Research on social media and journalism (2003-2017): a bibliometric and content review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Segado-Boj, Francisco
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Transinformação (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/transinfo/article/view/5867
Resumo: This paper introduces a bibliometric review of the scientific literature on social media and journalism published by journals indexed by Journal Citation Reports until 2017 (n=213). Besides descriptive measurements, it provides a co-citation and co-word analysis. A quantitative content analysis complements the bibliometric approach. Thus, the paper offers a conceptual and structural analysis of the field of study. Results show that the number of articles on the topic is growing steadily since 2014. United States, Australia and England stand as the most productive countries. Studies are based mostly on data from Europe and North America. Three conceptual clusters are identified: audience participation, user generated content and the influence of social media on journalistic professional values and practices. Most of the studies did not consider specific services but focused on the general concept of “social media”. Twitter was the most analyzed platform until recent years, when scholarly attention changed towards Facebook. Research has preferred focusing on political information in detriment of other branches of journalism. The most employed methods are content analysis and in-depth interviews. Further use of surveys and social network analysis, as well as stronger focus on visual studies, is suggested.
id PUC_CAMP-4_a2ac0f9044d167eb17af582600d3501a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br:article/5867
network_acronym_str PUC_CAMP-4
network_name_str Transinformação (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Research on social media and journalism (2003-2017): a bibliometric and content review This paper introduces a bibliometric review of the scientific literature on social media and journalism published by journals indexed by Journal Citation Reports until 2017 (n=213). Besides descriptive measurements, it provides a co-citation and co-word analysis. A quantitative content analysis complements the bibliometric approach. Thus, the paper offers a conceptual and structural analysis of the field of study. Results show that the number of articles on the topic is growing steadily since 2014. United States, Australia and England stand as the most productive countries. Studies are based mostly on data from Europe and North America. Three conceptual clusters are identified: audience participation, user generated content and the influence of social media on journalistic professional values and practices. Most of the studies did not consider specific services but focused on the general concept of “social media”. Twitter was the most analyzed platform until recent years, when scholarly attention changed towards Facebook. Research has preferred focusing on political information in detriment of other branches of journalism. The most employed methods are content analysis and in-depth interviews. Further use of surveys and social network analysis, as well as stronger focus on visual studies, is suggested.Este artigo apresenta uma análise bibliométrica da literatura científica em mídias sociais e jornalismo, publicada por periódicos indexados pelo Journal Citation Reports até 2017 (n=213). Além de medidas descritivas, fornece um análise de copalavras e de cocitação. Uma análise quantitativa do conteúdo complementa a abordagem bibliométrica. Assim, o artigo oferece uma análise conceitual e estrutural do campo de estudo. Os resultados mostram que o número de artigos sobre o tema está crescendo constantemente desde 2014. Estados Unidos, Austrália e Inglaterra são os países mais produtivos. Os estudos são baseados principalmente em dados da Europa e América do Norte. Três grupos conceituais são identificados: participação do público, conteúdo gerado pelo usuário e influência das mídias sociais nos valores e práticas profissionais jornalísticas. A maioria dos estudos não considerou serviços específicos, mas se concentrou no conceito geral de “mídia social”. O Twitter foi a plataforma mais analisada até os últimos anos, quando a atenção acadêmica mudou para o Facebook. A pesquisa preferiu se concentrar em informações políticas em detrimento de outros ramos do jornalismo. Os métodos mais empregados são a análise de conteúdo e entrevistas em profundidade. Sugere-se o uso adicional de pesquisas e análises de redes sociais e um foco mais forte em estudos visuaisNúcleo de Editoração - PUC-Campinas2020-06-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed ArticleArtículo revisado por paresAvaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/transinfo/article/view/5867Transinformação; Vol. 32 (2020)Transinformação; Vol. 32 (2020)Transinformação; v. 32 (2020)2318-08890103-3786reponame:Transinformação (Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)instacron:PUC_CAMPporhttps://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/transinfo/article/view/5867/3616https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSegado-Boj, Francisco 2024-04-02T12:21:16Zoai:ojs.periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br:article/5867Revistahttp://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/seer/index.php/transinfo/indexPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpsbi.nucleodeeditoracao@puc-campinas.edu.br2318-08890103-3786opendoar:2024-04-02T12:21:16Transinformação (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Research on social media and journalism (2003-2017): a bibliometric and content review
title Research on social media and journalism (2003-2017): a bibliometric and content review
spellingShingle Research on social media and journalism (2003-2017): a bibliometric and content review
Segado-Boj, Francisco
title_short Research on social media and journalism (2003-2017): a bibliometric and content review
title_full Research on social media and journalism (2003-2017): a bibliometric and content review
title_fullStr Research on social media and journalism (2003-2017): a bibliometric and content review
title_full_unstemmed Research on social media and journalism (2003-2017): a bibliometric and content review
title_sort Research on social media and journalism (2003-2017): a bibliometric and content review
author Segado-Boj, Francisco
author_facet Segado-Boj, Francisco
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Segado-Boj, Francisco
description This paper introduces a bibliometric review of the scientific literature on social media and journalism published by journals indexed by Journal Citation Reports until 2017 (n=213). Besides descriptive measurements, it provides a co-citation and co-word analysis. A quantitative content analysis complements the bibliometric approach. Thus, the paper offers a conceptual and structural analysis of the field of study. Results show that the number of articles on the topic is growing steadily since 2014. United States, Australia and England stand as the most productive countries. Studies are based mostly on data from Europe and North America. Three conceptual clusters are identified: audience participation, user generated content and the influence of social media on journalistic professional values and practices. Most of the studies did not consider specific services but focused on the general concept of “social media”. Twitter was the most analyzed platform until recent years, when scholarly attention changed towards Facebook. Research has preferred focusing on political information in detriment of other branches of journalism. The most employed methods are content analysis and in-depth interviews. Further use of surveys and social network analysis, as well as stronger focus on visual studies, is suggested.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-06-25
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
Artículo revisado por pares
Avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/transinfo/article/view/5867
url https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/transinfo/article/view/5867
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/transinfo/article/view/5867/3616
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Núcleo de Editoração - PUC-Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Núcleo de Editoração - PUC-Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Transinformação; Vol. 32 (2020)
Transinformação; Vol. 32 (2020)
Transinformação; v. 32 (2020)
2318-0889
0103-3786
reponame:Transinformação (Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)
instacron:PUC_CAMP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)
instacron_str PUC_CAMP
institution PUC_CAMP
reponame_str Transinformação (Online)
collection Transinformação (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Transinformação (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-CAMPINAS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv sbi.nucleodeeditoracao@puc-campinas.edu.br
_version_ 1799125983971770368