QUIEN CREÓ EL CANDADO TAMBIÉN CREÓ LA LLAVE

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Martel, James
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista da Faculdade Mineira de Direito (Online)
Texto Completo: http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/Direito/article/view/23652
Resumo: In this essay, I look at the way that Thomas Hobbes offers not only the building blocks for state power and sovereignty (as he is so famous for doing) but also a basis by which to resist those very things. Even as Hobbes constructs a vast and awe inspiring network of sovereign forms of authority, he shows how those forms are produced, in a sense, out of thin air. Hobbes’ understanding of language as a series of decisions that are made in ways that render the sovereign’s own decision derivative, as well as his understanding of theology as offering us a vision of a human community who must collectively decide on things in the absence of God’s ongoing instruction both serve to undermine and expose the emptiness of sovereign pronouncements. In this way, Hobbes can be read as a radical theorist and a theorist of resisting the very encryption that he is at the same time responsible for theorizing and producing.
id PUC_MINS-4_1f164c5508dc081e2ab011a46f9b0f18
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/23652
network_acronym_str PUC_MINS-4
network_name_str Revista da Faculdade Mineira de Direito (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling QUIEN CREÓ EL CANDADO TAMBIÉN CREÓ LA LLAVETHE ONE WHO MADE THE LOCK ALSO MADE THE KEYHobbesEncryptionSovereigntypolitical theologynegative theologynominalismHobbesEncriptaciónsoberaníateología políticateología negativanominalismoHobbesEncriptaçãoSoberaniaTeologia políticaTeologia NegativaNominalismoIn this essay, I look at the way that Thomas Hobbes offers not only the building blocks for state power and sovereignty (as he is so famous for doing) but also a basis by which to resist those very things. Even as Hobbes constructs a vast and awe inspiring network of sovereign forms of authority, he shows how those forms are produced, in a sense, out of thin air. Hobbes’ understanding of language as a series of decisions that are made in ways that render the sovereign’s own decision derivative, as well as his understanding of theology as offering us a vision of a human community who must collectively decide on things in the absence of God’s ongoing instruction both serve to undermine and expose the emptiness of sovereign pronouncements. In this way, Hobbes can be read as a radical theorist and a theorist of resisting the very encryption that he is at the same time responsible for theorizing and producing.En este ensayo, considero la forma en que Thomas Hobbes otorga no solo los materiales con los cuales se ha construido el poder y la soberanía del estado, (por lo cual es afamado) sino también una base para la resistencia ante esas mismas cosas. Incluso cuando Hobbes construye una vasta e impresionante red de formas soberanas de autoridad, muestra cómo esas formas se producen y salen, en cierto sentido, de la nada. La comprensión del lenguaje por parte de Hobbes como una serie de decisiones que se toman de manera que hacen que la decisión del soberano sea derivada, así como su comprensión de la teología como una visión de una comunidad humana que debe decidir colectivamente sobre las cosas en ausencia de la continuidad de las instrucciones dadas por Dios, sirve tanto para socavar como para exponer el vacío de los pronunciamientos soberanos. De esta manera, Hobbes puede leerse como un teórico radical y un teórico que crea las condiciones para resistir la encriptación que él, al mismo tiempo, es responsable de teorizar y producir.In this essay, I look at the way that Thomas Hobbes offers not only the building blocks for state power and sovereignty (as he is so famous for doing) but also a basis by which to resist those very things. Even as Hobbes constructs a vast and awe inspiring network of sovereign forms of authority, he shows how those forms are produced, in a sense, out of thin air. Hobbes’ understanding of language as a series of decisions that are made in ways that render the sovereign’s own decision derivative, as well as his understanding of theology as offering us a vision of a human community who must collectively decide on things in the absence of God’s ongoing instruction both serve to undermine and expose the emptiness of sovereign pronouncements. In this way, Hobbes can be read as a radical theorist and a theorist of resisting the very encryption that he is at the same time responsible for theorizing and producing.Editora PUC