã permaneceram recebendo a mesma ração. O grupo aprotéico foi desmembrado em grupo desnutrido controle, alimentado com a mesma ração do grupo central e grupo desnutrido Quissamã, alimentado com a mesma ração do grupo Quissamã e mais dois grupos desnutridos recebendo a ração do grupo desnutrido Quissamã adicionada com o pó de folha de mandioca (grupo desnutrido Quissamã + folha de mandioca) e da multimistura (grupo desnutrido Quissamã + multimistura). Para o grupo controle e o grupo Quissamã foram determinados o Coeficiente de Eficácia Protéica e a Razão Protéica Líquida, nos quais o grupo controle mostrou diferenças significativas em relação ao grupo Quissamã que obteve Razão Protéica Líquida e Coeficiente de Eficácia Protéica relativos de 71,54% e 66,04%, respectivamente. Para os grupos desnutridos foi determinado Coeficiente de Eficácia Proteíca modificado, sendo o grupo desnutrido controle diferente significativamente dos grupo desnutrido Quissamã, grupo desnutrido Quissamã + folha de mandioca e grupo desnutrido Quissamã + multimistura que apresentaram Coeficiente de Eficácia Protéica relativo de 78,10%, 75,72% e 74,67% respectivamente. Conclui-se que a adição da multimistura ou do pó de folha de mandioca não causou impacto sobre a qualidade da dieta estabelecida em Quissamã, não tendo melhorado sua capacidade de recuperar a desnutrição.Núcleo de Editoração – PUC-Campinas2000-12-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/8940Brazilian Journal of Nutrition; Vol. 13 No. 3 (2000): Revista de NutriçãoRevista de Nutrição; Vol. 13 Núm. 3 (2000): Revista de NutriçãoRevista de Nutrição; v. 13 n. 3 (2000): Revista de Nutrição1678-9865reponame:Revista de Nutriçãoinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)instacron:PUC_CAMPporhttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/8940/6337Copyright (c) 2023 Gilson Teles BOAVENTURA, Claudete Corrêa de Jesus CHIAPPINI, Núbia Regina ASSIS FERNANDES, Elaine Martins de OLIVEIRAhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTeles BOAVENTURA, Gilson Corrêa de Jesus CHIAPPINI, Claudete ASSIS FERNANDES, Núbia Regina Martins de OLIVEIRA, Elaine2024-04-08T12:23:15Zoai:ojs.periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br:article/8940Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rnPRIhttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/oai||sbi.submissionrn@puc-campinas.edu.br1678-98651415-5273opendoar:2024-04-08T12:23:15Revista de Nutrição - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv PROTEIN QUALITY EVALUATION OF A DIET ESTABLISHED IN QUISSAMÃ, RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL, ADDED OR NOT WITH MULTI-MIXTURE AND POWDER OF CASSAVA LEAF
AVALIAÇÃO DA QUALIDADE PROTÉICA DE UMA DIETA ESTABELECIDA EM QUISSAMÃ, RIO DE JANEIRO, ADICIONADA OU NÃO DE MULTIMISTURA E DE PÓ DE FOLHA DE MANDIOCA
title PROTEIN QUALITY EVALUATION OF A DIET ESTABLISHED IN QUISSAMÃ, RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL, ADDED OR NOT WITH MULTI-MIXTURE AND POWDER OF CASSAVA LEAF
spellingShingle PROTEIN QUALITY EVALUATION OF A DIET ESTABLISHED IN QUISSAMÃ, RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL, ADDED OR NOT WITH MULTI-MIXTURE AND POWDER OF CASSAVA LEAF
Teles BOAVENTURA, Gilson
multi-mixture
powder of cassava leaf
diet
rats
protein quality
food quality
multimistura
pó de folha de mandioca
dieta
ratos
qualidade protéica
qualidade dos alimentos
title_short PROTEIN QUALITY EVALUATION OF A DIET ESTABLISHED IN QUISSAMÃ, RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL, ADDED OR NOT WITH MULTI-MIXTURE AND POWDER OF CASSAVA LEAF
title_full PROTEIN QUALITY EVALUATION OF A DIET ESTABLISHED IN QUISSAMÃ, RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL, ADDED OR NOT WITH MULTI-MIXTURE AND POWDER OF CASSAVA LEAF
title_fullStr PROTEIN QUALITY EVALUATION OF A DIET ESTABLISHED IN QUISSAMÃ, RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL, ADDED OR NOT WITH MULTI-MIXTURE AND POWDER OF CASSAVA LEAF
title_full_unstemmed PROTEIN QUALITY EVALUATION OF A DIET ESTABLISHED IN QUISSAMÃ, RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL, ADDED OR NOT WITH MULTI-MIXTURE AND POWDER OF CASSAVA LEAF
title_sort PROTEIN QUALITY EVALUATION OF A DIET ESTABLISHED IN QUISSAMÃ, RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL, ADDED OR NOT WITH MULTI-MIXTURE AND POWDER OF CASSAVA LEAF
