Gnosticism and modernity in the thought of Eric Voegelin (1901-1985)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pimenta, Adelaide de Faria
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Horizonte - Revista de Estudos de Teologia e Ciências da Religião
Texto Completo: http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/horizonte/article/view/P.2175-5841.2018v16n50p938
Resumo: The proposal of this study is to theoretically address the thinking of the German-American philosopher and political scientist Eric Voegelin (1901-1985). Focusing on his assertion that Gnosticism is the foundation of modernity, this study seeks to understand the relationship between Gnosticism and modernity. Two concepts in his theory will be used as the fundamental theoretical basis for this research: political religions and Gnosticism. The work is divided into an introduction to the theme, followed by three chapters and the conclusion. The introduction addresses the historical-political context that provides the base for the emergence of modernity and totalitarian movements. While the biography of the author is used to search for essential elements to understand his position of unrestricted combat to ideologies, particularly in relation to German national-socialism and Stalinist socialism. Voegelin demonstrates that the symbolic, spiritual and transcendent dimension of the being is relegated to an inferior, non-existent or trivialized position from the critique of the positivist movement. This movement regards natural science and its methods as par excellence apprehension of reality, causing a deformation of the truth, which may manifest itself in ideological dogmas or doctrines. The second chapter introduces his notion that Gnosticism is the foundation of modern society; insofar as dissatisfaction with the current order, the belief and desire to change the individual through knowledge, stand as contrary to the development of being. This points to a trend in modern ideological movements to the immanentization of Christian eschatology. In the third chapter, we present the main discussions about the limits and scope of his theory and his approach to a philosophy of Consciousness. This chapter also considers the possibilities of using it for the comprehension of totalitarian phenomena nowadays, seen by Voegelin as a pneumopathological disease. It was concluded that Voegelin, categorical in pointing to the need for a new approach to social and political science, evidenced a religious structure in modern, secular movements. The concept of Gnosticism as the foundation of modernity, though revised by the author himself and still today fomenting controversy, can thus be a starting point for further studies since it emphasizes the need to expand consciousness for the restoration of social and political order. It also includes the transcendent aspect of being, expressed in its symbols and in its religious experiences throughout history, further contributing to the understanding of modernity.
id PUC_MINS-3_55fe6fed1c2695a0d49eb54544d6d661
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/18149
network_acronym_str PUC_MINS-3
network_name_str Horizonte - Revista de Estudos de Teologia e Ciências da Religião
repository_id_str
spelling Gnosticism and modernity in the thought of Eric Voegelin (1901-1985)Gnosticismo e modernidade no pensamento de Eric Voegelin (1901-1985)Eric Voegelin. Modernity. Gnosticism. Totalitarianism. TranscendenceReligious studiestheologyEric Voegelin. Modernidade. Gnosticismo. Totalitarismo. Transcendência.Religião e totalitarismo / gnosticismoThe proposal of this study is to theoretically address the thinking of the German-American philosopher and political scientist Eric Voegelin (1901-1985). Focusing on his assertion that Gnosticism is the foundation of modernity, this study seeks to understand the relationship between Gnosticism and modernity. Two concepts in his theory will be used as the fundamental theoretical basis for this research: political religions and Gnosticism. The work is divided into an introduction to the theme, followed by three chapters and the conclusion. The introduction addresses the historical-political context that provides the base for the emergence of modernity and totalitarian movements. While the biography of the author is used to search for essential elements to understand his position of unrestricted combat to ideologies, particularly in relation to German national-socialism and Stalinist socialism. Voegelin demonstrates that the symbolic, spiritual and transcendent dimension of the being is relegated to an inferior, non-existent or trivialized position from the critique of the positivist movement. This movement regards natural science and its methods as par excellence apprehension of reality, causing a deformation of the truth, which may manifest itself in ideological dogmas or doctrines. The second chapter introduces his notion that Gnosticism is the foundation of modern society; insofar as dissatisfaction with the current order, the belief and desire to change the individual through knowledge, stand as contrary to the development of being. This points to a trend in modern ideological movements to the immanentization of Christian eschatology. In the third chapter, we present the main discussions