Analysis of plagiarism policies in scientific publishing: the case of a group of Latin American Human Sciences journals
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Transinformação (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/transinfo/article/view/7384 |
Resumo: | Plagiarism is unacceptable in science, particularly when it appears in scientific publications, due to the enormous damage and risk it may pose to the credibility of published results. This study analyzed 14 journals indexed in Brazil’s Scientific Electronic Library Online database which focus on anthropology, linguistics, and archeology, five international and nine Brazilian. Qualitative and quantitative approaches were used, along with interviews to collect data. Seven of the 14 journals adopt international practices and standards, notably a 2018 good practice guide for scientific publication provided on the Scientific Electronic Library Online website as well as guidelines from the Committee on Publication Ethics, and “Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals” of 2019. Only seven adopt the Creative Commons Attribution License. Ethics is an essential issue for humanity, and the scientific arena is no different. Brazilian and international standards contain experiences that can be extremely valuable in the academic environment as a response when unintentional plagiarism appears, and represent important measures that should be taken by scientific editors. |
id |
PUC_CAMP-4_91eb1c25b27d40cf100ab339acc92fc1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br:article/7384 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_CAMP-4 |
network_name_str |
Transinformação (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Analysis of plagiarism policies in scientific publishing: the case of a group of Latin American Human Sciences journalsAnálise das políticas de plágio na publicação científica: o caso de um segmento de revistas da área de Ciências Humanas na América LatinaFraudScientifics journalsIntellectual propertyFraudePeriódicos científicosPropriedade intelectualDIONE Plagiarism is unacceptable in science, particularly when it appears in scientific publications, due to the enormous damage and risk it may pose to the credibility of published results. This study analyzed 14 journals indexed in Brazil’s Scientific Electronic Library Online database which focus on anthropology, linguistics, and archeology, five international and nine Brazilian. Qualitative and quantitative approaches were used, along with interviews to collect data. Seven of the 14 journals adopt international practices and standards, notably a 2018 good practice guide for scientific publication provided on the Scientific Electronic Library Online website as well as guidelines from the Committee on Publication Ethics, and “Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals” of 2019. Only seven adopt the Creative Commons Attribution License. Ethics is an essential issue for humanity, and the scientific arena is no different. Brazilian and international standards contain experiences that can be extremely valuable in the academic environment as a response when unintentional plagiarism appears, and represent important measures that should be taken by scientific editors.O plágio é prática inaceitável na ciência, pois desrespeita a propriedade intelectual de terceiros, bem como impede a realização de um conhecimento integro e de credibilidade, em particular em casos em que se materializa em publicações científicas, tendo em vista os inúmeros prejuízos e o potencial de risco que representa para a credibilidade dos resultados divulgados. Nesse sentido, a presente pesquisa analisou as políticas editoriais no que se refere as recomendações de plágio de 14 periódicos indexados na Scientific Electronic Library Online Brasil, voltados para as áreas de Antropologia, Linguística e Arqueologia, bem como a questão do autoplágio abordado pelas revistas. A pesquisa é de caráter quali-quantitativa, e utilizou a entrevista como técnica na coleta de dados. Das 14 revistas analisadas, observou-se que 10 adotam práticas e padrões internacionais, entre elas destacamos aqui o uso do “Guia de boas práticas para o fortalecimento da ética na publicação científica” de 2018, disponibilizado no site da Scientific Electronic Library Online, e as que aderem ao Committee on Publication Ethics, assim como as que seguem as “Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals” de 2019. Apenas quatro adotam somente a Licença de Atribuição Creative Commons. As questões de caráter ético são de fundamental importância para a humanidade, e no ambiente científico isso não pode ser diferente. Com experiências que podem, quando se orienta de forma adequada o infrator involuntário, ser de grande valia e aprendizado na formação acadêmica, os padrões e as práticas nacionais e internacionais são imprescindíveis nas condutas editoriais científicas.Núcleo de Editoração - PUC-Campinas2023-02-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed ArticleArtículo revisado por paresAvaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/transinfo/article/view/7384Transinformação; Vol. 34 (2022)Transinformação; Vol. 34 (2022)Transinformação; v. 34 (2022)2318-08890103-3786reponame:Transinformação (Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)instacron:PUC_CAMPporhttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/transinfo/article/view/7384/4940Copyright (c) 2023 Transinformaçãohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBELTRÃO, Jimena FelipeSILVA, Taíse da CruzSILVA, Narjara Lorena Luna da2024-04-02T12:31:03Zoai:ojs.periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br:article/7384Revistahttp://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/seer/index.php/transinfo/indexPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpsbi.nucleodeeditoracao@puc-campinas.edu.br2318-08890103-3786opendoar:2024-04-02T12:31:03Transinformação (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Analysis of plagiarism policies in scientific publishing: the case of a group of Latin American Human Sciences journals Análise das políticas de plágio na publicação científica: o caso de um segmento de revistas da área de Ciências Humanas na América Latina |
title |
Analysis of plagiarism policies in scientific publishing: the case of a group of Latin American Human Sciences journals |
spellingShingle |
Analysis of plagiarism policies in scientific publishing: the case of a group of Latin American Human Sciences journals BELTRÃO, Jimena Felipe Fraud Scientifics journals Intellectual property Fraude Periódicos científicos Propriedade intelectual DIONE |
title_short |
Analysis of plagiarism policies in scientific publishing: the case of a group of Latin American Human Sciences journals |
title_full |
Analysis of plagiarism policies in scientific publishing: the case of a group of Latin American Human Sciences journals |
title_fullStr |
Analysis of plagiarism policies in scientific publishing: the case of a group of Latin American Human Sciences journals |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis of plagiarism policies in scientific publishing: the case of a group of Latin American Human Sciences journals |
title_sort |
Analysis of plagiarism policies in scientific publishing: the case of a group of Latin American Human Sciences journals |
author |
BELTRÃO, Jimena Felipe |
author_facet |
BELTRÃO, Jimena Felipe SILVA, Taíse da Cruz SILVA, Narjara Lorena Luna da |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
SILVA, Taíse da Cruz SILVA, Narjara Lorena Luna da |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
BELTRÃO, Jimena Felipe SILVA, Taíse da Cruz SILVA, Narjara Lorena Luna da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Fraud Scientifics journals Intellectual property Fraude Periódicos científicos Propriedade intelectual DIONE |
topic |
Fraud Scientifics journals Intellectual property Fraude Periódicos científicos Propriedade intelectual DIONE |
description |
Plagiarism is unacceptable in science, particularly when it appears in scientific publications, due to the enormous damage and risk it may pose to the credibility of published results. This study analyzed 14 journals indexed in Brazil’s Scientific Electronic Library Online database which focus on anthropology, linguistics, and archeology, five international and nine Brazilian. Qualitative and quantitative approaches were used, along with interviews to collect data. Seven of the 14 journals adopt international practices and standards, notably a 2018 good practice guide for scientific publication provided on the Scientific Electronic Library Online website as well as guidelines from the Committee on Publication Ethics, and “Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals” of 2019. Only seven adopt the Creative Commons Attribution License. Ethics is an essential issue for humanity, and the scientific arena is no different. Brazilian and international standards contain experiences that can be extremely valuable in the academic environment as a response when unintentional plagiarism appears, and represent important measures that should be taken by scientific editors. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-02-07 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article Artículo revisado por pares Avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/transinfo/article/view/7384 |
url |
https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/transinfo/article/view/7384 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/transinfo/article/view/7384/4940 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Transinformação https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Transinformação https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Núcleo de Editoração - PUC-Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Núcleo de Editoração - PUC-Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Transinformação; Vol. 34 (2022) Transinformação; Vol. 34 (2022) Transinformação; v. 34 (2022) 2318-0889 0103-3786 reponame:Transinformação (Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS) instacron:PUC_CAMP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_CAMP |
institution |
PUC_CAMP |
reponame_str |
Transinformação (Online) |
collection |
Transinformação (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Transinformação (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
sbi.nucleodeeditoracao@puc-campinas.edu.br |
_version_ |
1799125987202433024 |