author Teles BOAVENTURA, Gilson
author_facet Teles BOAVENTURA, Gilson
Corrêa de Jesus CHIAPPINI, Claudete
ASSIS FERNANDES, Núbia Regina
Martins de OLIVEIRA, Elaine
author_role author
author2 Corrêa de Jesus CHIAPPINI, Claudete
ASSIS FERNANDES, Núbia Regina
Martins de OLIVEIRA, Elaine
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Teles BOAVENTURA, Gilson
Corrêa de Jesus CHIAPPINI, Claudete
ASSIS FERNANDES, Núbia Regina
Martins de OLIVEIRA, Elaine
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv multi-mixture
powder of cassava leaf
diet
rats
protein quality
food quality
multimistura
pó de folha de mandioca
dieta
ratos
qualidade protéica
qualidade dos alimentos
topic multi-mixture
powder of cassava leaf
diet
rats
protein quality
food quality
multimistura
pó de folha de mandioca
dieta
ratos
qualidade protéica
qualidade dos alimentos
description The following experiment tested the quality of proteins present in the diet of undernourished children in the city of Quissamã, Rio de Janeiro, and then conducted the same tests adding variables: multi-mixture or powder of cassava leaf. The subjects used were 48 Rattus norvergicus, Wistar, males, 24 days old, and weighing 58.95 g. They were fed water and ration ad libitum. Inthe first phase, called Undernourishment, the animals were divided into three groups: control group, Quissamã group and no proteins group. The control group was fed a ration based on casein and the Quissamã group was fed a ration based on the Quissamã diet. Both of these groups had 8 rats. The no proteins group, with 32 animals, was fed during 10 days a diet with no proteins. In the second phase, called Recovery, which lasted for 18 days, the control group and Quissamã group were fed the same diet. The no proteins group was subdivided into four groups: the undernourished control group, which was fed the same diet as that of the control group; the undernourished Quissamã group, which was fed the same diet as that of the Quissamã group;theundernourished Quissamã group plus powder of cassava leaf; and the undernourished Quissamã group plus multi-mixture. Then, the Protein Efficiency Ratio and the Net Protein Retention were determined for both the control group and the Quissamã group. The results showed significant statiscal differences between these two groups, with the Quissamã Group reaching relative NetProtein Retention and Protein Efficiency Ratio of 71.54% and 66.04 respectively, in relation to the control Group. The Protein Efficiency Ratio Modified was determined for the undernourished groups. The undernourished control group showed significant statiscal differences in relation to the other groups. In this case, the undernourished Quissamã group, the undernourished Quissamã group plus powder of cassava leaf and the undernourished Quissamã group plus multi-mixture reached Relative Protein Efficiency Ratio Modified of 78.10%, 75.72% and 74.67% respectively in relation to the undernourished control group. These tests showed that the presence of the multi-mixture or the powder of cassava leaf in the Quissamã diet had no positive effects in the dietquality since there were no signs of improvement of undernourishment in the animals tested.
publishDate 2000
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2000-12-25
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/8940
url https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/8940
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/8940/6337
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Núcleo de Editoração – PUC-Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Núcleo de Editoração – PUC-Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Nutrition; Vol. 13 No. 3 (2000): Revista de Nutrição
Revista de Nutrição; Vol. 13 Núm. 3 (2000): Revista de Nutrição
Revista de Nutrição; v. 13 n. 3 (2000): Revista de Nutrição
1678-9865
reponame:Revista de Nutrição
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)
instacron:PUC_CAMP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)
instacron_str PUC_CAMP
institution PUC_CAMP
reponame_str Revista de Nutrição
collection Revista de Nutrição
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Nutrição - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sbi.submissionrn@puc-campinas.edu.br
_version_ 1799126070882992128