about the limits and scope of his theory and his approach to a philosophy of Consciousness. This chapter also considers the possibilities of using it for the comprehension of totalitarian phenomena nowadays, seen by Voegelin as a pneumopathological disease. It was concluded that Voegelin, categorical in pointing to the need for a new approach to social and political science, evidenced a religious structure in modern, secular movements. The concept of Gnosticism as the foundation of modernity, though revised by the author himself and still today fomenting controversy, can thus be a starting point for further studies since it emphasizes the need to expand consciousness for the restoration of social and political order. It also includes the transcendent aspect of being, expressed in its symbols and in its religious experiences throughout history, further contributing to the understanding of modernity.A proposta deste estudo é abordar de forma teórica o pensamento do filósofo e cientista político, germano-americano, Eric Voegelin (1901-1985), buscando compreender a relação que promove entre o gnosticismo e a modernidade, tendo como foco sua afirmação de que o gnosticismo é o fundamento da modernidade. Para esta pesquisa, são utilizados como base teórica fundamental dois conceitos de sua teoria: religiões políticas e gnosticismo. Divide-se o trabalho em uma introdução ao tema e três capítulos, seguidos da conclusão. Na introdução, se aborda o contexto histórico-político que fornece o estofo para o surgimento da modernidade e movimentos totalitários; com a biografia do autor, buscam-se elementos essenciais para a compreensão de sua posição de combate irrestrito às ideologias, principalmente ao nacional-socialismo alemão e socialismo stalinista. A partir da crítica ao movimento positivista, que considera a ciência natural e seus métodos o modo por excelência de apreensão da realidade, Voegelin demonstra que a dimensão simbólica, espiritual e transcendente do ser fica relegada a uma posição inferior, inexistente ou banalizada, causando uma deformação da verdade, que pode se manifestar em dogmas ou doutrinas ideológicas. No segundo capítulo, introduz-se sua noção de que o gnosticismo é o fundamento da sociedade moderna, na medida em que a insatisfação com a ordem corrente, a crença e desejo de mudança do indivíduo por meio do conhecimento, se firmam como contrários ao desenvolvimento do ser, apontando uma tendência nos movimentos ideológicos modernos à imanentização da escatologia cristã. No terceiro capítulo, apresentam-se as principais discussões a respeito dos limites e alcances de sua teoria, sua aproximação com uma filosofia da consciência e as possibilidades de utilizá-la para a compreensão dos fenômenos totalitários na atualidade, vistos como uma doença pneumopatológica. Concluiu-se que Voegelin, categórico ao apontar para a necessidade de uma nova abordagem para a ciência social e política, evidenciou uma estrutura religiosa nos movimentos modernos, ditos seculares; o conceito de gnosticismo como fundamento da modernidade, apesar de revisto pelo próprio autor e ainda fomentar controvérsias, pode ser um ponto de partida para estudos complementares, uma vez que enfatiza a necessidade de ampliação da consciência para a restauração da ordem social e política, e de incluir o aspecto transcendente do ser, que se expressa em seus símbolos e em suas experiências religiosas ao longo da história, para a compreensão da modernidade.Editora PUC Minas2018-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTítulosapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/horizonte/article/view/P.2175-5841.2018v16n50p938HORIZONTE - Revista de Estudos de Teologia e Ciências da Religião; v. 16, n. 50, maio/ago. 2018 - Dossiê - Conferência de Medellín: 50 anos; 938-940HORIZONTE - Journal of Studies in Theology and Religious Sciences; v. 16, n. 50, maio/ago. 2018 - Dossiê - Conferência de Medellín: 50 anos; 938-9402175-5841reponame:Horizonte - Revista de Estudos de Teologia e Ciências da Religiãoinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas)instacron:PUC_MINSporhttp://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/horizonte/article/view/P.2175-5841.2018v16n50p938/13584Copyright (c) 2018 HORIZONTE - Revista de Estudos de Teologia e Ciências da Religiãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPimenta, Adelaide de Faria2020-12-23T09:50:31Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/18149Revistahttp://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/horizonteONGhttp://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/horizonte/oaihorizonte.pucminas@gmail.com2175-58411679-9615opendoar:2020-12-23T09:50:31Horizonte - Revista de Estudos de Teologia e Ciências da Religião - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Gnosticism and modernity in the thought of Eric Voegelin (1901-1985)
Gnosticismo e modernidade no pensamento de Eric Voegelin (1901-1985)
title Gnosticism and modernity in the thought of Eric Voegelin (1901-1985)
spellingShingle Gnosticism and modernity in the thought of Eric Voegelin (1901-1985)
Pimenta, Adelaide de Faria
Eric Voegelin. Modernity. Gnosticism. Totalitarianism. Transcendence
Religious studies
theology
Eric Voegelin. Modernidade. Gnosticismo. Totalitarismo. Transcendência.
