Agreement of body weight of older adults measured on digital chair scale and mechanical platform scale
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Nutrição |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/6304 |
Resumo: | ObjectiveThe aim of the study was to evaluate the agreement between the weight of older adults measured on a chair scale and a platform scale. MethodsThis is a cross-sectional study. We evaluated 131 older adults (≥60 years old), walk-in patients, admitted to a university hospital. Weight was measured on a digital chair scale model MS5811 (Charder® brand) and after on a mechanical platform scale (Filizola® brand). For the agreement analysis, the intraclass correlation coefficient and the Bland-Altman plot were used.ResultsMost of the sample consisted of males individuals (57.3%; n= 75). The average age was 70.47±7.59 years (60-96 years old). Measured by both methods, weight showed normal distribution. The average weight measured was 67.99±14.03 kg on the chair scale and 68.04±14.02 kg on the platform scale. The intraclass correlation coefficient of weight measured by the two methods was 1.00 (IC95%=1.00-1.00; p<0.001). In the Bland-Altman plot, the mean bias for the weight measured on the chair scale and the platform scale was 0.049 (IC95%=-0.011 to 0.110; p=0.1084).ConclusionThe agreement between the weight measured on a chair scale and on a platform scale was almost excellent. Thus, the chair scale can be used as an alternative method of measuring weight, especially in the older adults with postural instability, mobility restrictions or immobility syndrome. |
id |
PUC_CAMP-2_e0e74c644a040f343ee1ece33574c7ea |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br:article/6304 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_CAMP-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Nutrição |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Agreement of body weight of older adults measured on digital chair scale and mechanical platform scaleAgedAnthropometryBody weightHospitalizationNutrition assessmentObjectiveThe aim of the study was to evaluate the agreement between the weight of older adults measured on a chair scale and a platform scale. MethodsThis is a cross-sectional study. We evaluated 131 older adults (≥60 years old), walk-in patients, admitted to a university hospital. Weight was measured on a digital chair scale model MS5811 (Charder® brand) and after on a mechanical platform scale (Filizola® brand). For the agreement analysis, the intraclass correlation coefficient and the Bland-Altman plot were used.ResultsMost of the sample consisted of males individuals (57.3%; n= 75). The average age was 70.47±7.59 years (60-96 years old). Measured by both methods, weight showed normal distribution. The average weight measured was 67.99±14.03 kg on the chair scale and 68.04±14.02 kg on the platform scale. The intraclass correlation coefficient of weight measured by the two methods was 1.00 (IC95%=1.00-1.00; p<0.001). In the Bland-Altman plot, the mean bias for the weight measured on the chair scale and the platform scale was 0.049 (IC95%=-0.011 to 0.110; p=0.1084).ConclusionThe agreement between the weight measured on a chair scale and on a platform scale was almost excellent. Thus, the chair scale can be used as an alternative method of measuring weight, especially in the older adults with postural instability, mobility restrictions or immobility syndrome.Núcleo de Editoração – PUC-Campinas2022-07-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/6304Brazilian Journal of Nutrition; Vol. 34 (2021): Revista de Nutrição; 1-10Revista de Nutrição; Vol. 34 (2021): Revista de Nutrição; 1-10Revista de Nutrição; v. 34 (2021): Revista de Nutrição; 1-101678-9865reponame:Revista de Nutriçãoinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)instacron:PUC_CAMPenghttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/6304/4004Copyright (c) 2022 Maria Luiza Freitas ANNES, Fernanda Beck TABAJARA, Rosane Dias da ROSA, Rita MATTIELLO, Ana Luisa Sant’Anna ALVES, Carla Helena Augustin SCHWANKEhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFreitas ANNES, Maria Luiza Beck TABAJARA, Fernanda Dias da ROSA, Rosane MATTIELLO, Rita Sant’Anna ALVES, Ana Luisa Augustin SCHWANKE, Carla Helena 2023-03-01T12:29:00Zoai:ojs.periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br:article/6304Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rnPRIhttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/oai||sbi.submissionrn@puc-campinas.edu.br1678-98651415-5273opendoar:2023-03-01T12:29Revista de Nutrição - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Agreement of body weight of older adults measured on digital chair scale and mechanical platform scale |
