Comparison of four different nutritional risk screening tools in hospitalized children
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Nutrição |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/10180 |
Resumo: | ObjectiveEarly detection of malnutrition risk in hospitalized children can improve health outcomes and Nquality of life; however, the number of studies where the pediatric screening tool is appropriate for Turkish children is limited. Therefore, this article aims to determine the prevalence of malnutrition risk in pediatric patients evaluated with Screening Tool for Risk on Nutritional Status and Growth, Screening Tool for the Assessment of Malnutrition in Pediatrics, Pediatric Yorkhill Malnutrition Score, and Simple Pediatric Nutrition Screening Tool with original and adjusted cutoffs and to evaluate which pediatric screening tool is appropriate for Turkish children.MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, four published nutritional risk screening tools (Screening Tool for Risk on Nutritional Status and Growth, Screening Tool for the Assessment of Malnutrition in Pediatrics, Pediatric Yorkhill Malnutrition Score, Pediatric Nutrition Screening Tool) were applied to pediatric inpatients (n=604) aged 1 month to 17 years, admitted to a pediatric ward for at least 24 hours.ResultsPediatric Nutrition Screening Tool with adjusted cutoffs had the greatest recognition rate (94.2%) of acute malnutrition. Having a high nutritional risk by Pediatric Yorkhill Malnutrition Score was associated with an increased risk of acute (OR: 6.57 for Screening Tool for Risk on Nutritional Status and Growth, 5.84 for Screening Tool for the Assessment of Malnutrition in Pediatrics, and 20.35 for Pediatric Yorkhill Malnutrition Score) and chronic malnutrition (OR: 1.27 for Screening Tool for Risk on Nutritional Status and Growth, 3.28 for Screening Tool for the Assessment of Malnutrition in Pediatrics, and 1.72 for Pediatric Yorkhill Malnutrition Score). Classifying the at-risk category by the Pediatric Nutrition Screening Tool was related to raised odds of malnutrition (OR: 2.64 for original and 5.24 for adjusted cutoffs). This positive association was also observed for acute (OR: 4.07 for original cutoffs, and 28.01 for adjusted cutoffs) and chronic malnutrition (OR: 1.14 for original cutoffs, and 1.67 for adjusted cutoffs). ConclusionPediatric Nutrition Screening Tool with adjusted cutoffs and Pediatric Yorkhill Malnutrition Score have higher diagnostic accuracy than other screening tools in assessing the nutritional status of hospitalized Turkish children and detecting children, particularly with acute malnutrition. |
id |
PUC_CAMP-2_dde082359280e527e66fc00d96974589 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br:article/10180 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_CAMP-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Nutrição |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparison of four different nutritional risk screening tools in hospitalized childrenComparação de quatro ferramentas diferentes de triagem de risco nutricional em crianças hospitalizadasChild, hospitalizedMalnutritionNutrition assessmentCriança hospitalizadaDesnutriçãoAvaliação nutricionalObjectiveEarly detection of malnutrition risk in hospitalized children can improve health outcomes and Nquality of life; however, the number of studies where the pediatric screening tool is appropriate for Turkish children is limited. Therefore, this article aims to determine the prevalence of malnutrition risk in pediatric patients evaluated with Screening Tool for Risk on Nutritional Status and Growth, Screening Tool for the Assessment of Malnutrition in Pediatrics, Pediatric Yorkhill Malnutrition Score, and Simple Pediatric Nutrition Screening Tool with original and adjusted cutoffs and to evaluate which pediatric screening tool is appropriate for Turkish children.MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, four published nutritional risk screening tools (Screening Tool for Risk on Nutritional Status and Growth, Screening Tool for the Assessment of Malnutrition in Pediatrics, Pediatric Yorkhill Malnutrition Score, Pediatric Nutrition Screening Tool) were applied to pediatric inpatients (n=604) aged 1 month to 17 years, admitted to a pediatric ward for at least 24 hours.ResultsPediatric Nutrition Screening Tool with adjusted cutoffs had the greatest recognition rate (94.2%) of acute malnutrition. Having a high nutritional risk by Pediatric Yorkhill Malnutrition Score was associated with an increased risk of acute (OR: 6.57 for Screening Tool for Risk on Nutritional Status and Growth, 5.84 for Screening Tool for the Assessment of Malnutrition in Pediatrics, and 20.35 for Pediatric Yorkhill Malnutrition Score) and chronic malnutrition (OR: 1.27 for Screening Tool for Risk on Nutritional Status and Growth, 3.28 for Screening Tool for the Assessment of Malnutrition in Pediatrics, and 1.72 for Pediatric Yorkhill Malnutrition Score). Classifying the at-risk category by the Pediatric Nutrition Screening Tool was related to