Religião e totalitarismo / gnosticismo
title_short Gnosticism and modernity in the thought of Eric Voegelin (1901-1985)
title_full Gnosticism and modernity in the thought of Eric Voegelin (1901-1985)
title_fullStr Gnosticism and modernity in the thought of Eric Voegelin (1901-1985)
title_full_unstemmed Gnosticism and modernity in the thought of Eric Voegelin (1901-1985)
title_sort Gnosticism and modernity in the thought of Eric Voegelin (1901-1985)
author Pimenta, Adelaide de Faria
author_facet Pimenta, Adelaide de Faria
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pimenta, Adelaide de Faria
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Eric Voegelin. Modernity. Gnosticism. Totalitarianism. Transcendence
Religious studies
theology
Eric Voegelin. Modernidade. Gnosticismo. Totalitarismo. Transcendência.
Religião e totalitarismo / gnosticismo
topic Eric Voegelin. Modernity. Gnosticism. Totalitarianism. Transcendence
Religious studies
theology
Eric Voegelin. Modernidade. Gnosticismo. Totalitarismo. Transcendência.
Religião e totalitarismo / gnosticismo
description The proposal of this study is to theoretically address the thinking of the German-American philosopher and political scientist Eric Voegelin (1901-1985). Focusing on his assertion that Gnosticism is the foundation of modernity, this study seeks to understand the relationship between Gnosticism and modernity. Two concepts in his theory will be used as the fundamental theoretical basis for this research: political religions and Gnosticism. The work is divided into an introduction to the theme, followed by three chapters and the conclusion. The introduction addresses the historical-political context that provides the base for the emergence of modernity and totalitarian movements. While the biography of the author is used to search for essential elements to understand his position of unrestricted combat to ideologies, particularly in relation to German national-socialism and Stalinist socialism. Voegelin demonstrates that the symbolic, spiritual and transcendent dimension of the being is relegated to an inferior, non-existent or trivialized position from the critique of the positivist movement. This movement regards natural science and its methods as par excellence apprehension of reality, causing a deformation of the truth, which may manifest itself in ideological dogmas or doctrines. The second chapter introduces his notion that Gnosticism is the foundation of modern society; insofar as dissatisfaction with the current order, the belief and desire to change the individual through knowledge, stand as contrary to the development of being. This points to a trend in modern ideological movements to the immanentization of Christian eschatology. In the third chapter, we present the main discussions about the limits and scope of his theory and his approach to a philosophy of Consciousness. This chapter also considers the possibilities of using it for the comprehension of totalitarian phenomena nowadays, seen by Voegelin as a pneumopathological disease. It was concluded that Voegelin, categorical in pointing to the need for a new approach to social and political science, evidenced a religious structure in modern, secular movements. The concept of Gnosticism as the foundation of modernity, though revised by the author himself and still today fomenting controversy, can thus be a starting point for further studies since it emphasizes the need to expand consciousness for the restoration of social and political order. It also includes the transcendent aspect of being, expressed in its symbols and in its religious experiences throughout history, further contributing to the understanding of modernity.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-08-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Títulos
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/horizonte/article/view/P.2175-5841.2018v16n50p938
url http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/horizonte/article/view/P.2175-5841.2018v16n50p938
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/horizonte/article/view/P.2175-5841.2018v16n50p938/13584
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 HORIZONTE - Revista de Estudos de Teologia e Ciências da Religião
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 HORIZONTE - Revista de Estudos de Teologia e Ciências da Religião
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora PUC Minas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora PUC Minas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv HORIZONTE - Revista de Estudos de Teologia e Ciências da Religião; v. 16, n. 50, maio/ago. 2018 - Dossiê - Conferência de Medellín: 50 anos; 938-940
HORIZONTE - Journal of Studies in Theology and Religious Sciences; v. 16, n. 50, maio/ago. 2018 - Dossiê - Conferência de Medellín: 50 anos; 938-940
2175-5841
reponame:Horizonte - Revista de Estudos de Teologia e Ciências da Religião
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas)
instacron:PUC_MINS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas)
instacron_str PUC_MINS
institution PUC_MINS
reponame_str Horizonte - Revista de Estudos de Teologia e Ciências da Religião
collection Horizonte - Revista de Estudos de Teologia e Ciências da Religião
repository.name.fl_str_mv Horizonte - Revista de Estudos de Teologia e Ciências da Religião - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv horizonte.pucminas@gmail.com
_version_ 1799124752214786048