The dialectics of new fascism in Greece

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: MARVAKIS, Athanassios
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/estpsi/article/view/8276
Resumo: The success of historical fascism in the particular transitional period at the beginning of the 20th century was grounded in its contribution to the successive acceptance and application of the so-called Fordist model for the organization of labor (accompanied by the correspondent social conditions and relations). Historical fascism contributed thus, with its particular way, to establishing a new class compromise between the potentials related with the productive forces and the confinements emanating from the productive relations. This contribution constitutes the “creativity” of fascism. Such a historical perspective on social processes allows us not to fall into the trap of understanding fascism only as a (barbarian) “deception”. Fascism cannot be a plain deception, because a “mere deceit” cannot mobilize people. Fascism takes over, adopts real and unfulfilled needs and hopes - which as such constitute resistance to the capitalist arrogance and logic of commodification of everything - and offers its own (fascist, barbarian) solution or fulfillment. Consequently, our responsibility cannot lie in rejecting these needs and hopes (which are basically needs and hopes for security) because of their distorted or “pervert” articulations. Our responsibility lies in the careful peeling of these hopes/demands from their (fascist) enwrapment. Nationalism (from the subalterns!) does not constitute a mere irrational leftover from the past, but contains potentially mystic and romantic pre- or anti-capitalist elements and references. Nationalism obtains its dynamics and persuasion (for the subalterns!) from and for the contemporary societal processes, thus constituting an active, political and actual demand/position within the restructuring of society - which is in itself a moment in the restructuring of capitalism. Herein also the “rational kernel” of the anti-capitalist antithesis by the New Right is founded as counter position to the “neutral” commodification of everything. This antithesis can of course not be the issue for us the opponents of fascism. The “problem” for us is the fascist perspective in which this antithesis is embedded; the political vision which has recruited the antithesis for confining solidarity only to “our people” and not broadening solidarity towards all people!
id PUC_CAMP-3_769e9ee3ca63e49d1174a33024430e52
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br:article/8276
network_acronym_str PUC_CAMP-3
network_name_str Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas)
repository_id_str
spelling The dialectics of new fascism in GreeceA dialética do novo fascismo na GréciaErnst BlochFascismGreeceNationalismNew rightSocial consciousnessSolidarityErnst BlochFascismoGréciaNova direitaNacionalismoConsciência socialSolidariedadeThe success of historical fascism in the particular transitional period at the beginning of the 20th century was grounded in its contribution to the successive acceptance and application of the so-called Fordist model for the organization of labor (accompanied by the correspondent social conditions and relations). Historical fascism contributed thus, with its particular way, to establishing a new class compromise between the potentials related with the productive forces and the confinements emanating from the productive relations. This contribution constitutes the “creativity” of fascism. Such a historical perspective on social processes allows us not to fall into the trap of understanding fascism only as a (barbarian) “deception”. Fascism cannot be a plain deception, because a “mere deceit” cannot mobilize people. Fascism takes over, adopts real and unfulfilled needs and hopes - which as such constitute resistance to the capitalist arrogance and logic of commodification of everything - and offers its own (fascist, barbarian) solution or fulfillment. Consequently, our responsibility cannot lie in rejecting these needs and hopes (which are basically needs and hopes for security) because of their distorted or “pervert” articulations. Our responsibility lies in the careful peeling of these hopes/demands from their (fascist) enwrapment. Nationalism (from the subalterns!) does not constitute a mere irrational leftover from the past, but contains potentially mystic and romantic pre- or anti-capitalist elements and references. Nationalism obtains its dynamics and persuasion (for the subalterns!) from and for the contemporary societal processes, thus constituting an active, political and actual demand/position within the restructuring of society - which is in itself a moment in the restructuring of capitalism. Herein also the “rational kernel” of the anti-capitalist antithesis by the New Right is founded as counter position to the “neutral” commodification of everything. This antithesis can of course not be the issue for us the opponents of fascism. The “problem” for us is the fascist perspective in which this antithesis is embedded; the political vision which has recruited the antithesis for confining solidarity only to “our people” and not broadening solidarity towards all people!O sucesso do fascismo histórico no período de transição, em particular no início do século 20, foi baseado em sua contribuição para a aceitação e aplicação sucessiva do chamado modelo fordista para a organização do trabalho (acompanhada das condições e relações sociais correspondentes). Fascismo histórico contribuiu assim, em sua forma particular, com a criação de um novo compromisso de classe entre os potenciais relacionados com as forças produtivas e as prisões que emanam das relações produtivas. Esta contribuição constitui a “criatividade” do fascismo. Tal perspectiva histórica sobre os processos sociais, não nos permite cair na armadilha de se compreender o fascismo apenas como um (bárbaro) “engano”. O fascismo não pode ser um engano simples, porque um “mero engano” não pode mobilizar as pessoas. Fascismo assume, adota necessidades e esperanças reais e não cumpridas - que, como tal, constituem resistência à arrogância capitalista e lógica da mercantilização de tudo -, e oferece a sua própria solução (fascista, bárbara) ou sua realização. Por conseguinte, a nossa responsabilidade não pode mentir em rejeitar essas necessidades e esperanças (que são, basicamente, precisas e esperar pela segurança) por causa de suas articulações distorcidas ou “pervertido”. Nossa responsabilidade exige-nos cuidadosas esperanças e demandas de seu (fascista) envolvimento. Nacionalismo (a partir dos subalternos!) não constitui uma mera sobra irracional do passado, mas contém potencialmente elementos anticapitalistas e referencias pré-místicas e