raised odds of malnutrition (OR: 2.64 for original and 5.24 for adjusted cutoffs). This positive association was also observed for acute (OR: 4.07 for original cutoffs, and 28.01 for adjusted cutoffs) and chronic malnutrition (OR: 1.14 for original cutoffs, and 1.67 for adjusted cutoffs). ConclusionPediatric Nutrition Screening Tool with adjusted cutoffs and Pediatric Yorkhill Malnutrition Score have higher diagnostic accuracy than other screening tools in assessing the nutritional status of hospitalized Turkish children and detecting children, particularly with acute malnutrition.ObjetivoA detecção precoce do risco de desnutrição em crianças hospitalizadas pode melhorar a saúde e a qualidade de vida, porém o número de estudos em que a ferramenta de triagem pediátrica é apropriada para crianças turcas é limitado. O objetivo deste estudo foi determinar a prevalência do risco de desnutrição em pacientes pediátricos avaliados com Ferramenta de Triagem para Risco no Estado Nutricional e Crescimento, Ferramenta de Triagem para Avaliação de Desnutrição em Pediatria, Escore de Malnutrição Pediátrica de Yorkhill e Ferramenta de Triagem de Nutrição Pediátrica Simples com pontos de corte originais e ajustados para avaliar qual ferramenta de triagem pediátrica é apropriada para crianças turcas.MétodosNeste estudo transversal, quatro ferramentas de triagem de risco nutricional publicadas (Ferramenta de Triagem para Risco no Estado Nutricional e Crescimento, Ferramenta de Triagem para Avaliação de Desnutrição em Pediatria, Escore de Malnutrição Pediátrica de Yorkhill, Ferramenta de Triagem de Nutrição Pediátrica) foram aplicadas a pacientes pediátricos (n=604) com idades entre 1 mês e 17 anos, internados em uma enfermaria pediátrica por pelo menos 24 horas.ResultadosA Ferramenta de Triagem de Nutrição Pediátrica com pontos de corte ajustados obteve a maior taxa de reconhecimento de desnutrição aguda (94,2%), enquanto a Ferramenta de Triagem para Avaliação de Desnutrição em Pediatria teve a maior taxa na identificação da desnutrição crônica (67,4%). Essas associações positivas foram mais notáveis para desnutrição aguda (OR: 6,57 para Ferramenta de Triagem para Risco no Estado Nutricional e Crescimento, 5,84 para Ferramenta de Triagem para Avaliação de Desnutrição em Pediatria e 20,35 para Escore de Malnutrição Pediátrica de Yorkhill) do que para desnutrição crônica (OR: 1,27 para Ferramenta de Triagem para Risco no Estado Nutricional e Crescimento, 3,28 para Ferramenta de Triagem para Avaliação de Desnutrição em Pediatria e 1,72 para Escore de Malnutrição Pediátrica de Yorkhill). A classificação da categoria de risco pela Ferramenta de Triagem de Nutrição Pediátrica foi relacionada a maiores chances de desnutrição (OR: 2,64 para pontos de corte originais e 5,24 para pontos de corte ajustados). Essa associação positiva também foi observada para desnutrição aguda (OR: 4,07 para pontos de corte originais e 28,01 para pontos de corte ajustados) e crônica (OR: 1,14 para pontos de corte originais e 1,67 para pontos de corte ajustados).ConclusãoA Ferramenta de Triagem de Nutrição Pediátrica com pontos de corte ajustados e Escore de Malnutrição Pediátrica de Yorkhill têm maior precisão diagnóstica do que outras ferramentas de triagem na avaliação do estado nutricional de crianças turcas hospitalizadas e na detecção da desnutrição aguda em particular.Núcleo de Editoração – PUC-Campinas2023-10-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/10180Brazilian Journal of Nutrition; Vol. 36 (2023): Revista de NutriçãoRevista de Nutrição; Vol. 36 (2023): Revista de NutriçãoRevista de Nutrição; v. 36 (2023): Revista de Nutrição1678-9865reponame:Revista de Nutriçãoinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)instacron:PUC_CAMPengporhttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/10180/7550https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/10180/7551Copyright (c) 2023 Didem Gunes KAYA, Zeynep Caferoglu AKIN, Betul Orucoglu, Elif CELIKhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKAYA, Didem GunesAKIN, Zeynep CaferogluOrucoglu, BetulCELIK, Elif2024-04-23T11:21:26Zoai:ojs.periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br:article/10180Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rnPRIhttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/oai||sbi.submissionrn@puc-campinas.edu.br1678-98651415-5273opendoar:2024-04-23T11:21:26Revista de Nutrição - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of four different nutritional risk screening tools in hospitalized children Comparação de quatro ferramentas diferentes de triagem de risco nutricional em crianças hospitalizadas |
title |
Comparison of four different nutritional risk screening tools in hospitalized children |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of four different nutritional risk screening tools in hospitalized children KAYA, Didem Gunes Child, hospitalized Malnutrition Nutrition assessment Criança hospitalizada Desnutrição Avaliação nutricional |
title_short |
Comparison of four different nutritional risk screening tools in hospitalized children |