title |
Agreement of body weight of older adults measured on digital chair scale and mechanical platform scale |
spellingShingle |
Agreement of body weight of older adults measured on digital chair scale and mechanical platform scale Freitas ANNES, Maria Luiza Aged Anthropometry Body weight Hospitalization Nutrition assessment |
title_short |
Agreement of body weight of older adults measured on digital chair scale and mechanical platform scale |
title_full |
Agreement of body weight of older adults measured on digital chair scale and mechanical platform scale |
title_fullStr |
Agreement of body weight of older adults measured on digital chair scale and mechanical platform scale |
title_full_unstemmed |
Agreement of body weight of older adults measured on digital chair scale and mechanical platform scale |
title_sort |
Agreement of body weight of older adults measured on digital chair scale and mechanical platform scale |
author |
Freitas ANNES, Maria Luiza |
author_facet |
Freitas ANNES, Maria Luiza Beck TABAJARA, Fernanda Dias da ROSA, Rosane MATTIELLO, Rita Sant’Anna ALVES, Ana Luisa Augustin SCHWANKE, Carla Helena |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Beck TABAJARA, Fernanda Dias da ROSA, Rosane MATTIELLO, Rita Sant’Anna ALVES, Ana Luisa Augustin SCHWANKE, Carla Helena |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Freitas ANNES, Maria Luiza Beck TABAJARA, Fernanda Dias da ROSA, Rosane MATTIELLO, Rita Sant’Anna ALVES, Ana Luisa Augustin SCHWANKE, Carla Helena |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Aged Anthropometry Body weight Hospitalization Nutrition assessment |
topic |
Aged Anthropometry Body weight Hospitalization Nutrition assessment |
description |
ObjectiveThe aim of the study was to evaluate the agreement between the weight of older adults measured on a chair scale and a platform scale. MethodsThis is a cross-sectional study. We evaluated 131 older adults (≥60 years old), walk-in patients, admitted to a university hospital. Weight was measured on a digital chair scale model MS5811 (Charder® brand) and after on a mechanical platform scale (Filizola® brand). For the agreement analysis, the intraclass correlation coefficient and the Bland-Altman plot were used.ResultsMost of the sample consisted of males individuals (57.3%; n= 75). The average age was 70.47±7.59 years (60-96 years old). Measured by both methods, weight showed normal distribution. The average weight measured was 67.99±14.03 kg on the chair scale and 68.04±14.02 kg on the platform scale. The intraclass correlation coefficient of weight measured by the two methods was 1.00 (IC95%=1.00-1.00; p<0.001). In the Bland-Altman plot, the mean bias for the weight measured on the chair scale and the platform scale was 0.049 (IC95%=-0.011 to 0.110; p=0.1084).ConclusionThe agreement between the weight measured on a chair scale and on a platform scale was almost excellent. Thus, the chair scale can be used as an alternative method of measuring weight, especially in the older adults with postural instability, mobility restrictions or immobility syndrome. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-07-11 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/6304 |
url |
https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/6304 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/nutricao/article/view/6304/4004 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Núcleo de Editoração – PUC-Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Núcleo de Editoração – PUC-Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Nutrition; Vol. 34 (2021): Revista de Nutrição; 1-10 Revista de Nutrição; Vol. 34 (2021): Revista de Nutrição; 1-10 Revista de Nutrição; v. 34 (2021): Revista de Nutrição; 1-10 1678-9865 reponame:Revista de Nutrição instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS) instacron:PUC_CAMP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_CAMP |
institution |
PUC_CAMP |
reponame_str |
Revista de Nutrição |
collection |
Revista de Nutrição |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Nutrição - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||sbi.submissionrn@puc-campinas.edu.br |
_version_ |
1799126067231850496 |