românticas. Nacionalismo obtém sua dinâmica e persuasão (para os subalternos!) de e para os processos sociais contemporâneos, constituindo, assim, uma demanda/posição ativa, política e real no âmbito da reestruturação da sociedade - que é em si mesmo um momento na reestruturação do capitalismo. Aqui também o “núcleo racional” da antítese anticapitalista pela Nova Direita é fundada como posição contrária à mercantilização “neutra” de tudo. Esta antítese pode, naturalmente, não ser o problema para nós, os adversários do fascismo. O “problema” para nós é a perspectiva fascista em que essa antítese é incorporada; a visão política que recrutou a antítese para confinar solidariedade apenas para “nossa gente” e não a ampliação de solidariedade para com todas as pessoas!Núcleo de Editoração - PUC-Campinas2023-04-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/estpsi/article/view/8276Psychological Studies; Vol. 32 No. 3 (2015): Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas)Estudos de Psicologia; Vol. 32 Núm. 3 (2015): Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas)Estudos de Psicologia; v. 32 n. 3 (2015): Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas)1982-0275reponame:Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)instacron:PUC_CAMPenghttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/estpsi/article/view/8276/5795Copyright (c) 2023 Athanassios MARVAKIShttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMARVAKIS, Athanassios2023-04-13T14:49:56Zoai:ojs.periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br:article/8276Revistahttps://seer.sis.puc-campinas.edu.br/seer/index.php/estudosPRIhttps://seer.sis.puc-campinas.edu.br/seer/index.php/estudos/oaisbi.ne_estpsi@puc-campinas.edu.br||estudosdepsicologia@puc-campinas.edu.br||psychologicalstudies@puc-campinas.edu.br1982-02750103-166Xopendoar:2023-04-13T14:49:56Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The dialectics of new fascism in Greece
A dialética do novo fascismo na Grécia
title The dialectics of new fascism in Greece
spellingShingle The dialectics of new fascism in Greece
MARVAKIS, Athanassios
Ernst Bloch
Fascism
Greece
Nationalism
New right
Social consciousness
Solidarity
Ernst Bloch
Fascismo
Grécia
Nova direita
Nacionalismo
Consciência social
Solidariedade
title_short The dialectics of new fascism in Greece
title_full The dialectics of new fascism in Greece
title_fullStr The dialectics of new fascism in Greece
title_full_unstemmed The dialectics of new fascism in Greece
title_sort The dialectics of new fascism in Greece
author MARVAKIS, Athanassios
author_facet MARVAKIS, Athanassios
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv MARVAKIS, Athanassios
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ernst Bloch
Fascism
Greece
Nationalism
New right
Social consciousness
Solidarity
Ernst Bloch
Fascismo
Grécia
Nova direita
Nacionalismo
Consciência social
Solidariedade
topic Ernst Bloch
Fascism
Greece
Nationalism
New right
Social consciousness
Solidarity
Ernst Bloch
Fascismo
Grécia
Nova direita
Nacionalismo
Consciência social
Solidariedade
description The success of historical fascism in the particular transitional period at the beginning of the 20th century was grounded in its contribution to the successive acceptance and application of the so-called Fordist model for the organization of labor (accompanied by the correspondent social conditions and relations). Historical fascism contributed thus, with its particular way, to establishing a new class compromise between the potentials related with the productive forces and the confinements emanating from the productive relations. This contribution constitutes the “creativity” of fascism. Such a historical perspective on social processes allows us not to fall into the trap of understanding fascism only as a (barbarian) “deception”. Fascism cannot be a plain deception, because a “mere deceit” cannot mobilize people. Fascism takes over, adopts real and unfulfilled needs and hopes - which as such constitute resistance to the capitalist arrogance and logic of commodification of everything - and offers its own (fascist, barbarian) solution or fulfillment. Consequently, our responsibility cannot lie in rejecting these needs and hopes (which are basically needs and hopes for security) because of their distorted or “pervert” articulations. Our responsibility lies in the careful peeling of these hopes/demands from their (fascist) enwrapment. Nationalism (from the subalterns!) does not constitute a mere irrational leftover from the past, but contains potentially mystic and romantic pre- or anti-capitalist elements and references. Nationalism obtains its dynamics and persuasion (for the subalterns!) from and for the contemporary societal processes, thus constituting an active, political and actual demand/position within the restructuring of society - which is in itself a moment in the restructuring of capitalism. Herein also the “rational kernel” of the anti-capitalist antithesis by the New Right is founded as counter position to the “neutral” commodification of everything. This antithesis can of course not be the issue for us the opponents of fascism. The “problem” for us is the fascist perspective in which this antithesis is embedded; the political vision which has recruited the antithesis for confining solidarity only to “our people” and not broadening solidarity towards all people!
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-04-13
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/estpsi/article/view/8276
url https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/estpsi/article/view/8276
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/estpsi/article/view/8276/5795
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Athanassios MARVAKIS
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Athanassios MARVAKIS
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Núcleo de Editoração - PUC-Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Núcleo de Editoração - PUC-Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Psychological Studies; Vol. 32 No. 3 (2015): Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas)
Estudos de Psicologia; Vol. 32 Núm. 3 (2015): Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas)
Estudos de Psicologia; v. 32 n. 3 (2015): Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas)
1982-0275
reponame:Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)
instacron:PUC_CAMP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)
instacron_str PUC_CAMP
institution PUC_CAMP
reponame_str Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas)
collection Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv sbi.ne_estpsi@puc-campinas.edu.br||estudosdepsicologia@puc-campinas.edu.br||psychologicalstudies@puc-campinas.edu.br
_version_ 1799126020877451264