Minas2020-06-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/Direito/article/view/2365210.5752/P.2318-7999.2020v23n45p34-48Revista da Faculdade Mineira de Direito; v. 23 n. 45 (2020): REVISTA DA FACULDADE MINEIRA DE DIREITO - PUC MINAS; 34-482318-79991808-9429reponame:Revista da Faculdade Mineira de Direito (Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas)instacron:PUC_MINSenghttp://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/Direito/article/view/23652/16903Copyright (c) 2020 Revista da Faculdade Mineira de Direitoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMartel, James2022-03-10T14:14:52Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/23652Revistahttp://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/Direito/indexPRIhttp://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/Direito/oai||revistafmd@pucminas.br2318-79991808-9429opendoar:2022-03-10T14:14:52Revista da Faculdade Mineira de Direito (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv QUIEN CREÓ EL CANDADO TAMBIÉN CREÓ LA LLAVE
THE ONE WHO MADE THE LOCK ALSO MADE THE KEY
title QUIEN CREÓ EL CANDADO TAMBIÉN CREÓ LA LLAVE
spellingShingle QUIEN CREÓ EL CANDADO TAMBIÉN CREÓ LA LLAVE
Martel, James
Hobbes
Encryption
Sovereignty
political theology
negative theology
nominalism
Hobbes
Encriptación
soberanía
teología política
teología negativa
nominalismo
Hobbes
Encriptação
Soberania
Teologia política
Teologia Negativa
Nominalismo
title_short QUIEN CREÓ EL CANDADO TAMBIÉN CREÓ LA LLAVE
title_full QUIEN CREÓ EL CANDADO TAMBIÉN CREÓ LA LLAVE
title_fullStr QUIEN CREÓ EL CANDADO TAMBIÉN CREÓ LA LLAVE
title_full_unstemmed QUIEN CREÓ EL CANDADO TAMBIÉN CREÓ LA LLAVE
title_sort QUIEN CREÓ EL CANDADO TAMBIÉN CREÓ LA LLAVE
author Martel, James
author_facet Martel, James
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Martel, James
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Hobbes
Encryption
Sovereignty
political theology
negative theology
nominalism
Hobbes
Encriptación
soberanía
teología política
teología negativa
nominalismo
Hobbes
Encriptação
Soberania
Teologia política
Teologia Negativa
Nominalismo
topic Hobbes
Encryption
Sovereignty
political theology
negative theology
nominalism
Hobbes
Encriptación
soberanía
teología política
teología negativa
nominalismo
Hobbes
Encriptação
Soberania
Teologia política
Teologia Negativa
Nominalismo
description In this essay, I look at the way that Thomas Hobbes offers not only the building blocks for state power and sovereignty (as he is so famous for doing) but also a basis by which to resist those very things. Even as Hobbes constructs a vast and awe inspiring network of sovereign forms of authority, he shows how those forms are produced, in a sense, out of thin air. Hobbes’ understanding of language as a series of decisions that are made in ways that render the sovereign’s own decision derivative, as well as his understanding of theology as offering us a vision of a human community who must collectively decide on things in the absence of God’s ongoing instruction both serve to undermine and expose the emptiness of sovereign pronouncements. In this way, Hobbes can be read as a radical theorist and a theorist of resisting the very encryption that he is at the same time responsible for theorizing and producing.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-06-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/Direito/article/view/23652
10.5752/P.2318-7999.2020v23n45p34-48
url http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/Direito/article/view/23652
identifier_str_mv 10.5752/P.2318-7999.2020v23n45p34-48
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/Direito/article/view/23652/16903
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista da Faculdade Mineira de Direito
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista da Faculdade Mineira de Direito
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora PUC Minas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora PUC Minas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista da Faculdade Mineira de Direito; v. 23 n. 45 (2020): REVISTA DA FACULDADE MINEIRA DE DIREITO - PUC MINAS; 34-48
2318-7999
1808-9429
reponame:Revista da Faculdade Mineira de Direito (Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas)
instacron:PUC_MINS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas)
instacron_str PUC_MINS
institution PUC_MINS
reponame_str Revista da Faculdade Mineira de Direito (Online)
collection Revista da Faculdade Mineira de Direito (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista da Faculdade Mineira de Direito (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistafmd@pucminas.br
_version_ 1799124789233713152

Registros relacionados