title_full |
Comparison of four different nutritional risk screening tools in hospitalized children |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of four different nutritional risk screening tools in hospitalized children |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of four different nutritional risk screening tools in hospitalized children |
title_sort |
Comparison of four different nutritional risk screening tools in hospitalized children |
author |
KAYA, Didem Gunes |
author_facet |
KAYA, Didem Gunes AKIN, Zeynep Caferoglu Orucoglu, Betul CELIK, Elif |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
AKIN, Zeynep Caferoglu Orucoglu, Betul CELIK, Elif |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
KAYA, Didem Gunes AKIN, Zeynep Caferoglu Orucoglu, Betul CELIK, Elif |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Child, hospitalized Malnutrition Nutrition assessment Criança hospitalizada Desnutrição Avaliação nutricional |
topic |
Child, hospitalized Malnutrition Nutrition assessment Criança hospitalizada Desnutrição Avaliação nutricional |
description |
ObjectiveEarly detection of malnutrition risk in hospitalized children can improve health outcomes and Nquality of life; however, the number of studies where the pediatric screening tool is appropriate for Turkish children is limited. Therefore, this article aims to determine the prevalence of malnutrition risk in pediatric patients evaluated with Screening Tool for Risk on Nutritional Status and Growth, Screening Tool for the Assessment of Malnutrition in Pediatrics, Pediatric Yorkhill Malnutrition Score, and Simple Pediatric Nutrition Screening Tool with original and adjusted cutoffs and to evaluate which pediatric screening tool is appropriate for Turkish children.MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, four published nutritional risk screening tools (Screening Tool for Risk on Nutritional Status and Growth, Screening Tool for the Assessment of Malnutrition in Pediatrics, Pediatric Yorkhill Malnutrition Score, Pediatric Nutrition Screening Tool) were applied to pediatric inpatients (n=604) aged 1 month to 17 years, admitted to a pediatric ward for at least 24 hours.ResultsPediatric Nutrition Screening Tool with adjusted cutoffs had the greatest recognition rate (94.2%) of acute malnutrition. Having a high nutritional risk by Pediatric Yorkhill Malnutrition Score was associated with an increased risk of acute (OR: 6.57 for Screening Tool for Risk on Nutritional Status and Growth, 5.84 for Screening Tool for the Assessment of Malnutrition in Pediatrics, and 20.35 for Pediatric Yorkhill Malnutrition Score) and chronic malnutrition (OR: 1.27 for Screening Tool for Risk on Nutritional Status and Growth, 3.28 for Screening Tool for the Assessment of Malnutrition in Pediatrics, and 1.72 for Pediatric Yorkhill Malnutrition Score). Classifying the at-risk category by the Pediatric Nutrition Screening Tool was related to raised odds of malnutrition (OR: 2.64 for original and 5.24 for adjusted cutoffs). This positive association was also observed for acute (OR: 4.07 for original cutoffs, and 28.01 for adjusted cutoffs) and chronic malnutrition (OR: 1.14 for original cutoffs, and 1.67 for adjusted cutoffs). ConclusionPediatric Nutrition Screening Tool with adjusted cutoffs and Pediatric Yorkhill Malnutrition Score have higher diagnostic accuracy than other screening tools in assessing the nutritional status of hospitalized Turkish children and detecting children, particularly with acute malnutrition. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-10-25 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/10180 |
url |
https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/10180 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng por |
language |
eng por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/10180/7550 https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/10180/7551 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Didem Gunes KAYA, Zeynep Caferoglu AKIN, Betul Orucoglu, Elif CELIK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Didem Gunes KAYA, Zeynep Caferoglu AKIN, Betul Orucoglu, Elif CELIK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/xml |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Núcleo de Editoração – PUC-Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Núcleo de Editoração – PUC-Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Nutrition; Vol. 36 (2023): Revista de Nutrição Revista de Nutrição; Vol. 36 (2023): Revista de Nutrição Revista de Nutrição; v. 36 (2023): Revista de Nutrição 1678-9865 reponame:Revista de Nutrição instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS) instacron:PUC_CAMP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_CAMP |
institution |
PUC_CAMP |
reponame_str |
Revista de Nutrição |
collection |
Revista de Nutrição |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Nutrição - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||sbi.submissionrn@puc-campinas.edu.br |
_version_ |
1799126076317761536 |