Parallel lines: Different ways by which Psychology has approached work
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/estpsi/article/view/7484 |
Resumo: | This article analyses different ways by which Psychology has approached the world of work, promoting debate on nwhether these strategies constitute a unique or unified approach. Focusing on the branches Social Psychology of Work and Organizational Psychology, we aimed at understanding the history of these two traditions, their origins, and their role in the contemporary context. It was concluded that they have different approaches and understandings of the world of work, and that their historical processes, as well as their representation today, have very little in common. This indicates that they do not belong to the same field. Establishing boundaries between different approaches of Psychology that focus on work, enables the identification of their specificities and reveals the diversity of their objects of study, theoretical framework, methodological proposals, and the political aspects involved in their studies or interventions |
id |
PUC_CAMP-3_8b8bf8ad7c8f24c7c999b3d2bbc46417 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br:article/7484 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_CAMP-3 |
network_name_str |
Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Parallel lines: Different ways by which Psychology has approached workLinhas paralelas: as distintas aproximações da Psicologia em relação ao trabalhoManagerial discourseCritical psychologyOrganizational psychologyWorkDiscurso gerencialPsicologia críticaPsicologia organizacionalPsicologia socialTrabalhoThis article analyses different ways by which Psychology has approached the world of work, promoting debate on nwhether these strategies constitute a unique or unified approach. Focusing on the branches Social Psychology of Work and Organizational Psychology, we aimed at understanding the history of these two traditions, their origins, and their role in the contemporary context. It was concluded that they have different approaches and understandings of the world of work, and that their historical processes, as well as their representation today, have very little in common. This indicates that they do not belong to the same field. Establishing boundaries between different approaches of Psychology that focus on work, enables the identification of their specificities and reveals the diversity of their objects of study, theoretical framework, methodological proposals, and the political aspects involved in their studies or interventionsEste artigo analisa diferentes aproximações da Psicologia em relação ao mundo do trabalho, trazendo elementos para o debate sobre a unicidade, ou não, das abordagens construídas ao longo da história dessas aproximações, com foco nas vertentes da Psicologia Social do Trabalho e da Psicologia Organizacional. Para tanto, buscou-se compreender a história dessas tradições, suas origens e seu lugar no contexto contemporâneo. Concluiu-se que elas possuem diferentes abordagens e compreensões sobre o mundo do trabalho, com poucos pontos em comum em seus processos históricos e em suas expressões atuais, o que sinaliza a impossibilidade de afirmação de um campo unitário. A importância de demarcar essas fronteiras entre as diferentes vertentes da Psicologia que focalizam o trabalho é possibilitar a identificação das especificidades de cada uma, bem como apontar a diversidade de objetos de estudo, referenciais teóricos, propostas metodológicas e posicionamentos políticos que envolvem as pesquisas ou as intervenções.Núcleo de Editoração - PUC-Campinas2023-03-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/estpsi/article/view/7484Psychological Studies; Vol. 34 No. 1 (2017): Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas)Estudos de Psicologia; Vol. 34 Núm. 1 (2017): Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas)Estudos de Psicologia; v. 34 n. 1 (2017): Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas)1982-0275reponame:Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)instacron:PUC_CAMPporhttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/estpsi/article/view/7484/5033Copyright (c) 2023 Marcia Hespanhol BERNARDO, Fábio de OLIVEIRA, Heloisa Aparecida de SOUZA, Caroline Cristiane de SOUSAhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBERNARDO, Marcia HespanholOLIVEIRA, Fábio deSOUZA, Heloisa Aparecida deSOUSA, Caroline Cristiane de2023-03-07T14:19:33Zoai:ojs.periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br:article/7484Revistahttps://seer.sis.puc-campinas.edu.br/seer/index.php/estudosPRIhttps://seer.sis.puc-campinas.edu.br/seer/index.php/estudos/oaisbi.ne_estpsi@puc-campinas.edu.br||estudosdepsicologia@puc-campinas.edu.br||psychologicalstudies@puc-campinas.edu.br1982-02750103-166Xopendoar:2023-03-07T14:19:33Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Parallel lines: Different ways by which Psychology has approached work Linhas paralelas: as distintas aproximações da Psicologia em relação ao trabalho |
title |
Parallel lines: Different ways by which Psychology has approached work |
spellingShingle |
Parallel lines: Different ways by which Psychology has approached work BERNARDO, Marcia Hespanhol Managerial discourse Critical psychology Organizational psychology Work Discurso gerencial Psicologia crítica Psicologia organizacional Psicologia social Trabalho |
title_short |
Parallel lines: Different ways by which Psychology has approached work |
title_full |
Parallel lines: Different ways by which Psychology has approached work |
title_fullStr |
Parallel lines: Different ways by which Psychology has approached work |
title_full_unstemmed |
Parallel lines: Different ways by which Psychology has approached work |
title_sort |
Parallel lines: Different ways by which Psychology has approached work |
author |
BERNARDO, Marcia Hespanhol |
author_facet |
BERNARDO, Marcia Hespanhol OLIVEIRA, Fábio de SOUZA, Heloisa Aparecida de SOUSA, Caroline Cristiane de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
OLIVEIRA, Fábio de SOUZA, Heloisa Aparecida de SOUSA, Caroline Cristiane de |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
BERNARDO, Marcia Hespanhol OLIVEIRA, Fábio de SOUZA, Heloisa Aparecida de SOUSA, Caroline Cristiane de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Managerial discourse Critical psychology Organizational psychology Work Discurso gerencial Psicologia crítica Psicologia organizacional Psicologia social Trabalho |
topic |
Managerial discourse Critical psychology Organizational psychology Work Discurso gerencial Psicologia crítica Psicologia organizacional Psicologia social Trabalho |
description |
This article analyses different ways by which Psychology has approached the world of work, promoting debate on nwhether these strategies constitute a unique or unified approach. Focusing on the branches Social Psychology of Work and Organizational Psychology, we aimed at understanding the history of these two traditions, their origins, and their role in the contemporary context. It was concluded that they have different approaches and understandings of the world of work, and that their historical processes, as well as their representation today, have very little in common. This indicates that they do not belong to the same field. Establishing boundaries between different approaches of Psychology that focus on work, enables the identification of their specificities and reveals the diversity of their objects of study, theoretical framework, methodological proposals, and the political aspects involved in their studies or interventions |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-03-07 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/estpsi/article/view/7484 |
url |
https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/estpsi/article/view/7484 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/estpsi/article/view/7484/5033 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Núcleo de Editoração - PUC-Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Núcleo de Editoração - PUC-Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Psychological Studies; Vol. 34 No. 1 (2017): Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas) Estudos de Psicologia; Vol. 34 Núm. 1 (2017): Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas) Estudos de Psicologia; v. 34 n. 1 (2017): Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas) 1982-0275 reponame:Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS) instacron:PUC_CAMP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_CAMP |
institution |
PUC_CAMP |
reponame_str |
Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas) |
collection |
Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
sbi.ne_estpsi@puc-campinas.edu.br||estudosdepsicologia@puc-campinas.edu.br||psychologicalstudies@puc-campinas.edu.br |
_version_ |
1799126018591555584 |